ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07341230Brain-PACERUpdated Mar 24, 2026

Deep Brain Stimulation to Understand and Treat Addiction

An interventional study of Dual-Target Deep Brain Stimulation and Nucleus Accumbens Deep Brain Stimulation in Alcohol Use Disorder, sponsored by University of Cambridge. Recruiting at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-24.

Sponsored by University of Cambridge · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2025, registered Dec 2025).
  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is testing whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) can safely help people with severe alcohol use disorder who have not improved with standard treatments. DBS uses small electrical signals to change activity in brain areas linked to craving, self-control, and emotion. The study will test whether this treatment can reduce how often people drink and how much they drink each day. Researchers will also record brain activity to better understand how DBS affects craving and relapse.

Read the detailed description

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a leading cause of preventable illness and death worldwide and remains a major public health concern. In the United Kingdom, alcohol misuse is the greatest risk factor for death and disability among adults aged 15-49, yet many people relapse despite standard treatments. Treatment-refractory AUD therefore represents an urgent unmet clinical need. Addiction is increasingly viewed as a disorder of maladaptive brain network activity involving dysregulation of motivation, reward, stress, and executive-control systems.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) delivers small electrical pulses to targeted brain areas to restore balanced network activity. DBS is established for movement and obsessive-compulsive disorders, and early studies suggest potential benefit for substance addictions.

This pilot trial tests dual-target DBS of the nucleus accumbens and ventral internal capsule to modulate circuits supporting craving, emotion, and self-control. Participants with severe, treatment-resistant AUD will undergo an initial open-label optimization phase followed by a randomized, blinded cross-over comparison of dual, single-site, and sham stimulation. Primary outcomes are changes in drinking frequency and quantity. Intracranial recordings from the implanted device will capture local field potentials to identify brain-signal patterns linked to craving and emotion, helping guide the development of future adaptive neuromodulation approaches for addiction.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Use Disorder

Keywords

  • Alcohol use disorder (AUD)
  • Deep brain stimulation (DBS)
  • Addiction
03

In context

Alcoholism

1,674 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcoholism; 331 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 9 is below the median of 88 across 1,428 interventional studies indexed under Alcoholism.

Browse Alcoholism studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Cambridge is the lead sponsor of 116 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 60 years
  • Diagnosed with Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) according to criteria
  • Primary diagnosis of treatment- AUD (comorbid nicotine dependence, other psychoactive substance use disorders, moderate major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders or obsessive-compulsive disorder are permissible if AUD is principal)
  • Disorder duration of AUD ≥ 5 years
  • At least 3 unsuccessful attempts at achieving abstinence
  • Failed prior psychotherapy and standard pharmacotherapy for AUD
  • Medically and neurologically suitable for surgery and MRI-compatible
  • Capable of providing and willing to comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe psychiatric disorder other than Alcohol Use Disorder (e.g., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder)
  • Severe major depressive disorder (moderate depression acceptable)
  • Current active suicidal ideation or history of serious suicide attempts
  • Previous treatment with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT)
  • Presence of implanted electrical devices, including:
  • Cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator (or clinical indication for pacemaker placement)
  • Implanted vagus nerve stimulator (VNS)
  • Any other chronically implanted neurostimulation device
  • Significant neurological history, including prior hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or other major neurological illness
  • Any significant medical condition that, in the opinion of the clinical team, would increase surgical or anesthetic risk
  • Current pregnancy
  • to deep brain stimulation or neurosurgery, including:
  • Inability to tolerate general anesthesia (as assessed by anesthesiology)
  • Increased risk of bleeding (as determined by hepatology/hematology review)
  • History of coagulopathy
  • Current or previous anticoagulant use
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (controlled hypertension with medication is acceptable)
  • Stage 4 liver cirrhosis
  • History of major cardiac arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation) or need for anti-arrhythmic medication
  • History of requiring cardioversion
  • History of repeated falls
  • History of major head injury
  • Marked cognitive impairment
  • Seizure history, including multiple alcohol withdrawal seizures
  • Marked cortical atrophy on neuroimaging
  • Inadequate logistical or social support that would impair the safe conduct of deep brain stimulation therapy, including inability to reliably attend scheduled visits, lack of reasonable access to the study site, or inadequate home or caregiver support necessary for postoperative care, device management and follow-up.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
9 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dual Stimulation (Nucleus Accumbens + Ventral Internal Capsule)

    Participants receive active deep brain stimulation simultaneously targeting both the nucleus accumbens and the ventral internal capsule.

    Device: Dual-Target Deep Brain Stimulation

  • Active comparator
    Single Stimulation - Nucleus Accumbens Only

    Participants receive active deep brain stimulation targeting the nucleus accumbens only, with ventral internal capsule stimulation inactive.

    Device: Nucleus Accumbens Deep Brain Stimulation

  • Active comparator
    Single Stimulation - Ventral Internal Capsule Only

    Participants receive active deep brain stimulation targeting the ventral internal capsule only, with nucleus accumbens stimulation inactive.

    Device: Ventral Internal Capsule Deep Brain Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Stimulation (Inactive)

    Participants receive sham (inactive) deep brain stimulation. The implanted device is turned off; no therapeutic stimulation is provided.

    Device: Sham Deep Brain Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceDual-Target Deep Brain Stimulation

    A surgically implanted deep brain stimulation (DBS) system delivers active stimulation simultaneously to the nucleus accumbens and the ventral internal capsule. Stimulation parameters are based on individualized optimization performed prior to randomization and remain constant throughout this condition.

  • DeviceNucleus Accumbens Deep Brain Stimulation

    A surgically implanted deep brain stimulation (DBS) system delivers active stimulation to the nucleus accumbens only. Ventral internal capsule stimulation is inactive. Stimulation parameters are based on individualized optimization performed prior to randomization and remain constant throughout this condition.

  • DeviceVentral Internal Capsule Deep Brain Stimulation

    A surgically implanted deep brain stimulation (DBS) system delivers active stimulation to the ventral internal capsule only. Nucleus accumbens stimulation is inactive. Stimulation parameters are based on individualized optimization performed prior to randomization and remain constant throughout this condition.

  • DeviceSham Deep Brain Stimulation

    A surgically implanted deep brain stimulation (DBS) system is present but no therapeutic stimulation is delivered during this condition. All stimulation remains inactive.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Number of Drinking Days per Week (Timeline Followback)

    Alcohol use will be assessed using the Timeline Followback (TLFB), a validated self-report measure of daily alcohol consumption. Participants will report the number of days per week on which alcohol was consumed. TLFB data are collected for a 6-month pre-surgical baseline, monthly during the 6-month open-label optimization phase, and monthly during the 4-month randomized cross-over phase. Changes in drinking frequency across phases and stimulation conditions will be compared to evaluate the effect of deep brain stimulation on alcohol use.

    Time frame: Baseline (6 months pre-surgery), monthly during open-label (Months 1-6) and randomized cross-over (Months 6-10) phases

  2. Change in Number of Alcohol Units Consumed per Week (Timeline Followback)

    Weekly alcohol intake will be quantified using the Timeline Followback (TLFB). The total number of standard UK alcohol units consumed per week will be calculated from participant self-report. TLFB data are collected for a 6-month pre-surgical baseline, monthly during the 6-month open-label optimization phase, and monthly during the 4-month randomized cross-over phase. Changes in total weekly consumption across phases and stimulation conditions will be compared to determine the effect of deep brain stimulation on overall drinking volume.

    Time frame: Baseline (6 months pre-surgery), monthly during open-label (Months 1-6) and randomized cross-over (Months 6-10) phases

  3. Adverse Events Related to Surgery or Stimulation

    All adverse events related to DBS surgery, the implanted device, or stimulation are recorded and reviewed by the clinical and research teams. Events are categorized by severity (mild, moderate, severe) and relatedness (unrelated, possibly related, related). Higher severity classifications indicate more serious adverse outcomes.

    Time frame: Continuously monitored from surgery (Day 1) through the end of Month 10 (study completion)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Alcohol Craving (Alcohol Urge Questionnaire)

    Alcohol craving will be assessed using the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ), a validated self-report measure of desire to drink, anticipated effects, and perceived control over drinking. Scores range from 8 to 56, with higher scores indicating stronger craving. Participants complete the AUQ daily during the open-label and randomized phases and monthly during laboratory sessions.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-surgery), daily during open-label (Months 1-6) and randomized cross-over (Months 6-10) phases

  2. Quality of Life (Short Form Health Survey)

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed with the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), a 36-item self-report measure comprising eight domains of physical and mental health. Domain scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health status. Physical and Mental Component Summary scores may also be calculated, with higher scores reflecting better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-surgery), monthly during open-label (Months 1-6) and randomized cross-over (Months 6-10) phases

  3. Illness Severity (Clinical Global Impression)

    Illness severity and clinical change over time will be assessed with The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. The CGI-Severity (CGI-S) is a clinician-rated measure of current illness severity ranked on a 7-point scale, whereby the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) rates change from baseline on a 7-point scale. Lower scores indicate lower severity and greater improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-surgery), monthly during open-label (Months 1-6) and randomized cross-over (Months 6-10) phases

  4. Momentary Mood, Craving, Anxiety (0-100 VAS via WebApp)

    Participants complete high-frequency ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) via a smartphone-based web application up to five times per day. Each EMA consists of composite of single-item visual analogue scale (VAS) questions assessing current depression, anxiety, and craving (e.g., "What is your craving right now?"). Responses are recorded on a continuous scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates none/not at all and 100 indicates the most extreme level. Higher scores indicate greater levels of the assessed state.

    Time frame: Up to five times daily from Baseline (pre-surgery), during open-label (Months 1-6) and randomized cross-over (Months 6-10) phases

  5. Cue-Induced Alcohol Craving (0-100 VAS Following Presentation of Personalized Alcohol Cues)

    Cue-induced craving is assessed using a 0-100 visual analogue scale immediately after viewing personalized alcohol-related cues in laboratory sessions. Participants rate their urge to drink after each cue, with 0 representing "no urge" and 100 representing the "strongest imaginable urge." Higher scores indicate stronger cue-induced craving.

    Time frame: During perioperative laboratory testing (Days 1-7) and monthly laboratory sessions during open-label (Months 1-6) and RCT (Months 6-10) phases

  6. Daily Ecological Momentary Assessment of Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-9 Items)

    Depressive symptoms are assessed once daily using a battery comprising the nine items of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), adapted for daily assessment. Items are administered via a smartphone-accessible Qualtrics survey and assess current depressive symptom severity. Each item is rated using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (not at all) to 100 (most extreme). Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Once daily from Baseline (pre-surgery), during the 6-month open-label optimization (Months 1-6) and 4-month RCT (Months 6-10) phases

  7. Daily Ecological Momentary Assessment of Anxiety Symptoms (GAD-7 Items)

    Anxiety symptoms are assessed once daily using a battery comprising the seven items of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), adapted for daily assessment. Items are administered via a smartphone-accessible Qualtrics survey and assess current anxiety symptom severity. Each item is rated using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (not at all) to 100 (most extreme). Items are not rated using Likert-type response options. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Time frame: Once daily from Baseline (pre-surgery), during the 6-month open-label optimization (Months 1-6) and 4-month RCT (Months 6-10) phases

  8. Daily Ecological Momentary Assessment of Alcohol Urge (AUQ Items)

    Alcohol urge is assessed once daily using an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) battery comprising the eight items of the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ), adapted for daily assessment. Items are administered via a smartphone-accessible survey and assess current alcohol urge. Each item is rated using a continuous visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no urge) to 100 (strongest urge). Items are not rated using Likert-type response options. Higher scores indicate greater alcohol urge.

    Time frame: Once daily from Baseline (pre-surgery), during the 6-month open-label optimization (Months 1-6) and 4-month RCT (Months 6-10) phases

  9. Daily Assessment of Delay Discounting (Monetary Choice Questionnaire)

    Delay discounting is assessed once daily using the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (MCQ), administered via a smartphone-accessible Qualtrics survey. The MCQ comprises a series of 27 choice items in which participants select between a smaller, sooner monetary reward and a larger, later monetary reward. Each item requires a forced choice between the shorter-delay and longer-delay option. Responses are used to characterize individual differences in delay discounting, with a stronger preference for sooner rewards reflecting steeper discounting.

    Time frame: Once daily from Baseline (pre-surgery), during the 6-month open-label optimization (Months 1-6) and 4-month RCT (Months 6-10) phases

  10. Daily Assessment of Risk-Taking Behavior (Mixed Gamble Task)

    Risk-taking behavior is assessed once daily using a mixed gamble decision-making task administered via an online application. On each of the 80 total trials, participants are presented with gambles offering a 50% probability of monetary gain and a 50% probability of monetary loss, with the magnitudes of potential gains and losses varying across trials. Participants indicate whether they would accept or reject each gamble. Patterns of acceptance and rejection across varying gain-loss combinations are used to characterize individual differences in risk-taking behavior, with greater acceptance of gambles indicating increased risk-taking.

    Time frame: Once daily from Baseline (pre-surgery), during the 6-month open-label optimization (Months 1-6) and 4-month RCT (Months 6-10) phases

  11. Compulsive Alcohol-Related Thoughts and Behaviours (Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale)

    Compulsive alcohol-related thoughts and behaviors are assessed using the Obsessive-Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDUS). Scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe obsessive thoughts, urges, and loss of control related to drinking. Participants complete the OCDUS monthly to evaluate changes across study phases.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-surgery) and monthly during open-label (Months 1-6) and randomized cross-over (Months 6-10) phases

  12. Local Field Potential (LFP) Activity During Rest and Task Performance

    Local field potentials (LFPs) are recorded from implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes during resting-state periods and during computerized behavioral tasks. LFP recordings are used to characterize neural activity associated with behavioral state and task performance.

    Time frame: During perioperative phase (Days 1-7), and monthly during open-label (Months 1-6) and RCT (Months 6-10) phases

  13. Scalp Electroencephalography (EEG) Activity During Rest and Task Performance

    Scalp electroencephalography (EEG) is recorded during resting-state periods and during computerized behavioral tasks. EEG recordings are used to characterize cortical neural activity associated with behavioral state and task performance.

    Time frame: During perioperative phase (Days 1-7), and monthly during open-label (Months 1-6) and RCT (Months 6-10) phases

  14. Peripheral Physiological Activity During Laboratory Task Performance

    Peripheral physiological signals are recorded during laboratory sessions while participants complete resting-state assessments and computerized behavioral tasks. Measures include heart rate, heart rate variability, and galvanized skin response, and are used to characterize autonomic and physiological responses associated with task performance.

    Time frame: During perioperative phase (Days 1-7), and monthly during open-label (Months 1-6) and RCT (Months 6-10) phases

  15. Continuous Peripheral Physiological Activity During Daily Life (Wearable Monitoring)

    Peripheral physiological signals are continuously recorded during daily life using a wearable device. Measures include heart rate, heart rate variability, and galvanized skin response, and are used to characterize autonomic and physiological activity over time outside the laboratory setting.

    Time frame: Continuously monitored from Baseline (pre-surgery) through the end of Month 10 (study completion)

  16. Cognitive Performance (Executive Function, Impulsivity, and Compulsivity Tasks)

    Cognitive domains including executive function, impulsivity, and compulsivity are assessed during laboratory sessions using a battery of validated computerized behavioral tasks. Tasks are designed to probe components of cognitive control, decision-making, and behavioral flexibility. Performance measures derived from these tasks are used to characterize individual differences in these cognitive domains.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-surgery) and monthly during open-label (Months 1-6) and randomized cross-over (Months 6-10) phases.

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Cambridge University Hospitals (Addenbrooke's Hospital)
    Cambridge, Cambridgeshire CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Samantha N Sallie, PhD · Contactinfo@brain-pacer.com · 01223 245151
    • Valerie Voon, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Peter Hutchinson, PhD, FRCS · Principal investigator
    • John Strang, MBBS, FRCPsych, FRCP, MD · Principal investigator
    • Harry Bulstrode, BMBCh, PhD, FRCSI · Sub investigator
    • Jonathon Wood, MBChB, MRCPsych · Sub investigator
    • David Christmas, MBChB, MD, MRCPsych · Sub investigator
    • Robert Morris, MA, MBChB, FRCS · Sub investigator
  • King's College Hospital
    London, Greater London SE5 9RS, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
    • Peter Kosa, MBBS · Contactpeter.kosa@nhs.net · 02032999000
    • David Okai, MD, MRCPsych · Principal investigator
    • Keyoumars Ashkan, MBE · Principal investigator
    • Nicola Kalk, MBChB, MRCPsych, PhD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rezai AR, Mahoney JJ, Ranjan M, Haut MW, Zheng W, Lander LR, Berry JH, Farmer DL, Marton JL, Tirumalai P, Mears A, Thompson-Lake DGY, Finomore VS, D'Haese PF, Aklin WM, George DT, Corrigan JD, Hodder SL. Safety and feasibility clinical trial of nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory opioid use disorder. J Neurosurg. 2023 Jun 9;140(1):231-239. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.JNS23114. Print 2024 Jan 1. PubMed 37329519 ↗
  • Davidson B, Giacobbe P, George TP, Nestor SM, Rabin JS, Goubran M, Nyman AJ, Baskaran A, Meng Y, Pople CB, Graham SJ, Tam F, Hamani C, Lipsman N. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in the treatment of severe alcohol use disorder: a phase I pilot trial. Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Oct;27(10):3992-4000. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01677-6. Epub 2022 Jul 21. PubMed 35858989 ↗
  • Bach P, Luderer M, Muller UJ, Jakobs M, Baldermann JC, Voges J, Kiening K, Lux A, Visser-Vandewalle V; DeBraSTRA study group; Bogerts B, Kuhn J, Mann K. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in treatment-resistant alcohol use disorder: a double-blind randomized controlled multi-center trial. Transl Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 8;13(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02337-1. PubMed 36755017 ↗
  • Chen L, Li N, Ge S, Lozano AM, Lee DJ, Yang C, Li L, Bai Q, Lu H, Wang J, Wang X, Li J, Jing J, Su M, Wei L, Wang X, Gao G. Long-term results after deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens and the anterior limb of the internal capsule for preventing heroin relapse: An open-label pilot study. Brain Stimul. 2019 Jan-Feb;12(1):175-183. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Sep 14. PubMed 30245163 ↗
  • Muller UJ, Voges J, Steiner J, Galazky I, Heinze HJ, Moller M, Pisapia J, Halpern C, Caplan A, Bogerts B, Kuhn J. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for the treatment of addiction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013 Apr;1282:119-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06834.x. Epub 2012 Dec 10. PubMed 23227826 ↗
  • Denys D, Mantione M, Figee M, van den Munckhof P, Koerselman F, Westenberg H, Bosch A, Schuurman R. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;67(10):1061-8. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.122. PubMed 20921122 ↗
  • Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P, Volkmann J, Schafer H, Botzel K, Daniels C, Deutschlander A, Dillmann U, Eisner W, Gruber D, Hamel W, Herzog J, Hilker R, Klebe S, Kloss M, Koy J, Krause M, Kupsch A, Lorenz D, Lorenzl S, Mehdorn HM, Moringlane JR, Oertel W, Pinsker MO, Reichmann H, Reuss A, Schneider GH, Schnitzler A, Steude U, Sturm V, Timmermann L, Tronnier V, Trottenberg T, Wojtecki L, Wolf E, Poewe W, Voges J; German Parkinson Study Group, Neurostimulation Section. A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):896-908. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060281. PubMed 16943402 ↗
  • Voon V, Grodin E, Mandali A, Morris L, Donamayor N, Weidacker K, Kwako L, Goldman D, Koob GF, Momenan R. Addictions NeuroImaging Assessment (ANIA): Towards an integrative framework for alcohol use disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jun;113:492-506. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 13. PubMed 32298710 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie published results may be shared with researchers upon reasonable request, following approval by the study investigators and institutional ethics committees. Data will be shared in accordance with relevant data protection regulations and participant consent. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: Beginning 12 months after publication of primary results and for up to 5 years thereafter.

Access criteria: Requests should be directed to the Chief Investigator (Professor Valerie Voon) via the University of Cambridge and will require a data-sharing agreement approved by the Sponsor.

Data sharing details ↗ · www.data.cam.ac.uk

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 27 months after the start.

Of 470 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Alcoholism, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 55. This study's planned 27 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 493 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 53.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 9, 2025
First posted
Jan 14, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
Last update
Mar 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07341230
Responsible party
Valerie Voon (Professor Valerie Voon, Professor of Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, University of Cambridge) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 14, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 24, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion