ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03976635Updated Jun 6, 2019

Evaluation of Pain, Discomfort and Acceptance During the Orthodontic Treatment of Class III Malocclusion

An interventional study of Removable Mandibular Retractor and Bone-anchored intermaxillary traction in Class III Malocclusion, Cross Bite and Orthodontic Appliance Complication, sponsored by Damascus University. Completed at 1 site in Syrian Arab Republic. Open to participants aged 9 Years to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-06-06.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2015, registered Jun 2019).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
38
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
9 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the levels of pain, discomfort and acceptance between two treatment modalities of Class III correction of growing patients in the late mixed dentition period.

Read the detailed description

The acceptance of orthodontic appliance is measured by the amount of discomfort occurring during orthodontic treatment. Different feelings can be encountered during the course of orthodontic treatment such as pressure, tension and pain. Pain is defined as an unpleasant feeling and a bad subjective experience combined with internal or external reason and it is considered as the most annoying factor during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance. In a study by Oliver and Knappman, patients stated that the worse thing related to the orthodontic treatment was pain and 70% of the subjects suffered from pain during orthodontic treatment regardless the appliance' type. The fear from the pain is considered as the most important factor that not encourage patient to ask orthodontic treatment.Many studies demonstrated that there were no differences in the amount of the pain resulted from the orthodontic treatment between males and females [2, 5]. In a study of the reasons which make patient stopped the orthodontic treatment, Haynes found that the pain was the first reason, whereas the second one was the effect of the orthodontic appliance on the patient's daily social life.

When reviewing the medical literature, few studies have been found to identify the patient acceptance degree to the orthodontic appliance used for treating Class III cases in general and Class III functional appliances in particular.Removable appliances were evaluated by a series of publications by Sergl et al in Germany.Additionally, when rigorous study designs are considered utilizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), there are only few RCTs in the dental literature that evaluated patients' responses towards orthodontic treatment. Idris et al., evaluated Class II growing patients undergoing functional orthopedic corrections, whereas Khattab et al., compared labial brackets versus lingual brackets in terms of speech and functional impairments. Recently, Saleh et al., evaluated the levels of acceptance towards the removable mandibular retractor (RMR) when treating young children with Class III malocclusion in the late primary dentition and early mixed dentition (i.e. between 5 and 9 years) and found high levels of acceptance recommending the need for further analysis of patients' responses to this appliance in older age groups.

Bone-anchored intermaxillary elastics have been proposed as a method of correcting Class III deformities. Although this method was compared to the removable mandibular retractor in terms of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes, but the published paper did not report any information about the associated levels of pain and discomfort as well the general acceptability to this treatment modality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Class III Malocclusion
  • Cross Bite
  • Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Keywords

  • Removable Mandibular Retractor
  • Bone-anchored Intermaxillary Traction
03

In context

Malocclusion, Angle Class III

57 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class III; 11 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 38 is above the median of 32 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class III.

Browse Malocclusion, Angle Class III studies →

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Class III malocclusion according to Angle
  2. Presence of anterior cross bite on two teeth or more
  3. Class III Skeletal relationship confirmed radiographically (-4\<ANB\<+1)
  4. The lower incisors have normal inclination (Incisor-Mandibular-Plane angle not exceeding 100° and not less than 85°)
  5. Late mixed dentition or the beginning of the permanent dentition
  6. Eruption of The lower canines and first premolars on both sides
  7. Absence of craniofacial syndromes or cleft lip and/or palate abnormalities
  8. no supernumerary teeth or missing teeth except for the third molars
  9. no previous orthodontic treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pure maxillary deficiency
  2. Pure mandibular prognathism
  3. Diseases that prevent the application of mini-implants (e.g. Osteoporosis- cortisone and its derivatives treatment - radiation)
  4. The roots of the canine are so close to the first premolar
  5. Long face (Maxillary-mandibular plane angle greater than 30° or Mandibular-Cranial-Base angle greater than 36°).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
38 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Removable Mandibular Retractor

    Patients in this group will be treated by the Removable Mandibular Retractor (RMR) in order to get rid of the anterior cross bite. This appliance is removable.

    Device: Removable Mandibular Retractor

  • Experimental
    Bone-anchored intermaxillary Traction

    Patients will be treated using bone-anchored intermaxillary traction. Class III elastics will be extended from the Adam's clasps placed in the upper removable appliance towards the heads of mini-implants placed between the permanent canine and lateral incisors on either side of the lower dental arch.

    Device: Bone-anchored intermaxillary traction

Interventions

  • DeviceRemovable Mandibular Retractor

    The appliance will be used 18 hours per day. It can only be removed for eating meals.

    Also known as: RMR, Inferiorly extended labial bow, Reverse Hawley bow

  • DeviceBone-anchored intermaxillary traction

    The patients will be instructed to wear the upper removable appliance for 18 hours per day. The elastics should be extended from the upper appliance towards the lower mini-screws.

    Also known as: BAIMT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in the sensation of tension or pressure

    Patients will be asked this question about their sensation of tension or pressure (Item no 01): Do you have a sense of tension and pressure in your soft tissues? A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: one day following appliance insertion (T1), one week (T2), six weeks (T3), three months (T4) and after 6 months of appliance insertion (T5)

  2. Change in the perception of pain

    Patients will be asked this question about their perception of pain (Item no 02): 'Have you experienced any degree of pain?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: one day following appliance insertion (T1), one week (T2), six weeks (T3), three months (T4) and after 6 months of appliance insertion (T5)

  3. Change in the perception of speech

    Patients will be asked this question about any change encountered in the articulation of sounds (Item no 03): 'Do you feel that your articulation has changed?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: one day following appliance insertion (T1), one week (T2), six weeks (T3), three months (T4) and after 6 months of appliance insertion (T5)

  4. Change in swallowing ability

    Patients will be asked this question about any difficulties encountered during swallowing (Item no 04): 'Do you have difficulty in swallowing?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: one day following appliance insertion (T1), one week (T2), six weeks (T3), three months (T4) and after 6 months of appliance insertion (T5)

  5. Change in mandibular restriction

    Patients will be asked this question about any restrictions encountered in lower jaw movements (Item no 05): 'Do you have a sense of your mandible movement being restricted?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: one day following appliance insertion (T1), one week (T2), six weeks (T3), three months (T4) and after 6 months of appliance insertion (T5)

  6. Change in self-confidence perception

    Patients will be asked this question about their feelings when meeting other people regarding self-confidence (Item no 06): 'Do you have any feeling of embarrassment or lack of confidence?' A standardized questionnaire will be used to assess pain, discomfort and functional impairments' levels during the first six months of treatment. A four-point Likert scale is going to be used consisting of: (not at all), (little), (much) or (very much) to which points 0, 1, 2 and 3 respectively are going to be ascribed. Each questionnaire is going to be completed by the child in the presence of one of his/her parents.

    Time frame: Questionnaires will be filled at the following assessment times: one day following appliance insertion (T1), one week (T2), six weeks (T3), three months (T4) and after 6 months of appliance insertion (T5)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Orthodontic Department, University of Hama Dental School
    Hamah, 12JO76WH, Syrian Arab Republic
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Pain and discomfort during orthodontic treatment: causative factors and effects on compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Dec;114(6):684-91. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70201-x. PubMed 9844209 ↗
  • Khattab TZ, Farah H, Al-Sabbagh R, Hajeer MY, Haj-Hamed Y. Speech performance and oral impairments with lingual and labial orthodontic appliances in the first stage of fixed treatment. Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):519-26. doi: 10.2319/073112-619.1. Epub 2012 Oct 18. PubMed 23075062 ↗
  • Idris G, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Acceptance and discomfort in growing patients during treatment with two functional appliances: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2012 Sep;13(3):219-24. PubMed 22971260 ↗
  • Saleh M, Hajeer MY, Al-Jundi A. Assessment of pain and discomfort during early orthodontic treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion using the Removable Mandibular Retractor Appliance. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jun;14(2):119-24. PubMed 23758461 ↗
  • Gibreal O, Hajeer MY, Brad B. Evaluation of the levels of pain and discomfort of piezocision-assisted flapless corticotomy when treating severely crowded lower anterior teeth: a single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2019 Apr 16;19(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0758-9. PubMed 30991984 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03976635
Collaborators
Hama University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 6, 2019
Start date
Feb 15, 2015
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2015
Completion
May 10, 2016
Last update
Jun 6, 2019

Study contacts

Abdulmalek MR Majanni, DDS MSc
principal investigator · PhD student, Orthodontics Department, University of Damascus Dental School
Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD
study director · Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion