CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03454438Updated May 3, 2022

Strategies to Improve Appropriate Referral to Rheumatologists

An interventional study of Referral strategies in Rheumatic Disease and Arthralgia, sponsored by Maasstad Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-03.

Sponsored by Maasstad Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
544
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this cluster randomized controlled trial is to improve the number of effectively referred patients with IRD to the rheumatology outpatient clinic with either use of validated referral pro formas or triage of IRD by specialists in a primary care setting compared to usual care. In addition, the investigators want to provide tools for the general practitioner to recognise IRD and improve early referral of patients with IRD, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to evaluate the decreasing effect on health-care cost.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Currently, only 22% of all patients referred to the rheumatologist by primary care are diagnosed with an inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD). Previous research has shown that structured referral sheets and community-based specialist service improve appropriateness of referrals.

Objective: The aim of this study is to improve the number of effectively referred patients with IRD to the rheumatology outpatient clinic with either use of validated referral pro formas or triage of IRD by specialists in a primary care setting compared to usual care. In addition, the investigators want to provide tools for the general practitioner to recognise IRD and improve early referral of patients with IRD, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed to evaluate the decreasing effect on health-care cost.

Study design: Cluster randomized trial with randomization of general practitioner clinics.

Study population: Primary care patients of 18 years or older who are suspected of an IRD and considered by a GP for referral to a rheumatologist.

Intervention: One group of GPs will use a standardized referral strategy for IRD, another group will consist of triage by a rheumatologist in the local primary care clinic, the third group is usual care.

Main study parameters/endpoints: Percentage of patients diagnosed with an IRD by a rheumatologists after 12 months. In addition, cost effectiveness, quality of life, work participation and health care costs at baseline and after 12 months.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: There is no additional risk to participating patients. Patients might benefit from early referral since the referral pro formas point out important aspects of IRD that are frequently overlooked. Patients will be requested to fill in three online questionnaires related to quality of life, work participation and socio-economic costs. There are no additional visits, physical examinations or other tests.

02

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatic Disease
  • Arthralgia

Keywords

  • Referral
  • Primary care
  • Rheumatologist
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • A primary care patient who is referred by the GP to the rheumatology outpatient clinic
  • Subject must be able to understand and communicate with the rheumatologist
  • Participant must give a written signed and dated informed consent before enrolment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Limited understanding of the Dutch language.
  • Legally incapable or vulnerable subject as described in the Medical Research with Human Subjects Act (WMO).
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
544 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Algorithm

    Use of electronic structured referral sheets using the algorithms for rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

    Procedure: Referral strategies

  • Experimental
    Triage

    Triage by rheumatologist in a primary care setting.

    Procedure: Referral strategies

  • No intervention
    Usual care

    Control group consisting of usual care.

Interventions

  • ProcedureReferral strategies

    Two referral strategies will be compared to usual care, i.e. the control group. Patients will be followed for one year.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of appropriate referred patients

    Percentage of appropriate referred patients as proportion of all patients referred to the rheumatologist by the general practitioner (GP). Appropriate referred defined as patient diagnosed with an inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) as assessed by a rheumatologist, with an IRD as final diagnosis.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. EuroQoL Health questionnaire

    The standard analysis for health-related quality of life in cost-effectiveness research, tool in determining Quality adjusted life years (QALYs).

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire

    Collects information on non-disease specific health-care consumption.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire

    Measurement of productivity loss and work participation.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Health-care costs

    Amount of outpatient clinic visits (visits to medical specialist, supporting staff, other staff), diagnostics (laboratory analyses, imaging), therapy (medication, medical procedures, over the counter medication), general practitioner consultation, medication use prescribed by general practitioner.

    Time frame: 12 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Maasstad Hospital
    Rotterdam, Zuid Holland 3079, Netherlands
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03454438
Lead sponsor
Maasstad Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 5, 2018
Start date
Feb 28, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2020
Completion
Aug 31, 2021
Last update
May 3, 2022

Study contacts

Angelique Weel-Koenders
principal investigator · Maasstad Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion