ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07841067TiPlateRCTUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Comparing 3D-Printed and Milled Titanium Plates in Jaw Surgery (Le Fort I): Accuracy and Operative Time

An interventional study of 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Titanium Plates and Milled Patient-Specific Titanium Plates in Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Malocclusion, Angle Class III and Dentofacial Deformities, sponsored by Future University in Egypt. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Future University in Egypt · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Sep 25, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to find out if 3D printed patient-specific titanium plates improve surgical accuracy and decrease operative time compared to milled patient-specific titanium plates in patients having Le Fort I osteotomy for jaw correction. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Do 3D-printed patient specific titanium plates improve surgical accuracy (as measured by ability to transfer the computer plan to the patient's jaw)?
  • Do 3D-printed patient specific titanium plates decrease operative time when compared to milled patient specific titanium plates? This study will compare two groups of patients. One group will receive 3D printed plates (study group) and the other will receive milled plates (control group) to see if the different methods of making the plates changes the surgical accuracy or operative time.

All participants in the study will:

  • Have Le Fort I osteotomy surgery using patient specific titanium plates (either 3D printed or milled).
  • Have CT scans before and after surgery to evaluate accuracy. Have their operative time recorded.
  • Have a post-surgical follow-up to evaluate healing, stability and orthodontic treatment.
Read the detailed description
  • Background and Clinical Rationale Orthognathic surgeries, specifically Le Fort I osteotomy, requires precise transfer of the virtual surgical plan to the operative field to achieve predictable functional and facial outcomes. Conventional splint-based fixation techniques may introduce cumulative inaccuracies arising from laboratory fabrication errors, intraoperative handling, and manual plate adaptation. To overcome these limitations, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) workflows allow for the fabrication of patient-specific titanium plates via 3D printing (additive manufacturing) or milling (subtractive manufacturing). While both fabrication methods aim to enhance surgical accuracy and workflow efficiency, direct randomized controlled trial evidence comparing the three-dimensional accuracy and operative performance of 3D-printed versus milled maxillary patient-specific plates remains limited.
  • Preoperative Diagnostic Protocol \& 3D Virtual Surgical Planning

    1. Presurgical Orthodontic \& Diagnostic Setup: Participants undergo presurgical orthodontic treatment for dental decompensation to establish a stable occlusion in at least three points. Preoperative diagnostic records include standardized facial and dental photographs along with dental casts obtained from alginate impressions.
    2. Image Acquisition \& 3D Skull Reconstruction: Computed Tomography (CT) scans are acquired in the natural head position utilizing a Planmeca ProFace imaging machine. Diagnostic dental models are digitized using an optical scanner (Shera operating system 7Series; Dental Wing Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada). The digitized dental models will be manipulated using point-based matching iterative closest point (ICP) registration based on anatomical landmarks followed by manual surface-based registration to generate an artifact-free composite 3D skull model.
    3. Surgical Simulation \& Guide Design: 3D cephalometric analysis of the bony and soft tissue landmarks are conducted using surgical simulation software (Mimics 19.0; Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). Virtual Le Fort I osteotomy and mandibular sagittal split osteotomy (SSO) are simulated, adjusting the maxillary segment relative to facial symmetry planes and clinical anthropometric analysis. The cutting guides will be designed on the maxilla to orient the osteotomy and mark reference holes (16 holes with 8 holes on each side) to be used later for the repositioning/ fixation plate, using CAD software (3-matic 11.0; Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium).
    4. CAD/CAM Manufacturing:

Surgical Guides: Exported in stereolithography (STL) file format and printed in white polyamide (PA2200; EOS e-manufacturing solutions, Munich, Germany) via fused deposition modeling (FDM) on an additive CAM machine (FORMIGA P 110 printer; EOS e-manufacturing solutions, Munich, Germany). The guides are cold-sterilized by overnight immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde.

Patient-Specific Osteosynthesis Plates: Designed to fix the maxilla in the desired position making use of the previously established reference holes. The designed plates will be exported in STL file format to be manufactured in grade 5 titanium alloy using either 3D printing or milling according to randomized allocation .

Intraoperative Protocol \& Interventions Surgical procedures are performed under general anesthesia then intraoral local anesthetic infiltration along incision line with (lidocaine 2%, 1/100,000 adrenaline) for hemostasis. Access is established via intraoral vestibular maxillary and sagittal split mandibular incisions.

Osteotomy \& Reference Hole Drilling: The maxillary cutting guide is seated on the exposed bone, verified for passive fit, and secured using four 2.0-mm screws. Sixteen reference holes (8 per side) are established through the guide. A reciprocating saw is used to perform the Le Fort I osteotomy, followed by maxillary mobilization and removal of bony interferences. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies of the mandible are subsequently performed using a mandibular guide.

Fixation Protocol (Randomized Allocation):

Study Arm (Group 1): Maxillary repositioning and fixation are executed using 3D-printed patient-specific titanium plates, aligned with the pre-established reference holes and secured with 2.0-mm screws.

Control Arm (Group 2): Maxillary repositioning and fixation are executed using milled patient-specific titanium plates, aligned with the pre-established reference holes and secured with 2.0-mm screws.

Mandibular Fixation \& Closure: In both arms, the mandible is repositioned and fixated relative to the maxilla using traditional tri-poding bi-cortical screws. Incisions are sutured using 4-0 resorbable sutures in a continuous running fashion.

Postoperative Care \& Evaluation Schedule Postoperative Medications: Systemic antibiotic coverage (Amoxicillin / Clavulanic acid 625 mg every 8 hours) is initiated 4 hours postoperatively and continued for 5 days. Analgesics (NSAIDs every 6 hours) are provided for 3 days, and 0.12% Chlorhexidine mouthwash is prescribed for 2 weeks.

Follow-Up Schedule: Clinical evaluations occur weekly for the first month, followed by monthly visits for 5 additional months.

Radiographic Evaluation \& Orthodontics: A postoperative CT scan is acquired within the first postoperative week using parameters identical to the baseline scan to analyze 3D plan transfer accuracy. Post-surgical orthodontic treatment resumes 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively.

Quality Assurance, Monitoring, and Auditing Supervision \& Governance: All CAD/CAM virtual planning and surgical procedures are conducted under the direct supervision of senior academic staff (Prof. Lobna Abdelaziz Aly and Dr. Aya Magdy AbdelRady) at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Future University in Egypt.

Harms: Any temporary or permanent adverse effect will be recorded and documented.

Auditing: Auditing of the study design will be done by the Research Ethics Council, Future University in Egypt.

Protocol Amendments: Any modifications impacting study conduct, patient safety, or benefits require formal approval by the Council of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Future University in Egypt.

Discontinuation Criteria: Interventions are discontinued if technical difficulty with cutting guides/plates arises or if inaccurate translation of the surgical plan occurs intraoperatively.

Confidentiality: All study-related information will be stored securely. All participant information will be stored in locked file cabinets in areas with limited access. All patients' records will be digitized and stored securely on personal computer.

Ancillary and Post Trial Care: All patients will be followed up until complete healing and satisfactory results occur.

Declaration of interests: The study is self-funded. No conflict of interest Consent: The entire procedure will be explained to the patients and a written consent will be obtained.

Standard Operating Procedures \& Protocol Workflows

  1. Patient Recruitment \& Consent:

    Inclusion criteria target skeletally mature patients requiring Le Fort I osteotomy for Class II/III malocclusion with good oral hygiene and no active TMDs.

    Fully informed written consent is obtained prior to enrollment.

  2. CAD/CAM \& Manufacturing:

    Preoperative CT scans and digitized dental models. Cutting guides and Patient-specific titanium plates (Grade 5 titanium alloy) are manufactured.

  3. Intraoperative Fixation Procedures
  4. Postoperative Care \& Follow-Up
  5. Adverse Event (Harms) Reporting:

Any temporary or permanent adverse effects occurring during the trial are documented and recorded in patient files.

Plan for Missing Data \& Participant Retention Participant Retention Strategies: Patient phone numbers are recorded during written consent, and structured telephone reminders are made prior to every follow-up visit.

Adherence Verification: Patients are recalled at 1-week intervals and instructed to bring their medication packaging to verify postoperative drug compliance.

Statistical Analysis Plan Statistical analysis will be carried out. Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS advanced statistics (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Numerical data will be described as mean and standard deviation or median and range, as appropriate. Because of the small sample size, the comparisons between pre and post treatment will be done by Wilcoxon signed rank test. A p-value less than or equal to 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All tests will be two tailed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class III
  • Dentofacial Deformities
  • Osteotomy, Le Fort I

Keywords

  • Orthognathic Surgery
  • Le Fort I Osteotomy
  • Dentofacial Deformities
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class II
  • Malocclusion, Angle Class III
  • Milled Titanium Plates
  • 3D Printed Titanium Plates
03

In context

Malocclusion, Angle Class II

124 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class II; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 34 across 115 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class II.

Browse Malocclusion, Angle Class II studies →

Lead sponsor

Future University in Egypt is the lead sponsor of 104 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Skeletally mature patients (typically ≥ 18 years old) with fused growth plates.
  • Non-syndromic skeletal Class II or Class III malocclusion requiring a Le Fort I osteotomy (with or without mandibular involvement).
  • Patients with no signs or symptoms of active temporomandibular disorders (TMD).
  • Patients with good oral hygiene and no active periodontal disease that could affect tooth-borne guides.
  • Highly motivated patients.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refused to be included in the research and patients unable to comply with follow up Protocol.
  • Patients with systemic diseases may hinder the normal healing process or render the patient not fit for general anesthesia.
  • Craniofacial anomalies or syndromes (cleft lip/palate, syndromic deformities).
  • Previous orthognathic surgery or revision cases.
  • Patients with intra-bony lesions or infections that may retard the osteotomy healing.
  • History of maxillofacial trauma altering anatomy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    3D-Printed Patient-Specific Titanium Plates

    Participants in this group undergo Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary repositioning and fixation using 3D-printed (additive manufactured) patient-specific grade 5 titanium alloy plates. Plate placement is guided by pre-drilled reference holes established via CAD/CAM cutting guides and secured with 2.0-mm screws.

    Device: 3D-Printed Patient-Specific Titanium Plates

  • Active comparator
    Milled Patient-Specific Titanium Plates

    Participants in this group undergo Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary repositioning and fixation using milled (subtractive manufactured) patient-specific grade 5 titanium alloy plates. Plate placement is guided by pre-drilled reference holes established via CAD/CAM cutting guides and secured with 2.0-mm screws.

    Device: Milled Patient-Specific Titanium Plates

Interventions

  • Device3D-Printed Patient-Specific Titanium Plates

    Following a Le Fort I osteotomy performed with a reciprocating saw, the maxilla is repositioned and rigidly fixated using the 3D-printed patient-specific plates. Plate alignment is guided by 16 pre-drilled reference holes (8 per side) established using a customized cutting guide, and plates are secured using 2.0-mm screws

  • DeviceMilled Patient-Specific Titanium Plates

    Following a Le Fort I osteotomy performed with a reciprocating saw, the maxilla is repositioned and rigidly fixated using the milled patient-specific plates. Plate alignment is guided by the same 16 pre-drilled reference holes (8 per side) established via a customized cutting guide, and plates are secured using 2.0-mm screws

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of Surgical Transfer

    The primary outcome measures the precision with which the virtual surgical plan (P0/T0) is transferred to the actual surgical outcome (P1/T1). * Image Registration: The virtual surgical plan is superimposed onto the postoperative Computed Tomography (CT) scan using point-based matching Iterative Closest Point (ICP) registration, followed by manual surface-based best-fit registration targeting the stable skull base in Mimics 19.0 software. * Linear Measurement: Discrepancies between the planned and actual positions are measured from hard tissue reference points specifically the upper central incisor (U1) and upper first molars (16, 26): Vertical Deviation: Distance measured relative to the Frankfort Horizontal Plane (FHP). Anteroposterior Deviation: Distance measured relative to the Coronal Plane (CP). Mediolateral Deviation: Distance measured relative to the Mid-Facial Plane (MFP).

    Time frame: Immediate postoperative period (within the first week postoperatively)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Operative Time

    Operative time is defined as the total intraoperative duration required for all surgical procedures, including the positioning and fixation of the patient-specific titanium plate on the maxilla during Le Fort I osteotomy. The time is measured and recorded in minutes for each participant using a digital stopwatch, starting when the surgeon performs the first surgical incision and ending when the surgeon completes final closure suturing

    Time frame: Intraoperatively (from initial surgical incision to final suture closure)

  2. Postoperative Stability

    Evaluates the extent to which skeletal structures maintain their corrected position relative to the virtual surgical plan following Le Fort I osteotomy. Postoperative CT scans obtained within 1 week are imported into Mimics software and superimposed onto the virtual plan using stable skull base reference points. Linear deviations are evaluated at key hard tissue landmarks (central incisor U1, first molars 16 and 26) across three spatial dimensions

    Time frame: Immediate postoperative period (within 1 week postoperatively)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Future University in Egypt
    Cairo, New Cairo, Fifth Settlement 11835, Egypt
    Recruiting
    • Mohamed A Khedre, BDS, MSc candidate · Contact20253897@fue.edu.eg · +201091102408
    • Mohamed A Khedre, BDS, MSc candidate · Principal investigator
    • Lobna Abdelaziz, Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
    • Aya Magdy, Dr. · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Abdelhamid AM, Hassan AM, El-Mohandes WA. Accuracy Assessment of Customized Titanium Plates Compared to 3D-Printed Splints in Le Fort I Osteotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes. Cureus. 2025 May 15;17(5):e84151. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84151. eCollection 2025 May. PubMed 40519468 ↗
  • Cunningham SJ, Garratt AM, Hunt NP. Development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients with dentofacial deformity: II. Validity and responsiveness testing. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;30(2):81-90. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.300201.x. PubMed 12000348 ↗
  • Cunningham SJ, Garratt AM, Hunt NP. Development of a condition-specific quality of life measure for patients with dentofacial deformity: I. Reliability of the instrument. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000 Jun;28(3):195-201. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280305.x. PubMed 10830646 ↗
  • Zinser MJ, Sailer HF, Ritter L, Braumann B, Maegele M, Zoller JE. A paradigm shift in orthognathic surgery? A comparison of navigation, computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured splints, and "classic" intermaxillary splints to surgical transfer of virtual orthognathic planning. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Dec;71(12):2151.e1-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.07.007. PubMed 24237776 ↗
  • Buchanan EP, Hyman CH. LeFort I Osteotomy. Semin Plast Surg. 2013 Aug;27(3):149-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1357112. PubMed 24872761 ↗
  • Turvey T, Hall DJ, Fish LC, Epker BN. Surgical-orthodontic treatment planning for simultaneous mobilization of the maxilla and mandible in the correction of dentofacial deformities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 Nov;54(5):491-8. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90185-2. PubMed 6960302 ↗
  • Fish LC, Epker BN. Dentofacial deformities related to midface deficiencies. Integrated orthodontic-surgical correction. J Clin Orthod. 1987 Sep;21(9):654-64. No abstract available. PubMed 3482095 ↗
  • Hanafy M, Akoush Y, Abou-ElFetouh A, Mounir RM. Precision of orthognathic digital plan transfer using patient-specific cutting guides and osteosynthesis versus mixed analogue-digitally planned surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jan;49(1):62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.06.023. Epub 2019 Jun 29. PubMed 31262680 ↗
  • Heufelder M, Wilde F, Pietzka S, Mascha F, Winter K, Schramm A, Rana M. Clinical accuracy of waferless maxillary positioning using customized surgical guides and patient specific osteosynthesis in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017 Sep;45(9):1578-1585. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2017.06.027. Epub 2017 Jul 8. PubMed 28793965 ↗
  • Bai S, Bo B, Bi Y, Wang B, Zhao J, Liu Y, Feng Z, Shang H, Zhao Y. CAD/CAM surface templates as an alternative to the intermediate wafer in orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Nov;110(5):e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.05.052. Epub 2010 Sep 1. PubMed 20813559 ↗
  • Levine JP, Patel A, Saadeh PB, Hirsch DL. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniomaxillofacial surgery: the new state of the art. J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Jan;23(1):288-93. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241ba92. PubMed 22337427 ↗
  • Kusnoto B. Two-dimensional cephalometry and computerized orthognathic surgical treatment planning. Clin Plast Surg. 2007 Jul;34(3):417-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2007.04.005. PubMed 17692701 ↗
  • Ellis E 3rd. Accuracy of model surgery: evaluation of an old technique and introduction of a new one. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Nov;48(11):1161-7. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(90)90532-7. PubMed 1698956 ↗
  • Ellis E 3rd. Bimaxillary surgery using an intermediate splint to position the maxilla. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Jan;57(1):53-6. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90633-x. No abstract available. PubMed 9915396 ↗
  • Bai S, Shang H, Liu Y, Zhao J, Zhao Y. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing locating guides accompanied with prebent titanium plates in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;70(10):2419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.12.017. Epub 2012 Apr 18. No abstract available. PubMed 22516840 ↗
  • Lin HH, Lo LJ. Three-dimensional computer-assisted surgical simulation and intraoperative navigation in orthognathic surgery: a literature review. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Apr;114(4):300-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Mar 3. PubMed 25744942 ↗
  • Haas OL Jr, Becker OE, de Oliveira RB. Computer-aided planning in orthognathic surgery-systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov 25:S0901-5027(14)00430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.025. Online ahead of print. PubMed 25432508 ↗
  • Ong TK, Banks RJ, Hildreth AJ. Surgical accuracy in Le Fort I maxillary osteotomies. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Apr;39(2):96-102. doi: 10.1054/bjom.2000.0577. PubMed 11286442 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07841067
Responsible party
Mohamed Ashraf Mohamed Mohamed Khedre (MSc Candidate in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Future University in Egypt, Future University in Egypt) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion