ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06178237ROUNDUpdated Dec 20, 2023

RADA16 for Reducing Drain Output Trajectory Following Neck Dissection

An interventional study of Purabond in Head and Neck Cancer, sponsored by St. James's Hospital, Ireland. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-20.

Sponsored by St. James's Hospital, Ireland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
208
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This will be a prospective single-blind randomised controlled trial to evaluate if the use of a medical device named Purabond, a haemostatic agent already CE marked for use in Ireland, can reduce the occurrence of seroma, a complication related to but distinct from haematoma, following neck dissection surgery. Patients undergoing neck dissection surgery will be randomised either to standard post-operative care following neck dissection or to standard post-operative care and Purabond. Drains are placed routinely following surgery of this type and their removal is dictated by the volume of fluid produced per day - it is hypothesised that Purabond will reduce the volume of fluid produced and thereby facilitate earlier drain removal.

Read the detailed description

Purabond is a new medical device taking the form of a gel containing an active ingredient called RADA-16. It is designed to stop bleeding from wounds by forming into a stable barrier (matrix) when coming into contact with ionic fluids like blood. Purabond is already currently use for procedures by Cardiology, General Surgery, Vascular, Gynaecology, and ENT. Specific uses in ENT surgery so far have been for sinus surgery. Purabond is CE marked and indicated for situations where haemostasis by standard means is insufficient or impractical.

The investigators hypothesise that Purabond will reduce the duration for which neck drains must be left in place after neck dissection, which is an operation to remove lymph nodes from the neck. Following neck dissection, fluid can leak into the healing tissues in the neck from very small damaged blood vessels - when an excess of this fluid builds up underneath the skin this is called a seroma. This occurs in 1.3-7% of patients and represents a potential area for infection as well as a noticeable lump. Readmission is sometimes required in the event of an infected seroma though there is no published evidence on how common this is. Drains are placed during neck dissection surgery to remove this fluid and to also reduce the overall seroma rate. Drains are left in until the volume of fluid being produced decreases. The duration for which drains are left in place is also affected by the development of other, rarer complications - specifically chyle leak, anastomotic leak, and pharyngocutaneous fistula. In the setting of any of the above, drains are often left in for longer to ensure any fluid that accumulates is removed and that dead space in the neck is kept to a minimum.

This study aims to assess if Purabond can speed up the process of removing drains. The fluid that makes up a seroma leaks out from damaged blood vessels in the same way a haematoma (collection of blood in the neck) does but the vessels of interest in a seroma are smaller and more numerous - manual ligation of these is not feasible. As Purabond forms a matrix in response to ionic fluids (including seroma) it is expected to reduce the rate of seroma by sealing such vessels. The benefits of this would be reduced duration of stay in hospital for patients with otherwise uncomplicated neck dissections but also reducing infection risk to patients with more complex needs who could otherwise have their drains removed earlier. It would also be expected to reduce the subsequent need for readmission and aspiration of seroma. These findings would then be more broadly applicable to less extensive neck surgeries where there is a risk of seroma but drains are not placed frequently (parotidectomy, thyroidectomy, etc).

02

Conditions studied

  • Head and Neck Cancer

Keywords

  • seroma
03

In context

Head and Neck Neoplasms

2,710 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 594 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 208 is above the median of 46 across 2,032 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.

Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

St. James's Hospital, Ireland is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with head and neck cancer (including thyroid, cutaneous, \& mucosal primaries) for which a neck dissection is indicated as part of treatment.
  • Over 18 years of age.
  • Able to give .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to satisfy all the above listed inclusion criteria.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
208 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    Standard of care post-neck dissection

  • Experimental
    Standard of care plus Purabond

    Standard of care post-neck dissection plus Purabond

    Device: Purabond

Interventions

  • DevicePurabond

    Application of Purabond to surgical field

    Also known as: RADA16

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total volume of fluid drained

    Total output from intraoperatively placed drain plus any additional drainage performed percutaneously

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Duration of drain placement

    Duration of drain placement

    Time frame: Until drain removal, usually within 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Haematoma

    Haematoma

    Time frame: Usually within 1 week

  2. Number of percutaneous aspirations required

    Number of percutaneous aspirations required

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Duration of inpatient stay

    Duration of inpatient stay

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Number of patients with neck dissection complications relevant to drains management

    Complications affecting drain management - chyle leak, pharyngocutaenous fistula, anastomotic leak

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Mar 2024; primary completion for Mar 2026, 24 months later.

Of 437 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Head and Neck Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 71. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 455 studies reached it within 32 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 70.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 31, 2023
First posted
Dec 20, 2023
StartEst.
Mar 2024
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 2026
Last update
Dec 20, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 20, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06178237
Lead sponsor
St. James's Hospital, Ireland
Collaborators
Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
Responsible party
Gerard Sexton (Specialist Registrar in Otolaryngology, St. James's Hospital, Ireland) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 20, 2023
Start date
Mar 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 20, 2023

Study contacts

Gerard Sexton
Contact
gerardsexton@rcsi.ie
014103000

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion