ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07594821MeDeUpdated Jun 26, 2026

MeDe Study: Comparing Median Nerve Decompression at the Carpal Tunnel Alone Versus Median Nerve Decompression at Both the Carpal Tunnel and Lacertus Fibrosis in Adults With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

An interventional study of Carpal tunnel release and Combined carpal tunnel and lacertus release in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) and Lacertus Syndrome, sponsored by Maasstad Hospital. Recruiting at 2 sites in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-26.

Sponsored by Maasstad Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
110
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a condition that can cause pain, numbness, or tingling in the hand and wrist. The most common surgery for CTS is called carpal tunnel release, which aims to relieve pressure on the main nerve in the wrist.

However, after this surgery, some patients (up to 4 out of 10) still have symptoms, and about 1 in 8 may need another surgery. One reason symptoms can continue is that the nerve may also be compressed higher up in the arm, near a ligament called the Lacertus fibrosus. Releasing this area might help, but it is often not checked or treated during the first surgery because current tests (like physical exams, nerve studies, and ultrasounds) cannot reliably detect it.

This study is comparing two approaches for people with CTS:

  1. Standard surgery - only releasing the carpal tunnel.
  2. Extended surgery - releasing both the carpal tunnel and the Lacertus fibrosus.

The goal is to see which surgery helps patients feel better and have fewer symptoms in the hand and wrist after treatment.

Read the detailed description

Carpal tunnel release is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Nevertheless, up to 43% of patients experience residual symptoms, necessitating secondary surgical interventions in approximately one out of eight carpal tunnel releases.

These residual symptoms may be attributable to proximal median nerve compression (PMNC), which can potentially be alleviated by performing a Lacertus release. However, diagnosing PMNC poses a challenge, as standard diagnostic tools like physical examination, electromyography (EMG) and ultrasound lack the specificity to distinguish between CTS and PMNC. Consequently, PMNC often goes undetected and untreated during initial evaluations.

This randomised trial compares patient reported outcomes following median nerve decompression at the carpal tunnel alone versus median nerve decompression at both the carpal tunnel and the Lacertus fibrosus in individuals with CTS.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
  • Lacertus Syndrome

Keywords

  • carpal tunnel syndrome
  • proximal median nerve compression
  • lacertus syndrome
  • double crush
  • nerve decompression
  • carpal tunnel release
  • lacertus release.
03

In context

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

587 studies on the registry are indexed under Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; 134 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 110 is above the median of 60 across 443 interventional studies indexed under Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Browse Carpal Tunnel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Maasstad Hospital is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients being at least 18 years or older
  • CTS confirmed by EMG or nerve ultrasound
  • Patient opts for surgical treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous surgical decompression of the median nerve at the ipsilateral wrist or forearm
  • Severe thenar atrophy: Examination of the thenar is based on clinical observation. The presence of thenar muscle atrophy is scored as none, mild, or severe.
  • Simultaneous nerve decompression in the ipsilateral arm (e.g. cubital tunnel, Guyon and radial nerve release.
  • Neurological disorders affecting peripheral nerves (e.g. spinal cord compression or injury, muscular dystrophy, dystonia, ALS)
  • Malunion of the distal radius
  • Impaired hand function
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to complete study forms due to insufficient comprehension of the Dutch language
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    carpal tunnel release

    Control group

    Procedure: Carpal tunnel release

  • Other
    carpal tunnel release combined with Lacertus release

    Intervention group

    Procedure: Combined carpal tunnel and lacertus release

Interventions

  • ProcedureCarpal tunnel release

    Carpal tunnel release is a surgical procedure to treat carpal tunnel syndrome by cutting the ligament (transverse carpal ligament) covering the wrist's carpal tunnel. This action relieves pressure on the median nerve, alleviating pain, numbness, and weakness in the hand. It is usually an outpatient procedure done under local anesthesia.

  • ProcedureCombined carpal tunnel and lacertus release

    A transverse incision is made on the forearm's volar (anterior) aspect, approximately 3cm distal of the elbow crease. This incision is placed over the palpable brachioradialis and biceps tendon. The subcutaneous tissue is dissected to expose the fascia overlying the flexor pronator muscles. The brachial fascia is identified and incised to reveal the underlying Lacertus fibrosus (also known as the bicipital aponeurosis). The Lacertus fibrosus is a tendinous band extending from the biceps tendon medially across the forearm. Care is taken to avoid injury to the underlying structures, particularly the median nerve, which lies deep and slightly medial to the Lacertus fibrosus. The Lacertus fibrosus is incised transversely. The surgeon ensures that the median nerve is fully decompressed and that there are no remaining constrictive bands. It is usually an outpatient procedure done under local anesthesia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ SSS)

    Scores range from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates a more severe level of impairment or discomfort.

    Time frame: At twelve months follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Functional Status Scale (BCTQ FSS)

    Scores range from 1 to 5. A higher score indicates a more severe level of impairment or discomfort.

    Time frame: From enrollment until 12 months of follow-up

  2. Anchor questions

    Regarding patient satisfaction to analyse minimal clinically important difference (MCID)

    Time frame: At 12 months follow-up

  3. Number of participants with residual, persistent en recurrent CTS symptoms

    Time frame: From 6 weeks after surgery until 12 months of follow-up

  4. Pillar pain

    The presence of tenderness or pain in the thenar or hypothenar area around the hook of the hamate and the unciform process of the trapezium

    Time frame: From 6 weeks after surgery until 12 months of follow-up

  5. Number of participants undergoing secondary surgery

    This includes, but is not limited to, nerve decompression, internal or external neurolysis, and flap reconstruction in the ipsilateral arm.

    Time frame: From 6 weeks until 12 months of follow-up.

  6. Number of participants that experienced complications or adverse events

    Such as infection, seroma, and tendon and neurovascular damage.

    Time frame: From enrollment until 12 months of follow-up.

  7. (Return to) work using the QuickDASH work module.

    Time frame: From enrollment until 6 months of follow-up.

  8. Sensibility

    Monofilament test on the tuft of the 3rd digit and the proximal thenar. The tuft of the 5th digit and the distal thenar will be measured and used as a reference.

    Time frame: From enrollment until 12 months of follow-up.

  9. Tip-pinch strength

    Tip-to-tip pinch strength of the first and second digit will be measured with a baseline pinch gauge.

    Time frame: From enrollment until 12 months of follow-up

  10. Cost-effectiveness of intervention

    Measured with health care resource utilisation and costs (iMCQ, iPCQ).

    Time frame: From enrollment until 12 months of follow-up

  11. 5-level EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L): Quality of life

    Will be assessed using the 5-level EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire.

    Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and at 12 months of follow-up.

  12. Physical examination

    OK-sign, FLP and FDP2 strength separately (compared to contralateral hand). Scratch collapse test over the carpal tunnel and Lacertus fibrosis (positive or negative). Phalen and Tinel test (positive or negative).

    Time frame: From enrollment until 12 months of follow-up.

  13. Exploratory ultrasound

    Changes in median nerve cross-sectional diameter (mm) to evaluate postoperative changes in nerve size over time, measured by nerve ultrasound.

    Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and 3 months.

Other outcomes

  1. Patient Demographics

    Age, sex, labour (blue versus white collar), hand dominance and medical history regarding comorbidities and hand-specific conditions

    Time frame: At baseline

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Maasstad Ziekenhuis
    Rotterdam, South Holland 3079 DZ, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Niels W.L Schep, MD, PhD · ContactSchepN@maasstadziekenhuis.nl · +31 6 24232542
    • Sebastian Poggio Voormolen, BSc, PhD candidate · Sub investigator
    • Ileen Domela Nieuwenhuis Nyegaard, MD, PhD candidate · Sub investigator
    • Niels W.L Schep, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Spijkenise Medisch Centrum
    Rotterdam, South Holland 3201 GZ, Netherlands
    Recruiting
    • Niels W.L Schep, MD, PhD · ContactSchepN@maasstadziekenhuis.nl · +31 6 24232542
    • Sebastian Poggio Voormolen, BSc, PhD candidate · Sub investigator
    • Ileen Domela Nieuwenhuis Nyegaard, MD, PhD candidate · Sub investigator
    • Niels W.L Schep, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2028, 21 months after the start.

Of 251 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 27. This study's planned 21 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 261 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 11, 2026
First posted
May 19, 2026
StartActual
May 6, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2028
CompletionEst.
Feb 2028
Last update
Jun 26, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07594821
Lead sponsor
Maasstad Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 19, 2026
Start date
May 6, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 26, 2026

Study contacts

Sebastian Poggio Voormolen, BSc, PhD candidate
Contact
PoggioVoormolenS@maasstadziekenhuis.nl
+31 6 46560865

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion