ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03853330Updated Mar 14, 2022

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia in Patients With Multiple Fracture Ribs

An interventional study of Ultrasound and Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% in Fracture; Rib, Multiple, sponsored by Assiut University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-03-14.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To assess the analgesic and respiratory effect of continuous Erector Spinae Plane block versus Thoracic Epidural in patients with multiple fracture ribs.

Read the detailed description

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently described technique which may be an alternative to Paravertebral block (PVB) for providing thoracic analgesia. It involves injection of local anesthetic into the fascial plane deep to erector spinae muscle. ESP is a more superficial block with a better defined end-point injection between the bony transverse process and erector spinae muscle. A more superficial ultrasound-guided block will be faster to perform and less painful for the patient. ESP does not have the same risk of pneumothorax as PVB.

Epidural analgesia has become the standard of care. Although thoracic epidurals provide excellent analgesia for the management of rib fractures, they are limited to a certain population due to patient factors and side-effects. Many trauma patients have other injuries which contraindicate the use of epidurals, or which prevent positioning for insertion. There are disadvantages to thoracic epidural analgesia. They are technically challenging to insert, with a risk of dural puncture or spinal cord injury. Adverse effects include hypotension, and if opioids used, urinary retention and pruritus. Patients can develop a motor block and are unable to mobilize with an epidural in situ.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fracture; Rib, Multiple

Browse trials for

03

In context

Fractures, Bone

723 studies on the registry are indexed under Fractures, Bone; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 108 is above the median of 80 across 458 interventional studies indexed under Fractures, Bone.

Browse Fractures, Bone studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with multiple fracture ribs.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Patients with pre-existing infection at the block site.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Allergy to local anesthetics.
  • Pre-existing neurological deficits.
  • Psychiatric illness.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
108 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Thoracic Epidural Analgesia group

    25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia for multiple fracture ribs at the level of T8 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

    Device: Ultrasound · Drug: Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% · Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution

  • Active comparator
    Erector spinae plane block group

    25 patients will receive ultrasound-guided ESP block for multiple fracture ribs at the level from T1 to T5 with 7.5-12 ml of Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% as a loading dose followed by catheter insertion and infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h. For breakthrough pain bolus of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution 5-10 ml can be used.

    Device: Ultrasound · Drug: Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% · Drug: Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasound

    Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Erector spinae plane block.

  • DrugBupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25%

    Bupivacaine HCl Inj 0.25% will be used in both blocks by the same dose of 7.5-12 ml

  • infusion of Bupivacaine Hydrochloride, 0.125%-0.9% Injectable Solution at 5-7 ml/h will be used in both blocks and also for breakthrough pain after both blocks as a bolus of 5-10 ml.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain score (verbal numeric rating scale) as the median VNRS at rest and cough

    All patients will be assessed for pain score using the 11 points verbal numeric rating scale (VNRS), where zero equals no pain and 10 equals the worst pain imaginable. This assessment will be done before the block and after the block by 60 minutes and then every 6 hours up to 24 hours.

    Time frame: up to 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pulmonary function test

    Pulmonary function test will be done before the block, 60 minutes after the block and then every 6 hours up to 24 hours.

    Time frame: up to 24 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Assiut University Hospital
    Assiut, 71111, Egypt
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03853330
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Rasha Hamed (Ass. Prof. in Anesthesia and ICU, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 25, 2019
Start date
Dec 1, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2021
Completion
Dec 30, 2021
Last update
Mar 14, 2022

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bupivacaine

Start the discussion