CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03905837Updated Aug 25, 2021

Impact of Lidocaine Administration on Postoperative Complications During Lung Resection Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lidocaine and Remifentanil in Lung Diseases, Lung Inflammation and Lung Injury, Acute, sponsored by Francisco Andres de la Gala. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-25.

Sponsored by Francisco Andres de la Gala · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the intravenous (IV) or paravertebral (PV) lidocaine administration during the intraoperative period of lung resection surgery on the appearance of postoperative complications. We design a randomized, controlled and blinded study to be performed in 153 patients with 3 arms: 1) Lidocaine IV + PV saline 2) saline IV + PV lidocaine, 3) remifentanil IV + PV saline. Perioperative analysis of inflammatory biomarkers in bronchoalveolar lavage and serum. Follow-up of the postoperative course, especially the appearance of postoperative complications according to the revised Clavien-Dindo classification for thoracic surgery, as well as other relevant clinical results.

Read the detailed description

Postoperative pulmonary complications continue to be one of the main causes of morbidity, mortality and increase in hospital stay in patients undergoing surgical procedures requiring anesthesia. Its incidence in lung resection surgery is greater than in other non-cardiac major surgeries due to damage of structures related to respiratory function.

Furthermore, during lung resection surgery there is an exaggerated pulmonary inflammatory response related to the use of one-lung ventilation and / or the lung damage produced by the collapse of the operated lung as well as the surgical manipulation itself.

Recently, in a clinical trial on 180 patients (NCT 02168751), our researcher group observed that the attenuation of the pulmonary inflammatory response through the use of halogenated anesthetic agents, was related to a decrease in the appearance of postoperative pulmonary complications after lung resection surgery. In addition, the presence, in bronchoalveolar lavages, of elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukine(IL)-6 and the IL-6 / IL10 ratio were independent predictors of the risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications.

Lidocaine is a local anesthetic that blocks nerve conduction by blocking sodium channels. In addition it has been known for experimental and clinical studies of its immunomodulatory properties.

Clinical studies performed in different surgeries show that a continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine during surgery is associated with a lower inflammatory response assessed by monitoring plasma cytokines, as well as less postoperative pain, a shorter duration of postoperative paralytic ileus and a early hospital discharge.

Currently, there is no clinical study that has evaluated the role of intravenous lidocaine on the pulmonary inflammatory response and the subsequent lung damage that inevitably occurs during lung resection surgery with periods of one lung ventilation.

Currently, some experts are proposing the replacement of thoracic epidural and paravertebral analgesia by the intravenous infusion of lidocaine and minor analgesics, for fast-track programs, based on their analgesic and anti-inflammatory capacity and on avoiding the risks inherent in the insertion of an epidural or paravertebral catheter.

Hypothesis: The administration of intravenous or paravertebral lidocaine during lung resection surgery attenuates the exaggerated inflammatory response that inevitably occurs in this surgical intervention. The lower expression of pro-inflammatory mediators will be associated with a lower rate of postoperative complications that are related to the perioperative inflammatory process.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Diseases
  • Lung Inflammation
  • Lung Injury, Acute
  • Postoperative Complications

Keywords

  • lidocaine
  • postoperative complications
  • thoracic surgery
03

In context

Pneumonia

2,044 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 156 is above the median of 106 across 1,247 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Francisco Andres de la Gala is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients of both sexes undergoing lung resection surgery at the Thoracic Surgery Service at the Gregorio Maranón hospital.
  • Patients who voluntarily accept to participate in the study and sign the informed consent
  • Age> 18 years and legally capable
  • Scheduled surgery.
  • Functional respiratory tests with forced expiratory volume at one second > 50% or forced vital capacity > 50% preoperatively performed on these patients routinely.
  • Not having been on chronic treatment with oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants three months before surgery.
  • Patients without previous history of liver disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • Known hypersensitivity to amide-type local anesthetics.
  • Transfusion of blood products in the previous 10 days.
  • Impossibility of performing mechanical ventilation for pulmonary protection.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
156 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine IV

    Group 1: intravenous lidocaine and paravertebral saline (SF). In this group during intraoperative anesthetic maintenance, a continuous intravenous infusion of lidocaine at 1.5mg/kg/h until the end of surgery and perfusion of 0.9% SF through the intraoperative paravertebral catheter at a rate of 0.1ml/kg/h will be administered.

    Drug: Lidocaine

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine PV

    Group 2: intravenous SF and paravertebral lidocaine. During anesthesia maintenance, a continuous intravenous infusion of 0.9% SF and an infusion of 2% lidocaine will be administered through the intraoperative paravertebral catheter at a rate of 0.1 ml/kg/h.

    Drug: Lidocaine

  • Active comparator
    no lidocaine

    Group 3: intravenous remifentanil and paravertebral SF. During the maintenance of anesthesia, a continuous intravenous infusion of remifentanil at a rate of 0.1 mg/kg/min until the end of surgery and an infusion of 0.9% SF through the intraoperative paravertebral catheter at a rate of 0.1 ml / kg / h.

    Drug: Remifentanil

Interventions

  • DrugLidocaine

    Intravenous or paravertebral lidocaine

    Also known as: Lignocaine, N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N2,N2-diethylglycinamide

  • DrugRemifentanil

    intravenous remifentanil

    Also known as: methyl 1-(2-methoxycarbonylethyl)-4-(phenyl-propanoyl-amino)-piperidine-4-carboxylate

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative complications

    to compare the proportion of patients included in the different scales of the Clavien-Dindo classification of postoperative complications reviewed for thoracic surgery in the three groups of patients. Patients will be followed from the day of hospital admission until hospital discharge and up to 30 days after the surgery

    Time frame: up to 30 days after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. gas exchange

    Compare the gas exchange (PaO2 / FiO2) at 24 hours after the intervention between the three groups of the study.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Differences between three groups in Inflammatory biomarkers (IL 1, IL 2, IL 6, IL 8, IL 10, TNF alpha, MCP-1) measure in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage during 24 hours after the surgery.

    To evaluate the effect of intravenous lidocaine on the inflammatory response in lung resection surgery by measuring the inflammatory biomarkers (Interleukin(IL) 1, IL 2, IL 6, IL8, IL 10, tumor necrosis factor alfa and monocyte chemoattractant protein) in serum and in bronchoalveolar lavage, compared to the other two groups of patients. Blood samples are taken at the beginning of the surgery, at the end of the one lung ventilation, and at 24 hours postoperatively. Bronchoalveolar lavage is done just before the beginning of one lung ventilation and at the end of one lung ventilation

    Time frame: up to 24 hours of intervention

  3. Analgesic requirements of opioids in the first 24 hours after the surgery

    To compare the analgesic requirements of opioids in the immediate postoperative period (first 24 hours after the surgery) between the three groups of the study. When patients will be admitted in the postoperative care Unit a patient controlled analgesia pump of intravenous morphine 0,1% (bolus of 1mg) will be connected. The total dose of morphine self-administered by the patient in the first 24 hours after surgery will be recorded.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Special Care Units stay

    To compare the average stay (measure in hours) in Special Care Units among the three groups of the study

    Time frame: up to 30 days after intervention

  5. Hospital stay

    To compare the average hospital stay (measure in days) among the three groups of the study

    Time frame: up to 30 days after intervention

  6. Re-admissions in Special Care Units

    To compare the number of re-admissions in Special Care Units among the three groups of the study in the 30 days after the intervention.

    Time frame: up to 30 days after intervention

  7. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction measure by mini mental state examination

    To analyze the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in the three groups by comparing the mini mental state examination performed at admission and 3 days after the intervention.

    Time frame: up to 3 days after intervention

  8. Neuro-inflammatory response measure by the synthesis of protein S-100 beta in serum

    To evaluated the neuro-inflammatory response by the synthesis of protein S-100 beta measured in serum in the first 24 hours postoperatively in the three groups of patients. Blood samples are taken at the beginning of the surgery, at the end of the one lung ventilation, and at 24 hours postoperatively

    Time frame: up to 24 hours after intervention

  9. Neuro-inflammatory response measure by the synthesis of neuronal specific enolase in serum

    To evaluated the neuro-inflammatory response by the synthesis of neuronal specific enolase measured in serum in the first 24 hours postoperatively in the three groups of patients. Blood samples are taken at the beginning of the surgery, at the end of the one lung ventilation, and at 24 hours postoperatively

    Time frame: up to 24 hours after intervention

  10. Neuro-inflammatory response measure by the synthesis of glial fibrillary acidic protein

    To evaluated the neuro-inflammatory response by the synthesis of glial fibrillary acidic protein measured in serum in the first 24 hours postoperatively in the three groups of patients. Blood samples are taken at the beginning of the surgery, at the end of the one lung ventilation, and at 24 hours postoperatively

    Time frame: up to 24 hours after intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Gregorio Maranon
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • De la Gala F, Pineiro P, Reyes A, Simon C, Vara E, Rancan L, Huerta LJ, Gonzalez G, Benito C, Munoz M, Grande P, Paredes SD, Aznar PT, Perez A, Martinez D, Higuero F, Sanz D, De Miguel JP, Cruz P, Olmedilla L, Lopez Gil E, Duque P, Sanchez-Pedrosa G, Valle M, Garutti I. Effect of intraoperative paravertebral or intravenous lidocaine versus control during lung resection surgery on postoperative complications: A randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Nov 6;20(1):622. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3677-9. PubMed 31694684 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 25, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03905837
Lead sponsor
Francisco Andres de la Gala
Collaborators
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Responsible party
Francisco Andres de la Gala (Anesthesiologist. MD. PhD, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 5, 2019
Start date
Jan 28, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 2, 2021
Completion
Jul 2, 2021
Last update
Aug 25, 2021

Study contacts

Francisco de la Gala, MD PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Gregorio Maranon

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion