ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04217551ICECAPUpdated Jul 15, 2026

Influence of Cooling Duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients

An interventional study of Therapeutic Hypothermia in Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital, Hypothermia, Induced and Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain, sponsored by University of Michigan. Completed at 76 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-15.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Aug 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,158
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A multicenter, randomized, adaptive allocation clinical trial to determine if increasing durations of induced hypothermia are associated with an increasing rate of good neurological outcomes and to identify the optimal duration of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.

Read the detailed description

A multicenter, randomized, adaptive allocation clinical trial to determine if increasing durations of induced hypothermia are associated with an increasing rate of good neurological outcomes and to identify the optimal duration of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest.

Cardiac arrest is a common and devastating emergency of the heart and the brain. More than 380,000 patients suffer out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) each year in the US. Improvements in cardiac resuscitation (the early links in the "chain of survival" for patients with OHCA) are tempered by our limited ability to resuscitate and protect the brain from global cerebral ischemia.

Neurological death and disability are common outcomes in survivors of cardiac arrest. Therapeutic cooling of comatose patients resuscitated from shockable rhythms markedly increases the rate of good neurological outcome, but poor outcomes still occur in as many as 50%, and the benefit of cooling in those resuscitated from asystole and pulseless electrical activity has not been shown in a randomized study.

Objectives:

The overarching goal of this project is to identify clinical strategies that will increase the number of patients with good neurological recovery from cardiac arrest. We hypothesize that longer durations of cooling may improve either the proportion of patients that attain a good neurological recovery or may result in better recovery among the proportion already categorized as having good outcomes.

Primary Objectives:

A. To determine, in each of two populations of adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest (those with initial shockable rhythms and those with pulseless electrical activity (PEA)/asystole), the shortest duration of cooling that provides the maximum treatment effect as determined by a weighted 90 day modified Rankin score B. To determine, in each of two populations of adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest (those with initial shockable rhythms and those with PEA/asystole), whether increasing durations of cooling are associated with better outcomes or recovery implying efficacy of hypothermia to no cooling.

Secondary Objectives:

To characterize the overall safety and adverse events associated with duration of cooling To characterize the effect of duration of cooling on neuropsychological outcomes To characterize the effect of duration of cooling on patient reported quality of life

Design:

This study is a randomized, response-adaptive, duration (dose) finding, comparative effectiveness clinical trial with blinded outcome assessment. The design is based on a statistical model of response as defined by the primary endpoint, a weighted 90-day mRS, across the treatment arms. The design will fit patient outcome data to a duration response model (separately for shockable and non-shockable rhythms), in which the potentially non-linear association between durations of cooling and the primary endpoint are estimated. All conclusions about the treatment arms are based on this model. The functional form of the duration-response model is flexible and able to fit many different shapes for the duration-response curve. Specifically it is parameterized to identify up to two change-points in the treatment effect across arms, allowing it to fit an increasing, decreasing, flat, plateau, or U-shape duration-response curve.

Subjects will initially be equally randomized between 12, 24, and 48 hours of cooling. After the first 200 subjects have been randomized, additional treatment arms between 12 and 48 hours will be opened and patients will be allocated, within each rhythm type, by response adaptive randomization. As the trial continues, shorter and longer duration arms may be opened. Specifically, a 6-hour duration arm will be opened if the emerging duration-response curve from 12 hours is flat. Similarly, a 60-hour or 72-hour duration arm will be opened if the emerging duration response curve shows an increasing treatment benefit through 48 hours.

This trial will have frequent interim analyses to stop the trial early for futility if it is highly likely that no treatment arm offers a greater benefit then the 6-hour duration arm.

Primary Outcome Measure:

The primary outcome measure will be the modified Rankin scale at 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation. The mRS will be analyzed as a weighted score incorporating both the proportion of subjects achieving a good neurological outcome and degree of residual functional impairment among those with good neurological outcomes.

Study Population:

Comatose adult survivors of out of hospital cardiac arrest that have already been rapidly cooled using a definitive temperature control method (endovascular or surface) will be enrolled in the emergency department or intensive care unit. Hub and spoke hospitals from the SIREN network will be enriched with high potential ancillary Hubs. Approximately 50 hospitals are anticipated to each enroll an average of 9 subjects per year.

Randomization:

Central computerized randomization by web-based interface will be used. Subjects will be potentially randomized over the course of the trial to the following possible durations of cooling (in hours): 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 60, and 72. The first 200 patients will be randomized 1:1:1 to the 12, 24, and 48-hour durations only. After this initial "burn in" period, response adaptive randomization will be used to allocate subjects to durations inclusive of 12 to 48 hours initially, and then subsequently to the 6, 60 or 72 hour durations if specified conditions are met and the emerging duration-response curve suggests that the maximum treatment benefit might be on those durations. The response adaptive randomization probabilities for each arm will be determined separately for the two rhythm type populations. Randomization probabilities will be updated monthly, or approximately every 38 patients based on the expected accrual rate.

Consent:

Eligible patients for this trial will not have capacity to provide informed consent. Written informed consent from a legally authorized representative will be required.

Intervention:

The intervention will be random allocation to duration of cooling after cardiac arrest. Cooling in the study will be by a definitive temperature control method to a target temperature of 33 deg C. Any endovascular or surface cooling system with closed loop feedback will be allowed. Duration of cooling will be measured from the time that cooling with a definitive device is initiated in the hospital. As part of routine medical care, cooling may be initiated by emergency medical service (EMS) or in the emergency department. Eligibility will require that a temperature of \<34 degrees C be obtained by 240 minutes after cardiac arrest. After the allocated duration of cooling is completed, controlled rewarming will be performed. Rewarming to a temperature of 36.5 deg C will occur over the shorter of 24 hours or a rewarming period equal to the allocated duration of cooling. Definitive cooling devices may be used for maintenance of normothermia after rewarming is complete. A clinical standardization guideline will be followed to reduce the effects of practice variability. Key physiologic and practice variables will be tracked and compliance with clinical standardization and deviation from physiologic targets reported back to study teams.

Statistical Analysis for the Primary Outcome Measure:

We will model the mean weighted mRS at 90 days across the treatment arms. The weighted mRS incorporates both the proportion of subjects achieving a good neurological outcome and degree of impairment among those with good neurological outcomes. The primary analysis is conducted separately for each rhythm type, allowing for a different treatment effect by rhythm type, and has two components. First, we identify the most likely target duration, where the target duration is the shortest duration that achieves the maximum treatment effect (Objective A). Second, we calculate whether the efficacy of any duration is superior to any shorter duration of cooling indicating a positive duration response (Objective B). Establishing a positive duration response implies confirmation that cooling is effective in improving outcome or recovery versus normothermia, when a normothermia control arm is not clinically acceptable.

A maximal sample size of 1800 subjects enrolled over 4 years (estimated accrual rate of 37.5 subjects/month) is anticipated.

Investigational Device Exemption

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital
  • Hypothermia, Induced
  • Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain

Keywords

  • Bayesian Adaptive Clinical Trial
  • Hypothermia, therapeutic
  • Coma
03

In context

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

314 studies on the registry are indexed under Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; 93 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,158 is above the median of 218 across 179 interventional studies indexed under Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Browse Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Michigan is the lead sponsor of 1,506 studies on the registry; 192 are open to participants now.

Of its 169 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 133 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Coma after resuscitation from out of hospital cardiac arrest
  • Cooled to \<34 deg C with 240 minutes of cardiac arrest
  • Definitive temperature control applied
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • from legal authorized representative (LAR) including intent to maintain life support for 96 hours
  • Enrollment within 6 hours of initiation of cooling

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamic instability
  • Pre-existing neurological disability or condition that confounds outcome determination
  • Pre-existing terminal illness, unlikely to survive to outcome determination
  • Planned early withdrawal of life support
  • Presumed sepsis as etiology of arrest
  • Prisoner
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,158 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    6 hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 6 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 6 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    12 hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 12 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 12 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    18 hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 18 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 18 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    24 hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 24 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    30 hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 30 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    36 hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 36 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    42 Hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 42 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    48 hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 48 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    60 hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 60 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    72 hours - shockable

    Participants with shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 72 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    6 hours - non shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 6 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 6 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    12 hours - non-shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 12 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 12 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    18 hours - non-shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 18 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 18 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    24 hour - non-shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 24 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    30 hours - non-shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 30 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    36 hours - non-shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 36 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    42 hours - non-shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 42 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    48 hours - non-shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 48 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    60 hours - non-shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 60 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

  • Experimental
    72 hours - non-shockable

    Participants with non-shockable initial rhythm will be assigned to receive 72 hours of hypothermia with a target of 33 degrees followed by 24 hours of controlled rewarming.

    Device: Therapeutic Hypothermia

Interventions

  • DeviceTherapeutic Hypothermia

    Participants will receive therapeutic hypothermia for the assigned number of hours with controlled rewarming, using a closed-loop temperature control device.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Weighted Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    The mRS is a 7 level ordinal scale of disability that ranges from 0 (no symptoms at all) to 6 (death). ICECAP uses weighting of mRS states to capture changes in functional status.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

Secondary outcomes

  1. All Cause Mortality

    All patients who are dead at follow up.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

  2. NIH Toolbox Crystallized Cognition Composite Score

    Composite T-scores from a subset of study neuropsychological tests evaluating.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

  3. NIH Toolbox Fluid Cognition Composite Score

    Composite T-scores from a subset of study neuropsychological tests evaluating cognitive functioning in awake survivors collected on the NIH Toolbox platform. The fluid cognition composite score is more reflective of capacity for new learning and information. processing in novel situations

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

  4. Pneumonia

    Determined by simplified Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions of Ventilator-Associated Event (VAE) or Pneumonia.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

  5. Other infection

    Determined by simplified CDC NHSN (Center for Disease Control National Healthcare Safety Network) definitions of Urinary Tract Infection or Blood Stream Infection.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

  6. Malignant cardiac arrhythmia

    Defined as any arrhythmia that requires termination with chest compressions, pacing, defibrillation, or electrical cardioversion. Arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation) managed only with medication are excluded.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

  7. Seizures

    Defined as unambiguous convulsive or electroencephalographic seizure activity triggering urgent initial or additional anticonvulsant therapy. This definition does not include those given further anticonvulsants as secondary prophylaxis or as treatment for vague or uncertain exam findings or nondiagnostic electroencephalography. It does not include myoclonus.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

  8. Neurological worsening

    Determined by a decrease in Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score of ≥4 points that persists on two consecutive days or is associated with a neurological death. It excludes transient fluctuations in neurological examination or changes attributed to pharmacological sedation or paralysis.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

  9. Electrolyte abnormalities

    Defined as a measured serum Na, K, Mg, or Ca that is either higher or lower than study defined boundaries on at least two sequential measurements and resulting in a change in IV therapy. It excludes deliberate hypernatremia or hypermagnesemia induced to treat intracranial hypertension or shivering.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

  10. Coagulopathies

    Defined as requiring all 3 of the following parameters: (1) some form of major bleeding associated with (2) laboratory confirmation of an abnormal clotting axis and (3) treatment with blood product transfusion or reversal agent. Laboratory testing may include International Normalized Ratio (INR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), clotting time, or thromboelastography.

    Time frame: 90 days after return of spontaneous circulation

07

Study locations

76 sites
  • University of Alabama Hospital
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • Banner University Medical Center
    Tucson, Arizona 85719, United States
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90048, United States
  • Ronald Regan UCLA Medical Center
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • UC Davis Medical Center
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • UC San Diego Medical Center - Hillcrest
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
    San Francisco, California 94110, United States
  • Stanford University Medical Center
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
    Torrance, California 90502, United States
  • University of Colorado Hospital
    Aurora, Colorado 80045, United States
  • Denver Health Medical Center
    Denver, Colorado 80204, United States
  • Yale New Haven Hospital
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • George Washington University Hospital
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • UF Health Shands Hospital
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Grady Memorial Hospital
    Atlanta, Georgia 30303, United States
  • The Queen's Medical Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Rush University Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • University of Illinois-Chicago Hosptial
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • University of Chicago Medical Center
    Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States
  • Advocate Christ Medical Center
    Oak Lawn, Illinois 60453, United States
  • IU Health Methodist Hospital
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • University of Kentucky Hospital
    Lexington, Kentucky 40536, United States
  • Maine Medical Center
    Portland, Maine 04102, United States
  • University of Maryland Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Johns Hopkins Hospital
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Brigham & Women's Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • University of Michigan Hospital
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Henry Ford Macomb Hospital
    Clinton Township, Michigan 48038, United States
  • Detroit Receiving Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48201, United States
  • Henry Ford Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • DMC Sinai Grace Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48235, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • M Health Fairview Southdale Hospital
    Edina, Minnesota 55435, United States
  • Hennepin County Medical Center
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415, United States
  • Regions Hospital
    Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, United States
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States
  • Cooper University Hospital
    Camden, New Jersey 08103, United States
  • University of New Mexico
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, United States
  • South Shore University Hospital
    Bay Shore, New York 11706, United States
  • NYU Langone Health - Tisch Hospital
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • The Mount Sinai Hospital
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • NYP Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Strong Memorial Hospital
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Stony Brook University Hospital
    Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
    Syracuse, New York 13210, United States
  • Montefiore Medical Center
    The Bronx, New York 10467, United States
  • Duke University Hospital
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • ECU Health Medical Center
    Greenville, North Carolina 27834, United States
  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • University of Cincinnati
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45220, United States
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • MetroHealth Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44109, United States
  • OSU East Hospital
    Columbus, Ohio 43203, United States
  • OSU Wexner Medical Center
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center
    Toledo, Ohio 43608, United States
  • Adventist Health
    Portland, Oregon 97216, United States
  • Geisinger Medical Center
    Danville, Pennsylvania 17822, United States
  • UPMC Harrisburg
    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101, United States
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Temple University Hospital
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital
    Sayre, Pennsylvania 18840, United States
  • Parkland Hospital
    Dallas, Texas 75235, United States
  • Memorial Hermann Hospital
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Utah Hospital
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
  • University of Virginia Medical Center
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States
  • VCU Medical Center
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
  • Providence Regional Medical Center Everett
    Everett, Washington 98201, United States
  • Harborview Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • Froedtert Hospital
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Meurer WJ, Schmitzberger FF, Yeatts S, Ramakrishnan V, Abella B, Aufderheide T, Barsan W, Benoit J, Berry S, Black J, Bozeman N, Broglio K, Brown J, Brown K, Carlozzi N, Caveney A, Cho SM, Chung-Esaki H, Clevenger R, Conwit R, Cooper R, Crudo V, Daya M, Harney D, Hsu C, Johnson NJ, Khan I, Khosla S, Kline P, Kratz A, Kudenchuk P, Lewis RJ, Madiyal C, Meyer S, Mosier J, Mouammar M, Neth M, O'Neil B, Paxton J, Perez S, Perman S, Sozener C, Speers M, Spiteri A, Stevenson V, Sunthankar K, Tonna J, Youngquist S, Geocadin R, Silbergleit R; ICECAP trial investigators. Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (ICECAP): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, adaptive allocation clinical trial to identify the optimal duration of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection in comatose, adult survivors of after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Trials. 2024 Jul 23;25(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08280-w. PubMed 39044295 ↗
  • Meurer W, Schmitzberger F, Yeatts S, Ramakrishnan V, Abella B, Aufderheide T, Barsan W, Benoit J, Berry S, Black J, Bozeman N, Broglio K, Brown J, Brown K, Carlozzi N, Caveney A, Cho SM, Chung-Esaki H, Clevenger R, Conwit R, Cooper R, Crudo V, Daya M, Harney D, Hsu C, Johnson NJ, Khan I, Khosla S, Kline P, Kratz A, Kudenchuk P, Lewis RJ, Madiyal C, Meyer S, Mosier J, Mouammar M, Neth M, O'Neil B, Paxton J, Perez S, Perman S, Sozener C, Speers M, Spiteri A, Stevenson V, Sunthankar K, Tonna J, Youngquist S, Geocadin R, Silbergleit R. Influence of Cooling duration on Efficacy in Cardiac Arrest Patients (ICECAP): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, adaptive allocation clinical trial to identify the optimal duration of induced hypothermia for neuroprotection in comatose, adult survivors of after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2024 Jun 21:rs.3.rs-4033108. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4033108/v1. PubMed 38947064 ↗
  • Chen CT, Lin JW, Wu CH, Kuo RN, Shih CH, Hou PC, Yen DH, How CK. A Simple Risk Score for Predicting Neurologic Outcome in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients After Targeted Temperature Management. Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):428-439. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005266. PubMed 34495880 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data will be stored in the NHLBI data repository after trial completion.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: 1 year after publication on main outcome results paper

Access criteria: Data use agreement with the appropriate NHLBI repository

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04217551
Responsible party
William J Meurer (Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine and Neurology, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 3, 2020
Start date
May 18, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 25, 2025
Completion
Feb 1, 2026
Last update
Jul 15, 2026

Study contacts

William Meurer
principal investigator · University of Michigan
Robert Silbergleit
principal investigator · University of Michigan
Romer Geocadin
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion