ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03803787Updated Apr 8, 2026

Prophylactic Inhaled Steroids to Reduce Radiation Pneumonitis Frequency and Severity in Lung Cancer Patients

A Phase 2 interventional study of Inhaled budesonide in Radiation Pneumonitis, sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico. Recruiting at 2 sites in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-08.

Sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2018, registered Jan 2019).
  • Started Sep 2018; still recruiting 8 years 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized clinical study aims to assess whether prophylactic treatment with inhaled steroids in patients with locally advanced or concomitantly treated non-small cell lung carcinoma who are candidates for combination treatment with QT/RT or IMT + QT/RT.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Whether prophylactic treatment decreases the severity of NPR on CTCAE v4.0 and RTOG scales.

Whether inhaled steroid use modifies the response to radiation therapy treatment compared to patients who do not receive prophylactic inhaled steroids.

Read the detailed description

Clinical evaluation

The following BASELINE data shall be taken prior to radiation therapy:

Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data will be obtained from medical history and electronic records.

The patient will be instructed to perform the PFRs and tests of lung function.

Two EORTC, QLQ-C30, and QLQ LC13 quality of life questionnaires and three respiratory symptom questionnaires (St. George, dyspnea scale, and modified BORG) will be performed on the same day of lung function tests.

Additionally; blood samples will be taken for the evaluation of inflammatory mediators at the following times: BASAL (before RT), and every six weeks up to 48 weeks post-RT.

INTERVENTION GROUP

  1. Prior to the onset of RT, the patient will be sorted to receive the control rather than experimental intervention (QT/RT or IMT + QT/RT) and a logbook to record adherence to treatment.
  2. An IDM device shall be granted per month, containing the number of doses corresponding to 30 days. The record in the database of the day of the first session of RT will be taken to quantify the number of days of use of the drug and grant the next device per 30 days until the end of the study.
  3. The patient will be instructed on the use of the device inhaled with the spacer chamber in the clinic Pulmonology consultation, alarm data and indications of the use of the drug will be given in writing, and knowledge will be reinforced at each visit.
  4. The patient will be granted the drug use log where the patient will place the date and time of use of the drug to assess adherence to treatment
02

Conditions studied

  • Radiation Pneumonitis

Keywords

  • Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Radiation Pneumonia
  • Lung cancer treatment
  • Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
  • Radiation fibrosis
  • Thoracic Neoplasms
  • Lung Diseases
  • Radiation Injury with Fibrosis
  • Radiation Fibrosis of Lung
  • Lung Injury
03

In context

Radiation Pneumonitis

39 studies on the registry are indexed under Radiation Pneumonitis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is above the median of 61 across 24 interventional studies indexed under Radiation Pneumonitis.

Browse Radiation Pneumonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with unresectable locally advanced or disease (IIIA, IIIB or IV) of the classification tumor node, metastasis (TNM) of malignant lung tumors, 7th edition.
  • NSCLC patients candidates for concomitant treatment (chemotherapy plus radiotherapy or target therapy plus radiotherapy).
  • Evidence of
  • (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2, 70-100.
  • of > 4 months at the time of screening
  • Patients with the ability to comply with the study and follow-up procedures.
  • Patients with previous surgery less than four weeks.
  • Must be willing and able to give signed and, in the opinion of the Investigator, to comply with the protocol tests and procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable systemic disease: active infection, heart, liver, kidney or metabolic disease; including uncontrolled chronic lung disease.
  • Patients treated with systemic or inhaled .
  • Patients of reproductive age without a family planning method, pregnant or lactating.
  • Previous diagnosis of Pneumonitis with toxicity grade ≥ 2 by v4.0 or RTOG scale.
  • Patients with disease progression.
  • Inspiratory flow \< 90 liters / min.
  • Discontinue of Treatment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    QT/RT + Budesonide

    Patients are receiving chemotherapy (QT) and radiotherapy (RT) plus inhaled Budesonide with space chamber at 400 mcg given twice daily initiating after the first dose of RT and continuing until pneumonitis development or 12 months completed.

    Drug: Inhaled budesonide

  • No intervention
    QT/RT + No medication

    Patients are receiving chemotherapy (QT) and radiotherapy (RT) without intervention therapy and followed during 12 months.

  • Experimental
    Target drug/RT + Budesonide

    Patients are receiving target therapy and radiotherapy (RT) plus inhaled Budesonide with space chamber at 400 mcg given twice daily initiating after the first dose of RT and continuing until pneumonitis development or 12 months completed.

    Drug: Inhaled budesonide

  • No intervention
    Target drug/RT + No medication

    Patients are receiving target treatment and radiotherapy (RT) without intervention therapy and followed during 12 months.

Interventions

  • Patients will use inhaled budesonide (Numark) with space chamber at 400 mcg given twice daily initiating after the first dose of RT and continuing until pneumonitis development or 12 months completed.

    Also known as: Numark

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pneumonitis graded by the Common terminology criteria for adverse event v4.0. (CTCAE v4.0).

    Current score for radiation pneumonitis according to symptoms and radiographic changes. Grade 0: No changes, Grade 1: Asymptomatic or mild respiratory symptoms, Grade 2: Moderate respiratory symptoms of pneumonitis (a severe cough) and radiographic changes (radiographic patches), Grade 3: Severe respiratory symptoms of pneumonitis, dense radiographic changes. Grade 4: Symptoms of acute respiratory failure requiring assisted ventilation or continuous oxygen. Grade 5: Death directly related to late effects of radiotherapy.

    Time frame: from the beginning of radiotherapy up to 1 year after the 1st session.

  2. Pneumonitis graded by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group score (RTOG)

    Current score for radiation pneumonitis according to symptoms and radiographic changes. Grade 0: No changes, Grade 1: Asymptomatic, only radiological or tomographic findings, Grade 2: Symptomatic, does not interfere with daily activities, Grade 3: Symptomatic, interferes with daily activities, requires supplemental oxygen. Grade 4: Threatens life, needing ventilator support. Grade 5: Severe pneumonitis with fatal outcome.

    Time frame: from the beginning of radiotherapy up to 1 year after the 1st session.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lung cancer-associated symptoms assessment

    Symptoms are evaluated with the supplementary lung cancer-specific questionnaire of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (validated Mexican-Spanish version). It comprises 13 questions related to the assessment of dyspnoea, pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. The items scale ranges from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The average of the items that contribute to the scale (raw score) is estimated and transformed so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher scale score represents a higher level of symptoms.

    Time frame: before the start of Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  2. Treatment-related side effects in lung cancer

    Symptoms are evaluated with the supplementary lung cancer-specific questionnaire of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (validated Mexican-Spanish version). It comprises 13 questions related to the assessment of dyspnoea, pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. The items scale ranges from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The average of the items that contribute to the scale (raw score) is estimated and transformed so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher scale score represents a higher level of side-effects.

    Time frame: before the start of Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  3. Cognitive functioning evaluated by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire

    The cognitive functioning is evaluated using the validated Mexican-Spanish version of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires. It comprises two questions related to the assessment of short and long-term memory. The items scale ranges from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The average of the items that contribute to the scale (raw score) is estimated and transformed so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher scale score represents a healthy level of functioning.

    Time frame: before the start of Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  4. Emotional Functioning evaluated by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire

    The Emotional Functioning is evaluated using the validated Mexican-Spanish version of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires. It comprises four questions related to the assessment of depression, anxiety, irritability, and stress. The items scale ranges from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The average of the items that contribute to the scale (raw score) is estimated and transformed so that the scores range from 0 to 100. A higher scale score represents a represents a healthy level of functioning.

    Time frame: before the start Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment

  5. Physical functioning evaluated by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire

    The Physical functioning is evaluated using the validated Mexican-Spanish version of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires. It comprises five questions related to self-sufficiency activities (eating, walking, laying in bed or completing simple chores). The items scale ranges from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The average of the items that contribute to the scale (raw score) is estimated and transformed so that the scores range from 0 to 100. A higher scale score represents a represents a healthy level of functioning.

    Time frame: before the start Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  6. Role Functioning evaluated by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire

    The Role functioning is evaluated using the validated Mexican-Spanish version of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires. It comprises two questions related to daily activities (work and hobbies limitation). The items scale ranges from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The average of the items that contribute to the scale (raw score) is estimated and transformed so that the scores range from 0 to 100. A higher scale score represents a represents a healthy level of functioning.

    Time frame: before the start Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  7. Social Functioning evaluated by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire

    The Social Functioning is evaluated using the validated Mexican-Spanish version of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires. It comprises two questions related to family life and social activities. The items scale ranges from 1 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The average of the items that contribute to the scale (raw score) is estimated and transformed so that the scores range from 0 to 100. A higher scale score represents a represents a healthy level of functioning.

    Time frame: before the start Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  8. Respiratory symptoms evaluation using St. George respiratory questionnaire

    Respiratory symptoms are evaluated using the St. George respiratory questionnaire validated to Mexican-Spanish version. It is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure the impact on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in patients with airways disease. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.

    Time frame: before the start Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  9. Dyspnea assessment by the Borg Scale Dyspnea Index (BSDI)

    A system used to document the severity of the patient's shortness of breath using numbers anchored with verbal descriptions. This scale asks the patient to rate the dyspnea. It starts at number 0 where the breathing is causing no difficulty at all and progresses through to number 10 where the breathing difficulty is maximal.

    Time frame: before the start Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  10. Pulmonary function evaluation using spirometry test

    Spirometry measures the inhaled and exhaled air volume as a function of time using a forced expiratory maneuver.

    Time frame: before the start of Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment

  11. Pulmonary function evaluation using diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide measurement (DLCO).

    Diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) test measures the conductance of gas transfer from inspired gas to the red blood cells.

    Time frame: before the start of Radiotherapy and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  12. Airway inflammatory response evaluation using the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide measurement (FeNO)

    Nitric oxide concentration detected in the exhaled gas by chemiluminescence reported as particles per million.

    Time frame: before the start of Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

  13. Pulmonary function evaluation using Impulse oscillometry test (IOS)

    Impulse oscillometry provides a rapid, noninvasive measure of airway impedance during normal tidal breathing.

    Time frame: before the start of Radiotherapy, and at 6, 12, 24 and 48-weeks post-treatment.

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Arrieta O, Guzman-de Alba E, Alba-Lopez LF, Acosta-Espinoza A, Alatorre-Alexander J, Alexander-Meza JF, Allende-Perez SR, Alvarado-Aguilar S, Araujo-Navarrete ME, Argote-Greene LM, Aquino-Mendoza CA, Astorga-Ramos AM, Austudillo-de la Vega H, Aviles-Salas A, Barajas-Figueroa LJ, Barroso-Quiroga N, Blake-Cerda M, Cabrera-Galeana PA, Calderillo-Ruiz G, Campos-Parra AD, Cano-Valdez AM, Capdeville-Garcia D, Castillo-Ortega G, Casillas-Suarez C, Castillo-Gonzalez P, Corona-Cruz JF, Correa-Acevedo ME, Cortez-Ramirez SS, de la Cruz-Vargas JA, de la Garza-Salazar JG, de la Mata-Moya MD, Dominguez-Flores ME, Dominguez-Malagon HR, Dominguez-Parra LM, Dominguez-Peregrina A, Duran-Alcocer J, Enriquez-Aceves MI, Elizondo-Rios A, Escobedo-Sanchez MD, de Villafranca PE, Flores-Cantisani A, Flores-Gutierrez JP, Franco-Marina F, Franco-Gonzalez EE, Franco-Topete RA, Fuentes-de la Pena H, Galicia-Amor S, Gallardo-Rincon D, Gamboa-Dominguez A, Garcia-Andreu J, Garcia-Cuellar CM, Garcia-Sancho-Figueroa MC, Garcia-Torrentera R, Gerson-Cwilich R, Gomez-Gonzalez A, Green-Schneeweiss L, Guillen-Nunez Mdel R, Gutierrez-Velazquez H, Ibarra-Perez C, Jimenez-Fuentes E, Juarez-Sanchez P, Juarez-Ramiro A, Kelly-Garcia J, Kuri-Exsome R, Lazaro-Leon JM, Leon-Rodriguez E, Llanos-Osuna S, Llanos-Osuna S, Loyola-Garcia U, Lopez-Gonzalez JS, Lopez y de Antunano FJ, Loustaunau-Andrade MA, Macedo-Perez EO, Machado-Villarroel L, Magallanes-Maciel M, Martinez-Barrera L, Martinez-Cedillo J, Martinez-Martinez G, Medina-Esparza A, Meneses-Garcia A, Mohar-Betancourt A, Morales Blanhir J, Morales-Gomez J, Motola-Kuba D, Najera-Cruz MP, Nunez-Valencia Cdel C, Ocampo-Ocampo MA, Ochoa-Vazquez MD, Olivares-Torres CA, Palomar-Lever A, Patino-Zarco M, Perez-Padilla R, Pena-Alonso YR, Perez-Romo AR, Aquilino Perez M, Pinaya-Ruiz PM, Pointevin-Chacon MA, Poot-Braga JJ, Posadas-Valay R, Ramirez-Marquez M, Reyes-Martinez I, Robledo-Pascual J, Rodriguez-Cid J, Rojas-Marin CE, Romero-Bielma E, Rubio-Gutierrez JE, Saenz-Frias JA, Salazar-Lezama MA, Sanchez-Lara K, Sansores Martinez R, Santillan-Doherty P, Alejandro-Silva J, Tellez-Becerra JL, Toledo-Buenrostro V, Torre-Bouscoulet L, Torecillas-Torres L, Torres M, Tovar-Guzman V, Turcott-Chaparro JG, Vazquez-Cortes JJ, Vazquez-Manriquez ME, Vilches-Cisneros N, Villegas-Elizondo JF, Zamboni MM, Zamora-Moreno J, Zinser-Sierra JW. [National consensus of diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer]. Rev Invest Clin. 2013 Mar;65 Suppl 1:S5-84. Spanish. PubMed 24459776 ↗
  • Timmerman R, McGarry R, Yiannoutsos C, Papiez L, Tudor K, DeLuca J, Ewing M, Abdulrahman R, DesRosiers C, Williams M, Fletcher J. Excessive toxicity when treating central tumors in a phase II study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 20;24(30):4833-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.5937. PubMed 17050868 ↗
  • Henkenberens C, Janssen S, Lavae-Mokhtari M, Leni K, Meyer A, Christiansen H, Bremer M, Dickgreber N. Inhalative steroids as an individual treatment in symptomatic lung cancer patients with radiation pneumonitis grade II after radiotherapy - a single-centre experience. Radiat Oncol. 2016 Feb 2;11:12. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0580-3. PubMed 26830686 ↗
  • Kim S, Oh IJ, Park SY, Song JH, Seon HJ, Kim YH, Yoon SH, Yu JY, Lee BR, Kim KS, Kim YC. Corticosteroid therapy against treatment-related pulmonary toxicities in patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Sep;6(9):1209-17. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.07.16. PubMed 25276362 ↗
  • Ding NH, Li JJ, Sun LQ. Molecular mechanisms and treatment of radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Curr Drug Targets. 2013 Oct;14(11):1347-56. doi: 10.2174/13894501113149990198. PubMed 23909719 ↗
  • Williams JP, Johnston CJ, Finkelstein JN. Treatment for radiation-induced pulmonary late effects: spoiled for choice or looking in the wrong direction? Curr Drug Targets. 2010 Nov;11(11):1386-94. doi: 10.2174/1389450111009011386. PubMed 20583979 ↗
  • Daley-Yates PT. Inhaled corticosteroids: potency, dose equivalence and therapeutic index. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Sep;80(3):372-80. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12637. Epub 2015 May 28. PubMed 25808113 ↗
  • Leach C, Colice GL, Luskin A. Particle size of inhaled corticosteroids: does it matter? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Dec;124(6 Suppl):S88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.09.050. PubMed 19962042 ↗
  • Bledsoe TJ, Nath SK, Decker RH. Radiation Pneumonitis. Clin Chest Med. 2017 Jun;38(2):201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Mar 1. PubMed 28477633 ↗
  • Simone CB 2nd. Thoracic Radiation Normal Tissue Injury. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017 Oct;27(4):370-377. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2017.04.009. PubMed 28865520 ↗
  • Vallard A, Rancoule C, Le Floch H, Guy JB, Espenel S, Le Pechoux C, Deutsch E, Magne N, Chargari C. [Medical prevention and treatment of radiation-induced pulmonary complications]. Cancer Radiother. 2017 Aug;21(5):411-423. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.03.004. Epub 2017 Jun 5. French. PubMed 28596060 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The data of the participants will be reported in the publication results.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

Time frame: october 2021

Access criteria: the information will be available after being published in an indexed journal, any information or data related to this study must be requested via e-mail with the researchers.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2018 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 99 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 3, 2019
First posted
Jan 15, 2019
StartActual
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
Last update
Apr 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03803787
Lead sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
Collaborators
Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias
Responsible party
Oscar Gerardo Arrieta Rodríguez (Head of the Thoracic Oncology unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 15, 2019
Start date
Sep 1, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2026

Study contacts

Oscar Arrieta, MD MSc
Contact
ogarrieta@gmail.com
015556280400 ext. 71100
Diana Flores
Contact
clinicacancerpulmonincan@gmail.com
015556280400 ext. 71101
Oscar Arrieta, MD MSc
principal investigator · Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Budesonide

Start the discussion