An interventional study of Mind My Mind (MMM) and Treatment as Usual (TAU) in Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders and Depressive Symptoms, sponsored by Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-09-16.
Sponsored by Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Background
Impairing emotional and behavioural problems are common in children and adolescents and mark a three-fold increased risk of mental disorder in young adulthood. Evidence-based psychological interventions are recommended for indicated prevention and first-line treatment, but access to treatment is often limited.
A new, modular cognitive and behavioural therapy program Mind My Mind (MMM) comprising evidence-based interventions for children with emotional and behavioral problems was designed to be delivered by educational psychologists in the Danish municipalities.
A feasibility RCT (NCT03448809), demonstrated that the study design was acceptable among children, parents, and therapists, and it provided data to estimate the sample size needed for the definitive RCT. The investigators test the hypothesis that the parent-reported impact of mental health problems will be significantly lower for children in the MMM group as compared with children in the TAU group after the 18-week intervention period (primary hypothesis), and after follow-up at week 26 (first secondary hypothesis).
Aim
To investigate the effects and cost-effectiveness of MMM compared with TAU for children and adolescents with impairing anxiety, depressive symptoms and/or behavioral problems. Both beneficial and harmful effects are evaluated.
Methods
The study compares the new modular MMM with TAU for children aged 6-16 years with anxiety, depressive symptoms or behavioral problems impacting on their daily and social life. The trial is conducted in four Danish municipalities in the period from September 2017 to April 2019. Participants are children with indicated needs.
The parents sign up the child for assessment in the Pedagogical Psychological Services in the Municipalities. The assessment includes web-based standardized questionnaires for child and parent: 1) the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ), 2) Spence Children's Anxiety Scale, 3) Mood and Feelings Questionnaire, and 4) family, social and school functioning. The questionnaires are supplemented with a clinical psychopathological interview by a trained psychologist. The investigators exclude children with 1) low levels of problems and no indicated needs, or 2) high levels of problems and need of referral to the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
412 children will be included and randomized (1:1) to MMM versus TAU. MMM is supported by a central organization, who is responsible for the education and weekly supervision of the therapists, and the web-based data collection and feedback of data in real time to therapists and researchers. All outcomes are self-, parent- and teacher-reported scores on standardized questionnaires administered at baseline, week 18 and week 26. At entry, the child and the parents own description of the Top-problem is recorded and scored on a 10-point likert scale. The Top-problem and impact of problem is scored by parent and child every second week during the intervention period, and the progress is monitored by the therapists in the MMM group. Information on costs is gathered through administrative registers and questionnaires at baseline, week 18, and week 26.
Primary objectives and outcome measures
This primary outcome is measured with the parent-reported SDQ impact-scale. The minimum relevant difference in impact of mental health problems was set at 1.0 corresponding to a change from severe to moderate, or from moderate to little-or-no impact in one of five domains of child's life: distress, home-life, friendships, classroom learning and leisure activities.
Secondary objectives and outcomes measures
The key secondary hypotheses are that the children in the MMM group will show significantly lower levels of parent-reported anxiety, depressive symptoms, functional impairment, Top-problems and behavioural problems, and better school attendance and quality-of-life as compared with the children in the TAU group at week 18.
All other outcomes are explored at week 18 and 26, including the primary and secondary measures of potential harm: 1) youths with severe and increased levels of self-reported suicidality, hopelessness and/or negative self-evaluation, and 2) youths with poor quality of life in relation to family, free time and friends.
Statistical analyses
All analyses will be intention-to-treat with two-sided significance tests. The investigators will use mixed models with repeated measures for continuous outcomes and generalized linear mixed model for binary and non-normally distributed outcomes. For the key secondary outcomes, the investigators will use the strategy of hierarchical testing allowing us to preserve the level of significance, α=0.05, as long as the null hypotheses are rejected. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated to analyze cost-effectiveness.
Perspectives
The results will guide policy makers in deciding whether to implement modular CBT-programs like the MMM.
7,201 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,682 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 396 is above the median of 80 across 6,057 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.
Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Mind My Mind (MMM)
Behavioral: Mind My Mind (MMM)
Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Behavioral: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Mind My Mind (MMM) is a new transdiagnostic and modular cognitive and behavioural therapy (CBT) program comprising evidence-based interventions for children and adolescents with anxiety, depression or disruptive behavior. MMM manual consists of evidence-based CBT methods that are organized into modules. The intervention is tailored to the individual child by the dosing and the sequencing of the modules. Trauma-focused CBT is available. Parents are engaged in child's therapy and support the child in doing the homework. Parent management training is offered for behavioral disturbances. The educational psychologists deliver the therapy after one-week training in the manual, followed by weekly supervision. The treatment fidelity is monitored by video observation of therapy sessions (\>20%). The MMM training program consists of 9-13 sessions plus one booster, all completed within 17 weeks.
The parents in the TAU group are offered two sessions (week 2 and week 17) to support their attempts to seek help for the child in the municipality. This coordination is provided by psychologists (or other local professionals) who hold records of the currently available treatment options in the municipality. The TAU vary considerably from no intervention to counselling, talk therapy, pedagogical advice, network meetings, and/or individual support in the school setting. Some children are offered CBT interventions, but access to manualized treatment is generally very limited.
The child's impact of mental health problems reported by the parent on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
SDQ contains 25 items, each scored on a 3-point Likert scale (0, 1, 2), and divided into five sub-scales measuring emotional problems, behavioral problems, hyperactivity, peer problems and pro-social behavior. The total difficulties scale (range 0-40) sums up the difficulties across the first four problem areas. The extended version of the SDQ includes questions about child distress and interference of problems with home-life, friendships, classroom learning and leisure activities, and scores sum up the distress and the interference of problems on the impact scale (range 0-10). The minimum relevant difference in impact of mental health problems was set at 1.0 corresponding to a change from severe to moderate, or from moderate to little-or-no impact in one of the five domains of child's life. This primary outcome is measured with the parent-reported SDQ impact-scale (range 0-10) and analyzed in a mixed model with repeated measures adjusting for the stratification variables.
Time frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 18 and 26
Child' anxiety reported by the parent on 'Spence Children's Anxiety Scale (SCAS)
The parent-reported SCAS comprises 38 items, rated on a four-point scale (0-1-2-3). The six subscales cover social phobia (SoP; six items), panic disorder and agoraphobia (Panic; nine items), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD; six items), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD; six items), separation anxiety disorder (SAD; six items) and fear of physical injury (Fear; five items). Each subscale is scored separately and added together for a total score reflecting overall anxiety symptoms. A validation of the Danish version of the SCAS in children and adolescents aged 7-17 years found good psychometric properties.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Child's depressive symptoms reported by the parent on the Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ)
The parent-reported MFQ comprises 34 items, each rated on a three-point scale (0-1-2). The MFQ have well-established predictive validity for detection of depressive states and suicidality in epidemiological and clinical samples of children and adolescents aged 8-17 years, and the parent-reported MFQ has also demonstrated sensitivity for change with treatment.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Weiss Functional impairment rating Scale (WFIRS)
The Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale-Parent Report (WFIRS) was designed to evaluate to what degree a child's behavior or emotional problems impacted on various domains of daily functioning. The questionnaire comprises 50 items, each rated on a four-point scale (0-1-2-3). Although it has only been validated (and found very sensitive for change) in clinical samples of children with ADHD, it focuses on the impact of emotional and behavioral problems in children. The six domains (subscales) cover: Family and home life, School and learning, Life skills, Self-Concept, Social activities, and Risk behaviors. Only the parent-reported version was used in the present study.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
The self-reported physical and psychological well-being (two subscales from the KIDSCREEN).
The KIDSCREEN is a Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) questionnaire for children and adolescents aged from 8 to 18 years. It comprises parent- and youth-reported questionnaires. The investigators used the version with 27 items (rated on a five point scale, 1-2-3-4-5), containing five dimensions (subscales): Physical Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Autonomy \& Parents, Peers \& Social Support and School Environment. For the key secondary outcomes, the investigators use only the two self-reported subscales: 'Physical Well-Being' and 'Psychological Well-Being'.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
The child's behavioural problems, reported by the parent on the Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (ECBI)
The ECBI is a brief, parent-reported behavioral rating scale of externalizing problems in children of age 2-16 years. It consists of 36 items that assess typical problem behavior in children with oppositional and conduct disorders. Each item is rated on a 7-point Intensity Scale indicating how often the behaviors currently occur (0=Never, 4=sometimes, 7=always); and a Problem scale that identifies whether the child's behavior is problematic or not for the parent (1=yes, 0=no). Hence, the sum of scores on the 'Intensity Scale' measures the overall intensity of problem behavior, while the sum of scores on the 'Problem scale' measures the number of problematic behaviors.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Total emotional and behavioural difficulties, reported by parents (SDQ)
The SDQ total difficulties scale (range 0-40) sums up the difficulties across the four problem areas: emotional problems, behavioral problems, hyperactivity, and peer problems.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26.
School attendance
The parent reports the frequency of days with school attendance problems within the last four weeks: 1) days with late attendance, 2) days not attending school with parental accept or knowledge, 3) days not attending school without parental knowledge (best estimate in retrospect)
Time frame: Week 18 and 26
Top-problem scores, parent-reported
At entry, the child and the parents own description of the Top-problem is recorded and scored on a 10-point likert scale (range 1-10). The Top-problem is scored by the parent during the intervention period in both treatment groups. The therapists monitor the scores in MMM training group.
Time frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 18 and 26
The self-reported impact of mental health problems (SDQ, only children of age ≥ 11 years)
The SDQ impact scale (range 0-10) covering child distress and interference of problems with home-life, friendships, classroom learning and leisure activities. The impact scale is administered as part of the SDQ at week 0, 18 and 26; and as part of the new session-by-session questionnaire at week 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14.
Time frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 18 and 26
The teacher-reported impact of mental health problems (SDQ)
The teacher-reported version of the SDQ impact scale (range 0-6) covers child distress and interference of problems with friendships and classroom learning.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Self-reported anxiety reported (SCAS, only children of age ≥ 8 years)
The parent-reported SCAS comprises 44 items, rated on a four-point scale (0-1-2-3). The self-reported version is longer than the parent-reported, because it includes six positive filler items.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Self-reported depressive symptoms (MFQ, only children of age ≥ 8 years)
The parent-reported MFQ comprises 33 items, each rated on a three-point scale (0-1-2).
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Self-reported Top-problem scores
The Top-problem is scored by the child during the intervention period in both treatment groups. The therapists monitor the scores in MMM training group.
Time frame: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 18 and 26
The parent-reported Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) of their child (KIDSCREEN)
For other secondary outcomes, the investigators use all the parent-reported subscales of the KIDSCREEN: Physical Well-Being, Psychological Well-Being, Autonomy \& Parents, Peers \& Social Support and School Environment.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Self-reported emotional and behavioural difficulties (SDQ, only children of age ≥ 11 years)
The SDQ total difficulties scale (range 0-40) sums up the difficulties across the four problem areas: emotional problems, behavioral problems, hyperactivity, and peer problems.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Teacher-reported emotional and behavioural difficulties (SDQ)
The SDQ total difficulties scale (range 0-40) sums up the difficulties across the four problem areas: emotional problems, behavioral problems, hyperactivity, and peer problems.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Parental Stress Scale (PSS)
The PSS is a parent-reported questionnaire with 18 items, each rated on a five point scale (0-1-2-3-4). It measures the stress a parent may experience in their role-function as parent.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
The parent-reported Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ)
The parent-reported ESQ comprises seven items, each rated on a three-point scale (0-1-2). The Danish version was adapted from a longer English questionnaire asking young people and their parents how they felt about the psychiatric service they received. The brief Danish version proved useful in a recent study of efficacy of the Cool Kids program in Denmark.
Time frame: Week 18 and 26
The self-reported Experience of Service Questionnaire (ESQ)
The child-reported ESQ comprises seven items, each rated on a three-point scale (0-1-2).
Time frame: Week 18 and 26
The parent- and child-reported Child Health Utility 9D (CHU9D)
CHU9D is a generic preference-based measure of health-related quality of life. It contains nine items, each with five response categories that assess the child's functioning across domains of worry, sadness, pain, tiredness, annoyance, school, sleep, daily routine and activities.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Parents' absence from work
The parent reports the frequency of hours/days each of the parents have been absence from work within the last four weeks due to the problems of the child.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
Treatment and support received by the child and the family
The parent reports any support or treatment received by the child and/or family from the municipality, general practitioner, and private actors.
Time frame: Week 0, 18 and 26
The primary measures of potential harms
Selected items from the Mood and Feelings questionnaire (MFQ), covering the last two weeks, and scored by the child: four items on Suicidality ("I thought that life wasn't worth living", "thoughts about death or dying", "I thought my family would be better off without me", "I thought about killing myself"), and four items covering Negative cognitions about guilt, hopelessness and self-evaluation ("I blamed myself for things that weren't my fault", "I thought there was nothing good for me in the future", "I hated myself", "I felt I was a bad person"). If at least one out of the four items are scored "always" (the most severe response) at follow-up, but not at entry, then a potential harm is counted present (yes/no) in the domain of Suicidality and/or Negative cognitions.
Time frame: Week 18 and 26
The secondary measures of potential harm
Selected items from the KIDSCREEN covering the last week and scored by the child: five items on family relations/ free time ("Have you had enough time for yourself?", "Have you been able to do the things that you want to do in your free time?", "Have your parents had enough time for you?", "Have your parents treated you fairly?", "Have you been able talk to your parents when you wanted to?"; and four items on friends ("Have you spent time with your friends?", "Have you had fun with your friends?", "Have you and your friends helped each other?", "Have you been able to rely on your friends?"). If at least one out of the five and four items, respectively, are scored "always" (the most severe response) at follow-up, but not at entry, then a potential harm is counted present (yes/no) in the domain of family relations/free time and/or friends.
Time frame: Week 18 and 26
Costs
Costs of the Mind My Mind intervention and treatment as usual will be estimated.
Time frame: Week 26
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
The ICER using the primary outcome SDQ impact score as effect measure will be calculated (CEA) as well as the ICER using quality-adjusted life years, derived from the CHU9D score, as effect measure (CUA).
Time frame: Week 26
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark