CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03883555preopticapUpdated Mar 25, 2019

High Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy for Early Management of Acute Hypercapnic Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema in the Emergency Department

An observational study in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema and Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-25.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Montpellier · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
32
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

High flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has not been well evaluated for treating hypercapnia The purpose of this study is to determine whether high flow nasal therapy (HFNT) can decrease hypercapnia and improve respiratory distress parameters in Emergency Department patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure related to cardiogenic pulmonary edema and to compare its efficacy to that of non invasive ventilation.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective observational study conducted as a preliminary study to the randomized controlled OPTICAP trial (NCT02874339).

Prospective observational exploratory study including ED patients with a suspected diagnosis of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure related to cardiogenic pulmonary edema who require NIV according to the joint recommendations from the French society of anaesthesia and intensive care and the French society for intensive care.

Patients will receive a 1hr treatment session by either NIV or HFNT, depending on the attending ED physician expertise in using HFNT Repeat evaluation of arterial blood gases and respiratory parameters and dyspnea will be performed before and after treatment sessions according to current guidelines.

Improvement in PaCO2 and other respiratory parameters after 1hr treatment by HFNT will be analysed and compared to that of NIV.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
  • Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • Acute cardiogenic pulmonary
  • Respiratory failure
  • Hypercapnia
  • High flow nasal oxygen
  • Non invasive ventilation
  • Emergency department
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 32 is below the median of 100 across 545 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier is the lead sponsor of 1,244 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

patients admitted for acute respiratory failure secondary to acute cardiogenic lung edema with hypercapnia

Inclusion criteria

a suspected diagnosis of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema presenting with any of the following criteria:

  • dyspnea (orthopnea or a worsening of dyspnea according to NYHA criteria)
  • respiratory rate >20 b/min
  • bilateral crepitant rales at pulmonary auscultation
  • pulmonary infiltrate on chest X-ray

signs of respiratory failure or any of the following clinical, laboratory or radiology signs:

  • Use of accessory respiratory muscles or paradoxical abdominal movement
  • Cardiomegaly (cardiothoracic ratio >0.5)
  • Hypertensive crisis
  • PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mmHg breathing O2> 8L/min or PaO2 ≤ 63mmHg breathing room air

hypercapnia (PaCO2>45 mmHg at arterial blood gas analysis)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or associated dyspnea from non cardiac origin
  • Fever (>38,5°), sepsis or ongoing infection
  • Contra-indication to NIV
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
32 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Optiflow tm

    High flow nasal therapy (HFNT)

    Device: High flow nasal therapy (HFNT) : Optiflow™

  • Non invasive ventilation (NIV)

    Non invasive ventilation (NIV)

    Device: Non invasive ventilation (niv)

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh flow nasal therapy (HFNT) : Optiflow™

    HFNT will be administered through a heated humidifier (Airvo 2, Fisher and Paykel healthcare) and applied through large bore binasal prongs. Initial gas flow rate will be set at of 60 l/min and adjusted to 40-50 l/min based on patient's tolerance. FiO2 will be adjusted to maintain an SpO2 ≥ 92%. Initial temperature will be set at 37° and reduced according to patient's tolerance

    Also known as: High flow nasal cannula, High flow nasal oxygen, Optiflow™

  • DeviceNon invasive ventilation (niv)

    NIV will be delivered through a face mask connected to a dedicated ventilator with pressure support applied in a noninvasive ventilation mode (Monnal T75, Airliquide Medical Systems, Antony, France). The Pressure-support level will be adjusted to obtain an expired tidal volume of 6-8 ml/kg of predicted body weight and a respiratory rate of 25-30 b/min. PEEP (range 5-10 cm of water) and FiO2 will be adjusted to maintain an SpO2 ≥92% and to patient's comfort.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in PaCO2 after a 1-hour treatment session

    PaCO2 will be measured from standard laboratory arterial blood gas analysis performed at the end of the first 1-hour-treatment session

    Time frame: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. blood gas (PaO2, pH, SaO2)

    blood gas (PaO2, pH, SaO2) measured from standard laboratory arterial blood gas analysis at the end of each 1h-ventilatory support session and throughout ventilatory support

    Time frame: at 1 hour

  2. Respiratory rate

    Respiratory rate, measured over 1-min as part of standard clinical assessment after each 1h ventilatory support session and throughout ventilatory support

    Time frame: at 1 hour

  3. signs of increased work of breathing

    signs of increased work of breathing assessed based on patient's use of accessory respiratory muscles and paradoxical abdominal movement and measured using 5-point likert scales ranging from 1 to 5. Signs of increased work of berthing will be assessed at the end of each 1h ventilatory support sessions throughout ventilatory support

    Time frame: at 1 hour

  4. Dyspnea

    Dyspnea recorded by the patient using a Modified Borg scale ranging from 0 to 10. Dyspnea will be measured at the end of each 1h ventilatory support sessions and throughout ventilatory support

    Time frame: at 1 hour

  5. comfort

    Comfort recorded by the patient using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10. Comfort will be assessed at the end of each 1h ventilatory support sessions and throughout ventilatory support

    Time frame: at 1 hour

  6. Proportion of patients

    Proportion of patients with a normalized PaCO2 (PaCO2 equal or lower than 45 mmHg),

    Time frame: at 1 hour

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Uhmontpellier
    Montpellier, 34295, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Marjanovic N, Flacher A, Drouet L, Gouhinec AL, Said H, Vigneau JF, Chollet B, Lefebvre S, Sebbane M. High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Early Emergency Department Management of Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure Due to Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema. Respir Care. 2020 Sep;65(9):1241-1249. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07278. Epub 2020 Apr 14. PubMed 32291308 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 25, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03883555
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Montpellier
Collaborators
Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 21, 2019
Start date
Feb 1, 2015
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2016
Completion
Sep 30, 2016
Last update
Mar 25, 2019

Study contacts

Mustapha Sebbane, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Montpellier

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion