An observational study in Atherosclerosis, Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by University of Cambridge. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-19.
Sponsored by University of Cambridge · Observational
Inflammation drives atherosclerotic plaque rupture triggering most acute coronary syndromes. Despite advances in diagnosis and management of atherosclerosis, patients with myocardial infarction (MI) remain at increased risk of recurrent events. The RIPPLE study aims to examine the relationship between residual coronary inflammation detected by 68Ga-DOTATATE PET in patients treated for MI to long-term plaque progression measured by CT coronary angiography (CTCA). The association between infarct-related myocardial 68Ga-DOTATATE PET and myocardial function and viability will also be assessed.
While vascular inflammation can be detected using 18F-FDG PET, this method lacks inflammatory cell specificity and is unreliable for coronary imaging because of high background signals from the myocardium. Upregulation of somatostatin receptor subtype-2 (SST2) occurs in activated macrophages, offering a novel inflammation imaging target. 68Ga-DOTATATE, an SST2 PET tracer with low myocardial binding, shows promise for imaging coronary inflammation. Having previously demonstrated increased 68Ga-DOTATATE signals in coronary atherosclerotic lesions post-MI, we now aim to study the natural history of residual arterial inflammation in non-culprit arteries and better understand how 68Ga-DOTATATE signals relate to plaque morphology, progression and rupture. Residual infarct-related myocardial inflammation and its association with ischemic myocardial remodelling will also be examined.
5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 336 across 1,947 observational studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.
Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →University of Cambridge is the lead sponsor of 112 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with recent myocardial infarction and medically managed non-culprit coronary artery disease
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with recent MI
Diagnostic Test: PET imaging · Diagnostic Test: Coronary CT angiography · Diagnostic Test: Cardiac MRI
Coronary 68Ga-DOTATATE PET-MRI or PET-CT at baseline and 3 months
CTCA at baseline and 2 years
Cardiac MRI at 1 year
68Ga-DOTATATE PET vs. plaque progression
Comparison of non-culprit coronary artery 68Ga-DOTATATE tissue-to-blood ratio at 12 weeks post-MI in patients with plaque progression (changes in low attenuation plaque volume and total atheroma volume) after 2 years measured by CTCA versus those without
Time frame: 2 years
68Ga-DOTATATE PET vs. CTCA-defined plaque morphology
Comparison of coronary 68Ga-DOTATATE imaging to changes in plaque morphology measured by CTCA
Time frame: 2 years
68Ga-DOTATATE PET vs. intravascular imaging
Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATATE imaging to plaque morphology defined by high-resolution intravascular imaging performed during invasive coronary angiography
Time frame: Baseline
68Ga-DOTATATE PET vs. hsCRP
Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET to high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
Time frame: 2 years
68Ga-DOTATATE PET vs left ventricular myocardial function
Comparison of myocardial 68Ga-DOTATATE PET to left ventricular size and function
Time frame: 1 year
68Ga-DOTATATE PET vs myocardial tissue characterization
Comparison of myocardial 68Ga-DOTATATE PET to myocardial scarring and oedema
Time frame: 1 year
Plan to share: No
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University of Cambridge