CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03458689Updated Mar 13, 2019

Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Left Hemicolectomy

An interventional study of Left hemicolectomy, laparoscopic technique in Colon Neoplasm, Surgery and Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Ostfold Hospital Trust. Status unknown at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-13.

Sponsored by Ostfold Hospital Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2019), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The enhanced recovery after surgery and laparoscopic approach have been proven beneficial in surgery of the colon. However, patients have still pain, nausea and vomiting postoperatively. Postoperative pain is an expected but undesirable effect after an operation. This study will compare Transabdominis Plane (TAP) Block and Quadratus Lumborum (QL) Block with the common postoperative treatment with enteral and parenteral analgesics.

Read the detailed description

TAP is a recommended multimodal method of reducing postoperative pain in laparoscopic and open surgery. TAP block seems to be feasible and effective in postoperative pain control without increasing morbidity in colon resections. QL block is also performed as one of the perioperative pain management procedures in abdominal surgery. It is regarded as an effective analgesic tool. The dermatomal effects of QL block reach higher than the TAP block, and might explain the better effect of the QL block than TAP blocks on postoperative pain after caesarean delivery. For this study the investigators standardize the type of surgery to be left hemicolectomy. This is the most common procedure on colon.

Power and Sample Size Calculator:

The number of patients required for the study was calculated on the basis of opioid consumption. We were interested in a reduction by 20% in the group given QLB. Assuming α=0,05, we calculated that we need 69 patients (23 in each group) to achieve a power of 80% (β=0.2).

75 adult patients scheduled for left hemicolectomy have to be included.

Subcutaneous wound infiltration at the end of surgery in all patients with ropivacaine 2 mg/ml, 20 ml. Maximum allowed dosis of Ropivacain is 3 mg/kg bodyweight (BW), dosis reduction if BW\<70 kg Premedication: Paracetamol 2 g and Diklofenak 100 mg orally. General anaesthesia: TCI: Propofol and Remifentanil Ondansetron 4 mg, dexamethasone 8 mg and Oxycodone 5 mg intravenously at the end of surgery.

Postoperatively:

Oral paracetamol and codeine-fixed combination up to 1000 mg and 60 mg, respectively, every 6 h In case of insufficient analgesia, as judged by the patient, oxycodon 2 - 5 mg IV.

When nausea and vomiting occure postoperatively, ondansetron 4 mg IV administers as the drug of first choice followed by droperidol 0,625 mg IV if the nausea/vomiting persists.

Collected data:

Postoperative pain at rest and during activity evaluated by a 4-points verbal pain score (VPS; with no pain=0, slight pain = 1, Moderate pain = 2, and severe pain = 3) on admission to recovery, and every hour until discharge.

Rescue analgesic consumption during 0 to 4, 4 to 24 and 24 to 48 h. Sedation, nausea and vomiting record by the same 0 - 3 scale (none, slight, moderate, strong) during recovery Time of postoperative mobilization with corresponding pain score. Time of discharge-to-home or ward readiness according to standard criteria, including stable vital signs, no bleeding from the surgical site, ability to void, absence of excessive nausea and pain, and ability to dress and walk without support.

Side effects including nausea and/or vomiting (0 to 4, 4 to 24, and 24 to 48 h), antiemetics administered (0 to 24 and 24 to 48 H), grade of sedation (0 to 10 scale, where 0 = awake, and 10 = aroused on stimulation), and other side effects and symptoms of LA toxicity.

Telephone interview at 24 h, 48 h and 7 days, with questions:

Pain during rest and activity using the VPS Total need of analgesics Sedation Nausea Level of activity Overall satisfaction with the per- and postoperative period on a 0 - 3 scale: not satisfied, slight, moderate or highly satisfied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colon Neoplasm
  • Surgery
  • Pain, Postoperative
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-80 Years
  • BMI 20-35
  • ASA physical status I-II

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to LA
  • Chronic pain requiring opioid analgesics
  • Patients with atrioventricular block II
  • Patients treated with class III antiarrhythmics
  • Patients with severe renal and/or hepatic disease
  • A coagulation disorder
  • An infection at the LA injection place
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Left hemicolectomy without nerve blocks

    Left hemicolectomy, laparoscopic technique Enteral and parenteral analgesics such as paracetamol and oksykodon

    Procedure: Left hemicolectomy, laparoscopic technique

  • Active comparator
    Left hemicolectomy with TAP block

    Left hemicolectomy, laparoscopic technique TAP block bilateral with Naropin 3,75 mg/ml, 2 x 20 ml

    Procedure: Left hemicolectomy, laparoscopic technique

  • Active comparator
    Left hemicolectomy with QL block

    Left hemicolectomy, laparoscopic technique QL block bilateral with Naropin 3,75 mg/ml, 2 x 20 ml

    Procedure: Left hemicolectomy, laparoscopic technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureLeft hemicolectomy, laparoscopic technique

    Left hemicolectomy, Laparoscopic technique

    Also known as: QL block bilateral with ropivacain 3,75 mg/ml (2 x 20 ml), TAP block with ropivacain 3,75 mg/ml (2 x 20 ml), Traditional analgesics such as paracetamol and oksycodon

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Use of analgesics - "change" is being assessed

    Amount of analgesics used postoperative

    Time frame: 1 week (0-4 hrs) (4-24 hrs) (24-48 hrs) (48 - 168 hrs)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain at the incision site - "change" is being assessed

    VPS (Verbal Pain Score): No pain = 0, Slight pain = 1, Moderate pain= 2, Severe pain = 3

    Time frame: 1 week (0-4 hrs) (4-24 hrs) (24-48 hrs) (48 - 168 hrs)

  2. Deep pain and pain on coughing - "change" is being assessed

    VPS (Verbal Pain Score): No pain = 0, Slight pain = 1, Moderate pain= 2, Severe pain = 3

    Time frame: 1 week (0-4 hrs) (4-24 hrs) (24-48 hrs) (48 - 168 hrs)

  3. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption - "change" is being assessed

    Amount of different medicaments in mg

    Time frame: 1 week (0-4 hrs) (4-24 hrs) (24-48 hrs) (48 - 168 hrs)

  4. Postoperative nausea and vomiting - "change" is being assessed

    0 - 3 score where None = 0, Little nausea = 1, Can not eat = 2, Vomiting = 3

    Time frame: 1 week (0-4 hrs) (4-24 hrs) (24-48 hrs) (48 - 168 hrs)

  5. Antiemetic administered - "change" is being assessed

    Amount of different medicaments in mg

    Time frame: 1 week (0-4 hrs) (4-24 hrs) (24-48 hrs) (48 - 168 hrs)

  6. Sedation scores - "change" is being assessed

    Sleepy or active. Score: Awake = 0, Tired = 1, Falls asleep = 2, Asleep all the time = 3

    Time frame: 1 week (0-4 hrs) (4-24 hrs) (24-48 hrs) (48 - 168 hrs)

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Ostfold Hospital Trust, Moss
    Grålum, Ostfold 1714, Norway
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Borglum J, Gogenur I, Bendtsen TF. Abdominal wall blocks in adults. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;29(5):638-43. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000378. PubMed 27429253 ↗
  • Blanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, Shetty N. Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):757-762. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000495. Erratum In: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:111. PubMed 27755488 ↗
  • El-Dawlatly AA, Turkistani A, Kettner SC, Machata AM, Delvi MB, Thallaj A, Kapral S, Marhofer P. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block: description of a new technique and comparison with conventional systemic analgesia during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):763-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep067. Epub 2009 Apr 17. Erratum In: Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):622. PubMed 19376789 ↗
  • Murouchi T, Iwasaki S, Yamakage M. Quadratus Lumborum Block: Analgesic Effects and Chronological Ropivacaine Concentrations After Laparoscopic Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):146-50. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000349. PubMed 26735154 ↗
  • Pirrera B, Alagna V, Lucchi A, Berti P, Gabbianelli C, Martorelli G, Mozzoni L, Ruggeri F, Ingardia A, Nardi G, Garulli G. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) in laparoscopic colon surgery in the ERAS program. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):376-382. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5686-7. Epub 2017 Jul 1. PubMed 28667547 ↗
  • Ueshima H, Otake H, Lin JA. Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block: An Updated Review of Anatomy and Techniques. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2752876. doi: 10.1155/2017/2752876. Epub 2017 Jan 3. PubMed 28154824 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03458689
Lead sponsor
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Responsible party
Jan Sverre Vamnes (Senior conultant, Ph.D., Ostfold Hospital Trust) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 8, 2018
Start date
Feb 28, 2018
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 13, 2019

Study contacts

Jan Sverre Vamnes, MD, Ph.D.
Contact
janvam@so-hf.no
0047 91305016
Klaus Risnes, MD
Contact
klaris@so-hf.no
0047 99329515
Jan Sverre Vamnes, MD, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Senior Consultant

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion