An interventional study of Transobturator Paravaginal Repair and traditional transvaginal Paravaginal Repair in Cystocele, sponsored by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital. Completed. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-04-09.
Sponsored by Ain Shams Maternity Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Clinical trial comparing the new technique for paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique
trial comparing the transobturator paravaginal repair versus the traditional technique
71 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystocele; 5 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 75 across 46 interventional studies indexed under Cystocele.
Browse Cystocele studies →Ain Shams Maternity Hospital is the lead sponsor of 139 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
paravaginal defect cystocele
midline and paravaginal defect cystocele
Exclusion Criteria:
Transobturator Paravaginal Repair
Procedure: Transobturator Paravaginal Repair
traditional transvaginal Paravaginal Repair
Procedure: traditional transvaginal Paravaginal Repair
Transobturator application of sutures to the white line in cases needing paravaginal repair
traditional transvaginal application of sutures to the white line
Operative data
Operative time
Time frame: 1 day
Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system
Evaluation of the postoperative degree of anterior vaginal wall descent
Time frame: 3 month
Operative Details
blood loss
Time frame: 1 day
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2017, 11 months.
Of 19 interventional studies with no phase under Cystocele, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 76. This study's 11 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital →