ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07168863EUS-PANCREAUpdated Sep 15, 2025

EUS-guided FNB-induced PANCREatitis Assessment

An observational study in Pancreatitis, Acute and EUS Guided Biopsy, sponsored by University of Tehran. Recruiting at 1 site in Iran. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-15.

Sponsored by University of Tehran · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a descriptive analytical study to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for pancreatitis after Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) in patients at Shariati Hospital in Tehran. The study aims to identify risk factors for post-FNB pancreatitis to improve clinical protocols, reduce complications and treatment costs, and increase diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic and biliary tract diseases. The study will collect demographic and clinical data from all eligible patients undergoing EUS-guided FNB during the study period. Amylase and lipase levels will be measured in all enrolled patients 24 hours post-procedure. Pancreatitis will be diagnosed based on abdominal pain and amylase or lipase levels exceeding three times the normal range 24 hours after the procedure. The outcomes will be independently adjudicated by an expert gastroenterologist not involved in the EUS procedures by reviewing participants' medical records. The consensus definition will be applied as a diagnostic framework (rather than a strict definition) so that the adjudicator can use their best judgment in cases that does not strictly satisfy the criteria. The patients will be contacted 24-72 h after the procedure to follow-up on any potential complications. The study plans to enroll at least 300 patients.

Read the detailed description

EUS-guided tissue acquisition is an advanced diagnostic procedure for evaluating and diagnosing pancreatic, ampullary, and biliary tract tumors due to its high accuracy and minimally invasive nature. However, a potential complication is acute pancreatitis. This can lead to serious clinical problems, including severe abdominal pain, prolonged hospitalization, and, in rare cases, life-threatening complications. EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses is infrequently associated with acute pancreatitis. The incidence of pancreatitis after FNA of solid and cystic pancreatic lesions is reported to be 0.64%, and 1.4%, respectively (1, 2). The designs of the tips of FNA and FNB needles are different, and it may have impact on the risk of pancreatitis after FNB. Personal observations of the researchers of this study suggest that the risk of pancreatitis is likely higher after EUS-FNB than EUS-FNA, however, the incidence of pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNB is not systematically studied. The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of acute pancreatitis after EUS-FNB and identify the risk factors associated with post-EUS-FNB pancreatitis to help prevent and manage this complication, improve clinical outcomes, reduce treatment costs, and enhance diagnostic accuracy for pancreatic and biliary tract diseases. The study is a descriptive analytical study that will be conducted on patients referred to the endoscopy department of Shariati Hospital in Tehran who will undergo EUS-guided FNB.

Patient information, including demographic data and clinical characteristics, will be collected using specialized checklists based on clinical interviews, patient examinations, and review of patient records. The data collected will include gender, age, indication for FNB, history of acute or chronic pancreatitis, and technical details of the procedure, such as the needle brand and size, anatomical location of the biopsy, amount of normal pancreatic tissue the needle passes through, number of passes, and the biopsy site (stomach or duodenum).

All patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. Amylase and lipase levels will be measured in all enrolled patients 24 hours post-procedure. Pancreatitis will be diagnosed based on abdominal pain and amylase or lipase levels exceeding three times the normal range 24 hours after the procedure. The outcomes will be independently adjudicated by an expert gastroenterologist not involved in the EUS procedures by reviewing participants' medical records. The consensus definition will be applied as a diagnostic framework (rather than a strict definition) so that the adjudicator can use their best judgment in cases that does not strictly satisfy the criteria. The patients will be contacted 24-72 h after the procedure to follow-up on any potential complications. Patients who develop pancreatitis will receive standard diagnostic and therapeutic follow-up. The study plans to enroll at least 300 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pancreatitis, Acute
  • EUS Guided Biopsy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • acute pancreatitis
  • EUS-guided FNB
03

In context

Pancreatitis

557 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatitis; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 200 across 192 observational studies indexed under Pancreatitis.

Browse Pancreatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Tehran is the lead sponsor of 16 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive inpatients and outpatients aged 18 years or older undergoing EUS-guided FNB at Shariati Hospital

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Inpatients and outpatients aged 18 years or older undergoing EUS-guided FNB from a solid or cystic lesion in one of the following locations:

  • Pancreas
  • Ampulla of Vater
  • Distal CBD, defined as the intrapancreatic portion of the CBD where the FNB needle passes through the pancreas during

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who undergo concurrent ERCP in the same day
  • Patients experiencing an ongoing episode of acute pancreatitis during EUS-FNB
  • Patients undergoing EUS-guided FNA
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy ( > 1.5)
  • Uncorrectable thrombocytopenia ( \< 50,000)
  • Decline to participate in the study and sign the form
  • Patients undergoing EUS-guided FNB from the proximal CBD where the FNB needle does not traverse the pancreas
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • DeviceEUS-guided FNB

    EUS-guided FNB from the lesions in the pancreatobiliary tract

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Post-EUS-FNB acute pancreatitis

    Determining the incidence of acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNB from the pancreatobiliary lesions

    Time frame: From enrollment to three days after EUS-FNB

Secondary outcomes

  1. Factors associated with post-EUS-FNB pancreatitis

    The secondary objectives are to determine the role of the following factors in the development of pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNB: * Gender * Age * Biopsy site * Dilation of the main pancreatic duct (PD) and common bile duct (CBD) * The amount of normal pancreatic tissue the needle passes through * Number of needle passes * Number of back and forth movement of the needle in each pass * Biopsy approach (transgastric or transduodenal) * History of pancreatitis * Type of lesion (solid vs. cystic) * Needle size

    Time frame: From enrollment to three days after EUS-FNB

  2. Incidence of moderate to severe post-FNB pancreatitis

    The incidence of moderate to severe post-FNB pancreatitis will be assessed using Atlanta classification.

    Time frame: From enrollment to one week after EUS-FNB

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Shariati Hospital, Digestive Diseases Research Institute
    Tehran, Tehran Province 1411713135, Iran
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Eloubeidi MA, Gress FG, Savides TJ, Wiersema MJ, Kochman ML, Ahmad NA, Ginsberg GG, Erickson RA, Dewitt J, Van Dam J, Nickl NJ, Levy MJ, Clain JE, Chak A, Sivak MV Jr, Wong R, Isenberg G, Scheiman JM, Bounds B, Kimmey MB, Saunders MD, Chang KJ, Sharma A, Nguyen P, Lee JG, Edmundowicz SA, Early D, Azar R, Etemad B, Chen YK, Waxman I, Shami V, Catalano MF, Wilcox CM. Acute pancreatitis after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a pooled analysis from EUS centers in the United States. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Sep;60(3):385-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)01714-6. PubMed 15332028 ↗
  • Magahis PT, Chhoda A, Berzin TM, Farrell JJ, Wright DN, Rizvi A, Hanscom M, Carr-Locke DL, Sampath K, Sharaiha RZ, Mahadev S. Risk of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 1;119(11):2174-2186. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002942. Epub 2024 Jul 5. PubMed 38976379 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD will be shared for collaborative research after reviewing the requester's research protocol

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: IPD will be accessible following the study's publication and will remain available for three years.

Access criteria: IPD will be shared for collaborative research after reviewing the requester's research protocol

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07168863
Lead sponsor
University of Tehran
Responsible party
Mehdi Mohamadnejad (Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Tehran) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 11, 2025
Start date
Sep 11, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 12, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 12, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2025

Study contacts

Mehdi Mohamadnejad, MD
Contact
mehdi.nejad@gmail.com
+982182415104
Atieh Moghtadaie, MD
Contact
atiemoghtadaie@gmail.com
+982182415104

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion