ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04755127ARCTICUpdated Dec 28, 2023

Arthroscopic Synovectomy of the Wrist in Inflammatory Arthritis

An interventional study of Arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist and Intra-articular corticosteroid injection in Wrist Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis, sponsored by Maasstad Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-12-28.

Sponsored by Maasstad Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2021; still recruiting 5 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 34 studies in Arthritis, Psoriatic with a site in Netherlands — 2 open to participants now, 6 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Arthritis, Psoriatic · Netherlands.

Planned enrollment
19th of 27
80 · median 200
Started
2021
with 2 others
No phase
2 of 34
1 open now
Registered
32nd of 34
by date

Among the 34 studies in Arthritis, Psoriatic with a site in Netherlands, this one is the 19th largest by planned enrollment of the 27 interventional ones, is one of 3 that started in 2021, is one of 2 with no phase, and was the 32nd registered.

By phase

34 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 313 · 0 open
Observational7 · 0 open
Phase 14 · 0 open
Phase 24 · 0 open
Phase 44 · 1 open
No phasethis study2 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2005; this study’s year is marked. 3 started in 2021.

Size and results

Median enrollment 200 across the 27 interventional studies, 304 across the 7 observational. Of the 27 that completed or were terminated, 20 (74%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 34 studies in Arthritis, Psoriatic with a site in Netherlands, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Rationale: Psoriatic (PsA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are inflammatory joint diseases that often involve the wrist and may result in progressive joint destruction followed by impaired wrist function and reduced quality of life. The first line treatment usually consists of conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (cDMARDs) along with bridging therapy using systemic corticosteroids or intra-articular corticosteroids in case of limited joint disease. After initiation therapy, intra-articular corticosteroids are often utilized as they provide rapid dampening of joint inflammation in case of a flare-up of disease activity (mono- or oligoarthritis). However, a substantial part of these patients clinically respond poorly or not at all. Alternatively, arthroscopic synovectomy may provide substantial relieve of symptoms, improve functionality, slow down disease progression and prevent joint destruction, as earlier studies have suggested. Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings. Moreover, they may prevent the need for expensive biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) and assist in guiding therapeutic strategies in the long run, through collecting and analysing valuable synovial biopsies. Wrist arthroscopy is a routine procedure in the participating centres with only minor complications and fast recovery.

Objective: To compare arthroscopic synovectomy with deposition of intra-articular corticosteroids (DIACS) versus intra-articular injection of corticosteroids (IACSI) in RA and PsA patients with mono- or oligoarthritis of the wrist that is refractory to cDMARD therapy.

Study design: Multi-centre randomized controlled trial conducted in the Maasstad Hospital and Spijkenisse Medisch Centrum (SMC).

Study population: Patients with active RA or PsA and bDMARD-naive, who develop a localized flare of disease activity (mono- or oligoarthritis) that involves the wrist, defined as an increase in DAS28 > 1.2 or > 0.6 if DAS28 ≥ 3.2 compared to the last DAS28 measurement (maximum six months before) and that is refractory to systemic cDMARD for at least three months, defined as no response on the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria.

Intervention: This study will randomize between IACSI of the wrist (control) and arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist combined with DIACS (intervention). During arthroscopy synovial biopsies will be collected and stored for later analysis of the functional and histological characteristics of the synovium (beyond the scope of this study).

Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the change in Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score from randomization to three months of follow-up. The PRWE is a validated, fifteen-item self-reported questionnaire rating wrist pain and function. Secondary outcomes are resolution of wrist arthritis measured by ultrasound, standard wrist radiographs, DAS28, EULAR response rate, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), EQ-5D quality of life questionnaire, iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ), iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ), cost effectiveness analyses (CEA), physical examination, adverse events (AE) and laboratory results. Follow-up visits are scheduled at three, six and twelve months after intervention.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with study participation:

Both study arms include standard treatment of care. Wrist arthroscopy is a standard treatment for wrist arthritis and often implemented for other intra-articular wrist pathology. The risks include infection, neurovascular damage and articular surface damage. Nevertheless, wrist arthroscopy is a well-established and safe technique. Reduction of risks will be done according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. If complications arise, the treating physician will proportionate the adequate treatment according to the current protocols based on the published literature. Patients will be asked to return at three, six and twelve months. These visits are standard of care following the rheumatic arthritis protocol. Patients will be asked to complete questionnaires at baseline and at three follow-up moments. These will take 160 minutes in total. The arthroscopy group will return between ten to fourteen days for wound inspection. All patient will be contacted by telephone at two, four and six weeks for VAS pain scores.

Expected results: We expect that arthroscopic synovectomy followed by DIACS will lead to significantly more improvement in PRWE scores compared to IACSI three months after intervention. Furthermore, we anticipate that wrist arthroscopy will result in lower pain scores, better joint mobility, better response on EULAR score, sustained resolution of arthritis on ultrasound, less joint damage on radiographs and is more cost-effective after one-year analysis.

03

Conditions studied

  • Wrist Arthritis
  • Psoriatic Arthritis
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Surgery

Keywords

  • Wrist arthroscopy
  • Arthroscopic synovectomy
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Psoriatic Arthritis
  • Patient related outcome
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Male and female patients with age ≥ 18 years
  • Subjects able and willing to give written (or legally acceptable representative or impartial witness when applicable) and is available for entire study
  • Patients meet the criteria of either group below:

Group 1. Inclusion criteria RA patients:

  • Patients that are diagnosed with RA according to the revised 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria (table 1)
  • Patients are experiencing an exacerbation defined as an increase in DAS28 > 1.2 or > 0.6 if DAS28 ≥ 3.2 compared to last DAS28 measurement (maximum six months before)
  • The exacerbation is to systemic cDMARDs for at least three months, defined as 'no response' according to the EULAR response criteria (table 2)
  • Wrist arthritis, that is diagnosed clinically, is the predominant symptom

Group 2. Inclusion criteria PsA patients:

  • Patients that are diagnosed with PsA according to the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria (table 3)
  • Patients are experiencing an exacerbation defined as an increase in DAS28 > 1.2 or > 0.6 if DAS28 ≥ 3.2 compared to last DAS28 measurement (maximum six months before)
  • The exacerbation is refractory to systemic cDMARDs for at least three months, defined as 'no response' according to the EULAR response criteria (table 2)
  • Wrist arthritis, that is diagnosed clinically, is the predominant symptom

Exclusion criteria A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Previous or current treatment with biological (b) DMARDs
  • Current inflammatory joint disease other than RA or PsA (e.g. gout, reactive arthritis, Lyme disease)
  • Subjects who are pregnant or intend to become pregnant during the study
  • Intra-articular injection in the wrist in the last 6 months
  • Previous wrist surgery
  • Severe osteoarthritis with malformations of the wrist
  • Congenital abnormalities of wrist function or motion
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Intra-articular corticosteroid injection

    Injection with 40mg triamcinolone acetonide (kenacort) in the wrist

    Drug: Intra-articular corticosteroid injection

  • Experimental
    arthroscopic synovectomy

    Wrist arthroscopy in day surgery setting with debulking of synovitis, inspection of cartilage, ligament, tendon and bone damage, collection of synovial biopsies and deposition of intra-articular corticosteroids (40mg triamcinolone acetonide)

    Procedure: Arthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist

Interventions

  • ProcedureArthroscopic synovectomy of the wrist

    Wrist arthroscopy in day surgery setting with debulking of synovitis, inspection of cartilage, ligament, tendon and bone damage, collection of synovial biopsies and deposition of intra-articular corticosteroids (40mg triamcinolone acetonide)

  • DrugIntra-articular corticosteroid injection

    Injection with 40mg triamcinolone acetonide (kenacort) in the wrist

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-Rated Wrist evaluation (PRWE)

    15-item questionnaire scoring pain and wrist function on a scale from 0-100, with a higher score indicating worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient-Rated Wrist evaluation (PRWE)

    15-item questionnaire scoring pain and wrist function on a scale from 0-100, with a higher score indicating worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

  2. Wrist ultrasound

    Resolution of ultrasound (US) arthritis as defined by grey scale (B-mode) and power Doppler after three months compared to baseline measurement. Grey scale uses a two-dimensional image to visualize structural changes like synovial hypertrophy and bone erosions. Power Doppler mode can assess joint inflammatory activity by detecting pathological synovial blood flow. The EULAR-OMERACT (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials) combined scoring system includes both greyscale and power Doppler and will be used to score arthritis in this study. Ultrasound has demonstrated greater sensitivity than clinical assessment and conventional radiography for detecting synovitis in RA target joints. Also, US signs of synovitis were found predictive for flare and failure of DMARD therapy, despite clinical remission. Furthermore, ultrasound techniques are low-invasive, inexpensive and require no radiation.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Wrist X-ray

    Standard (plain) radiographs of the wrist at baseline and after twelve months. Arthritis on radiographs will be graded using the Modified Larsen grading system. This system grades wrist arthritis on a score of 0 to 5, 5 indicating the most joint abnormalities.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. NRS pain score

    Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score at baseline two, four and six weeks (by phone), and at three, six and twelve months (digitally). A score of 0 implies no pain and 10 the worst possible pain.

    Time frame: 2, 4 and 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

  5. Range of motion

    Range of motion (ROM) of the wrist at baseline, three, six and twelve months. ROM will be measured actively with a goniometer and includes pronation, supination, ulnar and radial deviation and palmar and dorsal flexion.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. Grip strength

    Grip strength of the wrist at baseline, three, six and twelve months. Grip strength will be measured using a dynamometer as the mean of three measurements.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  7. DAS 28

    EULAR response rate and Disease Activity Score (DAS28) at baseline, three, six and twelve months. The DAS28 is a measure of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis in which 28 joints are examined for swelling and tenderness, combined with global pain scores and blood markers (www.DAS28-score.nl). The EULAR response rate measures responsiveness to anti-rheumatic treatment and is derived from the DAS28 score

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  8. EQ-5D

    EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) at baseline, three, six and twelve months. The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire scoring quality of life on five different levels, on a scale from 0-100.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  9. iPCQ questionnaire

    Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) at baseline, three, six and twelve months. The iPCQ is a standardized instrument for measuring and valuing health related productivity losses. This wil be used for the cost effectiveness analysis.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  10. iMCQ questionnaire

    Institute for Medical Technology Assessment (iMTA) Medical Consumption Questionnaire (iMCQ) at baseline, three, six and twelve months. The iMCQ is a standardized instrument for measuring medical costs. The iMCQ includes questions related to frequently occurring contacts with health care providers, medication use and home care. This wil be used for the cost effectiveness analysis.

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  11. ESR

    Laboratory test: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at baseline and three, six and twelve months (part of the routine clinical care).

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  12. CRP

    Laboratory tests: C-reactive protein (CRP) at baseline and three, six and twelve months (part of the routine clinical care).

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

  13. Adverse events

    Adverse events (AEs) (including glucocorticoid related AEs), AEs leading to withdrawal, AEs leading to discontinuation of medication, and AEs due to infusion reactions.

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2025, 59 months after the start.

Of 67 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Arthritis, Psoriatic, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 59 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 72 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 44.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 27, 2021
First posted
Feb 15, 2021
StartActual
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Dec 28, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 28, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04755127
Lead sponsor
Maasstad Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 15, 2021
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 28, 2023

Study contacts

Philip d'Ailly, MD
Contact
daillyp@maastadziekenhuis.nl
31102912205
Christel Deugd-Verburg, MSc
Contact
DeugdC@maasstadziekenhuis.nl
31102912205
Radjesh Bisoendial, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Maasstad ziekenhuis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion