ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03496610Updated Mar 5, 2024Results posted

Surgeon Infiltration QL Block Comparison

A Phase 4 interventional study of Liposomal Bupivicaine and QL Block in Quadratus Lumborum Block and Surgical Wound Infiltration, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-05.

Sponsored by Duke University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to learn if using a Quadratus Lumborum (QL) plane injection technique (also called a "nerve block") that numbs the nerves going to the abdominal area improve pain control after surgery compared to administration of local anesthetic directly to the surgical incision. The QL block technique uses a numbing solution (local anesthetics) that is injected next to nerves located along muscles in the back to reduce pain. This block will not affect movement in the leg and/or make the legs weak. Some institutions, including Duke, use the QL block for patients having various abdominal surgeries, with the hope of providing good pain relief combined with improved mobility after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Quadratus Lumborum Block
  • Surgical Wound Infiltration

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Bupivacaine
  • Living donor nephrectomy
03

In context

Surgical Wound

315 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 44 is below the median of 66 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound.

Browse Surgical Wound studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • English speaking
  • ASA 1-2 patients undergoing living donor nephrectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ASA 3 or 5
  • Diagnosis of chronic pain
  • Daily chronic opioid use (over 3 months of continuous opioid use)
  • Inability to communicate pain scores or need for analgesia
  • Infection at the site of block placement
  • Pregnant women (as determined by standard of care day-of surgery urine bHCG)
  • Intolerance/allergy to local anesthetics
  • Weight \<50 kg
  • Suspected or known addiction to or abuse of illicit drug(s), prescription medicine(s), or alcohol within the past 2 years
  • Uncontrolled anxiety, schizophrenia, or other psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with study assessments or compliance
  • Current or historical evidence of any disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may increase the risk of surgery or complicate the subject's postoperative course
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
44 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block

    Patients will receive a bilateral ultrasound guided QL block by the anesthesia team.

    Procedure: QL Block

  • Active comparator
    Surgical wound infiltration

    Patients will receive 266 mg of liposomal bupivacaine mixed with 50 mg non-liposomal bupivacaine infiltrated into the wound by the surgeon.

    Drug: Liposomal Bupivicaine

Interventions

  • Patient will receive liposomal bupivicaine mixed with non-liposomal bupivicaine directly to wound

  • ProcedureQL Block

    Patient will receive ultrasound guided QL Block

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Opioid Consumption in Oral Morphine Milliequivalents for the First 24 Hours After Surgery (Defined as 24 Hours After the Anesthesia End Time)

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-reported Numeric Pain Scores on Postoperative Day Seven

    Pain was measured on a self-reported scale of 0-10, where 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Scores were gathered by phone on postoperative day 7.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 7

  2. Worst Bloating Severity in the First Postoperative Week

    Bloating severity scores were gathered daily by phone interview for the first week postoperatively. Bloating severity was assessed on a scale of 1-5, where 1= not at all severe and 5=very much. The highest severity score reported during the week was collected for this outcome measure.

    Time frame: First seven days postoperatively

  3. Self-reported Ability to Walk for 15 Minutes Without Any Difficulty Within the First Postoperative Week

    Physical function was assessed by daily phone interview during the first postoperative week. Subjects were asked to assess their ability to go for a walk of at least 15 minute on a scale of 1-5 with 1=unable to do and 5= able to do without any difficulty. For this outcome, the number of subjects who reported being able to go for a walk of at least 15 minutes "without any difficulty" at any time during the first postoperative week is reported.

    Time frame: First seven days postoperatively

07

Results

Posted Mar 5, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneQuadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound Infiltration
Started2420
Completed1918
Not completed52
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up32
Withdrew: Physician decision10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryOpioid Consumption in Oral Morphine Milliequivalents for the First 24 Hours After Surgery (Defined as 24 Hours After the Anesthesia End Time)
Time frame:
24 hours postoperatively
Reported as:
Median · oral morphine equivalents in milligrams
Opioid Consumption in Oral Morphine Milliequivalents for the First 24 Hours After Surgery (Defined as 24 Hours After the Anesthesia End Time)
oral morphine equivalents in milligramsQuadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound Infiltration
Opioid Consumption in Oral Morphine Milliequivalents for the First 24 Hours After Surgery (Defined as 24 Hours After the Anesthesia End Time)17.50 (6.88 to 33.88)21.25 (7.50 to 46.88)
Statistical analysis
  • Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block vs Surgical Wound Infiltration · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.81
SecondarySelf-reported Numeric Pain Scores on Postoperative Day Seven

Pain was measured on a self-reported scale of 0-10, where 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain. Scores were gathered by phone on postoperative day 7.

Time frame:
Postoperative day 7
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Self-reported Numeric Pain Scores on Postoperative Day Seven
score on a scaleQuadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound Infiltration
Self-reported Numeric Pain Scores on Postoperative Day Seven2 (1 to 3)1 (1 to 2)
Statistical analysis
  • Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block vs Surgical Wound Infiltration · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.40
SecondaryWorst Bloating Severity in the First Postoperative Week

Bloating severity scores were gathered daily by phone interview for the first week postoperatively. Bloating severity was assessed on a scale of 1-5, where 1= not at all severe and 5=very much. The highest severity score reported during the week was collected for this outcome measure.

Time frame:
First seven days postoperatively
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Worst Bloating Severity in the First Postoperative Week
score on a scaleQuadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound Infiltration
Worst Bloating Severity in the First Postoperative Week4 (3 to 5)4 (2.75 to 5)
Statistical analysis
  • Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block vs Surgical Wound Infiltration · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.74
SecondarySelf-reported Ability to Walk for 15 Minutes Without Any Difficulty Within the First Postoperative Week

Physical function was assessed by daily phone interview during the first postoperative week. Subjects were asked to assess their ability to go for a walk of at least 15 minute on a scale of 1-5 with 1=unable to do and 5= able to do without any difficulty. For this outcome, the number of subjects who reported being able to go for a walk of at least 15 minutes "without any difficulty" at any time during the first postoperative week is reported.

Time frame:
First seven days postoperatively
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Self-reported Ability to Walk for 15 Minutes Without Any Difficulty Within the First Postoperative Week
ParticipantsQuadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound Infiltration
Self-reported Ability to Walk for 15 Minutes Without Any Difficulty Within the First Postoperative Week1012
Statistical analysis
  • Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block vs Surgical Wound Infiltration · Chi-squared · p = 0.38Degrees of freedom = 1

Adverse events

Collected over Up to 7 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)
Surgical Wound Infiltration0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)0/20 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

The number of participants in the QL group excludes two subjects-- one subject who voluntarily withdrew and one who was withdrawn by the PI for a surgical site infection.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Quadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound InfiltrationTotal
Mean42.59 ± 14.4147.90 ± 12.5145.25 ± 13.46
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Quadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound InfiltrationTotal
Female151328
Male7714
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Quadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound InfiltrationTotal
Hispanic or Latino011
Not Hispanic or Latino221941
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Quadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound InfiltrationTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American6410
White161632
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Quadratus Lumborum (QL) BlockSurgical Wound InfiltrationTotal
United States222042
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke University
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03496610
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 12, 2018
Start date
Jan 25, 2021
Primary completion
Feb 23, 2023
Completion
Feb 23, 2023
Results posted
Mar 5, 2024
Last update
Mar 5, 2024

Study contacts

Hector Martinez-Wilson, MD
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Bupivacaine

Start the discussion