ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03858621NOLFentanylUpdated Mar 8, 2022

Comparison of Postoperative Nociception Between NOL-guided and Standard Intraoperative Analgesia Based on Fentanyl

An interventional study of fentanyl NOL guided in Pain, Postoperative, Opioid Use and Nociceptive Pain, sponsored by Victor Contreras, MSN. Completed at 1 site in Chile. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-08.

Sponsored by Victor Contreras, MSN · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 27 studies in Pain, Postoperative with a site in Chile — 6 open to participants now, 6 under way, none of them phase 3. Pain, Postoperative · Chile.

Enrollment
3rd of 23
100 · median 60
Started
2019
with 1 other
No phase
16 of 27
4 open now
Registered
11th of 27
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 27
Victor Contreras, MSN

Among the 27 studies in Pain, Postoperative with a site in Chile, this one is the 3rd largest by enrollment of the 23 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2019, is one of 16 with no phase, and was the 11th registered.

Pain, Postoperative

5,644 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,229 are open to participants now.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Open to participants now

6 of the 27 studies in Pain, Postoperative with a site in Chile are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

1 more — sign in →

All 6 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Chile have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Chile →

Who these studies take

Of the 678 Pain, Postoperative studies recruiting now, 241 (36%) set no upper age limit and 328 (48%) stop at 75 or younger; 74 take children under 18; 128 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 50 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 27 studies in Pain, Postoperative with a site in Chile, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Pain is defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional conscious experience, associated with actual or potential tissue damage. Nociception is the sympathetic response to noxious stimuli during unconsciousness. The appearance of different forms of chronic pain results from sensitization of both peripheral and central neural circuits of pain, which involves inflammatory mechanisms both at a systemic level and specifically in the peripheric and central nervous system, as observed through elevation of specific neuroinflammatory mediators, such as MCP-1, IL-1, IL-1b, and IL-10. Clinically, this sensitization expresses as hyperalgesia and allodynia, which increase postoperative pain and morbidity, but also induce permanent modifications in the nociceptive system. These effects may be ameliorated by adequately adjusting intraoperative analgesia through use of nociception/analgesia balance monitors, of which Nociception Level Index (NOL) shows convenient characteristics and promising results from previous studies.

Objectives: The goal of our study is to assess the utility of NOL index monitoring against standard care for Fentanyl-based analgesia by measuring postoperative pain, sensorial thresholds and inflammatory markers related to nociception.

Hypothesis: The use of NOL index to guide the intraoperative analgesia will produce less postoperative pain, hyperalgesia, allodynia, and neuroinflammation.

Read the detailed description

Methodology: In this RCT double-blinded study will invite to 100 patients aged between 18 and 50 years admitted for elective surgery that is planned to require general anesthesia, with fentanyl as the opioid of choice for intraoperative analgesia.

Each patient will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: the intervention group will be provided intraoperative analgesia guided by NOL values (n=50), and the control group will be provided standard intraoperative analgesia (n=50). To account for inter-personal variability, the NOL threshold value associated with nociceptive stimulation will be assessed on each patient at baseline condition with the Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST) and neuroinflammatory mediators MCP-1, IL-1, IL-1b, and IL-10 will be measured pre- and post-surgery in both groups. Opioid consumption and AVS will be assessed during the stay at the post-surgical care unit as a measurement of post-operative pain and will follow them until three months after surgery.

Statistical Analysis: Results will be expressed as means (±SD) or numbers (%). When indicated, 95% confidence interval (CI) will be calculated. A p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Differences between groups on post-surgical opioid consumption, Δz-score of QST measurements, and serum biomarkers level will be analyzed with Student's T-test for unpaired samples. For analysis purposes, VAS scores will be grouped into three distinct categories: Mild (0-3), Moderate (4-6) and Severe (7-10) pain. Differences between groups will be analyzed with Chi-square test.

03

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
  • Opioid Use
  • Nociceptive Pain
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Anesthesia
  • Allodynia
  • Analgesics, Opioid

Keywords

  • pain
  • Postoperative Pain
  • fentanyl
  • Nociceptive monitoring index
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective abdominal surgery without a neuraxial block.
  • Over 2 horas.
  • 18 - 30 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac surgery
  • Cardiopathy
  • Arrhythmia or use of pacemakers.
  • Chronic Kidney disease (Plasma Crea >1 mg/dL).
  • Allergic to drugs of this study.
  • Opioids or Non-inflammatory drugs over 5 days for two weeks before surgery.
  • Neuropathies and dysautonomias.
  • Beta-blockers and other drugs that act at the level of the sympathetic system the month prior to surgery.
  • Chemotherapy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    fentanyl NOL guided

    A bolus of 2 mcg/kg IV Fentanyl will be given at the induction of the anesthesia. A bolus of 0,5 - 1 mcg/kg IV Fentanyl will be given at the time of incision and during surgery following a predeterminate NOL index + heart rate + mean arterial blood pressure variations.

    Drug: fentanyl NOL guided

  • No intervention
    fentanyl standard analgesia

    A bolus of 2 mcg/kg IV Fentanyl will be given at the induction of the anesthesia. A bolus of 0,5 - 1 mcg/kg IV Fentanyl will be given at the time of incision and during surgery following the heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure variations.

Interventions

  • Drugfentanyl NOL guided

    Intervention is NOL monitoring in this group that will help to guide intravenous administration of fentanyl during surgery.

    Also known as: NOL analgesia guided fentanyl administration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Consumption of IV fentanyl intra-operative in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Total consumption of fentanyl in mcg.

    Time frame: Intra-operative

  2. Consumption of opioid in the early postoperative in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Total consumption of morphine in mg.

    Time frame: Postoperative Unit (2 hours)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Visual Analog Scale 0 to 10. 0 = no pain. 10 = worse pain Values to find out is less than 5-6

    Time frame: Postoperative Unit (Every 30 minutes per 2 hours)

  2. Sensorial thresholds in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    QST (Quantitative Sensory Testing) is a valuable method for diagnosing peripheral nervous system disorders. 1. Thermal Testing 2. Mechanical test threshold 3. Mechanical pain threshold 4. Wind-up phenomenon 5. Vibration detection threshold 6. Pressure pain threshold

    Time frame: Postoperative Unit (2 hours)

  3. Pain Management Satisfaction in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Pain Management Satisfaction Scale 1 to 5. 1 = Not satisfied at all. 5 = Completly satisfied One question

    Time frame: Postoperative Unit (2 hours)

  4. Pain Management Satisfaction in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Pain Management Satisfaction Scale 1 to 5. 1 = Not satisfied at all. 5 = Completly satisfied One question

    Time frame: Postoperative (6 hours)

  5. Pain Management Satisfaction in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Pain Management Satisfaction Scale 1 to 5. 1 = Not satisfied at all. 5 = Completly satisfied One question

    Time frame: Postoperative (12 hours)

  6. Inflammatory markers in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Concentration in plasma of: MCP1 (pg/mL) , IL6 (pg/mL) , IL1b (pg/mL), IL10 (pg/mL)

    Time frame: Postoperative (0 hours)

  7. Inflammatory markers in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Concentration in plasma of: MCP1 (pg/mL) , IL6 (pg/mL) , IL1b (pg/mL), IL10 (pg/mL)

    Time frame: Postoperative (6 hours)

  8. Inflammatory markers in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Concentration in plasma of: MCP1 (pg/mL) , IL6 (pg/mL) , IL1b (pg/mL), IL10 (pg/mL)

    Time frame: Postoperative (12 hours)

  9. Persistent pain at three months in the NOL-guided group compared to the standard group.

    Brief Pain Inventory by telephone call

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Victor Contreras
    Santiago, Región Metropolitana 8420525, Chile
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gandhi K, Heitz JW, Viscusi ER. Challenges in acute pain management. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011 Jun;29(2):291-309. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2011.04.009. PubMed 21620344 ↗
  • Baliki MN, Apkarian AV. Nociception, Pain, Negative Moods, and Behavior Selection. Neuron. 2015 Aug 5;87(3):474-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.005. PubMed 26247858 ↗
  • Katz J, Seltzer Z. Transition from acute to chronic postsurgical pain: risk factors and protective factors. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009 May;9(5):723-44. doi: 10.1586/ern.09.20. PubMed 19402781 ↗
  • Argoff CE. Recent management advances in acute postoperative pain. Pain Pract. 2014 Jun;14(5):477-87. doi: 10.1111/papr.12108. Epub 2013 Aug 15. PubMed 23945010 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2019 to primary completion in Feb 2022, 35 months.

Of 2,094 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's 35 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,107 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 27, 2019
First posted
Mar 1, 2019
StartActual
Mar 15, 2019
Primary completionActual
Feb 23, 2022
CompletionActual
Feb 23, 2022
Last update
Mar 8, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 8, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03858621
Lead sponsor
Victor Contreras, MSN
Responsible party
Victor Contreras, MSN (Co-Investigador, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Mar 1, 2019
Start date
Mar 15, 2019
Primary completion
Feb 23, 2022
Completion
Feb 23, 2022
Last update
Mar 8, 2022

Study contacts

VICTOR CONTRERAS, MSN
study director · Research Profesor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion