CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT04044391Updated May 26, 2020

Use of Magnetocardiography in Evaluation of Patients Going for Cardiac Catheterization

An observational study in Acute Coronary Syndrome, Coronary Artery Stenosis and Myocardial Ischemia, sponsored by Genetesis Inc.. Terminated at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-26.

Sponsored by Genetesis Inc. · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Study was defunded.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
101
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter, prospective trial to measure the test performance characteristics of the Magnetocardiography (MCG) CardioFlux cardiac diagnostic system in detecting clinically significant coronary artery obstruction in patients with symptoms of suspected acute coronary syndrome or who present with a failed stress test with the intention of treat with cardiac catheterization.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, prospective clinical trial studying the utility and accuracy of magnetocardiography (MCG) in identifying critical coronary artery obstruction responsible for myocardial ischemia. The study will enroll up to 1500 patients at high risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) who have been referred for cardiac catheterization. These patients will be recruited from an inpatient service post admission for chest pain or anginal equivalent or from a cohort of symptomatic patients who have failed outpatient stress testing. If they meet other stated inclusion criteria, they will have a 2 minute MCG scan prior to their cardiac catheterization. For comparative purposes, the first 300 patients will have an electrocardiogram (ECG) performed within 60 minutes of this initial scan.

After an enrolled study subject has had their catheterization procedure, the results of the catheterization will be reviewed by one of the study's primary investigators. If the subject has had a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), a second MCG scan will be performed prior to their discharge. The MCG scans will be interpreted by 3 physicians trained to read these images and blinded to all clinical information regarding study subjects.

The initial MCG scan will be evaluated for its sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy in detecting myocardial ischemia and critical coronary stenosis based on angiographic imaging, fractional flow reserve (FFR), or instant wave-free ratio (iFR) measurements, as applicable. The same statistical analysis will be performed for the ECGs performed on each of the applicable study subjects. When performed, the second MCG will be evaluated for any abnormalities after revascularization. These results will be used to determine the value of post-PCI MCG to predict 30 day and 180 day major adverse cardiac events (MACE)-specifically myocardial infarction or stroke, need for revascularization, or cardiac related death.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Coronary Artery Stenosis
  • Myocardial Ischemia

Keywords

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Myocardial ischemia
03

In context

Acute Coronary Syndrome

1,461 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome; 267 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 101 is below the median of 500 across 561 observational studies indexed under Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Browse Acute Coronary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Genetesis Inc. is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

This research study will enroll patients who will undergo cardiac catheterization because of symptoms and risk factors suggestive of acute coronary syndrome, and high risk patients presenting for cardiac catheterization due to an abnormal stress test. Patients meeting these criteria, and over the age of 18 years and all genders will be candidates.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years of age at the time of enrollment.
  • Patient presenting acutely with signs and symptoms suggestive of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and in the opinion of the treating physician and based on best clinical assessment that a cardiac catheterization will be performed; or, had a positive stress test and is scheduled for cardiac catheterization.
  • Patient's ability to lay supine for five minutes.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years of age
  • Patients unable to fit into device
  • Unable to transfer to device gantry
  • Positive response on magnetocardiography (MCG) prescreening form
  • Patients with claustrophobia or unable to lie supine for five minutes
  • Pregnant women
  • Poor candidate for follow-up (e.g. no access to phone)
  • Repeat participants
  • Prisoners
  • Acute STEMI or hemodynamically unstable patients (Mean Arterial Pressure ≤ 65, Respiratory Rate ≥24, Heart Rate ≥105 bpm, Temperature>38.1 or \<34 degrees Celsius, O2 Saturation\<90% despite oxygen therapy).
  • Do not resuscitate order (DNR)
  • Unable to have a cardiac catheterization secondary to dye, allergy, creatinine clearance, can't obtain access, etc.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
101 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Intention to Treat: Cardiac Catheterization

    All patients meeting inclusion criteria and scheduled to undergo cardiac catheterization will undergo a CardioFlux magnetocardiogram (MCG) to determine presence of patterns which indicate myocardial ischemia.

    Diagnostic Test: CardioFlux Magnetocardiograph

  • Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    All patients found to have significant coronary artery obstruction seen via angiography +/- fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instant wave-free ratio (iFR) and who receive a catheter based intervention will have a post-procedure CardioFlux MCG scan. Follow up over the next 30 and 180 days will be performed to determine if a persistent pattern suggesting residual ischemia will correlate with an increased incidence of major cardiac adverse events (MACE).

    Diagnostic Test: CardioFlux Magnetocardiograph

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testCardioFlux Magnetocardiograph

    CardioFlux is a noninvasive diagnostic modality which can measure and image the heart's intrinsic magnetic field created by ion transit across cardiac cell membranes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of MCG to detect myocardial ischemia as determined by cardiac catheterization

    Assess accuracy of CardioFlux MCG (MCG-CF) and magnetic field map characteristics with findings of significant coronary artery stenosis ≥70% via angiography and/or via FFR of \<0.8 or via instant wave-free ratio (iFR) .

    Time frame: 72 hours

  2. Accuracy of MCG vs. ECG

    Compare CardioFlux MCG accuracy to ECG accuracy in identifying cardiac ischemia using coronary angiography with or without FFR/iFR as gold standard.

    Time frame: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incident of post-PCI MACE

    Determine if residual abnormalities on post PCI MCG-CF maps can predict 30 day and 180 day MACE.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Inter-reader reliability percentage

    Measurement of consistency of interpretation among 3 physician readers of CardioFlux MCG scans.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Ascension St. John Medical Center
    Detroit, Michigan 48236, United States
  • Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chaikovsky I, Hailer B, Sosnytskyy V, Lutay M, Mjasnikov G, Kazmirchuk A, Bydnyk M, Lomakovskyy A, Sosnytskaja T. Predictive value of the complex magnetocardiographic index in patients with intermediate pretest probability of chronic coronary artery disease: results of a two-center study. Coron Artery Dis. 2014 Sep;25(6):474-84. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000107. PubMed 24667125 ↗
  • Chen T, Z., C., Jiang, S, Van Leeuwen, P., Gronemeyer, D, Noninvasively diagnosing coronary artery disease with 61 channel MCG data. Chinese Science Bulletin. , 2014. 59: p. 1123.
  • Hailer B, Chaikovsky I, Auth-Eisernitz S, Schafer H, Van Leeuwen P. The value of magnetocardiography in patients with and without relevant stenoses of the coronary arteries using an unshielded system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28(1):8-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09318.x. PubMed 15660796 ↗
  • Park JW, Hill PM, Chung N, Hugenholtz PG, Jung F. Magnetocardiography predicts coronary artery disease in patients with acute chest pain. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2005 Jul;10(3):312-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2005.00634.x. PubMed 16029382 ↗
  • Lim HK, Kwon H, Chung N, Ko YG, Kim JM, Kim IS, Park YK. Usefulness of magnetocardiogram to detect unstable angina pectoris and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 15;103(4):448-54. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.10.013. Epub 2008 Dec 25. PubMed 19195500 ↗
  • Li Y, Che Z, Quan W, Yuan R, Shen Y, Liu Z, Wang W, Jin H, Lu G. Diagnostic outcomes of magnetocardiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Feb 15;8(2):2441-6. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25932186 ↗
  • Kwong JS, Leithauser B, Park JW, Yu CM. Diagnostic value of magnetocardiography in coronary artery disease and cardiac arrhythmias: a review of clinical data. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 1;167(5):1835-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.12.056. Epub 2013 Jan 19. PubMed 23336954 ↗
  • Agarwal R, Saini A, Alyousef T, Umscheid CA. Magnetocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2012 Oct;17(4):291-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2012.00538.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13. PubMed 23094875 ↗
  • Kwon H, Kim K, Lee YH, Kim JM, Yu KK, Chung N, Ko YG. Non-invasive magnetocardiography for the early diagnosis of coronary artery disease in patients presenting with acute chest pain. Circ J. 2010 Jul;74(7):1424-30. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-09-0975. Epub 2010 May 27. PubMed 20508380 ↗
  • Tolstrup K, Madsen BE, Ruiz JA, Greenwood SD, Camacho J, Siegel RJ, Gertzen HC, Park JW, Smars PA. Non-invasive resting magnetocardiographic imaging for the rapid detection of ischemia in subjects presenting with chest pain. Cardiology. 2006;106(4):270-6. doi: 10.1159/000093490. Epub 2006 May 29. PubMed 16733351 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is no plan to make individual patient data (IPD) available to researchers not affiliated with the centers enrolling patients within this trial.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04044391
Lead sponsor
Genetesis Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 5, 2019
Start date
May 15, 2019
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2020
Completion
May 4, 2020
Last update
May 26, 2020

Study contacts

Claire Pearson, M.D.
principal investigator · Ascension St, John Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion