ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06568276Updated Aug 13, 2025

The Benefit of Repairing the Deltoid Ligament in Unstable Ankle Fractures

An interventional study of Additional deep deltoid ligament suture in Ankle Fractures and Deltoid Ligament; Sprain (Strain) (Ankle), sponsored by Ostfold Hospital Trust. Recruiting at 9 sites in Norway. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-13.

Sponsored by Ostfold Hospital Trust · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ankle fractures occur in 1 out of 800 persons a year and is a common injury. The deltoid ligament is necessary for the stability of the joint and guides choice of treatment. Cadaveric studies have shown that deltoid ligament repair gives more stability than the osteosynthesis of the lateral malleolus itself. The investigators want to show if suture of the deltoid ligament in unstable ankle fractures contribute to a better functional result and/or prevent long term osteoarthritis for our participants. Patients sustaining severe ankle fractures have shown a considerable loss of function that might affect their long term activities of daily living (ADL) function. Improving outcome for this group may preserve some patients' ability to work and reduce community expenses.

Read the detailed description

During the last two decades less severe ankle fractures have been shown not to need operative treatment in general. The total number of ankle fracture surgeries has gone down. Therefore, surgically treated ankle fractures nowadays are on average more complex. The understanding of these injuries implies a recognition of the role of the deep deltoid ligament as a main stabilizer of the ankle joint. Deltoid ligament repair is documented to be a good option to regain ankle joint anatomy from smaller studies. This repair also compensates for syndesmotic injury to some extent. The effect of deep deltoid ligament repair in Weber B ankle fractures and its effect on long term function and arthritis is not yet known from clinical studies.

The investigators aim to show whether deltoid ligament suture gives a clinically significant superior result than solely osteosynthesis of the lateral malleolus in unstable ankle fractures. This will be performed as a multicentre randomized controlled study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ankle Fractures
  • Deltoid Ligament; Sprain (Strain) (Ankle)
03

In context

Ankle Fractures

202 studies on the registry are indexed under Ankle Fractures; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 90 across 150 interventional studies indexed under Ankle Fractures.

Browse Ankle Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Ostfold Hospital Trust is the lead sponsor of 50 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria; fluent in oral and written Norwegian language

  • isolated Weber type B fractures and Weber B+ posterior malleolar Mason Molloy class I.
  • Initial medial clear space (MCS)>=7mm or weightbearing x-ray evaluated as unstable or primary reposition after fracture dislocation.
  • Pre-injury walking ability without aids.

Exclusion criteria

  • assumed not compliant (drug use, cognitive- and/or psychiatric disorders).
  • previous history of ipsilateral ankle fracture or ipsilateral major ankle-/foot surgery.
  • open fx Gustilo Anderson II or more, multi-trauma and pathologic fracture.
  • neuropathies and generalized joint disease such as Rheumatoid Arthritis or other more severe condition in same extremity
  • fixation of tibial fragment or syndesmotic screw or suture button planned prior to surgery
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Conventional treatment

    Unstable Weber B fractures receiving standard treatment, plate and screw fixation of the lateral malleolus only

  • Experimental
    Additional deltoid ligament suture

    Unstable Weber B fractures receiving standard treatment, plate and screw fixation of the lateral malleolus and additional deep deltoid ligament suture

    Procedure: Additional deep deltoid ligament suture

Interventions

  • ProcedureAdditional deep deltoid ligament suture

    The deep deltoid ligament will be sutured through a curved incision lifting the tibialis posterior tendon out to be sutured back after tying the ligament to an anchor in the talus.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported functional outcome 1 year after injury

    Function will be measured in Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) (ankle specific) (0 (worst)-100 (best))

    Time frame: 1 and 2 years after injury, function 5 years after injury will also be collected

  2. Differences in radiological stability parameters with or without ligament suture at group level

    Differences in medial clear space (mm) on weightbearing x-rays or Gravity test at group level

    Time frame: 1 and 2 years after injury, function 5 years after injury will also be collected

Secondary outcomes

  1. General health state reported through a general (generic) Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM)

    The generic Euroquol EQ-5D (EQ 5D-5L) reports general health based on 5 items where Index scores range from -0.59 to 1; 1 is the best possible health state. Negative values represent health states perceived as worse than dead, which is equal to 0.

    Time frame: up to 5 years

  2. Posttraumatic ankle arthritis

    Arthritis seen on weightbearing x-rays will be reported according to Kellgren Lawrence Scale (KGLS) (0 no arthritis to 4 severe/end stage arthritis with bone to bone contact and bone wear and osteophytes)

    Time frame: 1,2 and 5 years

  3. VAS Pain

    scale limited by intervals of no pain (0) and worst imaginable pain (100)

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 1, 2 and 5 years

  4. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

    We will use a version of the Mobility bank 2.1. The setup and calculation method is still not clear. We await further progress from the organization developing this PROM. We hope to get a computer adapted testing (CAT) version of this survey ready in a Norwegian version within the start of 1 year follow up in September 2025

    Time frame: 1, 2 and 5 years

  5. Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS)

    Ankle specific PROM based on 12 items, scale 0(worst) - 48 (best possible)

    Time frame: 3 months, 1, 2 and 5 years

  6. Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure

    Ankle Specific PROM based on 15 main items where 0 is the worst index score and 100 the best

    Time frame: 3 months, 1, 2 and 5 years

Other outcomes

  1. Complications

    Infection, suture anchor malplacement, delayed/non-union and reoperation rate will be recorded.

    Time frame: especially on first visits after surgery ie 6 and 12 weeks, and later visits up to 5 years after surgery.

07

Study locations

9 of 9 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 27 months after the start.

Of 69 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Ankle Fractures, half reached primary completion within 44 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 61. This study's planned 27 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 72 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 61.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 22, 2024
First posted
Aug 23, 2024
StartActual
Sep 20, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2032
Last update
Aug 13, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06568276
Lead sponsor
Ostfold Hospital Trust
Collaborators
Sykehuset Innlandet HF, Helse Nord-Trøndelag HF, Helse-Bergen HF, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Helse Stavanger HF, Trondheim University Hospital, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Alesund Hospital, Nordlandssykehuset HF
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 23, 2024
Start date
Sep 20, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 13, 2025

Study contacts

Esten Konstad Haanæs, MD
Contact
estenkh@gmail.com
+4799789013
Marius Molund, MD, PhD
Contact
mariusmolund@hotmail.com
+4790093988
Frede Jon Frihagen, MD, PhD
study director · Oestfold Hospital Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion