ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03468686Updated Oct 5, 2022

The Study of Effectiveness of rTMS on Rumination and Anhedonia in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder

An interventional study of Bilateral rTMS and Sham rTMS in Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Depression, sponsored by University of Tehran. Completed at 1 site in Iran, Islamic Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-05.

Sponsored by University of Tehran · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2016, registered Feb 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
61
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rumination is significantly frequent in major depressive disorder. However, not a lot of studies have investigated the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on rumination and its electrophysiological correlates. This study recruited 61 participants who were randomly assigned to sham, bilateral, or unilateral stimulation groups to investigate the potential differences between these stimulation protocols and changes in the behavioral and electrophysiological outcomes after treatment.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to compare the effect of unilateral and bilateral rTMS on the reduction of rumination and anhedonia and their associated neural networks. In a randomized double-blind trial, 65 patients with depressive disorder in Atieh Clinical Neuroscience Center are assigned to three groups. The first group receives bilateral rTMS for 20 sessions on right and left DLPFC; the second group receives unilateral rTMS for 20 sessions on LDLPFC; third group receives sham rTMS for 10 sessions. In this group, the stimulation parameters are similar to that in the actual rTMS group, except that the coil angel is 90° and perpendicular to the head. Rumination and anhedonia symptoms will be measured by the Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) and Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) in the baseline and after the 20th session. In order to investigate the neural networks associated with rumination and anhedonia, EEG of patients will be recorded at the first session and at the end of the treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • Bipolar Depression

Keywords

  • MDD
  • rTMS
  • Rumination
  • Anhedonia
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Major

3,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 592 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 61 is below the median of 80 across 2,532 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Tehran is the lead sponsor of 17 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Outpatients male and female with the range of 18-65 years of age
  • The diagnosis of Major depressive disorder according to
  • Having BDI>18
  • Having stable symptoms as defined by not requiring a change in medication for at least 4 weeks
  • Completion of consent form
  • Being under supervision of a psychiatrist

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The history of rTMS treatment for any reason
  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • The risk of seizure with any reasons
  • Pregnancy
  • High risk of suicide
  • Intracranial implant and other ferromagnetic materials close to the head
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
61 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    bilateral rTMS

    sequential bilateral repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

    Device: Bilateral rTMS

  • Sham comparator
    Sham rTMS

    Sham Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

    Device: Sham rTMS

  • Active comparator
    Unilateral rTMS

    Unilateral (High frequency) repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

    Device: Unilateral rTMS (High frequency)

Interventions

  • DeviceBilateral rTMS

    The coil will locate on F3 and F4 in accordance with the 10-20 international system. bilateral rTMS include stimulate the right DLPFC at 1 Hz for a 10 seconds train of stimulation, and a total of 150 pulse trains. Immediately after that, the stimulation was carried out on the left DLPFC at 10 Hz, 5 seconds of stimulation, with 10 second inter-train interval and 75 pulse trains.

  • DeviceSham rTMS

    The same parameters will use in the sham rTMS. However, the coil adjust at an angle of 90º vertically on the skull in a way that one wing place on the head.

  • DeviceUnilateral rTMS (High frequency)

    The coil will locate on F3 in accordance with the 10-20 international system. Unilateral rTMS include stimulate the Left DLPFC at 10Hz for a 5seconds train of stimulation, 10 seconds inter-train interval, and a total of 75 pulse trains. .

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rumination Symptoms

    The Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) is a measure of depressive rumination which has two subscales: Both subscales are composed of five items. Brooding and Reflection. Higher score indicate a higher level of ruminative responses (range: 22-88).

    Time frame: baseline before start of treatment and immediately after the last treatment session.

  2. changes in default mode network

    EEG

    Time frame: baseline before start of treatment and immediately after the last treatment session.

  3. Anhedonia Symptoms

    Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), a measure of anhedonia

    Time frame: baseline before start of treatment and immediately after the last treatment session.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depressive symptoms measured by the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale

    Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS),(HRSD17) Range: 0-53 Normal: 0-7 Mild: 8 - 13 Moderate 14 - 18 Severe: 19-22 Very severe \> 22

    Time frame: baseline before start of treatment and immediately after the last treatment session.

  2. Depressive symptoms measured by the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-II

    Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), (BDI-II) Range: 0-63 Normal: 0-13 Mild: 14- 9 Moderate 20- 28 Severe: 29-63

    Time frame: baseline before start of treatment and immediately after the last treatment session.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Atieh Clinical Neuroscience Center (ACNC)
    Tehran, 1969713663, Iran, Islamic Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kazemi R, Rostami R, Nasiri Z, Hadipour AL, Kiaee N, Coetzee JP, Philips A, Brown R, Seenivasan S, Adamson MM. Electrophysiological and behavioral effects of unilateral and bilateral rTMS; A randomized clinical trial on rumination and depression. J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 15;317:360-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.098. Epub 2022 Aug 30. PubMed 36055535 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2016 to primary completion in Sep 2020, 45 months.

Of 648 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depressive Disorder, Major, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 55. This study's 45 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 688 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 55.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 6, 2018
First posted
Mar 16, 2018
StartActual
Dec 21, 2016
Primary completionActual
Sep 30, 2020
CompletionActual
Oct 30, 2020
Last update
Oct 5, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03468686
Lead sponsor
University of Tehran
Collaborators
Stanford University
Responsible party
reza kazemi (Researcher, University of Tehran) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 16, 2018
Start date
Dec 21, 2016
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2020
Completion
Oct 30, 2020
Last update
Oct 5, 2022

Study contacts

Reza Kazemi, PhD
principal investigator · Atieh Clinical Neuroscience center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion