ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03471923Updated Feb 7, 2020

Non-Motor Features of Cervical Dystonia (CD)

An observational study in Cervical Dystonia, Movement Disorders and Focal Dystonia, sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-07.

Sponsored by Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
33
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine the prevalence of four previously identified non-motor markers in a population of cervical dystonia patients, unaffected family members, and healthy volunteers in an attempt to identify a distinct combination of non-motor symptoms that may be indicative of disease development.

Read the detailed description

The primary aim of this study is to identify the prevalence of four previously identified non-motor markers - (1) spatial discrimination threshold, (2) temporal discrimination threshold, (3) vibration-induced illusion of movement, and (4) kinesthesia - in a population of cervical dystonia patients, unaffected family members, and healthy volunteers (control group). Consenting participants will receive a neurological examination performed by a movement disorders neurologist, followed by an assessment of the four non-motor symptoms.

The investigators hypothesize that a distinct combination of non-motor symptoms will be more prevalent in the CD group, and therefore this set of symptoms may be indicative of disease development. This combination will be identified through analysis of the concurrence of the non-motor features across the three groups of participants. This study will fill an important unmet need, as to the investigators' knowledge there are no published studies assessing the comorbid presentation of these four non-motor symptoms in a single cervical dystonia population. The exploration of a distinct combination of concurrent non-motor symptoms as a marker for the development of cervical dystonia will improve the ability of movement disorders neurologists to diagnose the condition.

The results of this study will facilitate the investigators' longstanding aim of improving rates of cervical dystonia diagnosis. Cervical dystonia is currently diagnosed based upon the exclusion of other movement disorders; therefore, characterization of non-motor features in cervical dystonia patients will help to refine the diagnostic criteria for this condition. This investigation will also improve understanding of the factors associated with CD. Future studies can examine the source of these associated factors in order to help understand the cause of CD, since the etiology is currently unknown.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Dystonia
  • Movement Disorders
  • Focal Dystonia
  • Signs and Symptoms
  • Nervous System Diseases
  • Neurologic Manifestations
  • Neuromuscular Manifestations
  • Spasmodic Torticollis
03

In context

Torticollis

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Torticollis; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 33 is below the median of 48 across 43 observational studies indexed under Torticollis.

Browse Torticollis studies →

Lead sponsor

Vanderbilt University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 833 studies on the registry; 155 are open to participants now.

Of its 125 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants in this study will include adults that have cervical dystonia, are healthy and related to someone with cervical dystonia, or are healthy and not related to someone with cervical dystonia (control group).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have a diagnosis of cervical dystonia, OR a first order relation of a Vanderbilt patient diagnosed with cervical dystonia, OR a healthy volunteer who is neurologically normal
  • Capable of participating in all study procedures
  • Willing and able to provide written or verbal .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects for whom participation in the study may cause medical harm
  • Subjects who are not considered competent to make their own medical decisions
  • Subjects who display sensory deficits during a short screening examination prior to study enrollment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
33 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • CD Patients

    Subjects must have a prior diagnosis of cervical dystonia and be capable of participating in all study procedures. Subjects will undergo assessment of non-motor features.

    Diagnostic Test: Assessment of Non-Motor Features

  • Family Members

    Subjects must be a first order relation of a Vanderbilt patient diagnosed with cervical dystonia. The subject must pass a short neurological examination to ensure the subject does not have cervical dystonia or any sensory deficits. Subjects will undergo assessment of non-motor features.

    Diagnostic Test: Neurological Examination · Diagnostic Test: Assessment of Non-Motor Features

  • Healthy volunteers

    Subjects must be healthy volunteers who are neurologically normal. The subject must pass a short neurological examination to ensure the subject does not have cervical dystonia or any sensory deficits. Subjects will undergo assessment of non-motor features.

    Diagnostic Test: Neurological Examination · Diagnostic Test: Assessment of Non-Motor Features

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testNeurological Examination

    The family members and healthy volunteers will undergo elements of the neurological examination during which the movement disorders neurologist will look specifically for the presence of cervical dystonia and other sensory abnormalities. If the subject is found to have cervical dystonia or any other sensory abnormalities, the subject will be excluded from the study.

  • Diagnostic testAssessment of Non-Motor Features

    All subjects will be assessed for four non-motor symptoms, including (1) spatial discrimination threshold, (2) temporal discrimination threshold, (3) vibration-induced illusion of movement, and (4) kinesthesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence of spatial discrimination threshold in cervical dystonia patients, unaffected family members, and healthy volunteers

    For participants in all groups, the investigators will examine the prevalence of spatial discrimination threshold. Prevalence of spatial discrimination threshold will be determined with a task using Johnson-Van-Boven-Phillips (JVP) domes. The spatial discrimination threshold will be recorded as the mean of both hands at the 75% level of accuracy. The research coordinator will report prevalence of spatial discrimination threshold as a descriptive statistic.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent is obtained

  2. Prevalence of temporal discrimination threshold in cervical dystonia patients, unaffected family members, and healthy volunteers

    For participants in all groups, the investigators will examine the prevalence of temporal discrimination threshold. Prevalence of temporal discrimination threshold will be determined with a visual-visual discrimination task.The research coordinator will report prevalence of temporal discrimination threshold as a descriptive statistic.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent is obtained

  3. Prevalence of vibration-induced illusion of movement in cervical dystonia patients, unaffected family members, and healthy volunteers

    For participants in all groups, the investigators will examine the prevalence of vibration-induced illusion of movement. Prevalence of vibration-induced illusion of movement will be determined by recording the change in displacement of the tracking arm during a vibration-induced illusion of movement task. The research coordinator will report prevalence of vibration-induced illusion of movement as a descriptive statistic.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent is obtained

  4. Prevalence of impaired kinesthesia in cervical dystonia

    For participants in all groups, the investigators will examine the prevalence of impaired kinesthesia. Kinesthesia will be determined by a neurologist during the neurological examination. The research coordinator will report prevalence of impaired kinesthesia as a descriptive statistic.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent is obtained

Secondary outcomes

  1. Probability of concurrence of multiple non-motor features

    The concurrence of multiple non-motor symptoms will be assessed using a multinomial logistic regression model to determine if a distinct combination of non-motor symptoms is more prevalent in the cervical dystonia patient group than in the unaffected family members or healthy volunteer groups.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent is obtained

Other outcomes

  1. Potential new demographic indicators of cervical dystonia

    Analysis of demographic factors will be performed to identify additional environmental factors that are more prevalent in the CD patient population than in healthy controls and unaffected family members. Through exploration of potential new indicators, the investigators hope to progress the long-term goal of improving the rate of cervical dystonia diagnosis.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent is obtained

  2. Potential new medical indicators of cervical dystonia

    Analysis of medical history and specific elements of the neurological examination will be performed to identify additional symptoms and environmental factors that are more prevalent in the CD patient population than in healthy controls and unaffected family members. Emphasis will be placed on sensory tricks, as previous studies and clinical experience have shown that patients often use sensory tricks such as touching the face, hand, or neck to temporarily relieve muscle contraction. Through exploration of potential new indicators, the investigators hope to progress the long-term goal of improving the rate of cervical dystonia diagnosis.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent is obtained

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center Clinical Research Center
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Crowner BE. Cervical dystonia: disease profile and clinical management. Phys Ther. 2007 Nov;87(11):1511-26. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060272. Epub 2007 Sep 18. PubMed 17878433 ↗
  • Stacy M. Epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of cervical dystonia. Neurol Clin. 2008 May;26 Suppl 1:23-42. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8619(08)80003-5. No abstract available. PubMed 18603166 ↗
  • Jinnah HA, Berardelli A, Comella C, Defazio G, Delong MR, Factor S, Galpern WR, Hallett M, Ludlow CL, Perlmutter JS, Rosen AR; Dystonia Coalition Investigators. The focal dystonias: current views and challenges for future research. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):926-43. doi: 10.1002/mds.25567. PubMed 23893450 ↗
  • Stamelou M, Edwards MJ, Hallett M, Bhatia KP. The non-motor syndrome of primary dystonia: clinical and pathophysiological implications. Brain. 2012 Jun;135(Pt 6):1668-81. doi: 10.1093/brain/awr224. Epub 2011 Sep 20. PubMed 21933808 ↗
  • Bradley D, Whelan R, Kimmich O, O'Riordan S, Mulrooney N, Brady P, Walsh R, Reilly RB, Hutchinson S, Molloy F, Hutchinson M. Temporal discrimination thresholds in adult-onset primary torsion dystonia: an analysis by task type and by dystonia phenotype. J Neurol. 2012 Jan;259(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/s00415-011-6125-7. Epub 2011 Jun 8. PubMed 21656045 ↗
  • Chen H, Zhao EJ, Zhang W, Lu Y, Liu R, Huang X, Ciesielski-Jones AJ, Justice MA, Cousins DS, Peddada S. Meta-analyses on prevalence of selected Parkinson's nonmotor symptoms before and after diagnosis. Transl Neurodegener. 2015 Jan 8;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2047-9158-4-1. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25671103 ↗
  • Frima N, Nasir J, Grunewald RA. Abnormal vibration-induced illusion of movement in idiopathic focal dystonia: an endophenotypic marker? Mov Disord. 2008 Feb 15;23(3):373-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.21838. PubMed 18044715 ↗
  • Molloy FM, Carr TD, Zeuner KE, Dambrosia JM, Hallett M. Abnormalities of spatial discrimination in focal and generalized dystonia. Brain. 2003 Oct;126(Pt 10):2175-82. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg219. Epub 2003 Jun 23. PubMed 12821512 ↗
  • Fiorio M, Gambarin M, Valente EM, Liberini P, Loi M, Cossu G, Moretto G, Bhatia KP, Defazio G, Aglioti SM, Fiaschi A, Tinazzi M. Defective temporal processing of sensory stimuli in DYT1 mutation carriers: a new endophenotype of dystonia? Brain. 2007 Jan;130(Pt 1):134-42. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl283. Epub 2006 Nov 14. PubMed 17105745 ↗
  • Bradley D, Whelan R, Walsh R, O'Dwyer J, Reilly R, Hutchinson S, Molloy F, Hutchinson M. Comparing endophenotypes in adult-onset primary torsion dystonia. Mov Disord. 2010 Jan 15;25(1):84-90. doi: 10.1002/mds.22889. PubMed 19938165 ↗
  • Westenberger A, Klein C. Genetics of dystonia. In: Dystonia and Dystonic Syndromes. ; 2015:27-48. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-1516-9_3.
  • Putzki N, Stude P, Konczak J, Graf K, Diener HC, Maschke M. Kinesthesia is impaired in focal dystonia. Mov Disord. 2006 Jun;21(6):754-60. doi: 10.1002/mds.20799. PubMed 16482525 ↗
  • Walsh R, O'Dwyer JP, Sheikh IH, O'Riordan S, Lynch T, Hutchinson M. Sporadic adult onset dystonia: sensory abnormalities as an endophenotype in unaffected relatives. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;78(9):980-3. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.105585. PubMed 17702779 ↗
  • Bradley D, Whelan R, Walsh R, Reilly RB, Hutchinson S, Molloy F, Hutchinson M. Temporal discrimination threshold: VBM evidence for an endophenotype in adult onset primary torsion dystonia. Brain. 2009 Sep;132(Pt 9):2327-35. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp156. Epub 2009 Jun 12. PubMed 19525326 ↗
  • Klingelhoefer L, Martino D, Martinez-Martin P, et al. Nonmotor symptoms and focal cervical dystonia: Observations from 102 patients. Basal Ganglia. 2014;4(3-4):117-120. doi:10.1016/j.baga.2014.10.002.
  • Lobbezoo F, Tanguay R, Thon MT, Lavigne GJ. Pain perception in idiopathic cervical dystonia (spasmodic torticollis). Pain. 1996 Oct;67(2-3):483-91. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03153-3. PubMed 8951945 ↗
  • Defazio G, Jankovic J, Giel JL, Papapetropoulos S. Descriptive epidemiology of cervical dystonia. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2013 Nov 4;3:tre-03-193-4374-2. doi: 10.7916/D80C4TGJ. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24255801 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 7, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03471923
Responsible party
Mallory Hacker (Research Instructor, Vanderbilt University Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 21, 2018
Start date
Mar 26, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 2, 2019
Completion
Dec 2, 2019
Last update
Feb 7, 2020

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion