ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07775612Updated Aug 20, 2026

Pain-Sleep in Rheumatic Disease

An interventional study of Better Nights, Better Days for Youth in Rheumatic Diseases, Arthritis and Lupus, sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 12 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-20.

Primary conditionArthritis, JuvenileRegistry: Rheumatic DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Rheumatic Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Arthritis, Juvenile
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Arthritis, Juvenile, a narrower term within Rheumatic Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
43
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 18 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 11 studies in Arthritis, Juvenile by The Hospital for Sick Children — 3 open to participants now, 3 under way, none of them phase 3. Arthritis, Juvenile · The Hospital for Sick Children.

Planned enrollment
8th of 10
43 · median 57
Started
2026
the only one that year
No phase
9 of 11
2 open now
Registered
11th of 11
by date

Among the 11 studies in Arthritis, Juvenile by The Hospital for Sick Children, this one is the 8th largest by planned enrollment of the 10 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 9 with no phase, and was the 11th registered.

By phase

11 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study9 · 2 open
Observational1 · 1 open
Phase 21 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 57 across the 10 interventional studies, 4,100 across the 1 observational. Of the 8 that completed or were terminated, 1 (13%) have results posted.

Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in Arthritis, Juvenile by The Hospital for Sick Children, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Overall, our understanding of how pain and sleep are experienced and how they can be treated in teenagers with rheumatic diseases is limited. This two-phased study aims to deepen our understanding of pain and sleep in this population using 'Better Nights, Better Days for Youth' (BNBD-Youth). 'BNBD-Youth' is a self-guided web-based sleep program for teenagers with sleep problems that uses educational and behavioural strategies, such as understanding sleep processes and changing unhelpful thoughts about sleep, to help improve sleep experiences. In Phase One, participants will use daily diaries to record their sleep and pain, and then use 'BNBDYouth' for five weeks to test whether it improves these outcomes. Then, in Phase Two, these participants will take part in an interview to further describe their experiences using 'BNBD-Youth' and their pain and sleep.

Read the detailed description

Across two phases, this research will use an explanatory sequential mixed methods design involving (1) a single-arm trial of Better Nights, Better Days for Youth (BNBD-Youth) with 30 adolescents, aged 12-18, with a chronic pediatric rheumatic disease to characterize the correlational pain-sleep relationship and to estimate the preliminary effectiveness of the web-based sleep program on sleep and pain outcomes. These quantitative findings will guide the selection of participants, and the interview questions asked in the (2) subsequent qualitative study involving individual, semi-structured interviews with 10-26 quantitative participants to further contextualize the pain-sleep relationship using the personal pain and sleep experiences reported by participants. The quantitative and qualitative datasets will be analyzed separately and then merged during the interpretation phase.

03

Conditions studied

  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • Arthritis
  • Lupus
  • Lupus Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • JIA
  • Dermatomyositis
  • Vasculitis
  • Pediatric Rheumatological Condition (i.e., Arthritis, SLE, Kawasaki's Disaese)
  • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
  • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)

Keywords

  • Sleep Disturbance
  • Sleep Problems
  • Insomnia
  • Cognitive behavioural therapies
  • CBT
  • Psychoeducation
  • Sleep Hygiene
  • Healthy Sleep Practices
  • Web-based
  • Digital
  • Better Nights, Better Days
  • Pediatric
  • Adolescents
  • Pain
  • Rheumatic Diseases
  • JIA
  • Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis
  • SLE
  • Lupus
  • Vasculitis
  • Juvenile Dermatomyositis
04

In context

Arthritis, Juvenile Reclassified

365 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis, Juvenile; 101 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 43 is below the median of 52 across 230 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis, Juvenile.

Browse Arthritis, Juvenile studies →

Lead sponsor

The Hospital for Sick Children is the lead sponsor of 578 studies on the registry; 83 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (14%) have results posted.

Compared within Arthritis, Juvenile, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Rheumatic Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

05

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Able to provide ,
  2. Can speak, read, and write in English,
  3. Are an adolescent between the ages of 12 and 18 years,
  4. Have a confirmed diagnosis of a chronic pediatric rheumatic disease,
  5. Report at least a one-month history of dissatisfactory sleep quantity or quality with difficulty initiating sleep, difficulty maintaining sleep, or early-morning awakenings with an inability to return to sleep experienced at least three nights a week,
  6. Report a minimum of mild pain (i.e., at least 1/10 pain on a numeric rating scale) at least once in the past week, and
  7. Have access to the Internet and an email account.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have a hearing, visual, or cognitive impairment that would prevent the completion of outcome measures, as indicated by the healthcare team,
  2. Have a sleep disorder that requires medical or surgical intervention,
  3. Are currently receiving sleep-related psychosocial care, or
  4. Have used 'Better Nights, Better Days for Youth' before.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

06

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
43 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Arm

    Behavioral: Better Nights, Better Days for Youth

Interventions

  • BehavioralBetter Nights, Better Days for Youth

    BNBD-Youth is a web-based sleep program, available only for research, designed to introduce healthy sleep practices to adolescents and young adults with sleep disturbances, aiming to improve their sleep quality and duration. It is entirely self-guided and adolescent-based (i.e., does not involve the caregiver or healthcare professional) and accessed on the individual's personal device (e.g., smartphone, tablet, computer). This program comprises 31 short, interactive microlessons organized into 4 overarching sessions.

07

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)

    The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is a 7-item, validated self-report questionnaire that assesses the nature, severity, and impact of sleep over the past 2 weeks, with a total score ranging from 0-28. It has an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.74) and is selected as Phase One's primary outcome because it is: 1. Frequently used in sleep research with older children, 2. Brief and easy to complete, and 3. Sensitive to perceived sleep impact after treatment.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

Secondary outcomes

  1. PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference - Short Form 8a

    The PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference - Short Form 8a is an 8-item self-report tool that assesses the impact of pain on function over the past seven days. It has high internal consistency in children, 8-18 years old, with chronic pain (Cronbach's α = 0.90). PROMIS instruments are scored using item-level calibrations and response pattern scoring. PROMIS scores will be calculated via REDCap auto-score, guided by the HealthMeasures Scoring.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

  2. Pain Symptom Tracker

    Daily pain will be collected via the "Check-in" feature on iCanCope, a smartphone-based pain self-management app developed through a phased, user-centred design study with adolescents with chronic pain and healthcare providers. Using numeric rating scales ranging from 0-10, the Check-in feature collects self-reported data on pain intensity, pain interference, mood, physical activity, sleep quality, and energy. The Check-in feature uses adolescent-friendly language, pictorial response options, and daily push notifications at a time of their choice to promote engagement. In previous iCanCope studies with adolescents (12 to 18 years) with chronic pain and JIA, over half of the participants were shown to have high to moderate levels of adherence to the application. Participants will be asked to complete three check-in entries each day. Each entry is estimated to take up to 1 minute to complete.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

  3. Sleep Diary

    In sleep research, sleep diaries are considered the "golden standard" for subjective sleep assessment. This study will use an investigator-developed sleep diary on REDCap that participants will complete upon waking to capture participants' sleep patterns close to the time they occur, including sleep efficiency (i.e., the percentage of total time spent asleep while in bed), a composite of total sleep time and total time in bed, and sleep quality. The necessary fields selected to calculate these sleep parameters were selected based on (1) this study's research objectives and (2) a previous research consensus-based panel. Participants will be advised to complete 1 daily sleep diary entry shortly upon waking, reflecting the night before and the day of. Each diary entry is estimated to take up to 5 minutes to complete. Data entered by participants is automatically populated into REDCap.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

  4. Actigraphy

    Objective sleep-wake activity will be captured using an actigraph wrist device (ActiGraph GT9X Link \[Ametris\] and Actiwatch 2 \[Philips Respironics\]), which measures movement using a 3-axis accelerometer to detect raw position and rotational data. In sleep research, actigraphy is preferred to polysomnography, the "golden standard" for objective sleep measurement, due to practicality reported by research participants. In this study, actigraph data is compared with sleep diary data to screen for potential artifacts.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

Other outcomes

  1. Pediatric Anxiety - Short Form 8a

    The PROMIS Pediatric Depressive Symptoms - Short Form 8a and PROMIS Pediatric Anxiety - Short Form 8a scales are 8-item tools that assess symptomology during the past seven days. PROMIS instruments are scored using item-level calibrations and response pattern scoring. PROMIS scores will be calculated via REDCap auto-score, guided by the HealthMeasures Scoring.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

  2. PROMIS Pediatric Depressive Symptoms - Short Form 8a

    The PROMIS Pediatric Depressive Symptoms - Short Form 8a and PROMIS Pediatric Anxiety - Short Form 8a scales are 8-item tools that assess symptomology during the past seven days. PROMIS instruments are scored using item-level calibrations and response pattern scoring. PROMIS scores will be calculated via REDCap auto-score, guided by the HealthMeasures Scoring.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

  3. Patient Global Assessment

    The Patient Global Assessment is a 21-point visual analogue scale widely used in pediatric rheumatic diseases to allow patients to subjectively rate their disease status. The 21-point scale was selected over the traditional 10-cm horizontal line scale because evidence indicates it is more feasible and may increase the precision of patient assessment.

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

  4. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Generic Core Scales

    The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Generic Core Scales is a 23-item self-report tool comprising 4 dimensions (i.e., physical, emotional, social, and school functioning) to determine HRQoL. The PedsQL has high internal consistency in children up to 18 years (Cronbach's α = 0.88).

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

  5. Patient Global Impression of Change

    The Patient Global Impression of Change is a single-item, self-reported 7-point rating of participants' perceived change at the end of the study. In pediatric chronic pain clinical trials, the PGIC is recommended for its clinical utility and ease of use.

    Time frame: Immediately post-intervention (5 weeks post intervention-start)

08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07775612
Responsible party
Jennifer Stinson (Senior Scientist, Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 20, 2026

Study contacts

Kelly Nguyen
Contact
kelly.nguyen@sickkids.ca
(416) 813-1500

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion