ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03429075Psilodep-RCTUpdated Oct 24, 2024Results posted

Psilocybin vs Escitalopram for Major Depressive Disorder: Comparative Mechanisms

A Phase 2 interventional study of Psilocybin + Placebo and Psilocybin + Escitalopram in Depressive Disorder, Major, sponsored by Imperial College London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-24.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
59
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-15

Among 96 studies in Depressive Disorder, Major with a site in United Kingdom — 17 open to participants now, 19 under way, 7 of them phase 3. Depressive Disorder, Major · United Kingdom.

Enrollment
63rd of 84
59 · median 141
Started
2019
with 9 others
Phase 2
17 of 96
2 open now
Registered
31st of 96
by date

Among the 96 studies in Depressive Disorder, Major with a site in United Kingdom, this one is the 63rd largest by enrollment of the 84 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 10 that started in 2019, is one of 17 in phase 2, and was the 31st registered.

Depressive Disorder, Major

3,047 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 593 are open to participants now.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →

Open to participants now

17 of the 96 studies in Depressive Disorder, Major with a site in United Kingdom are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

12 more — sign in →

All 17 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United Kingdom have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United Kingdom →

Who these studies take

Of the 413 Depressive Disorder, Major studies recruiting now, 93 (23%) set no upper age limit and 294 (71%) stop at 75 or younger; 55 take children under 18; 99 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 80 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 96 studies in Depressive Disorder, Major with a site in United Kingdom, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This is a randomised double-blind clinical trial. The aim is to compare the efficacy and mechanisms of action of psilocybin, the primary psychoactive substance in 'magic mushrooms', with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram for major depressive disorder (MDD).

03

Conditions studied

  • Depressive Disorder, Major

Keywords

  • depression
  • mdd
  • major depression
  • major depressive disorder
  • unipolar depression
  • psilocybin
  • psychedelics
  • psychedelic
  • escitalopram
  • ssri
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Major depressive disorder ()
  2. Depression of moderate to severe degree (17+ on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D)).
  3. No Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  4. No SSRI contraindications
  5. Has a general practitioner (GP) or other mental healthcare professional who can confirm diagnosis
  6. 18-80 years of age
  7. Males and females
  8. Sufficiently competent with English language

Key exclusion criteria:

  1. Current or previously diagnosed psychotic disorder
  2. Immediate family member with a diagnosed psychotic disorder
  3. Medically significant condition rendering unsuitability for the study (e.g., diabetes, epilepsy, severe cardiovascular disease, hepatic or renal failure e.g. creatine clearance:renal clearance (CLRC) \< 30 ml/min etc.)
  4. History of serious suicide attempts requiring hospitalisation.
  5. Significant history of mania (determined by study psychiatrist and medical records)
  6. Psychiatric condition judged to be incompatible with establishment of rapport with therapy team and/or safe exposure to psilocybin, e.g. borderline personality disorder
  7. Blood or needle phobia
  8. Positive pregnancy test at screening or during the study, women who are planning a pregnancy and/or women who are nursing/breastfeeding.
  9. Participants who do not agree to use an acceptable method throughout their participation in study.
  10. Current drug or alcohol dependence
  11. No email access
  12. Use of contraindicated medication
  13. Patients presenting with abnormal prolongation at screening or with a history of this (QTc at screening above 440ms for men and above 470ms for women)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
59 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Psilocybin

    Patients receive Psilocybin

    Drug: Psilocybin + Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Escitalopram

    Patients receive Escitalopram

    Drug: Psilocybin + Escitalopram

Interventions

  • DrugPsilocybin + Placebo

    Multiple dosing days psilocybin vs 6 weeks of daily placebo

  • DrugPsilocybin + Escitalopram

    Drug pages: Psilocybin · Escitalopram

    Multiple dosing days psilocybin vs 6 weeks of daily escitalopram

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change of the BOLD Signal

    Patients were tested with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure brain brain responses to emotional faces before and after the treatment. The 2 values of BOLD signal (before and after exposure to emotional faces) were used to estimate a percentage value per patient and then these were used to estimated a group percentage change.

    Time frame: Baseline measure vs 6 weeks post 1st psilocybin dosing

  2. Change in QIDS-16: Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated (QIDS-16)

    Change in QIDS-16 (self-rated measure of depressive symptoms). Scale is composed of 16 items that correlate with the 9 Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) symptom criteria for depression. Each response is graded 0-4 (none-severe symptoms). Questions 1-4 concern sleep disturbances, Question 5 addresses sad mood, Questions 6-9 appetite/weight, Question 10 concentration, Question 11 self-criticism, Question 12 suicidal ideation, Question 13 interest, Q14 energy/fatigue and Questions 15-16 psychomotor agitation/retardation. All questions that address the same topic are grouped and only the highest score from each group is summed up together with the other questions in order to produce a total score. Scores can range from 0-27 and depression severity is graded based on the total score in the following way: 1-5 = No depression 6-10 = Mild depression 11-15 = Moderate depression 16-20 = Severe depression 21-27 = Very severe depression Lower score =better outcome (less depression)

    Time frame: Baseline vs 6 weeks post 1st psilocybin dosing

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17)

    HAMD-17: clinician rated Hamilton Depression Scale of depression severity. Range of scores: 0-52: where 0-7 is normal, 8-16 is mild, 17-23 is moderate, \>23 is severe. A threshold score of 17 is the entry: a score of 17 or higher indicated moderate-severe depression and was a requirement for entry into this trial at the screening point. This baseline does not refer to the screening point, it refers to the HAMD conducted 7-10 days before psilocybin dosing. A higher decrease in the HAMD (larger negative change score) is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

  2. Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA)

    BDI-IA: patient-rated Beck Depression Inventory, depressive symptomatology scale. Higher score = worse depression. The total score range is 0-63: where 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe Higher negative score = greater decrease in depression scores 6 weeks after each treatment arm = better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

  3. Change in MADRS

    MADRS - Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, clinician-rated measure of depression. This scale is clinician-rated and consists of 10 items; each item is rated on a 0-6 scale, resulting in a maximum total score of 60 points, with higher scores indicative of greater depressive symptomology.36 The MADRS scoring instructions indicate that a total score ranging from 0 to 6 indicates that the patient is in the normal range (no depression), a score ranging from 7 to 19 indicates "mild depression," 20 to 34 indicates "moderate depression," a score of 35 and greater indicates "severe depression," and a total score of 60 or greater indicates "very severe depression." A higher decrease in the MADRS (larger negative change score) is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

  4. Number of Patients Who "Responded": Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-16) Response at 6 Weeks

    Number of patients who "responded" on the QIDS-16 scale (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-rated). "Response" is defined by a decrease in QIDS score of 50% from baseline. Higher number of patients who responded = better outcome for treatment arm.

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

  5. Number of Patients Who "Remitted": QIDS-16 Remission Rate

    Number of patients who "remitted" on the QIDS-16 scale (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-rated). "Remission" is defined by having a QIDS score below 5 at the 6 week point = no depression. Higher remission rate = better outcome (less depressed patients after treatment)

    Time frame: Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose

07

Results

Posted Oct 24, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePsilocybinEscitalopram
Started3029
Completed3029
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage Change of the BOLD Signal

Patients were tested with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure brain brain responses to emotional faces before and after the treatment. The 2 values of BOLD signal (before and after exposure to emotional faces) were used to estimate a percentage value per patient and then these were used to estimated a group percentage change.

Time frame:
Baseline measure vs 6 weeks post 1st psilocybin dosing
Reported as:
Mean · percentage change in BOLD signal
Percentage Change of the BOLD Signal
percentage change in BOLD signalPsilocybinEscitalopram
Percentage Change of the BOLD Signal-0.08 ± 0.450.43 ± 0.62
PrimaryChange in QIDS-16: Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated (QIDS-16)

Change in QIDS-16 (self-rated measure of depressive symptoms). Scale is composed of 16 items that correlate with the 9 Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) symptom criteria for depression. Each response is graded 0-4 (none-severe symptoms). Questions 1-4 concern sleep disturbances, Question 5 addresses sad mood, Questions 6-9 appetite/weight, Question 10 concentration, Question 11 self-criticism, Question 12 suicidal ideation, Question 13 interest, Q14 energy/fatigue and Questions 15-16 psychomotor agitation/retardation. All questions that address the same topic are grouped and only the highest score from each group is summed up together with the other questions in order to produce a total score. Scores can range from 0-27 and depression severity is graded based on the total score in the following way: 1-5 = No depression 6-10 = Mild depression 11-15 = Moderate depression 16-20 = Severe depression 21-27 = Very severe depression Lower score =better outcome (less depression)

Time frame:
Baseline vs 6 weeks post 1st psilocybin dosing
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in QIDS-16: Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated (QIDS-16)
score on a scalePsilocybinEscitalopram
Change in QIDS-16: Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Rated (QIDS-16)-8 ± 1-6 ± 1
Statistical analysis
  • Psilocybin vs Escitalopram · ANCOVA · p = 0.17
SecondaryChange in Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17)

HAMD-17: clinician rated Hamilton Depression Scale of depression severity. Range of scores: 0-52: where 0-7 is normal, 8-16 is mild, 17-23 is moderate, \>23 is severe. A threshold score of 17 is the entry: a score of 17 or higher indicated moderate-severe depression and was a requirement for entry into this trial at the screening point. This baseline does not refer to the screening point, it refers to the HAMD conducted 7-10 days before psilocybin dosing. A higher decrease in the HAMD (larger negative change score) is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17)
units on a scalePsilocybinEscitalopram
Change in Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17)-10.5 ± 1-5.1 ± 1
SecondaryChange in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA)

BDI-IA: patient-rated Beck Depression Inventory, depressive symptomatology scale. Higher score = worse depression. The total score range is 0-63: where 0-13 is considered minimal range, 14-19 is mild, 20-28 is moderate, and 29-63 is severe Higher negative score = greater decrease in depression scores 6 weeks after each treatment arm = better outcome.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA)
units on a scalePsilocybinEscitalopram
Change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA)-18.4 (-22.6 to -13.8)-10.8 (-14.3 to -7.3)
SecondaryChange in MADRS

MADRS - Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, clinician-rated measure of depression. This scale is clinician-rated and consists of 10 items; each item is rated on a 0-6 scale, resulting in a maximum total score of 60 points, with higher scores indicative of greater depressive symptomology.36 The MADRS scoring instructions indicate that a total score ranging from 0 to 6 indicates that the patient is in the normal range (no depression), a score ranging from 7 to 19 indicates "mild depression," 20 to 34 indicates "moderate depression," a score of 35 and greater indicates "severe depression," and a total score of 60 or greater indicates "very severe depression." A higher decrease in the MADRS (larger negative change score) is a better outcome.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in MADRS
score on a scalePsilocybinEscitalopram
Change in MADRS14.4 ± 1.7-7.2 ± 1.7
SecondaryNumber of Patients Who "Responded": Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-16) Response at 6 Weeks

Number of patients who "responded" on the QIDS-16 scale (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-rated). "Response" is defined by a decrease in QIDS score of 50% from baseline. Higher number of patients who responded = better outcome for treatment arm.

Time frame:
Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients Who "Responded": Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-16) Response at 6 Weeks
participantsPsilocybinEscitalopram
Number of Patients Who "Responded": Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-16) Response at 6 Weeks2114
SecondaryNumber of Patients Who "Remitted": QIDS-16 Remission Rate

Number of patients who "remitted" on the QIDS-16 scale (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, self-rated). "Remission" is defined by having a QIDS score below 5 at the 6 week point = no depression. Higher remission rate = better outcome (less depressed patients after treatment)

Time frame:
Change from baseline (7-10 days pre-dosing) to 6 weeks after the first psilocybin dose
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Patients Who "Remitted": QIDS-16 Remission Rate
participantsPsilocybinEscitalopram
Number of Patients Who "Remitted": QIDS-16 Remission Rate178

Adverse events

Collected over 6 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Psilocybin0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)26/30 (86.7%)
Escitalopram0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)24/29 (82.8%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 12
Most frequent other events
EventPsilocybinEscitalopram
HeadacheNervous system disorders20/3015/29
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders8/309/29
FatigueGeneral disorders2/307/29
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders0/304/29
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders0/304/29
PalpitationsCardiac disorders1/303/29
Sleep disorderPsychiatric disorders1/303/29
Feeling abnormalGeneral disorders0/303/29
MigraineNervous system disorders3/301/29
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/302/29

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)PsilocybinEscitalopramTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years302959
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PsilocybinEscitalopramTotal
Mean43.3 ± 11.739.1 ± 9.741.2 ± 10.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PsilocybinEscitalopramTotal
Female11920
Male192039
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)PsilocybinEscitalopramTotal
White282452
Asian145
Mixed Asian + White112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)PsilocybinEscitalopramTotal
United Kingdom302959
No previous psilocybin use
No previous psilocybin use(participants)PsilocybinEscitalopramTotal
Number222143
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Imperial College Hammersmith campus
    London, W12 0NN, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Carhart-Harris RL, Bolstridge M, Day CMJ, Rucker J, Watts R, Erritzoe DE, Kaelen M, Giribaldi B, Bloomfield M, Pilling S, Rickard JA, Forbes B, Feilding A, Taylor D, Curran HV, Nutt DJ. Psilocybin with psychological support for treatment-resistant depression: six-month follow-up. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Feb;235(2):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4771-x. Epub 2017 Nov 8. PubMed 29119217 ↗
  • Carhart-Harris R, Giribaldi B, Watts R, Baker-Jones M, Murphy-Beiner A, Murphy R, Martell J, Blemings A, Erritzoe D, Nutt DJ. Trial of Psilocybin versus Escitalopram for Depression. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 15;384(15):1402-1411. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2032994. PubMed 33852780 ↗
  • Murphy R, Kettner H, Zeifman R, Giribaldi B, Kartner L, Martell J, Read T, Murphy-Beiner A, Baker-Jones M, Nutt D, Erritzoe D, Watts R, Carhart-Harris R. Therapeutic Alliance and Rapport Modulate Responses to Psilocybin Assisted Therapy for Depression. Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 31;12:788155. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.788155. eCollection 2021. PubMed 35431912 ↗
  • Daws RE, Timmermann C, Giribaldi B, Sexton JD, Wall MB, Erritzoe D, Roseman L, Nutt D, Carhart-Harris R. Increased global integration in the brain after psilocybin therapy for depression. Nat Med. 2022 Apr;28(4):844-851. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01744-z. Epub 2022 Apr 11. PubMed 35411074 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2019 to primary completion in Apr 2020, 15 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2024, 4 years 6 months after primary completion.

Of 99 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Depressive Disorder, Major, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 57. This study's 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 195 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 37.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 6, 2017
First posted
Feb 12, 2018
StartActual
Jan 7, 2019
Primary completionActual
Apr 17, 2020
CompletionActual
Oct 17, 2020
Results first posted
Oct 24, 2024
Last update
Oct 24, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03429075
Collaborators
Alexander Mosely Charitable Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 12, 2018
Start date
Jan 7, 2019
Primary completion
Apr 17, 2020
Completion
Oct 17, 2020
Results posted
Oct 24, 2024
Last update
Oct 24, 2024

Study contacts

David J Nutt, Medicine
principal investigator · Imperial College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion