ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03479476MetUpdated Jan 17, 2025

A Trial of Metformin in Individuals With Fragile X Syndrome

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Placebo Medication and Metformin in Fragile X Syndrome, Fragile X Mental Retardation Syndrome and Mental Retardation, X Linked, sponsored by University of California, Davis. Completed at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-17.

Sponsored by University of California, Davis · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was May 2024, 2 years 5 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a controlled trial of metformin in individuals with fragile X syndrome between the ages of 6 and 25 years. Participants will be randomized in a double-blind design to either drug or placebo and will attend three visits to the study site in a 4-month period for a series of tests. The primary objectives are to assess safety, tolerability, and efficacy of metformin in the treatment of language deficits, behavior problems, and obesity/excessive appetite in individuals with fragile X syndrome.

Read the detailed description

This is a multi-site study for fragile X syndrome (FXS) patients aged 6 to 25 years inclusive. It is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of metformin (also known as Glumetza, Glucophage, Fortamet), a type 2 diabetes medication that can also improve obesity and excessive appetite.

Metformin has emerged as a candidate drug for the targeted treatment of FXS based on animal studies showing rescue of multiple phenotypes in the FXS model. Metformin may contribute to normalizing signaling pathways in FXS in the central nervous system, which may include activities of mTOR and PI3K, both of which have shown to be pathogenically overactive in FXS. In addition, metformin inhibits phosphodiesterase, which would lead to correction of cAMP levels, and MMP9 production, which is also elevated in FXS. Looking at the potential signaling pathways, metformin appears to be a good candidate for targeting several of the intracellular functions in neurons disrupted in FXS and, therefore, has potential to rescue several types of symptoms in individuals with FXS. The researchers have utilized metformin in the clinical treatment of over 20 individuals with FXS between the ages of 4 and 58 years and have found the medication to be well tolerated and to provide benefits not only in lowering weight gain and normalizing appetite but also in language and behavior. In this controlled trial, the researchers hope to further assess metformin's safety and benefits in the areas of language and cognition, eating and weight loss, and overall behavior.

Each participant will be involved in this trial for a period of 4 months. This will include 3 visits to the UC Davis MIND Institute and 5 phone calls. At each visit, the researchers will assess behavioral, cognitive, and language development. The researchers will also assess the side effects of the study medication throughout the trial.

Study record updated 9/26/2018 to reflect the following IRB-approved protocol modifications: Erroneous references to "digital" books for primary outcome measure were removed, as this measure is administered using print (non-digital) materials. Eligibility criteria were updated to include subjects with IQ of up to and including 79 on the Leiter-III at screening. The Hyperphagia Questionnaire (HQ-CT) was replaced by the Anxiety Depression and Mood Screen (ADAMS) as a secondary outcome measure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fragile X Syndrome
  • Fragile X Mental Retardation Syndrome
  • Mental Retardation, X Linked
  • Genetic Diseases, X-Linked
  • Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion
  • Fra(X) Syndrome
  • Intellectual Disability
  • FXS
  • Neurobehavioral Manifestations
  • Sex Chromosome Disorders

Keywords

  • Congenital Abnormalities
  • Metformin
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Chromosome Disorders
03

In context

Fragile X Syndrome

114 studies on the registry are indexed under Fragile X Syndrome; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 120 is above the median of 50 across 91 interventional studies indexed under Fragile X Syndrome.

Browse Fragile X Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Davis is the lead sponsor of 809 studies on the registry; 142 are open to participants now.

Of its 67 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Molecular genetic confirmation of the full FMR1 mutation or mosaicism.
  • Males and non-pregnant, non-lactating females age 6 to 25 years, inclusive.
  • Ability of subject and/or caregiver to understand, read, write, and speak English fluently to complete study-related materials.
  • IQ ≤ 79 as measured by the Leiter-III at screening.
  • Participant is able to speak at least occasional 3-word phrases.
  • Participant and parent/caregiver are willing to participate in the protocol and able to attend the clinic regularly and reliably.
  • Stable concomitant medication dose and dosing regimen for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening/baseline visit, and the intention to maintain a stable regimen of allowed concomitant medications for the full duration of the study.
  • Stable behavioral/educational treatments for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening/baseline visit.
  • Sexually active women of must be using a medically acceptable method of for the duration of the study and have a negative urine pregnancy test collected at the initial screening/baseline visit.
  • For participants who are not their own legal guardian, the parent/legal authorized representative is able to understand and sign an to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-cooperation or inability to follow through with the study protocol.
  • Life-threatening medical problem or other major systemic illness that compromises health or safety and/or would interfere with the study.
  • History of intolerable adverse events with metformin.
  • Current or recent metformin treatment (within the past year).
  • (BMI) less than 2 standard deviations for age.
  • Serum creatinine > 1.4 mg/dl (female) or > 1.5 mg/dl (male) at screening.
  • History of metabolic acidosis or a condition with lactic acidosis.
  • Severe B12 deficiency.
  • Pregnancy at screening or unwillingness to use acceptable method of , if applicable.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Medication

    The placebo will be dosed in a weight-dependent manner. Liquid placebo will be provided to any participants unable to swallow the placebo capsules. For participants under 50kg at baseline, the initial dose will be 250mg once per day, and if this dose is well tolerated, they will increase each week by 250mg until a maximum dose of 1000mg daily is reached. For participants at and above 50kg at baseline, the initial dose will be 500mg once per day, and if this dose is well tolerated, they will increase each week by 500mg until a maximum dose of 2000mg daily is reached. After the 4-week titration period, each participant will continue dosing at his or her maximum tolerated dose daily for the remaining 12 weeks of the study.

    Drug: Placebo Medication

  • Active comparator
    Active Metformin Medication

    The active metformin medication will be dosed in a weight-dependent manner. Liquid metformin (100mg/cc) will be provided to any participants unable to swallow the metformin capsules. For participants under 50kg at baseline, the initial dose will be 250mg once per day, and if this dose is well tolerated, they will increase each week by 250mg until a maximum dose of 1000mg daily is reached. For participants at and above 50kg at baseline, the initial dose will be 500mg once per day, and if this dose is well tolerated, they will increase each week by 500mg until a maximum dose of 2000mg daily is reached. After the 4-week titration period, each participant will continue dosing at his or her maximum tolerated dose daily for the remaining 12 weeks of the study.

    Drug: Metformin

Interventions

  • DrugPlacebo Medication

    Placebo liquid or capsules given in parallel to active medication.

    Also known as: Placebo

  • Active medication.

    Also known as: Glumetza, Glucophage, Fortamet, Riomet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in the Expressive Language Sampling (ELS) mean Number of Different Words (NDW) score

    The ELS is collected from shared interactions around a wordless picture book involving the participant and the examiner. The primary outcome measure will be Number of Different Words (NDW) derived from transcripts of audiorecorded samples of spoken language taken from two sampling contexts (conversation and narration), according to procedures described by Abbeduto and colleagues (Abbeduto et al., 1995; Kover et al., 2012). Samples are collected pre- and post- treatment using different books on each occasion. The mean of NDW in conversation and NDW in narration will be computed, and statistically adjusted through analysis of covariance for differences in talkativeness as outlined in Conners et al., 2018. The mean NDW score ranges from 1 to infinite/unspecified. An increase (positive change) in score from baseline to follow-up indicates improvement. The greater the increase, the greater the improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Treatment/Week 16

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in the FXS-normed Aberrant Behavior Checklist - Community Edition (ABC-C)

    The ABC-C is a 58-item caregiver-rated behavior scale used to examine treatment effects on challenging behaviors for individuals with FXS in the following domains: (1) irritability, agitation, crying; (2) lethargy, social withdrawal; (3) stereotypic behavior; (4) hyperactivity, noncompliance; and (5) inappropriate speech. Analysis will be performed utilizing the Sansone et al. (2012) FXS-normed ABC scoring measures.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, End of Treatment/Week 16

  2. Improvement of symptoms in FXS using the Clinical Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) scale

    The CGI is a clinician-rated scale utilizing history from the caregiver and incorporating it into a clinical rating, first for severity, and then for clinical follow-up. The CGI-S will be used at the baseline assessment to judge symptom severity as 1 = Normal, not at all ill; 2 = Borderline ill; 3 = Mildly ill; 4 = Moderately ill; 5 = Markedly ill; 6 = Severely ill; and 7 = Among the most extremely ill. The CGI-I will be used at the Week 8 and End of Treatment/Week 16 visits to judge the change in clinical impression as 1 = Very Much Improved; 2 = Much Improved; 3 = Minimally Improved; 4 = No Change; 5 = Minimally Worse; 6 = Much Worse; and 7 = Very Much Worse.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, End of Treatment/Week 16

  3. Change from baseline in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS will be used to measure the severity of three specific behavioral symptoms targeted in this study: behavior problems, language abilities, and eating behavior. For each behavior the caregiver is instructed to mark their impression of the behavior at the baseline visit and again at the Week 8 and End of Treatment/Week 16 visits. The calculated distance in cm between the visit marks thereby demonstrates whether each behavior stayed the same, improved, or worsened during the study and by how much. The scale is from 0 cm (defined as "worst behavior") to 10 cm ("behavior not a problem").

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, End of Treatment/Week 16

  4. Change from baseline in the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-Third Edition (VABS-III) Adaptive Behavior Composite Score

    The VABS-III is a caregiver survey interview that measures the personal and social skills of individuals from birth through adulthood. It was designed to assess handicapped and non-handicapped persons in their personal and social functioning and is appropriate for individuals of all ages. The Adaptive Behavior Composite (ABC) score is calculated from the caregiver responses using age-adjusted scoring tables. ABC scores range from 20 to 160 and indicate low (20-70), moderately low (70-85), adequate (85-115), moderately high (115-130), or high (130-160) overall adaptive functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, End of Treatment/Week 16

  5. Change from baseline in the Anxiety Depression and Mood Screen (ADAMS) overall score

    The ADAMS consists of a series of 28 questions relating to the participant's symptoms of anxiety, depression, and mood. The sum of responses on a scale of 0 to 3 for each of the 28 questions generates the overall score, which ranges from 0 to 84. Lower scores indicate lower severity of symptoms, while higher scores indicate higher severity of symptoms. It will be completed by the caregiver at baseline, Week 8, and End of Treatment/Week 16 visits.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, End of Treatment/Week 16

  6. Change from baseline in the Child Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ) overall score

    The CSHQ consists of a series of questions relating to the sleep habits of children. It will be completed by caregivers of all participants, regardless of participant age, at the baseline, Week 8, and End of Treatment/Week 16 visits.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, End of Treatment/Week 16

  7. Change from baseline in the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Questionnaire (SNAP-IV) overall score

    The SNAP-IV, based on DSM-V criteria for ADHD, is a caregiver-rated questionnaire that effectively identifies those with and without ADHD and accurately predicts presentation specifier (inattention, hyperactivity/impulsivity, and combined). Its psychometric properties and clinical utility have been demonstrated in multiple studies since its introduction in 2001, and it has been found to be reliable and well validated with normative data from both parents and teachers. It will be completed by caregivers of all participants at baseline, Week 8, and End of Treatment/Week 16.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, End of Treatment/Week 16

  8. Change from baseline in the Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Parent Proxy overall score

    The PedsQL Parent Proxy consists of a series of questions relating to a child's quality of life and is administered to the caregiver of the participant. The parent proxy module designed for children 8-12 years of age will be administered to the caregivers of all participants, regardless of participant age, because the questions therein are most appropriate for the overall study population's cognitive age and ability. It will be completed at the baseline, Week 8, and End of Treatment/Week 16 visits. For any participants not in school, questions pertaining to "school" will be replaced with references to "work" or other activities in their life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8, End of Treatment/Week 16

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • UC Davis MIND Institute
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • University of Alberta
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G2R3, Canada
  • St Justine Hospital
    Montréal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Apr 2018 to primary completion in May 2024, 72 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 20, 2018
First posted
Mar 27, 2018
StartActual
Apr 30, 2018
Primary completionActual
May 22, 2024
CompletionActual
May 22, 2024
Last update
Jan 17, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 17, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03479476
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2018
Start date
Apr 30, 2018
Primary completion
May 22, 2024
Completion
May 22, 2024
Last update
Jan 17, 2025

Study contacts

Randi J Hagerman, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Davis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Metformin

Start the discussion