ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03734627EndoGutUpdated Aug 16, 2021

Gastrointestinal Nutrient Transit and Enteroendocrine Function After Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery

An observational study in Esophageal Cancer, Nutrition Disorders and Appetite Disorders, sponsored by St. James's Hospital, Ireland. Completed at 2 sites in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-16.

Sponsored by St. James's Hospital, Ireland · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The incidence of oesophagogastric cancer has increased by 400% since the 1970s in Ireland and the United Kingdom. In addition, refinement of perioperative management and the now widespread use of multimodal protocols for patients with locally advanced disease have significantly improved outcomes for patients with oesophagogastric cancer treatable with curative intent. Despite significant advances in chemoradiotherapy, surgical resection remains the primary curative option.

Unintentional weight loss and nutritional complications represent serious concerns for patients after radical resection, even among those who remain free from recurrent disease in the long-term. A study from the Swedish Esophageal and Cardia Cancer Registry reported a mean three year weight loss of 10.8% among disease-free patients, with 33.8% of this cohort demonstrating malnutrition at three years post-oesophagectomy.

Mechanisms contributing to weight loss for disease-free patients after upper gastrointestinal surgery are poorly understood, however an association between increasing magnitude of weight loss and the presence of increased satiety is described. Our recent studies at SJH have demonstrated four fold elevated postprandial satiety gut hormone concentrations after oesophagectomy, compared with baseline preoperative values. Postprandial gut hormone levels correlate significantly with postprandial symptoms and altered appetite at 3 months postoperatively, and with body weight loss at 2 years postoperatively. However, the mechanism leading to exaggerated postprandial gut hormone production after upper gastrointestinal surgery is poorly understood, limiting targeted therapeutic options.

In this study, we aim to characterise the role of altered nutrient transit and enteroendocrine cell function in the pathophysiology of excessive post-prandial gut hormone responses after upper gastrointestinal surgery. To do this, we will measure the gut hormone response to a standardised 400 kcal meal, as per previous studies, while concurrently assessing gastrointestinal transit time, and enteroendocrine cell morphology and function. In this way, we will determine whether the magnitude of the postprandial gut hormone response correlates with the rate of nutrient transit into the enteroendocrine L-cell rich small intestine, and whether enteroendocrine cell adaptation occurs after oesophagectomy.

Furthermore, we have previously observed that gut hormone suppression using octreotide is associated with increased ad libitum among subjects after upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery (Elliott JA et al, Annals of Surgery, 2015). The mechanism of action of octreotide may relate to SSTR-5-mediated negative feedback to the enteroendocrine L-cell, but this medication may additionally reduce enteroendocrine L-cell responses through its inhibitory effect on gastrointestinal motility - reducing the rapidity with which nutrients are delivered to the small intestine - and small intestinal nutrient sensing via inhibition of the Na+-dependent glucose transporter SGLT-18-10. Through conduction of this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled crossover study, we aim to establish the mechanism of action of octreotide-mediated increased food intake in patients after gastrointestinal surgery. This may inform the design of future targeted interventions for this patient group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Esophageal Cancer
  • Nutrition Disorders
  • Appetite Disorders
  • Dumping Syndrome
  • Delayed Gastric Emptying
  • Surgery

Keywords

  • Gut hormones
  • GLP-1
  • Enteroendocrine L-cell
  • Early satiety
  • Dumping syndrome
  • Gastrointestinal transit
  • Insulin
  • Octreotide
  • Somatostatin
  • Esophagectomy
03

In context

Esophageal Neoplasms

1,873 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms; 501 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 200 across 432 observational studies indexed under Esophageal Neoplasms.

Browse Esophageal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

St. James's Hospital, Ireland is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients at least 9 months post upper gastrointestinal surgery and age-, weight- and sex-matched control subjects with gastroesophageal reflux disease or non-dysplastic Barrett's oeosophagus.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Patient group:

  1. History of upper gastrointestinal surgery at least 9 months previously

Control group:

  1. Patients with suspected or confirmed non-dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus or reflux who are age, weight and gender matched to the patient cohort

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy, breastfeeding
  2. Recurrent disease after surgery
  3. Other active
  4. Significant psychiatric disorder or cognitive decline or communication impairment limiting capacity to provide
  5. Other disease or medication which may impact gut hormone physiology
  6. Previous upper gastrointestinal resection
  7. Certain allergies or dietary intolerances
  8. Anticoagulants

Patients with to the study medications (as per www.medicines.ie) will not be automatically excluded, but will be invited to participate in an attenuated protocol where that agent is not given. It is not anticipated that this will be a frequent occurrence, however this strategy will minimise unnecessary participant exclusion.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery - Transit

    Drug: Octreotide Acetate · Drug: Saline Solution · Drug: Paracetamol · Drug: Sulfasalazine

  • Control - Transit

    Drug: Octreotide Acetate · Drug: Saline Solution · Drug: Paracetamol · Drug: Sulfasalazine

  • Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery - Gut Function

    Diagnostic Test: Duodenal biopsy

  • Control - Gut Function

    Diagnostic Test: Duodenal biopsy

Interventions

  • 50mcg octreotide acetate by subcutaneous injection 10 minutes prior to a 400kcal mixed meal challenge

  • Equivalent volume of 0.9% saline by subcutaneous injection 10 minutes prior to a 400kcal mixed meal challenge

  • Paracetamol 1g by mouth consumed with a 400kcal mixed meal challenge

  • 1g sulfasalazine by mouth consumed with a 400kcal mixed meal challenge

  • Diagnostic testDuodenal biopsy

    Biopsy from the second part of the duodenum taken at routine endoscopic surveillance, undertaken for another clinical indication.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area under the curve for paracetamol at 30 minutes after a 400kcal mixed meal stimulus

    Time frame: 30 minutes post meal

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peak paracetamol level

    Time frame: Within 300 minutes post meal

  2. GLP-1 area under the curve over 300 minutes after a 400kcal mixed meal stimulus

    Time frame: Within 300 minutes post meal

  3. Glucose area under the curve over 300 minutes after a 400kcal mixed meal stimulus

    Time frame: Within 300 minutes post meal

  4. Insulin area under the curve over 300 minutes after a 400kcal mixed meal stimulus

    Time frame: Within 300 minutes post meal

  5. Visual analogue scales

    Time frame: Within 300 minutes post meal

  6. EORTC health related quality of life

    Time frame: At one year post surgery, on the day of assessment

Other outcomes

  1. Duodenal enteroendocrine cell density

    Time frame: At one year post surgery, on the day of assessment

  2. Duodenal enteroendocrine L-cell density

    Time frame: At one year post surgery, on the day of assessment

  3. Duodenal enteroendocrine cell mRNA expression profile

    Time frame: At one year post surgery, on the day of assessment

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Department of Surgery, St. James's Hospital
    Dublin, D4, Ireland
  • Wellcome Trust-Health Research Board Clinical Research Facility, St. James's Hospital
    Dublin, D8, Ireland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Elliott JA, Docherty NG, Eckhardt HG, Doyle SL, Guinan EM, Ravi N, Reynolds JV, Roux CWL. Weight Loss, Satiety, and the Postprandial Gut Hormone Response After Esophagectomy: A Prospective Study. Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):82-90. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001918. PubMed 27455150 ↗
  • Elliott JA, Jackson S, King S, McHugh R, Docherty NG, Reynolds JV, le Roux CW. Gut Hormone Suppression Increases Food Intake After Esophagectomy With Gastric Conduit Reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):824-29; discussion 829-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001465. PubMed 26583672 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2016 to primary completion in Jul 2021, 60 months.

Of 152 non-industry observational studies under Esophageal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 81 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 32 and three quarters within 252. This study's 60 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 174 studies reached it within 60 months; a quarter within 33 and three quarters within 252.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 6, 2018
First posted
Nov 8, 2018
StartActual
Jul 1, 2016
Primary completionActual
Jul 1, 2021
CompletionActual
Jul 1, 2021
Last update
Aug 16, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 16, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03734627
Lead sponsor
St. James's Hospital, Ireland
Responsible party
Dr Jessie A Elliott (Clinical Research Fellow, St. James's Hospital, Ireland) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 8, 2018
Start date
Jul 1, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2021
Completion
Jul 1, 2021
Last update
Aug 16, 2021

Study contacts

John V Reynolds, MD FRCS
principal investigator · St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Carel W le Roux, FRCP FRCPath PhD
principal investigator · Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion