CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT03767621iLITROUpdated Mar 5, 2025

Concordance Between FFR and iFR for the Assessment of Intermediate Lesions in the Left Main Coronary Artery. A Prospective Validation of a Default Value for iFR

An observational study in Coronary Artery Disease, Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis and Left Main Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Fundación EPIC. Active, not recruiting at 38 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-05.

Sponsored by Fundación EPIC · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The assessment of Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) lesions by means of coronary angiography renders serious limitations.

Studies with a limited number of patients have shown that a value of FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve) above 0.80 identify a low risk of events in case of not performing revascularization in patients with intermediate stenosis in the LMCA. Although iFR (Instant wave Free Ratio) has recently been found equivalent to FFR The demonstration of the prognostic utility of iFR in patients with LMCA intermediate lesions could have an important clinical impact and justify its systematic use for the treatment decision in these high-risk patients.

Read the detailed description

The assessment of Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) lesions by means of coronary angiography renders serious limitations. In the case of intermediate stenoses (25-60%), invasive imaging tests, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) or functional by determining the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), have been proposed to identify those patients who could benefit from revascularization.

Studies with a limited number of patients have shown that a value of FFR above 0.80 identify a low risk of events in case of not performing revascularization in patients with intermediate stenosis in the LMCA. Although iFR (Instant wave Free Ratio) has recently been found equivalent to FFR in assessing the prognosis of patients with intermediate lesions, the validation of the prognostic power of this index in patients with intermediate LMCA lesions has not been demonstrated, although it is used in clinical practice assuming the results in other locations of the lesions.

The demonstration of the prognostic utility of iFR in patients with LMCA intermediate lesions could have an important clinical impact and justify its systematic use for the treatment decision in these high-risk patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis
  • Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
  • Restenosis, Coronary

Keywords

  • Left Main Coronary Artery
  • Intermediate Coronary Lesions
  • iFR
  • Coronary Physiology
  • IVUS
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is below the median of 336 across 1,947 observational studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundación EPIC is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with intermediate stenosis of the LMCA will be included by coronary angiography (estimate visual 25-60%) in which a functional study is performed with pressure and calculation guidance of iFR and FFR with intravenous adenosine in perfusion to guide the indication of revascularization.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with intermediate lesion in the LMCA (25-60% angiographic stenosis) by visual estimation) in which the realization of a study with guide of pressure for the determination of the iFR.
  • Patients aged ≥18 years.
  • Patients able of giving informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with indication for coronary surgery regardless of the significance of the LMCA lesion.
  • Patients with a LMCA lesion presenting with ulceration, dissection or thrombus.
  • Patients with previous arterial or venous graft lesion functioning in the territory irrigated by the LMCA (LMCA protected).
  • Patients with ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome) with a potentially guilty lesion in the LMCA.
  • Patients unable to obtain informed consent.
  • Patients with known terminal illness that conditions a life expectancy less than 1 year.
  • Patients with hemodynamic instability with Killip III or IV class.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with intermediate lesions.

    Patients with intermediate lesions (stenosis in angiography between 25% and 60%) in LMCA.

    Other: Indication of revascularization

Interventions

  • OtherIndication of revascularization

    Device: iFR/FFR

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment correlation between FFR>=0.80 and iFR >=0.89

    Efficacy and correlation of two invasive indexes of functional assessment by intracoronary pressure guidance in intermediate lesions of the LMCA with a cut-off point to defer the treatment of FFR\> = 0.80 (with intravenous adenosine) and iFR \> = 0.89. the LMCA.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Major Adverse Cardiac Events

    Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. Major Adverse Cardiac Events

    Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation

    Time frame: 1 year

  4. Major Adverse Cardiac Events

    Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment correlation between iFR and IVUS

    Assessment correlation between iFR and IVUS derived minimal luminal area

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Death (all cause)

    Death (all cause)

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

  3. Death (cardiovascular)

    Death (cardiovascular)

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

  4. Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction

    Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

  5. Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction related to the LMCA lesion

    Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction related to the LMCA lesion

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

  6. Revascularization

    Revascularization

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

  7. Revascularization of the target lesion

    Revascularization of the target lesion

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

  8. Myocardial Infarction related to target lesion revascularization

    Myocardial Infarction related to target lesion revascularization

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

  9. Stent Thrombosis in the target lesion revascularization

    Stent Thrombosis in the target lesion revascularization

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

  10. Restenosis of the stent in target lesion

    Restenosis of the stent in target lesion

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

  11. New revascularization of the target lesion

    New revascularization of the target lesion

    Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years

07

Study locations

38 sites
  • Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa
    Terrassa, Barcelona 08221, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario de Santa Lucia de Cartagena
    Cartagena, Murcia 30202, Spain
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca
    El Palmar, Murcia 30120, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario de Castellón
    Castellón De La Plana, Valencia 12004, Spain
  • Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
    Galdakao, Vizcaya 48960, Spain
  • Hospital General Universitario de Albacete
    Albacete, 02006, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario de Badajoz
    Badajoz, 06080, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol de Badalona
    Badalona, 08916, Spain
  • Hospital Del Mar
    Barcelona, 08003, Spain
  • Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona
    Barcelona, 08028, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron
    Barcelona, 08035, Spain
  • Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
    Barcelona, 08041, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Bellvitge
    Barcelona, 08908, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Puerto Real
    Cadiz, 11510, Spain
  • Hospital General de Ciudad Real
    Ciudad Real, 13005, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
    Córdoba, 14004, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes
    Gijón, 33203, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Doctor Josep Trueta
    Girona, 17007, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves
    Granada, 18014, Spain
  • Hospital General Juan Ramón Jiménez
    Huelva, 21005, Spain
  • Hospital de León
    León, 24080, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Lucus Agusti
    Lugo, 27003, Spain
  • Hospital de La Princesa
    Madrid, 28006, Spain
  • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
    Madrid, 28027, Spain
  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
    Madrid, 28040, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario de La Paz
    Madrid, 28046, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Victoria
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • Hospital de Merida
    Mérida, 06800, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
    Oviedo, 33011, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario de Donostia
    San Sebastián, 20014, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
    Santander, 39008, Spain
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
    Santiago De Compostela, 15706, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari Joan Xxiii de Tarragona
    Tarragona, 43005, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Salud
    Toledo, 45004, Spain
  • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
    Valencia, 46010, Spain
  • Hospital Universitari I Politecnic La Fe
    Valencia, 46026, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Alvaro Cunqueiro
    Vigo, 36312, Spain
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa
    Zaragoza, 50009, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, Paulus WJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994 Mar;89(3):1013-22. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1013. PubMed 8124786 ↗
  • Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available. PubMed 25173339 ↗
  • Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17. PubMed 17531660 ↗
  • Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611. PubMed 19144937 ↗
  • Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7. PubMed 22154731 ↗
  • Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824-1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445. Epub 2017 Mar 18. PubMed 28317458 ↗
  • Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Ohagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Todt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Karegren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Frobert O; iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540. Epub 2017 Mar 18. PubMed 28317438 ↗
  • de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M, Carrillo P, Rondan J, Lozano I, Ruiz Nodar JM, Baz JA, Fernandez Nofrerias E, Pajin F, Garcia Camarero T, Gutierrez H; LITRO Study Group (Spanish Working Group on Interventional Cardiology). Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 19;58(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064. PubMed 21757111 ↗
  • Hamilos M, Muller O, Cuisset T, Ntalianis A, Chlouverakis G, Sarno G, Nelis O, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Wyffels E, Barbato E, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2009 Oct 13;120(15):1505-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.850073. Epub 2009 Sep 28. PubMed 19786633 ↗
  • de la Torre Hernandez JM, Baz Alonso JA, Gomez Hospital JA, Alfonso Manterola F, Garcia Camarero T, Gimeno de Carlos F, Roura Ferrer G, Recalde AS, Martinez-Luengas IL, Gomez Lara J, Hernandez Hernandez F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cequier Fillat A, Perez de Prado A, Gonzalez-Trevilla AA, Jimenez Navarro MF, Mauri Ferre J, Fernandez Diaz JA, Pinar Bermudez E, Zueco Gil J; IVUS-TRONCO-ICP Spanish study. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary disease: pooled analysis at the patient-level of 4 registries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.014. PubMed 24650399 ↗
  • Rodriguez-Leor O, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Garcia-Camarero T, Garcia Del Blanco B, Lopez-Palop R, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Cuellas Ramon C, Jimenez-Kockar M, Jimenez-Mazuecos J, Fernandez Salinas F, Gomez-Lara J, Brugaletta S, Alfonso F, Palma R, Gomez-Menchero AE, Millan R, Tejada Ponce D, Linares Vicente JA, Ojeda S, Pinar E, Fernandez-Pelegrina E, Morales-Ponce FJ, Cid-Alvarez AB, Rama-Merchan JC, Molina Navarro E, Escaned J, Perez de Prado A. Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio for the Assessment of Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Correlations With Fractional Flow Reserve/Intravascular Ultrasound and Prognostic Implications: The iLITRO-EPIC07 Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;15(11):861-871. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012328. Epub 2022 Sep 16. PubMed 36111801 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03767621
Lead sponsor
Fundación EPIC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 6, 2018
Start date
Feb 19, 2019
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 5, 2025

Study contacts

José María de la Torre, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Oriol Rodríguez Leor, PhD, MD
principal investigator · Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion