ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04057872Updated Oct 3, 2025

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Adult Patients With Severe Sepsis

A Phase 1 interventional study of Therapeutic plasma exchange in Septic Shock, sponsored by Alberta Health Services, Calgary. Completed at 2 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-03.

Sponsored by Alberta Health Services, Calgary · Phase 1, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 38 studies in Shock, Septic with a site in Canada — 7 open to participants now, 7 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Shock, Septic · Canada.

Enrollment
23rd of 26
17 · median 129
Started
2020
with 1 other
Phase 1
3 of 38
none open now
Registered
30th of 38
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 38
Alberta Health Services, Calgary

Among the 38 studies in Shock, Septic with a site in Canada, this one is the 23rd largest by enrollment of the 26 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2020, is one of 3 in phase 1, and was the 30th registered.

Shock, Septic

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 38 studies in Shock, Septic with a site in Canada are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

All 7 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Canada have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Canada →

Who these studies take

Of the 136 Shock, Septic studies recruiting now, 102 (75%) set no upper age limit and 19 (14%) stop at 75 or younger; 12 take children under 18; 13 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 38 studies in Shock, Septic with a site in Canada, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The incidence of sepsis (severe infection) has increased over the last four decades. Severe sepsis and septic shock are among the leading causes of death for patients admitted to critical care units with mortality ranging from 20-70% depending on totality of organ dysfunction. Outside of antibiotics and good bedside care, little has changed in the management of this life-threatening problem.

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) involves the separation of plasma from whole blood. The removed plasma is 'exchanged or replaced' with either IV fluids, albumin, blood products or a combination thereof.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of the TPE intervention protocol within 24 hours of study criteria being met. TPE is now a well-established program at the South Health Campus for neuro-muscular disorders. Since starting in May 2018, the investigators have performed over 150 runs making the SHC ICU one of the most experienced centers in Canada.

Read the detailed description

Background

The incidence of sepsis has increased over the last four decades (1). Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to an infection injures its own tissues and organs. Severe sepsis and septic shock are among the leading causes of death for patients admitted to critical care units with mortality ranging from 20-70% depending on totality of organ dysfunction (2, 3). The literature is replete with initial promising phase 2 therapies failing in definitive randomized trails (4-8). In fact, a recent systematic review concluded that no evidence exists for any pharmacologic intervention that has consistently reduced mortality in critically ill patients (9). This is both surprising and frustrating for the author. The most recent guidelines have tried to redefine sepsis as a 'syndrome' since neither validated criterion nor do standard diagnostic tests exist (10). The authors argue that sepsis should be viewed as organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated or non-homeostatic host response. Most of the clinical manifestations of severe infections are caused by an intense, generalized inflammatory response in the host mediated by a multitude of interrelated cellular and humoral factors (3).

Plasmapheresis or therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) involves the separation of plasma from whole blood. The removed plasma is 'exchanged or replaced' with crystalloids, albumin, fresh frozen plasma or a combination thereof. TPE use is well established in many neurological disorders including Guillain-Barre syndrome (11), Myasthenia Gravis (12, 13) and antibody mediated syndromes(14, 15). It is considered the standard of care for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) (16, 17). The rationale for the use of TPE in sepsis, a non-selective intervention, is to remove multiple toxic mediators including endotoxins, activated complement, pro-inflammatory cytokines and pro-coagulant factors (18, 19). If fresh-frozen plasma is used as replacement fluid, consumed plasma factors are substituted, thereby possibly restoring the opsonic capacity and improving the coagulation abnormalities and microcirculation.

Plasma exchange has been reported since the late 1970s as a potential adjunctive or salvage therapy in severe sepsis in both pediatric and adult patients (20-24). These case reports, retrospective reviews and observational studies suggest a survival advantage when compared to historical controls. However, the obvious bias limits any meaningful interpretation. A literature review found only 4 studies with any attempt at randomization. One study enrolled only adults (25), two were exclusively pediatric patients (26, 27) and one study involved both adults and children (28). Excluding the pediatric studies, the adult protocols had few similarities:

  1. Reeves and colleagues attempted a multi-center Australian study but terminated enrollment after 22 adult and 8 children (28). The mean APACHEII scores for adults were 25.2. They aggressively exchanged 5 plasma volumes continuously over 36 hours using a combination of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and albumin (1/4 ratio). Mortality was reported at 14 days. No data on ICU or hospital length of stay was provided. This trial reported significant decrease in certain inflammatory markers.
  2. Busund's larger trail involved 106 adults and reported mortality at 28 days (25). They performed a single 30-40mls/kg exchange that could be repeated once if no clinical improvement was observed. The replacement used was FFP and albumin in a 1:1 ratio. Six episodes of transient hypotension and 1 allergic reaction to FFP was reported (the only trial to report adverse events). There was an encouraging trend towards improved survival (33% vs 53%) versus historical controls. No data on ICU or hospital length of stay was provided.

A more recent German pilot study tried to evaluate the safety and feasibility of enrollment within 12 hours of shock for a proposed randomized controlled trial (RCT) (29). The inclusion criteria were simple: (a) Current sepsis-3 definitions; noradrenaline dose >0.4ug/kg/min despite >30mls/kg of crystalloid; (b) Less than 12 hours of vasopressor support. They performed a single 1.2x plasma exchange using entirely FFP. The major findings were significantly less vasopressor support, fluid balance and a decline in plasma concentrations of pro-inflammatory mediators. The "sustained -responders" mortality was 43% vs 77% of non-responders, but the small numbers prevented statistical significance.

The use of plasma exchange in severe sepsis is graded by the American Society for Apheresis as category III with grade 2C indications, indicating that there is a lack of reliable trials to support TPE use in the condition (30). The purpose of this phase 1 clinical trial is to assess the safety of using plasma exchange in critically ill adult patients with septic shock. TPE is now a well-established program at the South Health Campus (SHC) for neuro-muscular disorders. Since starting in May 2018, we have performed over 240 runs in 43 patients making the SHC ICU the most experienced TPE center in Canada in the past 2 years. One plasma volume is currently the standard dose used safely in patients with neuro-muscular disorders at SHC.

Justification of Research

  1. The incidence of sepsis has increased over 4 decades but no single pharmacological invention reduces mortality/morbidity.
  2. A potential treatment that increases the chance of survival and recovery in patients with septic shock would be both beneficial to patients and help decrease medical costs from long term stays in the ICU.
  3. The maximum tolerable dose of TPE in septic patients is unknown.

Study Objectives

Primary Objective: To evaluate the safety of the TPE intervention protocol within 24 hours of study criteria being met.

Secondary Objectives:

  1. To evaluate preliminary efficacy of the TPE protocol.
  2. To determine maximum tolerable dose of TPE in septic patients.
  3. To record adverse events from TPE intervention.

Hypothesis

It is hypothesized that TPE will be safe for use in patients with septic shock. We will determine the maximum tolerable dose via a dose escalation study.

03

Conditions studied

  • Septic Shock

Keywords

  • Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE)
  • Septic Shock
  • Severe Sepsis
  • Albumin
  • Fresh Frozen Plasma
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria Adult patients (age ≥18) with a documented or strong clinical suspicion of infection that meets the definition of septic shock as per the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Exhibiting two of the four clinical signs of inflammation:

  1. Core temperature > 38oC or \< 36oC
  2. Heart rate > 90 beats per minute
  3. Respiratory rate > 20 breaths per minute, or PaCO2 \< 32 mmHg, or mechanical ventilation
  4. White cell count > 12 x 109/L or \< 4 x 109/L or > 10% immature neutrophils

We will further identify the subset with a hospital mortality in excess of 40%:

  1. >30 mls/kg fluid resuscitation
  2. Noradrenaline >0.1 ug/kg/min to maintain MAP> 65mmHg for at least 4 consecutive hours and present at initiation of TPE
  3. Lactate >2 mmol/l.

Exclusion Criteria Patients will be excluded in cases where death is deemed inevitable or imminent during admission and either the attending physician, patient or surrogate legal decision maker is not committed to active treatment.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
17 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TPE in Septic Shock

    The patients will undergo a dosing trial to determine safety and the most effective dose

    Procedure: Therapeutic plasma exchange

Interventions

  • ProcedureTherapeutic plasma exchange

    The removed plasma is 'exchanged or replaced' with either IV fluids, albumin, and/or Fresh frozen plasma

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adverse Events

    Proportion of patients who experience at least 1 Adverse Event (AE)

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

  2. Discontinue TPE

    Proportion of patients who discontinue TPE administration due to an AE

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

  3. Enrollment Rate

    3\. Enrollment rate (patients screened, patients eligible, patients approached, patients enrolled)

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

  4. Protocol Completion

    Protocol completion (patients who complete study protocol)

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Organ dysfunction

    Resolution or worsening of organ dysfunction as per SOFA score

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

  2. Vasopressor support

    Hours of vasopressor support

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

  3. Ventilator support

    Days on ventilator if applicable

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

  4. Days in ICU

    Days in ICU (censored to day ready for discharge)

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

  5. Mortality

    Mortality

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

  6. RRT Required

    Need for RRT

    Time frame: During course of ICU stay, could be up to 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Peter Lougheed Centre
    Calgary, Alberta T3M 1M4, Canada
  • South Health Campus
    Calgary, Alberta T3M 1M4, Canada
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 17;348(16):1546-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022139. PubMed 12700374 ↗
  • Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):840-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208623. No abstract available. PubMed 23984731 ↗
  • Minasyan H. Sepsis and septic shock: Pathogenesis and treatment perspectives. J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:229-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.015. Epub 2017 Apr 18. PubMed 28448952 ↗
  • Fisher CJ Jr, Dhainaut JF, Opal SM, Pribble JP, Balk RA, Slotman GJ, Iberti TJ, Rackow EC, Shapiro MJ, Greenman RL, et al. Recombinant human interleukin 1 receptor antagonist in the treatment of patients with sepsis syndrome. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Phase III rhIL-1ra Sepsis Syndrome Study Group. JAMA. 1994 Jun 15;271(23):1836-43. PubMed 8196140 ↗
  • Cohen J, Carlet J. INTERSEPT: an international, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of monoclonal antibody to human tumor necrosis factor-alpha in patients with sepsis. International Sepsis Trial Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1996 Sep;24(9):1431-40. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199609000-00002. PubMed 8797612 ↗
  • Abraham E, Reinhart K, Opal S, Demeyer I, Doig C, Rodriguez AL, Beale R, Svoboda P, Laterre PF, Simon S, Light B, Spapen H, Stone J, Seibert A, Peckelsen C, De Deyne C, Postier R, Pettila V, Sprung CL, Artigas A, Percell SR, Shu V, Zwingelstein C, Tobias J, Poole L, Stolzenbach JC, Creasey AA; OPTIMIST Trial Study Group. Efficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):238-47. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.2.238. PubMed 12851279 ↗
  • Afshari A, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Moller A. Antithrombin III in critically ill patients: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. BMJ. 2007 Dec 15;335(7632):1248-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39398.682500.25. Epub 2007 Nov 23. PubMed 18037615 ↗
  • Ranieri VM, Thompson BT, Barie PS, Dhainaut JF, Douglas IS, Finfer S, Gardlund B, Marshall JC, Rhodes A, Artigas A, Payen D, Tenhunen J, Al-Khalidi HR, Thompson V, Janes J, Macias WL, Vangerow B, Williams MD; PROWESS-SHOCK Study Group. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2055-64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1202290. Epub 2012 May 22. PubMed 22616830 ↗
  • Santacruz CA, Pereira AJ, Celis E, Vincent JL. Which Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trials in Critical Care Medicine Have Shown Reduced Mortality? A Systematic Review. Crit Care Med. 2019 Dec;47(12):1680-1691. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004000. PubMed 31567349 ↗
  • Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, Van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18. PubMed 28101605 ↗
  • van der Meche FG, Schmitz PI. A randomized trial comparing intravenous immune globulin and plasma exchange in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Dutch Guillain-Barre Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1992 Apr 23;326(17):1123-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199204233261705. PubMed 1552913 ↗
  • Barth D, Nabavi Nouri M, Ng E, Nwe P, Bril V. Comparison of IVIg and PLEX in patients with myasthenia gravis. Neurology. 2011 Jun 7;76(23):2017-23. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821e5505. Epub 2011 May 11. PubMed 21562253 ↗
  • Mandawat A, Kaminski HJ, Cutter G, Katirji B, Alshekhlee A. Comparative analysis of therapeutic options used for myasthenia gravis. Ann Neurol. 2010 Dec;68(6):797-805. doi: 10.1002/ana.22139. PubMed 21061395 ↗
  • Bonnan M, Cabre P. Plasma exchange in severe attacks of neuromyelitis optica. Mult Scler Int. 2012;2012:787630. doi: 10.1155/2012/787630. Epub 2012 Feb 12. PubMed 22474589 ↗
  • DeSena AD, Noland DK, Matevosyan K, King K, Phillips L, Qureshi SS, Greenberg BM, Graves D. Intravenous methylprednisolone versus therapeutic plasma exchange for treatment of anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antibody encephalitis: A retrospective review. J Clin Apher. 2015 Aug;30(4):212-6. doi: 10.1002/jca.21363. Epub 2015 Feb 9. PubMed 25664728 ↗
  • Rock GA, Shumak KH, Buskard NA, Blanchette VS, Kelton JG, Nair RC, Spasoff RA. Comparison of plasma exchange with plasma infusion in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Canadian Apheresis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 8;325(6):393-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199108083250604. PubMed 2062330 ↗
  • Sarode R, Bandarenko N, Brecher ME, Kiss JE, Marques MB, Szczepiorkowski ZM, Winters JL. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: 2012 American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) consensus conference on classification, diagnosis, management, and future research. J Clin Apher. 2014 Jun;29(3):148-67. doi: 10.1002/jca.21302. Epub 2013 Oct 17. PubMed 24136342 ↗
  • Reeves JH. A review of plasma exchange in sepsis. Blood Purif. 2002;20(3):282-8. doi: 10.1159/000047021. PubMed 11867876 ↗
  • Zhou F, Peng Z, Murugan R, Kellum JA. Blood purification and mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2209-20. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828cf412. PubMed 23860248 ↗
  • Scharfman WB, Tillotson JR, Taft EG, Wright E. Plasmapheresis for meningococcemia with disseminated intravascular coagulation. N Engl J Med. 1979 May 31;300(22):1277-8. No abstract available. PubMed 431695 ↗
  • Vain NE, Mazlumian JR, Swarner OW, Cha CC. Role of exchange transfusion in the treatment of severe septicemia. Pediatrics. 1980 Nov;66(5):693-7. PubMed 7432874 ↗
  • Bjorvatn B, Bjertnaes L, Fadnes HO, Flaegstad T, Gutteberg TJ, Kristiansen BE, Pape J, Rekvig OP, Osterud B, Aanderud L. Meningococcal septicaemia treated with combined plasmapheresis and leucapheresis or with blood exchange. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Feb 11;288(6415):439-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.288.6415.439. PubMed 6419956 ↗
  • Lercari G, Paganini G, Malfanti L, Rolla D, Machi AM, Rizzo F, Cannella G, Valbonesi M. Apheresis for severe malaria complicated by cerebral malaria, acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute renal failure, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. J Clin Apher. 1992;7(2):93-6. doi: 10.1002/jca.2920070211. PubMed 1429495 ↗
  • Gardlund B, Sjolin J, Nilsson A, Roll M, Wickerts CJ, Wikstrom B, Wretlind B. Plasmapheresis in the treatment of primary septic shock in humans. Scand J Infect Dis. 1993;25(6):757-61. doi: 10.3109/00365549309008575. PubMed 8052817 ↗
  • Busund R, Koukline V, Utrobin U, Nedashkovsky E. Plasmapheresis in severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Oct;28(10):1434-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1410-7. Epub 2002 Jul 23. PubMed 12373468 ↗
  • Long EJ, Taylor A, Delzoppo C, Shann F, Pearson G, Buckley D, Butt W. A randomised controlled trial of plasma filtration in severe paediatric sepsis. Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Sep;15(3):198-204. PubMed 23944206 ↗
  • Nguyen TC, Han YY, Kiss JE, Hall MW, Hassett AC, Jaffe R, Orr RA, Janosky J, Carcillo JA. Intensive plasma exchange increases a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin motifs-13 activity and reverses organ dysfunction in children with thrombocytopenia-associated multiple organ failure. Crit Care Med. 2008 Oct;36(10):2878-87. doi: 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318186aa49. PubMed 18828196 ↗
  • Reeves JH, Butt WW, Shann F, Layton JE, Stewart A, Waring PM, Presneill JJ. Continuous plasmafiltration in sepsis syndrome. Plasmafiltration in Sepsis Study Group. Crit Care Med. 1999 Oct;27(10):2096-104. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00003. PubMed 10548188 ↗
  • Knaup H, Stahl K, Schmidt BMW, Idowu TO, Busch M, Wiesner O, Welte T, Haller H, Kielstein JT, Hoeper MM, David S. Early therapeutic plasma exchange in septic shock: a prospective open-label nonrandomized pilot study focusing on safety, hemodynamics, vascular barrier function, and biologic markers. Crit Care. 2018 Oct 30;22(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2220-9. PubMed 30373638 ↗
  • Szczepiorkowski ZM, Winters JL, Bandarenko N, Kim HC, Linenberger ML, Marques MB, Sarode R, Schwartz J, Weinstein R, Shaz BH; Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice--evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis. J Clin Apher. 2010;25(3):83-177. doi: 10.1002/jca.20240. PubMed 20568098 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Once the results have been analyzed and published the de-identified data will be made available to other researchers

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: The data will be made available once published. It will be made available for 5 years as per University of Calgary data storage protocol.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2020 to primary completion in Dec 2024, 50 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 2, 2019
First posted
Aug 15, 2019
StartActual
Oct 21, 2020
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Oct 3, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04057872
Lead sponsor
Alberta Health Services, Calgary
Responsible party
Dr. George Alvarez (Intensivist, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services, Calgary) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 15, 2019
Start date
Oct 21, 2020
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024
Completion
Dec 31, 2024
Last update
Oct 3, 2025

Study contacts

George F Alvarez, MD
principal investigator · Alberta Health services

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion