An interventional study of VIA Family 2.0 in Child, Parents and Mental Disorder, sponsored by Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 0 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-26.
Sponsored by Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
VIA Family 2.0 - a Family Based Intervention for families with parental mental illness
Background: Children born to parents with mental illness have consistently been shown to have increased risks for a range of negative life outcomes including increased frequencies of mental disorders, somatic disorders, poorer cognitive functioning, social, emotional and behavioral problems and lower quality of life. Further these children are often overlooked by both society and mental health services, although they represent a potential for prevention and early intervention.
A collaboration between researchers and clinicians from two regions, the Capital Region and the North Region Denmark has been established as the Research Center for Family Based Interventions. The research center is an umbrella for a series of research activities, all focusing on children and adolescents in families with parental mental illness.
Method: A large randomized, controlled trial (RCT) for families with parental mental illness will be conducted in order to evaluate the effect of a two-year multidisciplinary, holistic team intervention (the VIA Family 2.0 team intervention) against treatment as usual (TAU). Inclusion criteria will be biological children 0-17 of parents with any mental disorder treated in the secondary sector at any time of their life and receiving treatment in primary or secondary sector within the previous three years. A total of 870 children or approx. 600 families will be included from two sites. Primary outcomes will be changes in child well being, parental stress, family functioning and quality of the home environment, .
Time plan: The RCT will start including families from March 1st, 2024 to Dec 2025 (or later if needed). All families will be assessed at baseline and at end of treatment, i.e. after 24 months and after 36 months. Baseline data will inform the intervention team about each family's needs, problems, and motivation. TAU will be similar in the two regions, which means three family meetings and option for children to participate in peer groups.
Challenges: final funding is being applied for. Recruitment of families can be challenging but we have decades of experience in conducting research in the field. Since both the target group, their potential problems and the intervention is complex, primary outcome is difficult to determine.
A detailed study protocol will be published in 2024
1,740 studies on the registry are indexed under Mental Disorders; 348 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 1,452 is above the median of 100 across 1,301 interventional studies indexed under Mental Disorders.
Browse Mental Disorders studies →Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
In the intervention all child-involving elements are adapted to the specific age groups of the children, but everything is built on the same basic multidisciplinary, holistic and cross-sectional team model. Every family will be affiliated to a case manager, who will coordinate all activities and appointments and be available throughout the intervention period of two years. A range of intervention elements will be offered to the family, depending on age of the child(ren), the family's needs and will always rely on their motivation: * Case-management supporting to reach good family functioning * Family-based psychoeducation * Parents' and children's groups with integrated peer-support * Parenting support and training * Mapping and nurturing of resources in the social network and social counseling * Early assessment of children's possible mental health problems * All elements will be adapted to the age of the children (details available upon request)
Other: VIA Family 2.0
TAU varies to some extent in the two regions, but common is that it consists of 2-3 family consultations (family sessions) with the presence of parents and all children above the age of six years. These consultations will be managed by the Center for Relatives in the North Denmark Region and by the clinical 'child key persons' , who are staff with a special training in children and family impact in all departments of mental health services in the Capital Region. The child is also referred to participate in a psychoeducational group for same aged children. Children can participate in a group with peers, who have a parent with a mental illness as well. These groups are run by two therapists with many years of experience working with groups like this for different age groups. Participation in groups like this is voluntary, and not all children continue in a group after the family consultations.
Other: VIA Family 2.0
Multidisciplinary team based preventive intervention. For details, please see arm/group description.
Change in Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Primary outcome for children/adolescents aged 3 years to 17 years will be child's development and wellbeing measured by Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), which has been used in several other studies, is easy to complete, has Danish norms and is a part of the diagnostic evaluation, Development and Well-Being Assessment, (DAWBA), will be used for psychopathology assessment as well, and can be filled in digitally by the primary caregiver before the clinical assessment. The higher score, the more problems Rated by child from age 11 and by always by parent. A 25 item self-report questionnaire assessing developmental, behavioural and emotional problems completed by children aged 11-17. Items are rated on a three-point Likert scale (0= not true, 1= somewhat true, 2= certainly true).
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in Bayley-4 Bayley Scales Test for Infant and Toddler Development
The primary outcome for the youngest children aged 0-2 years will be scores from Bayley-4, a clinical test of the child's cognitive, language, motor and emotional development, conducted by a trained researcher. Scores range from 1-19, the higher score the better functioning
Time frame: Baseline, after 6 months, after 12 months, after 18 months and after 24 months.
Change in Family Assessment Device - General Function Scale (FAD-GF)
Primary outcome for the whole family is family functioning rated by the primary caregiver. Family function will be measured by the questionnaire Family Assessment Device, a 12 item questionnaire by the parents and children from age 12 Scale from 1-4. Low score represents better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months), and 36 months follow up
Change in Parental Stress Scale (PSS)
The primary outcome for the parents is parental stress measured by the Parental Stress Scale (PSS), which is a 18 item parent-reported questionnaire on the quality of experienced stress related to parenting. Score 1-5. A higher score indicates more parental stress.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME)
A clinician rated semi-structured interview with both caregiver and child measuring stimulation and support in the home environment (scale 0-60/62 dep on age versions). Higher score represents better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS)
30 item questionnaire assessing changes in parenting practices, parental adjustment, and family relationships. Scores from 0-90, higher scores indicates poorer parenting or adaptation
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months), and 36 months follow up
Change in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)
A clinical rated measurement based on interview to assess general functioning in children. Information is obtained from the child and the caregiver, separately. Scale from 1-100. Higher score indicates better functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
10 item questionnaire measuring perceived stress (parents)
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Client Satisfaction Scale (CSQ)
Questionnaire with 8 items measuring patient/client .Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.
Time frame: End of intervention (24 months)
Change in Ages and Stages Questionnaire:SE-2 (ASQ-SE)
Questionnaire measuring child social and emotional development and milestones. Scores range from 0-465, higher scores above cut-off (59) indicate social and emotional problems.
Time frame: Baseline, after 6 months, after 12 months, after 18 months, after 24 months and 36 months (for children aged 3-5 years)
Change in Daily Life Stressor Scale (DLSS)
14 item questionnaire measuring child stress, scores range from 0-56, the higher score the higher level of perceived stress
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in Child and Youth Resilience Measure (CYRM-R)
A 12 item self-report questionnaire from age 5 assessing resiliency in children across a number of areas including personal skills, peer support, social skills, physical and psychological caregiving, educational and cultural. Items are rated on a 3- or 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicating greater resiliency.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Alarm Distress Baby Scale (ADBB)
Test for children aged 2-24 months measuring social withdrawal, scores range from 0-32, scores above 4 indicate social withdrawal, the higher score the more severe
Time frame: Baseline, after 6 month (for children age 0-2 years), after 12 month, after 18 months, after 24 months), and 36 months follow up
Change in Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP)
An interviewer-rated scale assessing the parent's personal and social functioning over four domains (social activities, social relationships, self-care and aggressive behavior). Scores range from 1-100, the higher score the better social functioning.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS)
14 item questionnaire measuring mental wellbeing (non-index parent) scores range from 14 to 70, the higher scores, the better mental wellbeing
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in Global Assessment of Function - Symptoms (GAF-S)
An interviewer-rated scale assessing the Parents Level of Psychiatric Symptoms. GAF-S provides a score from 1-100, with higher scores indicating better outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, K10
10 item questionnaire on psychological distress with a five-level response scale. Scale from 10-50. Higher score indicating higher level of psychological distress.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE)
10 item questionnaire measuring general belief in one's own capabilities. Self-report. Total score is measured. Ranges from 10 to 40. Higher scores indicates better self-efficacy.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in Social Provision Scale-short form (SPS)
The perceived social network can be understood as a resource for resilience and will be measured with Social Provision Scale (SPS) short form, a.10 item questionnaire, with scores ranging from 10-40, the higher score the better social provision perceived
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months), and 36 months follow up
Change in Quality-adjusted life year (EQ-5D)
6 item questionnaire, range from 0-100, the higher score the better health
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in Self-Stigma of Mental Illness Scale - short form (SSMIS-SF)
20 item questionnaire on mental health self-stigma (only index parent), in four subscales (stereotype awareness, stereotype agreement, application to self , harm to self-esteem), each scoring from 5 (low) to 45 (high).
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
Change in The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR)
15 item questionnaire on the process of recovery on a 4-point scale. Higher scores are indicative of recovery. Only index parent.
Time frame: Baseline, end of intervention (24 months) and 36 months follow up.
General Intelligence Test (RIST)
A clinician rated test measuring general intelligence. The RIST comprises a verbal subtest (Guess What) and a nonverbal subtest (Odd-Item Out). Guess What is a classic measure of crystallized intelligence, whereas Odd-Item Out shares characteristics with fluid intelligence.
Time frame: Baseline
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Mental Health Services in the Capital Region, Denmark