ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07843017LANDCAP 2Updated Nov 5, 2026

Inhaled Lexofloxacin vs Usual Care for Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Inhaled levofloxacin and Standard-of-care / Usual care in Community-acquired Pneumonia, CAP and Community Acquired Pneumonia, sponsored by Copenhagen Respiratory Research. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Copenhagen Respiratory Research · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 5, 2026Now Active, not recruitingFirst site in Denmark+4 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
460
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial aims to determine whether treatment with inhaled levofloxacin (an antibiotic) is equal to systemic antibiotic treatment (usual care) for patients admitted to a hospital with community-acquired pneumonia in regards to treatment-effect and safety parameters.

Additionally, this study will assess if treatment with inhaled antibiotics leads to fewer antibiotic side-effects and a more preserved gastro-intestinal microbial environment.

The main question this study aims to answer is:

Does inhaled levofloxacin 240mg twice daily result in comparable days alive and out of hospital at 14 days compared to standard-of-care (usual care) antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in admitted patients?

Secondary questions this study aims to answer are:

  1. Does treatment with inhaled levofloxacin reduce proportion of patients with antibiotic side-effects?
  2. Does treatment with inhaled levofloxacin lead to preserved diversity in the gut microbiome?
  3. Is treatment with inhaled levofloxacin comparable with usual care in regards to patient reported outcomes?

The above list is not the complete list of questions this study aims to answer, but serves as highlights.

Read the detailed description

Community-acquired pneumonia is common and potentially fatal. Standard-of-care treatment mainly consists of systemic antibiotics and treatment supporting recovery (e.g. oxygen-therapy, fluid rescucitation, respiratory physiotherapy, sufficient dietary intake etc.). As with all medicinal treatments, antibiotic treatment is hard on the body and can lead to side-effects as well as organ-failure in extreme cases.

Antibiotic treatment naturally promotes antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which result in less effective antibiotic treatment, and ultimately it could potentially lead to antibiotics being rendered useless in treating infections such as pneumonia.

A strategy to reduce the promotion of antimicrobial restistance (AMR) is better targeting of the disease-inducing microbes and several other strategies exists. Physicians and researchers usually categorize the targeting of disease-promoting microbes as either "local"/"topical" or "systemic". No "local" treatment of community-acquired pneumonia has been demonstrated to this day, but "local" treatment is theoretically possible with inhaled antibiotics. This treatment strategy has been hypothesized in the last decade, but no studies have been conducted regarding community-acquired pneumonia.

This study will include 460 patients and be conducted in two stages: Stage A and Stage B, each stage including 230 patients.

Patients are included voluntarilty and with prior written informed consent.

Patients included in stage A will be treated with systemic antibiotics for 24 hours and will then be randomized to further treatment with either inhaled levofloxacin 240mg twice daily or continue the "usual care"-treatment that they were receiving. The duration of intervention is up to 5 days.

At 230 included patients a planned interrim analysis will be conducted by an appointed data safety monitoring board of certified healthcare professionals to assess the further continuation of the trial. If favorable assessment, the trial will commence to Stage B.

Patients included in Stage B will be randomized at admission to either usual standard-of-care treatment for 5 days OR inhaled levofloxacin 240mg twice daily for 5 days.

The trial is open-label, which means that both patients and healthcare professionals will know which treatment arm the patient is receiving.

02

Conditions studied

  • Community-acquired Pneumonia
  • CAP
  • Community Acquired Pneumonia
  • Pneumonia
  • Microbial Composition

Keywords

  • Inhaled antibiotics
  • Nebulized antibiotics
  • Aerosolized antibiotics
  • Levofloxacin
  • Flourquinolone
  • CAP
  • Pneumonia
  • Community-acquired
  • Community acquired
03

In context

Community-Acquired Pneumonia

324 studies on the registry are indexed under Community-Acquired Pneumonia; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 460 is above the median of 250 across 195 interventional studies indexed under Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Browse Community-Acquired Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

Copenhagen Respiratory Research is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Hospital admission within 24 hours.
  2. Clinical suspicion of community-acquired pneumonia necessitating antibiotic treatment.

    Defined as one or more of the following:

    • Chest X-ray, CT or ultrasound findings consistent with bacterial pneumonia*
    • Symptoms consistent with bacterial pneumonia (such as dyspnea, tachypnea, cough or purulent sputum)
  3. C-reactive protein >50 mg/L OR central body temperature >38.0 °C OR blood leukocytes ≥10.0×109/L (1-3 of these fulfilled).
  4. Age ≥ 18 years.
  5. Able to give .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Suspected septic shock defined as MAP \< 65 mmHg on sequential measurements despite adequate volume resuscitation.
  2. Oxygen requirement >4L/min to maintain acceptable peripheral oxygen saturation*.
  3. Significant suspicion of an infection with a focus other than the lungs
  4. for fluoroquinolone treatment, including but not limited to:

    • Known allergy to fluoroquinolones or a serious adverse reaction when previously treated with a fluoroquinolone.
    • Medical history of myasthenia gravis.
  5. Reduced kidney function ( \< 20 mL/min/1.73 m²).
  6. Suspected aspiration pneumonia, pulmonary abscess, or pleural empyema / complicated parapneumonic effusion.
  7. Suspicion of cardiac conduction disorders/arrhythmias or prolonged (QTc (f) > 480ms).
  8. Pregnancy**.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
460 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard-of-care (Control)

    Systemic antibiotic treatment

    Drug: Standard-of-care / Usual care

  • Experimental
    Inhaled levofloxacin

    Drug: Inhaled levofloxacin

Interventions

  • Inhaled levofloxacin 240mg twice daily

  • DrugStandard-of-care / Usual care

    Standard-of-care / Usual care deemed of antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia assessed by the treating physician

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. DAOH14

    Days alive and out of hospital day 14

    Time frame: From inclusion to 14 days after

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All reasonable requests will be considered for pseudo-anonymized datasharing in accordance with applicable law of datasharing in the state of Denmark.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: At earliest 1 year after Last patients last visit.

Access criteria: To be determined

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

3 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 22 months after the start.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Oct 2026, on Nov 5, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 21, 2026
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
StartActual
Oct 8, 2026was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2029
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Nov 5, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in Denmark
Show site
  • Herlev and Gentofte University hospital · Gentofte Municipality, Denmark
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Sep 28, 2026→Oct 8, 2026 (actual)
Nov 5, 2026
Title
An Open-label, Multicenter, Parallel-group Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing Non-inferiority of Inhaled Lexofloxacin vs Usual Care for Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Sep 30, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 3 updates
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    1 site added — first site in Denmark
    Show site
    • Herlev and Gentofte University hospital · Gentofte Municipality, Denmark
    Start date Sep 28, 2026→Oct 8, 2026 (now actual)
    + 1 other change: contact details
  2. Sep 30, 2026
    Title An Open-label, Multicenter, Parallel-group Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing Non-inferiority of Inhaled Lexofloxacin vs Usual Care for Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
  3. Sep 25, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07843017
Lead sponsor
Copenhagen Respiratory Research
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 25, 2026
Start date
Oct 8, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Jens-Ulrik S Jensen, Professor, PhD, Medical Doctor
study director · Copenhagen Respiratory Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Levofloxacin

Start the discussion