ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03466190Updated Mar 15, 2018

Clinical Assessment of Computer-assisted PEEK Versus Conventional Titanium Plates on Mandibular Body Fractures

An interventional study of Titanium plate fixation and Custom made PEEK plate fixation in Fracture Mandible and Mandibular Fractures, sponsored by Cairo University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-15.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2018), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2017, registered Mar 2018).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Two groups of patients with mandibular body fractures indicated for Open reduction internal fixation alone or in combination with fractures elsewhere in the mandible or midface. First group will be subjected to traditional titanium internal rigid fixation. Second group will be subjected to custom made PEEK plates.

Read the detailed description

Two groups of patients with mandibular body fractures indicated for Open reduction internal fixation alone or in combination with fractures elsewhere in the mandible or midface. First group will be subjected to traditional titanium internal rigid fixation. Second group will be subjected to custom made PEEK plates.

Inclusion criteria:

All subjects were required:

  1. Patients with at least a unilateral body fracture indicated for Open reduction internal fixation alone or in combination with fracture elsewhere in the mandible or midface.
  2. All ages and both sexes were included in this study.
  3. Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome.
  4. Patients with good general condition allowing major surgical procedure under general anesthesia.
  5. Patients with physical and psychological tolerance.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with high risk systemic diseases like uncontrolled diabetes . As uncontrolled diabetes has a negative impact on normal bone healing.
  2. Patients with old fractures. As they will affect accuracy of reduction of the fractured segments.
  3. Patients with physical and psychological intolerance. As psychological stress will affect the immune system and patient's fitness including healing capacity.

Interventions:

Eligible patients will be randomized in equal proportions between the study group (PEEK custom made plates) and the control group (titanium plates).

A- Computer-assisted PEEK custom made plates:

  • All cases will undergo surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Exposure of the fractured segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach.
  • The fractured segments will be reduced in normal anatomic position guided by customized plate.
  • Fracture fragments will be fixed using PEEK custom made plate utilizing 2.0 mm screws.

B- Conventional titanium plates:

  • All cases will undergo surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Exposure of the fractured segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach.
  • Inter-maxillary fixation will be done.
  • The fractured segments will be reduced in normal anatomic position guided by occlusion.
  • The fracture fragments will be fixed using 2.3 titanium plate on the inferior border and 2.0 titanium plate on the superior border utilizing bone screws.

Follow up:

Clinical evaluation will be performed at the first week postoperative. Computed tomography will be performed at the first week postoperative then patients will be recalled for clinical evaluation every week for one month. Final follow up visit will be at 3 months postoperative.

02

Conditions studied

  • Fracture Mandible
  • Mandibular Fractures

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Mandibular body fractures, PEEK plates, titanium plates.
03

In context

Mandibular Fractures

84 studies on the registry are indexed under Mandibular Fractures; 20 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is close to the median of 22 across 64 interventional studies indexed under Mandibular Fractures.

Browse Mandibular Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,909 studies on the registry; 1,445 are open to participants now.

Of its 37 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with at least a unilateral body fracture indicated for Open reduction internal fixation alone or in combination with fracture elsewhere in the mandible or midface.
  2. All ages and both sexes were included in this study.
  3. Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome.
  4. Patients with good general condition allowing major surgical procedure under general anesthesia.
  5. Patients with physical and psychological tolerance.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with physical and psychological intolerance. Because psychological stress will affect the immune system and general health.
  2. Patients with systemic diseases like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Because uncontrolled diabetes mellitus has a negative impact on normal bone healing.
  3. Patients with old and/or mal-union fractures. As they will affect accuracy of reduction of the fractured segments.
  4. Patient with bad oral hygiene. As it has an influence on normal osseous healing
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Custom made PEEK plate fixation

    Open Reduction Internal Fixation using Custom made PEEK plates.

    Procedure: Custom made PEEK plate fixation

  • Active comparator
    Titanium plate fixation

    Open Reduction Internal Fixation using conventional titanium plating system.

    Procedure: Titanium plate fixation

Interventions

  • ProcedureTitanium plate fixation

    Under General Anesthesia, exposure of the fractured mandibular body segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach. Open Reduction Internal Fixation using conventional titanium plates will be performed.

    Also known as: Conventional titanium plates

  • ProcedureCustom made PEEK plate fixation

    Under General Anesthesia, exposure of the fractured mandibular body segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach. Open Reduction Internal Fixation using custom made PEEK plates will be performed.

    Also known as: Computer-assisted PEEK plate fixation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative occlusion

    Restoration of normal patient occlusion will be assessed using Visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10)

    Time frame: 1 month postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of the planned reduction

    The accuracy of computer assisted PEEK custom made plates in open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular body fractures will be assessed using Mimics software, measuring unit (mm)

    Time frame: 1st week

  2. Wound dehiscence

    Wound infection will be assessed via clinical assessment, measuring unit (Binary yes/no)

    Time frame: 1 month postoperative

  3. The need for 2nd surgery

    Redo surgery will be assessed via clinical assessment, measuring unit (Binary yes/no)

    Time frame: 1 month postoperative

  4. Operative time

    Surgical time will be assessed via clinical assessment, measuring unit (hours)

    Time frame: During operation

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine -Cairo University
    Cairo, Giza Governorate 12613, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03466190
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Rofaida Atef Atef (Assistant lecturer, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 15, 2018
Start date
Aug 2, 2017
Primary completion
Mar 2, 2019 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2, 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 15, 2018

Study contacts

Rofaida A Ahmad, MSc
Contact
ro_fy_at@yahoo.com
+201099669299
Rofaida A Ahmad, MSc
Contact
rofaidaatef14@gmail.com
+201099669299
Khaled Amr, PhD
study director · Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine -Cairo University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion