ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03881930REQ-PROUpdated May 27, 2026

Balance Rehabilitation With Modified Visual Input in Patients With Neuropathy

An interventional study of Balance rehabilitation with modified visual input and Balance rehabilitation with no modified visual input in Neuropathy, Ataxia and Proprioceptive Disorders, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-27.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2019; still recruiting 7 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research focuses on the effects of rehabilitation on balance, in patients with acquired chronic demyelinating neuropathy. Rehabilitation will be performed with or without vision.

It is planned to include 40 subjects consulting for walking instability related to sensitivity disorders.

This multicenter study will take place in Paris's area. Each participant will benefit from 20 rehabilitation sessions with a Physical Therapist and 3 assessments.

Thanks to randomization, patient will be allocated in one of the 2 following groups:

  • Control group, Patients will benefit from balance rehabilitation with open eyes.
  • Experimental group, they will perform the same exercises while keeping their eyes closed or their vision will be obstructed by a mask or disturbed by moving luminous dots projected on the environment in darkness.
Read the detailed description

Patients with chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathy may be referred for instability or falls when walking. Some of them have complaints of dysesthesia, paresthesia. The majority of these patients, due to the involvement of large sensory fibres, have deep and superficial sensitivity disorders (hypoesthesia or anaesthesia), which explain proprioceptive ataxia and balance disorders.

In a given situation, an individual maintains his or her balance thanks to sensory information, among which he or she may have to choose the most appropriate one for the context. A good balance control depends on the ability to select the best information, but many subjects do not have, or have lost, this ability, giving too systematically priority to the same sensory input. This is what is called sensory preferences or sensory profiles that differ from one subject to another. The most common behaviour is visual dependence.

This tendency to visual dependence has been described in different pathological situations, especially after a stroke. Research has shown that specific rehabilitation in visual deprivation can reduce visual dependence and improve balance and walking autonomy in stroke patients.

The investigators have shown in previous work that patients with acquired chronic demyelinating neuropathy have ataxic symptomatology with a visual dependence behavior, while a good sensitivity to vibration stimulation of proprioceptive pathways persists. The proprioceptive potential still present seems to be under-used.

Rehabilitation of patients with peripheral neuropathy involves many techniques, such as muscle strengthening, vibration, virtual reality, Tai chi, electrical stimulation, etc. However, some techniques, such as the use of virtual reality or visual biofeedback, tend to increase the use of the visual input, which could be detrimental to other inputs. The specific approach to balance disorders in these patients through manipulation of the visual input has, to our knowledge, not been studied. This is the objective of the study.

The main hypothesis of this research is that rehabilitation with modified visual input can, by reducing visual dependence, strengthen the proprioceptive input that still appears to be available in these patients with acquired chronic demyelinating neuropathy, despite deficits already present, and thus improve balance and walking ability.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuropathy
  • Ataxia
  • Proprioceptive Disorders
  • Balance; Distorted

Keywords

  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Balance
  • Proprioceptive Disorders
  • Visual dependence
  • Rehabilitation
  • Physical Therapy
03

In context

Ataxia

149 studies on the registry are indexed under Ataxia; 37 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is above the median of 30 across 100 interventional studies indexed under Ataxia.

Browse Ataxia studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with chronic demyelinating acquired neuropathy
  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Patients able to walk 20 meters without human assistance at least indoors with or without technical assistance.
  • Patients with complaints such as discomfort, walking instability related to sensitivity disorders.
  • Patients being clinically stable for at least 2 months, regardless of ongoing treatments.
  • Patients who have provided consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to walk 20 metres without technical and human assistance indoors.
  • Patients with an ongoing hospitalization.
  • Patients already included and participating in another intervention study.
  • Patients with ongoing balance rehabilitation and continued during the REQ-PRO program in another rehabilitation centre or practice.
  • Patients with ongoing acute treatment (related to polyneuropathy) started less than 2 months ago or stopped less than 2 months ago.
  • Patients with scheduled surgery during the period of the patient's participation in the protocol, preventing the successful completion of the rehabilitation program and participation in assessments.
  • Patients with recent surgery, in particular lower limb prosthesis (less than 1 year old) or equipment for planned exercises such as standing kneeling positions.
  • Patients with skin wounds on the foot that contraindicate rehabilitation.
  • Patients with balance disorders of vestibular origin or central neurological pathology.
  • Patients with a visual disability.
  • Patients with a hearing impairment that prevents the patient from hearing and understanding instructions during the rehabilitation program or assessments.
  • Patients with an inability to speak or understand the French language.
  • Patients with cognitive or language impairments that prevent understanding of the protocol.
  • Patients with a residence outside of the Paris Region (Ile de France).
  • Patients with a known pregnancy.
  • Patients not affiliated to a social security system (beneficiary or having a right), deprived of their right, under guardianship, curatorship, prisoner.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    Balance rehabilitation with modified visual input: In experimental group, patients with chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathy will benefit from 20 rehabilitation sessions with a Physical Therapist and 3 assessments. They will perform balance training with modified visual input.

    Other: Balance rehabilitation with modified visual input

  • Active comparator
    control group

    Balance rehabilitation with no modified visual input: In control group, patients with chronic acquired demyelinating neuropathy will benefit from 20 rehabilitation sessions with a Physical Therapist and 3 assessments. They will perform balance training with no modified visual input.

    Other: Balance rehabilitation with no modified visual input

Interventions

  • OtherBalance rehabilitation with modified visual input

    Patients will perform the exercises alternatively: while keeping their eyes closed or their vision will be obstructed by a opaque mask or disturbed by moving luminous dots projected on the environment in a dark room without any visual reference cues.

  • OtherBalance rehabilitation with no modified visual input

    Patients will perform the exercises while keeping their eyes openned

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. U-turn time of realization, in seconds, realized at a comfortable speed measured with accelerometers just after the end of the rehabilitation program

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at a comfortable speed by the time of realization, in seconds, of the U-turn, measured with accelerometers between 2 to 8 days after 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

Secondary outcomes

  1. U-turn time of realization, in seconds, realized at comfortable speed, measured with accelerometers 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn with eyes open realized at comfortable speed, by the time of realization, in seconds, of the U-turn measured with accelerometers between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  2. U-turn time of realization, in seconds, realized at fast speed, measured with accelerometers just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn with eyes open realized at fast speed, by the time of realization, in seconds, of the U-turn measured with accelerometers between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  3. U-turn time of realization, in seconds, realized at fast speed, measured with accelerometers 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn with eyes open realized at fast speed, by the time of realization, in seconds, of the U-turn measured with accelerometers between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  4. Number of external steps of the U-turn realized at a comfortable speed, measured with accelerometers just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at comfortable speed by the number of external steps of the U-turn measured with accelerometers between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  5. Number of external steps of the U-turn realized at a comfortable speed, measured with accelerometers 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at a comfortable speed by the number of external steps of the U-turn measured with accelerometers between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  6. Number of external steps of the U-turn realized at fast speed, measured with accelerometers just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at fast speed by the number of external steps of the U-turn measured with accelerometers between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  7. Number of external steps of the U-turn realized at fast speed, measured with accelerometers 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at fast speed by the number of external steps of the U-turn measured with accelerometers between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  8. The double stance phase time, walking 20 meters, realized at a comfortable speed, measured with accelerometers just after the end of the rehabilitation program

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at comfortable speed by the double stance phase in %, to walk 20 meters, measured with accelerometers between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  9. The double stance phase, walking 20 meters, realized at a comfortable speed, measured with accelerometers 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at a comfortable speed by the double stance phase in %, to walk 20 meters, measured with accelerometers between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  10. The double stance phase, walking 20 meters during walking with a U-turn, realized at fast speed, measured with accelerometers just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at fast speed by the double stance phase in %, to walk 20 meters, measured with accelerometers between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  11. The double stance phase, walking 20 meters, realized at fast speed, measured with accelerometers 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at fast speed by the double stance phase in %, to walk 20 meters, measured with accelerometers between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  12. Global amount of movement during walking with a U-turn realized at a comfortable speed, measured with accelerometers just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at comfortable speed by global amount of movement (related to oscillations and abruptness of the gesture) measured with accelerometers between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  13. Global amount of movement during walking with a U-turn, realized at a comfortable speed, measured with accelerometers 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at a comfortable speed by global amount of movement (related to oscillations and abruptness of the gesture), measured with accelerometers between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  14. Global amount of movement during walking with a U-turn realized at fast speed, measured with accelerometers just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at fast speed by the global amount of movement (related to oscillations and abruptness of the gesture), measured with accelerometers between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  15. Global amount of movement during walking with a U-turn realized at fast speed, measured with accelerometers 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance during walking with a U-turn realized with eyes open at fast speed by global amount of movement (related to oscillations and abruptness of the gesture), measured with accelerometers between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  16. Time in seconds, to walk 10 meters, realized with open eyes at a comfortable speed just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate the balance by the Time in seconds, to walk 10 meters, realized with open eyes at a comfortable speed between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  17. Time in seconds, to walk 10 meters, realized with open eyes at a comfortable speed 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation.

    Evaluate the balance by the Time in seconds, to walk 10 meters, realized with open eyes at a comfortable speed between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  18. The number of steps, to walk 10 meters with open eyes at a comfortable speed just after the end of the rehabilitation

    Evaluate the balance by the the number of steps, to walk 10 meters with open eyes at a comfortable speed between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

  19. The number of steps, to walk 10 meters with open eyes at a comfortable speed 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation

    Evaluate the balance by the the number of steps, to walk 10 meters with open eyes at a comfortable speed between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  20. The Goggle Task performed just after the end of the rehabilitation program

    Evaluate the balance by the Goggle Task, the ratio: time in seconds, to walk 10 meters, in visual deprivation at comfortable speed / time in seconds, to walk 10 meters, eyes open at comfortable speed just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

  21. The Goggle Task performed 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation

    Evaluate the balance by the Goggle Task, the ratio: time in seconds, to walk 10 meters, in visual deprivation at comfortable speed / time in seconds, to walk 10 meters, eyes open at comfortable speed between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  22. The times, in seconds, of descent and ascent of a staircase floor, realized just after the end of the rehabilitation program

    Evaluate balance by the times, in seconds, of descent and ascent of a staircase floor, realized with open eyes between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  23. The times, in seconds, of descent and ascent of a staircase floor, realized 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation

    Evaluate balance by the times, in seconds, of descent and ascent of a staircase floor, realized with open eyes between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  24. Romberg quotient collected just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate balance by the Romberg quotient collected during a static stabilometry test between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

  25. Romberg quotient collected 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation

    Evaluate balance by the Romberg quotient collected during a static stabilometry test between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  26. Sensory preference realized just after the end of the rehabilitation program

    Determine the sensory profile of the patient by the sensory preference score after visual and proprioceptive stimuli between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

  27. Sensory preference realized 2 months after from the end of the rehabilitation

    Determine the sensory profile of the patient by the sensory preference score after visual and proprioceptive stimuli between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

    Time frame: between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

  28. Monofilament test 10 g just after the end of the rehabilitation program.

    Evaluate the superficial sensitivity to tact on the sole of the foot by the monofilament test 10 g (Semmes-Weinstein 5.07) between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  29. Monofilament test 10 g, 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation.

    Evaluate the superficial sensitivity to tact on the sole of the foot by the monofilament test 10 g (Semmes-Weinstein 5.07) between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  30. Score of kinesthetic sensitivity in the lower limbs just after the end of the rehabilitation program

    Evaluate sensitivity by a score of kinesthetic sensitivity in the lower limbs between 2 to 8 days

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

  31. Score of kinesthetic sensitivity in the lower limbs, 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation.

    Evaluate sensitivity by a score of kinesthetic sensitivity in the lower limbs between 60 to 70 days

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  32. Merkies palatal score in the lower limbs just after the end of the rehabilitation program

    Evaluate sensitivity by the Merkies palatal score in the lower limbs between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

  33. Merkies palatal score in the lower limbs 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation

    Evaluate sensitivity by the Merkies palatal score in the lower limbs between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  34. Simplified version of the "Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale just after the end of the rehabilitation program

    Evaluate the person's confidence in his or her balance, in the activities of daily living Simplified version of the "Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale between 2 to 8 days:the 20th and last rehabilitation session. Questionnaire made of 15 statements to assess the person's degree of confidence in his or her balance associated with activities of daily life in both the home environment and in the community environment. The questionnaire is part of this research administered by the evaluator. Add the scores obtained to the 15 items to obtain an overall score out of 45. The score is converted to a pourcentage.

    Time frame: Between 2 to 8 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

  35. Simplified version of the "Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale 2 months after the end of the rehabilitation.

    Evaluate the person's confidence in his or her balance, in the activities of daily living Simplified version of the "Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale between ¬60 to 70 days: the 20th and last rehabilitation session. Questionnaire made of 15 statements to assess the person's degree of confidence in his or her balance associated with activities of daily life in both the home environment and in the community environment. The questionnaire is part of this research administered by the evaluator. Add the scores obtained to the 15 items to obtain an overall score out of 45. The score is converted to a pourcentage.

    Time frame: Between 60 to 70 days after the 20th and last rehabilitation session.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation (MPR)
    Paris, 75010, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Barrois RP, Ricard D, Oudre L, Tlili L, Provost C, Vienne A, Vidal PP, Buffat S, Yelnik AP. Observational Study of 180 degrees Turning Strategies Using Inertial Measurement Units and Fall Risk in Poststroke Hemiparetic Patients. Front Neurol. 2017 May 15;8:194. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00194. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28555124 ↗
  • Bonan IV, Yelnik AP, Colle FM, Michaud C, Normand E, Panigot B, Roth P, Guichard JP, Vicaut E. Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part II: Effectiveness of a balance rehabilitation program with visual cue deprivation after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Feb;85(2):274-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.016. PubMed 14966713 ↗
  • Yelnik AP, Le Breton F, Colle FM, Bonan IV, Hugeron C, Egal V, Lebomin E, Regnaux JP, Perennou D, Vicaut E. Rehabilitation of balance after stroke with multisensorial training: a single-blind randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Sep-Oct;22(5):468-76. doi: 10.1177/1545968308315996. PubMed 18780882 ↗
  • Provost CP, Tasseel-Ponche S, Lozeron P, Piccinini G, Quintaine V, Arnulf B, Kubis N, Yelnik AP. Standing postural reaction to visual and proprioceptive stimulation in chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathy. J Rehabil Med. 2018 Feb 28;50(3):278-284. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2314. PubMed 29313871 ↗
  • Missaoui B, Thoumie P. Balance training in ataxic neuropathies. Effects on balance and gait parameters. Gait Posture. 2013 Jul;38(3):471-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.01.017. Epub 2013 Mar 5. PubMed 23465318 ↗
  • Filiatrault J, Gauvin L, Fournier M, Parisien M, Robitaille Y, Laforest S, Corriveau H, Richard L. Evidence of the psychometric qualities of a simplified version of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale for community-dwelling seniors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 May;88(5):664-72. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.003. PubMed 17466738 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 92 months after the start.

Of 53 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ataxia, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34. This study's planned 92 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 55 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 33.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 25, 2019
First posted
Mar 20, 2019
StartActual
Oct 1, 2019
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2027
Last update
May 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03881930
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 20, 2019
Start date
Oct 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 27, 2026

Study contacts

Bénédicte PANIGOT GUERIN, PT
Contact
benedicte.panigot@aphp.fr
01.40.05.41.73
Alain YELNIK, MD, PhD
Contact
alain.yelnik@aphp.fr
01.40.05.42.05
Bénédicte PANIGOT GUERIN, PT
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion