CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06557343SPITFIREUpdated Jan 9, 2026

Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis of Radiation Pneumonitis Signals In Patients Treated For Cancer With Radiotherapy

An observational study in Radiation Pneumonitis, sponsored by NHS Lothian. Recruiting at 3 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-09.

Sponsored by NHS Lothian · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with signs of radiation induced lung inflammation, who are referred for a clinical bronchoscopy for investigation, will have a sample sent for single cell sequencing. This is a novel technique which allows for identification of which cells are present and what they are doing. This hopes to better understand radiation pneumonitis, a dose-limiting toxicity in cancer treatment which can be highly morbid and even fatal.

Read the detailed description

Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in the UK with around 48,500 people diagnosed with the condition each year. Unfortunately, despite significant progress in treatment options and their delivery, improvements in survival remain elusive. Radiotherapy (RT) is a cornerstone of both radical and palliative treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Radiation pneumonitis (RP) is the key dose-limiting constraint and a morbid, potentially even life-threatening, toxicity associated with RT to the thorax. Newer combinations of chemo-radiotherapy and adjuvant immunotherapy demonstrate improved survival but are associated with higher risk of RP.

Current management of RP is very limited consisting of supportive measures and steroids; the latter of which are often ineffective and come with their own risks. The typical triad of symptoms (exertional dyspnoea, a non-productive cough and hypoxia) can be directly fatal for some whilst for others represent a devastating and permanent decline in their lung function and quality of life. Although modest understanding of the patient and treatment related risk factors for RP development have been identified the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood and has been challenging to investigate. A cascade of inflammatory changes with hypoxia lead to endovascular damage, cytokine release and ultimately endothelial cell death and irreversible fibrosis. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a relatively novel technique that allows access to an understanding of this process. It can allow the identification of what genetics, cell types and functional heterogeneity are up/down-regulated in association with irradiated lung tissue in humans.

It is known that Stereotactic-Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) is a well-tolerated highly conformal form of RT. It has been safely delivered to patients before radical surgery without significant toxicity or increase in complication rate. If a targetable mechanism behind this condition could be identified it has the potential to change the landscape of lung cancer RT management and in doing so save lives.

A literature search revealed no investigation like this has been conducted in humans. A Chinese study has been done in murine models and demonstrated several signals which, if demonstrated in humans, could be of interest. SPITFIRE proposes to obtain inflamed lung tissue from patients who have developed pneumonitis following radiation for their lung cancer to find these answers.

1.2 RATIONALE FOR STUDY Both patients who have potentially been cured of their lung cancer and those being treated to alleviate symptoms in their last months-to-years of life are diagnosed with RP. Potentially treatable disease can be refused due to an unacceptable combination of risk factors for developing RP. Hospitalisation for RP is common and yet often frustratingly unhelpful. RP is a major contributor to patient morbidity, mortality and healthcare cost. Although clearly a constant concern in lung cancer any radiation delivered through the chest (including oesophageal, breast and pulmonary metastatic RT) carries a risk of RP.

Pulmonary fibrosis treatment is starting to improve with novel agents such as Nintedanib and Pirfenidone demonstrating some promise. There is likely, though yet unproven, crossover between the molecular and genetic processes involved in these conditions. Should a better understanding of the mechanisms behind RP reveal a targetable signal, and subsequent treatment, it has the potential to completely change not only the management of this toxicity but that of thoracic malignancies.

Obtaining tissue from human lung affected by RP is a challenge. These patients are often too unstable to safely proceed with such intervention. There is, however, a population of patients who have clinical and radiological features diagnostic of the condition but maintain oxygen saturations (SpO2) adequate to proceed to bronchoscopy. Some of these patients will be referred for a bronchoscopy to exclude super-added infection. As part of this process they may be enrolled in the ELFMAN (Edinburgh Lung Fibrosis Molecular Endotyping) Study - to better characterise suspected inflammatory and fibrotic interstitial lung disease, as it may have shared molecular pathways to interstitial pneumonias including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Standard bronchoscopy may not reach the effect area of lung but deep bronchial brushings obtains a good cellular yield which should be adequate for scRNA-seq whilst minimising risk to the patient. This study proposes to utilise a brushing from these patients to process using a novel laboratory technique to help identify the cellular processes that may be involved in radiation pneumonitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Radiation Pneumonitis

Keywords

  • radiation pneumonitis
  • cancer
  • single cell sequencing
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients meeting the above eligibility criteria who demonstrate clinical/radiological diagnosis of radiation pneumonitis

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 18 years
  • Patient has received thoracic radiotherapy and has clinical or radiological features in fitting with a diagnosis of Radiation Pneumonitis (onset one to four months post-RT with breathlessness, especially exertional, cough, chest discomfort, which is persistent over weeks, a chest x-ray [CXR] may demonstrate patchy or widespread opacification although can be normal.)
  • Must be ambulant, oxygen independent with SpO2 >92% on air and haemodynamically stable to be considered safe for a bronchoscopy.
  • Willing to undergo and likely able to tolerate bronchoscopy, ie. Can lie flat without compromising ventilation, and able to consent to the ELFMAN Protocol and SPITFIRE trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to bronchoscopy, ie. Previously not tolerated, unable to lie flat, Sp02 \<92% on air
  • Patient requires admission or oxygen dependant
  • Test positive for Covid-19 within the preceding six weeks to enrolment
04

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
5 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Bronchoscopy under ELFMAN

    Clinical bronchoscopy performed under ELMAN study

    Diagnostic Test: Single Cell Sequencing

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSingle Cell Sequencing

    Sequencing of all viable single cells present in deep bronchial brushings using transcriptomics to identify what cells are present and what they are doing.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Successful creation of dataset

    If deep bronchial brushings generates sufficient viable cells for processing via single-cell sequencing this will generate a dataset of cellular activity for each of these five patients. The only way to know if this technique - ie. the use of deep bronchial brushings combined with single-cell sequencing, is to run the test on the samples and therefore successful generation of the dataset is proof of feasibility of the method. There may be further use for this dataset (ie. secondary outcome below) but primarily this process will prove feasibility simply by generating data. This is not a health outcome, simply demonstration of a viable sample using a novel combination of sampling and laboratory test.

    Time frame: within a month of sample collection, a year to recruit five patients

Secondary outcomes

  1. Signals in pneumonitis

    Comparison with normal lung dataset (publicly available) to potentially identify radiation pneumonitis signals that may be targetable via drug therapy or worth expanding to a larger trial to explore.

    Time frame: 3-6 months

06

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
  • Centre for Information Research, University of Edinburgh
    Edinburgh, EH16 4UU, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
  • Henderson Lab
    Edinburgh, EH16 4UU, United Kingdom
    Not yet recruiting
  • Edinburgh Cancer Centre
    Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, United Kingdom
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Linked anonymized data only

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06557343
Lead sponsor
NHS Lothian
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 16, 2024
Start date
Oct 25, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 9, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion