ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05713006Updated Apr 8, 2026

Alectinib Pharmacokinetic in Patients With NSCLC

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Alectinib Oral Product in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIB and ALK Gene Mutation, sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico. Recruiting at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-08.

Sponsored by Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2022, registered Jan 2023).
  • Started May 2022; still recruiting 4 years 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This interventional study aims to determine the pharmacokinetics of orally administered alectinib with dose escalation from 300 mg to 600 mg twice daily in Mexican patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

The main question it aims to answer is: what will be the peak plasma concentrations of alectinib following sequential dose escalation (300, 450, and 600 mg BID) over nine weeks of pharmacokinetic evaluation (phase I) in Mexican patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC?

In phase I (on days 0, 21, and 42), oral alectinib will be administered twice per day (BID) to patients with ALK-positive NSCLC; starting with 300 mg BID in 21-day cycles and dose escalation in 150 mg increments until 600 mg BID. Blood samples will be taken before and after administration of each dose (on days 1, 22, and 43). The primary endopoints in phase I will be dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and PK parameters (Cmax. maximum plasma concentration; Tmax: time to reach maximum concentration: AUC 1-12: area under plasma ocncentrations-time curve steady-state concentration). At the end of the last blood collection (at day 43), the evaluation of each cycle will be at 600 mg, and the participant will be discharged to continue their treatment on an outpatient basis. Phase one will finish on day 63 of the study.

In phase II, the chosen BID dose based on the phase I portion will be administrated until disease progression, development of unacceptable side effects, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint in phase 2 is the overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST V.1.1.

Read the detailed description

Alectinib will be administrated under fast conditions.

The primary endpoint of the phase II part was ORR. Other secondary endpoints in phase II are progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), intracranial response (ICR), and duration of response (DOR).

Exploratory endpoints in this follow-up analysis included the evaluation of the correlation between tumor shrinkage and PFS and chosen dose to relieve cancer symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIB
  • ALK Gene Mutation

Keywords

  • alectinib
  • positive-ALK
  • non small cell lung cancer
03

In context

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

7,620 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; 1,838 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 62 across 6,019 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung.

Browse Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung studies →

Lead sponsor

Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico is the lead sponsor of 41 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both sexes
  • ≥ 18 years old
  • confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC
  • Stage IIIB - IV by the American Joint Committee of Cancer Version 8.
  • Recurrent disease (at least 180 days from curative intent treatment)
  • ALK rearrangements tested by FDA-approved tests (IHQ or FISH)
  • PS scale ≥ 70%
  • Having received treatment with anti-ALK inhibitors and one previous line of platinum-based chemotherapy.
  • as referred by version 1.1
  • Symptomatic could receive prior treatment with radiotherapy or surgery for at least two weeks before treatment initiation.
  • Asymptomatic brain metastases could not receive local therapy before study inclusion.
  • Negative highly sensitive pregnancy test (serum or urine) within 72 days before first dose intervention.
  • Sexually active patients should use a method with a failure rate of less than 1% per year.
  • Signed written
  • Adequate organ function (hematological, liver, and renal function)
  • of at least 12 weeks

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Carcinomatous meningitis confirmed by a positive CRL cytology or highly suspicious brain MRI.
  • Previous except for any carcinoma in-situ
  • Treatment with other anti-cancer therapy
  • Participating in other clinical trials in the former four weeks
  • Any other serious condition or uncontrolled active infection, altered mental status, or psychiatric condition that, in the investigator´s opinion, would limit the ability of an individual to meet the requirements of the study or which affects the interpretability of the results.
  • Active hepatitis virus infection (any serotype) or chronic infection with a potential risk of reactivation evaluated through a serological panel.
  • Active infection.
  • Breastfeeding.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

Measurable disease

The amount of disease can be tracked with a defined measurement, so the study can see whether it shrinks or grows. It might be a tumour measured on a scan or, in some blood cancers such as myeloma, a marker measured in blood or urine.

The criteria or the study team say which measurement counts — having no tumour visible on a scan does not by itself rule you out.

RECIST

The standard rules for measuring tumours on CT or MRI scans, to tell whether a cancer is shrinking, stable or growing during treatment.

“Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1” usually means at least one tumour 10 mm or more at its longest on a CT scan, or a lymph node 15 mm or more across its short axis.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Alectinib escalation dose

    Alecensa 150 mg Roche

    Drug: Alectinib Oral Product

Interventions

  • Alectinib is administered with a sequential dose escalation every 21 days from 300 to 600mg twice daily in the phase 1 portion. In phase 2, patients received an investigator-chosen dose based on the PK analysis.

    Also known as: Alecensa 150 mg Roche

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. AUC

    The area under the curve (AUC). Pharmacokinetic behavior of the initial alectinib for each given dose (300, 450 and 600 mg).

    Time frame: Amount of drug concentration between 0 to 12 hours after first drug administration

  2. Cmax

    Highest concentration of drug in blood (Serum) for each given dose (300, 450 and 600 mg).

    Time frame: From baseline control pre-dose, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, 3.00, 4.00, 5.00, 6.00, 8.00, 10.00 and 11.90 hours

  3. Cmin

    Lowest concentration of drug in blood (Serum) for each given dose (300, 450 and 600 mg).

    Time frame: From baseline control pre-dose, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, 3.00, 4.00, 5.00, 6.00, 8.00, 10.00 and 11.90 hours

  4. Tmax

    Time in witch Cmax is reached in each dose of the drug (300,450 and 600 mg)

    Time frame: From first dose administration through the following 12 hours (day 1)

  5. ORR

    overall response rate is measured in phase two

    Time frame: From first dose administration up to disease progression by CT scan every 6 weeks, through study completion.

  6. Steady state

    The amount of drug in the plasma has built up to a therapeutically effective concentration level, and as long as regular doses are administered to balance the amount of drug being cleared, the drug will continue to be active.

    Time frame: For phase two: between 2 and 4 months of treatment with investigators chosen dose.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adverse events

    Tolerance during drug escalation doses (300, 450, and 600 mg) in the phase one portion based on the PK analysis.

    Time frame: From date of first dose administration through 9 weeks.

  2. Drug toxicity

    Adverse events under alectinib Administration a the chosen dose are measured in the phase two portion.

    Time frame: From date of starting phase 2 portion until the date of first documented progression date or death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 60 months.

  3. PFS

    Progression-free survival

    Time frame: From date of first dose administration until the date of first documented progression date or death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 100 months.

  4. OS

    overall survival

    Time frame: From date of first dose administration until the date of documented death from any cause or last follow-up, whichever comes first, assessed up to 120 months.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Thoracic Oncology Unit and Personalized Medicine Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología
    Mexico City, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
    Recruiting
    • Oscar G Arrieta, M.D., M.Sc. · Contactogar@unam.mx · 5556280400
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Morcos PN, Nueesch E, Jaminion F, Guerini E, Hsu JC, Bordogna W, Balas B, Mercier F. Exposure-response analysis of alectinib in crizotinib-resistant ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;82(1):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3597-5. Epub 2018 May 10. PubMed 29748847 ↗
  • Sivignon M, Monnier R, Tehard B, Roze S. Cost-effectiveness of alectinib compared to crizotinib for the treatment of first-line ALK+ advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in France. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 16;15(1):e0226196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226196. eCollection 2020. PubMed 31945065 ↗
  • Carlson JJ, Suh K, Orfanos P, Wong W. Cost Effectiveness of Alectinib vs. Crizotinib in First-Line Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Apr;36(4):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0625-6. PubMed 29488070 ↗
  • Hida T, Nokihara H, Kondo M, Kim YH, Azuma K, Seto T, Takiguchi Y, Nishio M, Yoshioka H, Imamura F, Hotta K, Watanabe S, Goto K, Satouchi M, Kozuki T, Shukuya T, Nakagawa K, Mitsudomi T, Yamamoto N, Asakawa T, Asabe R, Tanaka T, Tamura T. Alectinib versus crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (J-ALEX): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017 Jul 1;390(10089):29-39. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30565-2. Epub 2017 May 10. PubMed 28501140 ↗
  • Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Gadgeel S, Ahn JS, Kim DW, Ou SI, Perol M, Dziadziuszko R, Rosell R, Zeaiter A, Mitry E, Golding S, Balas B, Noe J, Morcos PN, Mok T; ALEX Trial Investigators. Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 31;377(9):829-838. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704795. Epub 2017 Jun 6. PubMed 28586279 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 55 months after the start.

Of 123 non-industry phase 1/2 interventional studies under Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, half reached primary completion within 69 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 46 and three quarters within 107. This study's planned 55 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 431 studies reached it within 63 months; a quarter within 42 and three quarters within 80.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 4, 2023
First posted
Feb 6, 2023
StartActual
May 1, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
Last update
Apr 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05713006
Lead sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico
Responsible party
Oscar Gerardo Arrieta Rodríguez (Head of the Thoracic Oncology Unit and Personalized Medicine Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 6, 2023
Start date
May 1, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 8, 2026

Study contacts

Oscar G Arrieta Rodriguez, M.D., M.Sc.
Contact
ogar@unam.mx
5556280400 ext. 71101
Oscar G Arrieta Rodriguez, M.D., M.Sc.
principal investigator · Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia de Mexico

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Alectinib

Start the discussion