ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT073396444DCT-FLARUpdated Feb 9, 2026

Functional Lung Avoidance Radiotherapy Guided by 4DCT Pulmonary Ventilation Function Imaging: A Prospective Single-arm Clinical Study

An interventional study of 4DCT Ventilation Imaging-Guided Functional Lung Avoidance Radiotherapy (FLAR) in Lung Cancer (Including Metastatic Cancer), Radiation Pneumonitis and Radiation-induced Lung Injury, sponsored by The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-09.

Sponsored by The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, single-center, single-arm study will evaluate the feasibility and safety of 4DCT ventilation functional imaging-guided functional lung avoidance radiotherapy (FLAR) in patients with lung malignancies receiving IMRT radiotherapy.

All participants will undergo 4DCT simulation as part of routine radiotherapy preparation. A ventilation map will be generated from 4DCT data, and the top 80% ventilation region will be defined as the high-function lung. This structure will be imported into the treatment planning system to create an FLAR plan that prioritizes sparing of high-function lung while maintaining target coverage (PTV D95%) and meeting standard dose constraints for organs at risk. A conventional anatomic plan (without functional guidance) will also be created for paired, within-patient dosimetric comparison.

The primary outcome is improvement in dosimetric sparing of the high-function lung (V10, V20, V30, and mean lung dose). Secondary outcomes include the incidence of grade ≥2 radiation pneumonitis (CTCAE v5.0), changes in pulmonary function (e.g., FEV1 and DLCO), and lung-related quality-of-life scores. Assessments will be performed mid-treatment (after 15 fractions), at the end of radiotherapy (after 30 fractions), and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after radiotherapy. The study plans to enroll 100 participants and follow each participant for 12 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer (Including Metastatic Cancer)
  • Radiation Pneumonitis
  • Radiation-induced Lung Injury

Keywords

  • Functional lung avoidance radiotherapy
  • 4DCT ventilation imaging
  • Functional lung imaging (FLI)
  • Dose-volume histogram (DVH)
  • High-function lung
  • Radiotherapy planning optimization
  • Radiation pneumonitis
  • Pulmonary function
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

5,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,346 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 3,656 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University is the lead sponsor of 102 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 85 years (inclusive); any sex.
  • Diagnosed lung requiring thoracic radiotherapy (e.g., non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, or pulmonary ).
  • Planned to receive thoracic radiotherapy using either conventionally fractionated IMRT/VMAT or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and able to complete pre-treatment 4DCT simulation suitable for generating a ventilation map.
  • Adequate baseline organ function and clinically judged able to tolerate radiotherapy; performance status 0-1.
  • No absolute to pulmonary function testing; patients with moderate or impaired lung function may be included if the treating team judges radiotherapy to be tolerable.
  • Able to comply with treatment and follow-up assessments.
  • Written provided.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women. Women of must have pregnancy excluded prior to radiotherapy per institutional practice.
  • Age \<18 or >85 years.
  • Uncontrolled severe cardiopulmonary disease or other severe comorbidities that make radiotherapy excessively high risk (e.g., decompensated heart failure, unstable cardiopulmonary status, active severe pulmonary infection).
  • Prior high-dose thoracic radiotherapy to the same region such that safe re-irradiation is not feasible.
  • Concurrent other active/advanced requiring priority treatment that would confound study outcomes.
  • Recent participation in another interventional clinical trial or concurrent therapy judged likely to interfere with this study's endpoints.
  • Severe psychiatric, cognitive, or other conditions that prevent cooperation with radiotherapy and/or scheduled follow-up.
  • Inadequate 4DCT image quality or inability to generate/validate the 4DCT ventilation map required for functional-lung-guided planning.
  • Any other condition deemed unsuitable by the investigators in the interest of participant safety.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    4DCT-FLI-Guided Functional Lung Avoidance Radiotherapy (FLAR)

    Participants receive IMRT planned with 4DCT ventilation functional imaging guidance. A ventilation map is generated from 4DCT, high-function lung (top 80% ventilation) is contoured, and the treatment plan is optimized to spare high-function lung while maintaining target coverage and meeting standard OAR constraints. A conventional anatomic plan is also generated for within-patient dosimetric comparison.

    Procedure: 4DCT Ventilation Imaging-Guided Functional Lung Avoidance Radiotherapy (FLAR)

Interventions

  • Procedure4DCT Ventilation Imaging-Guided Functional Lung Avoidance Radiotherapy (FLAR)

    All participants undergo 4DCT simulation. A ventilation map is generated from 4DCT data, and the high-function lung is defined as the top 80% ventilation region. This structure is imported into the treatment planning system, and an IMRT plan is optimized to preferentially spare high-function lung while maintaining target (PTV) coverage and meeting standard organ-at-risk constraints. A conventional anatomic plan (without functional guidance) is also created for within-patient paired dosimetric comparison.

    Also known as: Functional Lung Avoidance Radiotherapy, 4DCT-FLAR, 4DCT Ventilation Functional Imaging (4DCT-FLI)-Guided Radiotherapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury (Grade ≥2)

    Incidence of radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) of Grade ≥ 2, assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 5.0. CTCAE grades range from Grade 1 (mild) to Grade 5 (death related to adverse event), with higher grades indicating more severe toxicity. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients experiencing CTCAE Grade ≥ 2 RILI.

    Time frame: Time Frame: Assessed at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after completion of radiotherapy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Dose to High-Function Lung (Gy)

    DVH-derived mean dose to ventilation-defined high-function lung on paired plans (functional-lung-avoidance vs conventional plans). Lower dose indicates better sparing.

    Time frame: At baseline treatment planning (prior to radiotherapy delivery).]

  2. MLD for Whole Lung (Gy)

    Percentage volume (%) of ventilation-defined high-function lung receiving ≥5 Gy, reported separately for functional-lung-avoidance and conventional radiotherapy plans.

    Time frame: At baseline treatment planning (prior to radiotherapy delivery).

  3. V5 of High-Function Lung (%)

    Percentage volume (%) of ventilation-defined high-function lung receiving ≥5 Gy, reported separately for functional-lung-avoidance and conventional radiotherapy plans.

    Time frame: At baseline treatment planning (prior to radiotherapy delivery).

  4. V20 of High-Function Lung(%)

    DVH-derived V20 of ventilation-defined high-function lung, defined as the percentage of lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy, compared between functional-lung-avoidance and conventional radiotherapy plans.

    Time frame: At baseline treatment planning (prior to radiotherapy delivery).

  5. Mean Dose to Heart (Gy)

    DVH-derived mean dose (Dmean) to the heart, compared between functional-lung-avoidance and conventional radiotherapy plans.

    Time frame: At treatment planning (baseline, pre-radiotherapy delivery).

  6. Maximum Dose to Esophagus (Gy)

    DVH-derived maximum dose (Dmax) to the esophagus, compared between functional-lung-avoidance and conventional radiotherapy plans.

    Time frame: At treatment planning (baseline, pre-radiotherapy delivery).]

  7. Maximum Dose to Spinal Cord (Gy)

    DVH-derived maximum dose (Dmax) to the spinal cord, compared between functional-lung-avoidance and conventional radiotherapy plans.

    Time frame: At treatment planning (baseline, pre-radiotherapy delivery).

  8. Target Coverage (PTV D95)

    Percentage of planning target volume (PTV) receiving at least 95% of prescribed dose, compared between functional-lung-avoidance and conventional plans.

    Time frame: At treatment planning (baseline, pre-radiotherapy delivery).

  9. Conformity Index of Radiotherapy Plans

    Conformity Index (CI) of paired treatment plans, comparing functional-lung-avoidance and conventional anatomic radiotherapy plans. The Conformity Index is defined as the ratio of the prescription isodose volume to the target volume (CI = VRI / VT). The score ranges from 1.0 to \>2.0, where a value closer to 1.0 indicates better conformity and thus higher plan quality.

    Time frame: At treatment planning (baseline, pre-radiotherapy delivery).

  10. Homogeneity Index of Radiotherapy Plans

    Homogeneity Index (HI) of paired treatment plans, comparing functional-lung-avoidance and conventional anatomic radiotherapy plans. The Homogeneity Index is defined as (D2% - D98%) / D50%. The score typically ranges from 0 to 1.0, where lower values indicate more homogeneous dose distribution and better plan quality.

    Time frame: At treatment planning (baseline, pre-radiotherapy delivery).

  11. Gradient Measure (GM) of Radiotherapy Plans

    Gradient Measure (cm) of paired radiotherapy plans, comparing 4DCT-FLI-guided functional lung avoidance plans and conventional anatomic plans. GM is defined as the difference between the equivalent sphere radii of the 50% and 100% prescription isodose volumes (GM = R50% - R100%); lower values indicate steeper dose fall-off and better plan quality.

    Time frame: At treatment planning (baseline, pre-radiotherapy delivery).

  12. Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

    FEV1 measured by standardized spirometry (L and % predicted). Outcome is change from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after radiotherapy.

  13. Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO)

    DLCO measured using a standardized single-breath method (mL/min/mmHg and % predicted). Outcome is change from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after radiotherapy.

  14. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

    FVC measured by standardized spirometry (L and % predicted). Outcome is change from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after radiotherapy.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Cancer Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
    Chongqing, 400000, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Vinogradskiy Y, Castillo R, Castillo E, Tucker SL, Liao Z, Guerrero T, Martel MK. Use of 4-dimensional computed tomography-based ventilation imaging to correlate lung dose and function with clinical outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):366-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Mar 6. PubMed 23474113 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 14 months after the start.

Of 864 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Lung Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 68. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 915 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 67.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 5, 2026
First posted
Jan 14, 2026
StartActual
Oct 24, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 24, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 24, 2027
Last update
Feb 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07339644
Responsible party
ZhenZhou Yang (Professor of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 14, 2026
Start date
Oct 24, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 24, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 24, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 9, 2026

Study contacts

Zhi chen, MD.
Contact
2023440076@stu.cqmu.edu.cn
+86 18982928222
zhengjun Guo, MD.
principal investigator · The Second Clinical College of Chongqing Medical University: The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion