ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03416010A-RCTUpdated Mar 18, 2025Results posted

Healthy Lifestyle Intervention for High-Risk Minority Pregnant Women

An interventional study of COPE-P in Emotional Disturbances, Depression and Pregnancy Late, sponsored by Ohio State University. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-18.

Sponsored by Ohio State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
299
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Female
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 28 studies in Affective Symptoms with a site in United States — 4 open to participants now, 4 under way, none of them phase 3. Affective Symptoms · United States.

Enrollment
5th of 27
299 · median 50
Started
2018
with 3 others
No phase
24 of 28
4 open now
Registered
10th of 28
by date

Among the 28 studies in Affective Symptoms with a site in United States, this one is the 5th largest by enrollment of the 27 interventional ones, is one of 4 that started in 2018, is one of 24 with no phase, and was the 10th registered.

By phase

28 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study24 · 4 open
Observational1 · 0 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 21 · 0 open
Phase 41 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2004; this study’s year is marked. 4 started in 2018.

Size and results

Median enrollment 50 across the 27 interventional studies, 53 across the 1 observational. Of the 23 that completed or were terminated, 4 (17%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 28 studies in Affective Symptoms with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The overall purpose of this application is to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention designed to decrease health disparities in pregnant, emotionally distressed, minority women. This randomized controlled trial will test a six session (spaced over 18 weeks) cognitive behavioral skills building (CBSB) prenatal care intervention (specifically designed and based on prior research for pregnant minority women experiencing emotional distress) at three sites (Jacobi Medical Center, New York City and The Ohio State University Total Health and Wellness Clinic, and The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center OB/GYN Columbus, Ohio.

Read the detailed description

A randomized controlled trial will test a cognitive behavioral skills building intervention (COPE-P) in Black and Hispanic women experiencing emotional distress in two sites (New York and Ohio) to determine if the intervention leads to better health behaviors, better psychosocial health (anxiety, stress, and depressive symptoms), and improved birth and post-natal outcomes in women experiencing emotional distress. Developing scalable prenatal interventions designed to improve birth outcomes as well as maternal physical and psychosocial health is essential to decrease health disparities in pregnant minority women.

03

Conditions studied

  • Emotional Disturbances
  • Depression
  • Pregnancy Late
  • Post-Partum Depression
  • Anxiety
  • Nutritional Deficiency

Keywords

  • emotional distress pregnancy disparities minority depression
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women between the ages of 18-40 years old
  • Pregnant women experiencing an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy of less than 19 weeks
  • Self-identified as either Black or Hispanic
  • Able to read and speak English.
  • The child participants born to the participants will have their record accessed for data collection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women with chronic medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, or diabetes), are currently receiving treatment or therapy for a psychiatric diagnosis, or have participated in this study with a prior pregnancy.
  • Women with obstetrical complications, such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, or fetal abnormalities.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
299 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    In addition to standard prenatal care the PregnancyPlus attention control group for 6 weeks will receive 1.5 hours of ACOG-designed patient education pamphlets. Material will include prenatal and post-partum education.. Dr. Gennaro will conduct the training of the attention control group midwives. The same protocol for assessing fidelity for COPE-P also will be used for assessing fidelity to the attention control intervention

  • Active comparator
    Intervention

    In addition to standard prenatal care the COPE-P intervention group will also receive 1.5 hours each week for 6 weeks the cognitive-behavior skills building program driven by CBT as the theoretical framework by health care providers trained in COPE-P by Dr. Melnyk. The content of the COPE program is driven by the literature review, the theoretical framework, previous studies of COPE interventions with mothers of preterm infants and prior work with pregnant minority women by our team.

    Behavioral: COPE-P

Interventions

  • BehavioralCOPE-P

    Session 1 ABCs (A=Antecedent or Activator event, B=Belief that follows the event, C=Consequence: how you feel and how you behave). Session 2 self-esteem and positive self-talk, including ways to build self-esteem and the group provides examples of how to change unhealthy habits into healthy ones. Session 3 stress/coping during pregnancy. Physical and emotional responses to stress are discussed along with healthy snacking and healthy ways to cope with typical stresses. Session 4 planning, goal setting and the 4-step problem solving process. Session 5 dealing with emotions in healthy ways through positive thinking and effective communication. Session 6 coping with stressful situations encountered during pregnancy while continuing to reinforce the thinking-feeling-behaving triangle.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Self-reported Healthy Lifestyle Beliefs Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

    Healthy Lifestyle Beliefs Scale survey will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. This scale taps beliefs about various facets of maintaining a healthy lifestyle. This 16-item is scored on a five point Likert-type scale that ranging from 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree. The minimum score is 16 and the maximum score is 80. The higher the score the higher the beliefs of maintaining a healthy lifestyle.

    Time frame: Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)

  2. Change in Self-reported Anxiety Level From Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

    The Generalized Anxiety Scale (GAD-7) is a 7-item survey which measures anxiety will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. The GAD-7 is a 7-item, 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from (0) Not at all to (3). Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment related to the patient's experience of anxiety. A score greater than or equal to 10 indicates moderate and higher anxiety and will be used in this study,

    Time frame: Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)

  3. Change in Self-reported Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors From Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

    The Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale survey will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. Participants respond to each of the 15 items (e.g., I exercised regularly; I talked about my worries) on a 5-point Likert-type scale that ranges from 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree. The minimum score is 15 and the maximum score is 75. The higher the score the higher the healthy lifestyle behaviors are practiced.

    Time frame: Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)

  4. Change in Self-reported Depressive Symptoms From Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

    The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a scale measuring depressive symptoms will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is a 10 item self-report perinatal depression questionnaire. The scale asks participants to describe how they have felt in the previous week. Unlike other depression screening tools, the EPDS excludes questions regarding somatic symptoms of pregnancy and has been found to be equivalent to a structured interview in determining prevalence of depression. Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores signifying higher severity of depressive symptoms. A cut-off score of 10 on the EPDS will be used in this study to indicate moderate depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)

  5. Change Self-reported Stress at Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

    The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a scale measuring stress will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. This scale is a standardized measure of global stress designed to elicit the degree to which respondents find their lives unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloading (three central components of stress). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 40. A higher score is correlated with a higher amount of stress. A score of 20 or greater is the high stress cut-off and will be used in this study.

    Time frame: Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Birth Weight

    record of birth weight as recorded in patient's medical file

    Time frame: T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit

  2. Breastfeeding Initiation

    Initiation of breastfeeding according to self-report at Timepoint 2: "Did you ever breastfeed or try to breastfeed your baby?". Responses below indicated number of participants that responded "yes" to this question.

    Time frame: T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit

  3. Breastfeeding Duration

    Self-reported maintenance of breastfeeding at approximately 6 months postpartum, inclusive of participants that responded both breastfeeding only and combined breast and bottle feeding (formula vs breastmilk not specified in question to participants).

    Time frame: T3 = at 6 month well baby visit

  4. Mode of Delivery

    (C/S, Vaginal, Forceps/Vacuum)

    Time frame: T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit

  5. Nutritional Intake

    Nutrition behaviors as reflected in response to likert scale-type question "I eat fresh fruits and vegetable snacks". Reponses included Strongly Disagree (1), Disagree (2), Neither Agree Nor Disagree (3), Agree (4), Strongly Agree (5).

    Time frame: Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation), T1 = 31 gestational weeks, T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit, T3 = at 6 month well baby visit

  6. Level of Exercise

    Fitbit Flex 2 Accelerometer report data: data from Fitbit Flex 2 report will be collected at each of the in-person meetings

    Time frame: T1 = 31 gestational weeks, T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit, T3 = at 6 month well baby visit

  7. Gestational Age at Birth

    Gestational age at birth will be collected as reported on patient's medical chart

    Time frame: T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit

  8. Weight

    weight in pounds

    Time frame: Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation)

  9. Participant Body Mass Index (BMI)

    derived calculation from weight and height values reported at each of the in person meetings

    Time frame: Timepoint 0 (Baseline at screening), T1 = 31 gestational weeks, T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit, T3 = at 6 month well baby visit

  10. Participant Height

    height in feet and inches will be recorded at each of the in person meetings

    Time frame: Timepoint 0 (Baseline at screening)

  11. Group Prenatal Care Acceptability

    Survey addressing participant responses to prenatal care in a group setting with 12 Likert scale-type responses: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree. Participants were also provided a free text box. Reported are responses to the question "I would recommend group prenatal care to a friend".

    Time frame: T1=31 gestational weeks

  12. Program Evaluation: Delivery Method

    Separate forms for intervention and attention control that collected data regarding participant experience in study program as well as delivery method, virtually or in-person. Delivery method was ranked by participants 1-4 for preference: 1:1 in person, 1:1 by telehealth, in small group in person, in small group by telehealth.

    Time frame: Timepoint 3, approximately 6 months postpartum

  13. COPE-P Acceptability

    Survey administered with likert-style scale exploring participant satisfaction with different aspects of COPE-P. Participant score range 1 (Strongly Disagree) - 5 (Strongly Agree). Minimum score of 21, maximum of 105. High scores indicate higher satisfaction with the COPE-P program and its elements.

    Time frame: Timepoint 2 (6 to 8 weeks postpartum)

  14. Program Evaluation

    Separate forms for intervention and attention control that collected data regarding participant experience in study program as well as delivery method, virtually or in-person. Delivery method was ranked by participants 1-4 for preference: 1:1 in person, 1:1 by telehealth, in small group in person, in small group by telehealth.

    Time frame: Timepoint 3, approximately 6 months postpartum

07

Results

Posted Mar 18, 2025
Limitations and caveats
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted delivery of care requiring changes to methodology and impacting recruitment. Virtual sessions and timepoints were utilized, limiting data collection (e.g. measured weight vs participant report), the efficacy of Fitbit use (less frequent clinic visits resulted in less reminders to charge devices and lack of syncing at in-person sessions). Recruitment target was not met and attrition exceeded expectations leading to fewer participants analyzed than expected.

Participant flow

Participant recruitment was initiated March 5, 2018, at two medical clinic sites in urban clinics in two states. A third medical clinic site was added to support recruitment in 2019. Recruitment closed April 11, 2022.

Timepoint 0 (<19 Weeks Gestation)
Participant flow — Timepoint 0 (<19 Weeks Gestation)
MilestoneControlIntervention
Started122177
Completed111145
Not completed1132
Withdrew: Medically excluded or aged out prior to initiating intervention1132
Timepoint 1 (31 Gestational Weeks)
Participant flow — Timepoint 1 (31 Gestational Weeks)
MilestoneControlIntervention
Started111145
Completed7395
Not completed3850
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2738
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1112
Timepoint 2 (6 Weeks Postpartum)
Participant flow — Timepoint 2 (6 Weeks Postpartum)
MilestoneControlIntervention
Started7395
Completed7192
Not completed23
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up13
Timepoint 3 (6 Months Postpartum)
Participant flow — Timepoint 3 (6 Months Postpartum)
MilestoneControlIntervention
Started7192
Completed6886
Not completed36
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up13
Withdrew: Missing data23

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Self-reported Healthy Lifestyle Beliefs Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

Healthy Lifestyle Beliefs Scale survey will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. This scale taps beliefs about various facets of maintaining a healthy lifestyle. This 16-item is scored on a five point Likert-type scale that ranging from 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree. The minimum score is 16 and the maximum score is 80. The higher the score the higher the beliefs of maintaining a healthy lifestyle.

Time frame:
Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Self-reported Healthy Lifestyle Beliefs Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3
units on a scaleControlIntervention
Timepoint 059.044 ± 0.73659.349 ± 0.615
Timepoint 164.972 ± 0.82364.234 ± 0.720
Timepoint 263.683 ± 0.88064.614 ± 0.744
Timepoint 363.328 ± 0.85363.852 ± 0.744
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = 0.009
PrimaryChange in Self-reported Anxiety Level From Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

The Generalized Anxiety Scale (GAD-7) is a 7-item survey which measures anxiety will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. The GAD-7 is a 7-item, 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from (0) Not at all to (3). Scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment related to the patient's experience of anxiety. A score greater than or equal to 10 indicates moderate and higher anxiety and will be used in this study,

Time frame:
Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Self-reported Anxiety Level From Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3
units on a scaleControlIntervention
Timepoint 08.647 ± 0.5079.018 ± 0.329
Timepoint 15.500 ± 0.5075.447 ± 0.444
Timepoint 23.358 ± 0.5264.114 ± 0.459
Timepoint 33.853 ± 0.5224.398 ± 0.459
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001 (Threshold for significance: p \<0.01)
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
PrimaryChange in Self-reported Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors From Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

The Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors Scale survey will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. Participants respond to each of the 15 items (e.g., I exercised regularly; I talked about my worries) on a 5-point Likert-type scale that ranges from 1 strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree. The minimum score is 15 and the maximum score is 75. The higher the score the higher the healthy lifestyle behaviors are practiced.

Time frame:
Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Self-reported Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors From Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3
units on a scaleControlIntervention
Timepoint 049.506 ± 0.90350.669 ± 0.730
Timepoint 156.194 ± 0.98156.783 ± 0.868
Timepoint 253.677 ± 1.03257.267 ± 0.897
Timepoint 355.692 ± 1.03256.209 ± 0.897
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
PrimaryChange in Self-reported Depressive Symptoms From Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a scale measuring depressive symptoms will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale is a 10 item self-report perinatal depression questionnaire. The scale asks participants to describe how they have felt in the previous week. Unlike other depression screening tools, the EPDS excludes questions regarding somatic symptoms of pregnancy and has been found to be equivalent to a structured interview in determining prevalence of depression. Scores range from 0-30 with higher scores signifying higher severity of depressive symptoms. A cut-off score of 10 on the EPDS will be used in this study to indicate moderate depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change in Self-reported Depressive Symptoms From Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3
units on a scaleControlIntervention
Timepoint 013.042 ± 0.43512.855 ± 0.362
Timepoint 17.000 ± 0.5607.776 ± 0.490
Timepoint 26.119 ± 0.5806.545 ± 0.506
Timepoint 36.662 ± 0.5766.818 ± 0.506
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
PrimaryChange Self-reported Stress at Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a scale measuring stress will be administered at each of the in-person meetings. This scale is a standardized measure of global stress designed to elicit the degree to which respondents find their lives unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloading (three central components of stress). The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 40. A higher score is correlated with a higher amount of stress. A score of 20 or greater is the high stress cut-off and will be used in this study.

Time frame:
Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation) to Timepoint 3 (6 month well child visit)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change Self-reported Stress at Timepoint 0 to Timepoint 3
units on a scaleControlIntervention
Timepoint 021.857 ± 0.56221.971 ± 0.468
Timepoint 115.278 ± 0.72315.596 ± 0.633
Timepoint 212.448 ± 0.75013.420 ± 0.654
Timepoint 313.971 ± 0.74414.193 ± 0.654
Statistical analysis
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
  • Control vs Intervention · two-way ANOVA · p = <0.001
SecondaryBirth Weight

record of birth weight as recorded in patient's medical file

Time frame:
T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit
Reported as:
Mean · grams
Birth Weight
gramsControlIntervention
Birth Weight3139.9 ± 740.33310.1 ± 732.6
SecondaryBreastfeeding Initiation

Initiation of breastfeeding according to self-report at Timepoint 2: "Did you ever breastfeed or try to breastfeed your baby?". Responses below indicated number of participants that responded "yes" to this question.

Time frame:
T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Breastfeeding Initiation
ParticipantsControlIntervention
Breastfeeding Initiation6483
SecondaryBreastfeeding Duration

Self-reported maintenance of breastfeeding at approximately 6 months postpartum, inclusive of participants that responded both breastfeeding only and combined breast and bottle feeding (formula vs breastmilk not specified in question to participants).

Time frame:
T3 = at 6 month well baby visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Breastfeeding Duration
ParticipantsControlIntervention
Breastfeeding Duration1834
SecondaryMode of Delivery

(C/S, Vaginal, Forceps/Vacuum)

Time frame:
T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mode of Delivery
ParticipantsControlIntervention
Vaginal Delivery5252
Assisted Vaginal Delivery (forceps, vacuum)04
Cesarean Delivery1729
SecondaryNutritional Intake

Nutrition behaviors as reflected in response to likert scale-type question "I eat fresh fruits and vegetable snacks". Reponses included Strongly Disagree (1), Disagree (2), Neither Agree Nor Disagree (3), Agree (4), Strongly Agree (5).

Time frame:
Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation), T1 = 31 gestational weeks, T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit, T3 = at 6 month well baby visit
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Nutritional Intake
units on a scaleControlIntervention
Timepoint 03.955 ± 0.0884.070 ± 0.073
Timepoint 14.264 ± 0.0984.298 ± 0.085
Timepoint 24.075 ± 0.1014.200 ± 0.090
Timepoint 34.169 ± 0.1034.173 ± 0.092
SecondaryLevel of Exercise

Fitbit Flex 2 Accelerometer report data: data from Fitbit Flex 2 report will be collected at each of the in-person meetings

Time frame:
T1 = 31 gestational weeks, T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit, T3 = at 6 month well baby visit

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryGestational Age at Birth

Gestational age at birth will be collected as reported on patient's medical chart

Time frame:
T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit
Reported as:
Mean · weeks
Gestational Age at Birth
weeksControlIntervention
Gestational Age at Birth39.0 ± 1.938.8 ± 1.8
SecondaryWeight

weight in pounds

Time frame:
Timepoint 0 (<19 weeks gestation)
Reported as:
Mean · pounds
Weight
poundsControlIntervention
Weight174.3 ± 47.2171.0 ± 46.7
SecondaryParticipant Body Mass Index (BMI)

derived calculation from weight and height values reported at each of the in person meetings

Time frame:
Timepoint 0 (Baseline at screening), T1 = 31 gestational weeks, T2= 6-8 week postpartum visit, T3 = at 6 month well baby visit
Reported as:
Mean · kg/m^2
Participant Body Mass Index (BMI)
kg/m^2ControlIntervention
Timepoint 029.4 ± 7.629.2 ± 7.5
Timepoint 133.1 ± 7.831.8 ± 7.9
Timepoint 231.2 ± 7.329.7 ± 7.2
Timepoint 331.0 ± 8.030.4 ± 8.0
SecondaryParticipant Height

height in feet and inches will be recorded at each of the in person meetings

Time frame:
Timepoint 0 (Baseline at screening)
Reported as:
Mean · inches
Participant Height
inchesControlIntervention
Participant Height63.9 ± 3.063.9 ± 3.0
SecondaryGroup Prenatal Care Acceptability

Survey addressing participant responses to prenatal care in a group setting with 12 Likert scale-type responses: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, and strongly agree. Participants were also provided a free text box. Reported are responses to the question "I would recommend group prenatal care to a friend".

Time frame:
T1=31 gestational weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Group Prenatal Care Acceptability
ParticipantsControlIntervention
Strongly Disagree00
Disagree00
Neutral10
Agree1516
Strongly Agree4240
SecondaryProgram Evaluation: Delivery Method

Separate forms for intervention and attention control that collected data regarding participant experience in study program as well as delivery method, virtually or in-person. Delivery method was ranked by participants 1-4 for preference: 1:1 in person, 1:1 by telehealth, in small group in person, in small group by telehealth.

Time frame:
Timepoint 3, approximately 6 months postpartum
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Program Evaluation: Delivery Method
ParticipantsControlIntervention
First choice 1:1 in person96
First choice 1:1 by telehealth32
First choice in small group in person917
First choice in small group by telehealth96
Missing data10
SecondaryCOPE-P Acceptability

Survey administered with likert-style scale exploring participant satisfaction with different aspects of COPE-P. Participant score range 1 (Strongly Disagree) - 5 (Strongly Agree). Minimum score of 21, maximum of 105. High scores indicate higher satisfaction with the COPE-P program and its elements.

Time frame:
Timepoint 2 (6 to 8 weeks postpartum)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
COPE-P Acceptability
score on a scaleIntervention
COPE-P Acceptability94.05 ± 9.06
SecondaryProgram Evaluation

Separate forms for intervention and attention control that collected data regarding participant experience in study program as well as delivery method, virtually or in-person. Delivery method was ranked by participants 1-4 for preference: 1:1 in person, 1:1 by telehealth, in small group in person, in small group by telehealth.

Time frame:
Timepoint 3, approximately 6 months postpartum
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Program Evaluation
ParticipantsControlIntervention
Program helpful: yes3130
Program helpful: no01

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline (<19 weeks gestation) to collection of Timepoint 3, approximately 6 months postpartum.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control0/122 (0%)0/122 (0%)6/122 (4.9%)
Intervention0/177 (0%)3/177 (1.7%)6/177 (3.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventControlIntervention
Fetal DemisePregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions0/1222/177
Suicide AttemptPsychiatric disorders0/1221/177
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventControlIntervention
Preterm BirthPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions6/716/92

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ControlInterventionTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years122177299
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ControlInterventionTotal
Mean26.2 ± 5.326.4 ± 5.326.3 ± 5.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ControlInterventionTotal
Female122177299
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ControlInterventionTotal
Hispanic or Latino5668124
Not Hispanic or Latino4991140
Unknown or Not Reported171835
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)ControlInterventionTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American76118194
White61521
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported404484
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ControlInterventionTotal
United States122177299
Enrolled in School
Enrolled in School(Participants)ControlInterventionTotal
Enrolled10335138
Not Enrolled18140158
Did not respond123
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Jacobi Medical Center
    Bronx, New York 10461, United States
  • OSU Total Health and Wellness
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
  • OSUWMC OB/GYN Clinic
    Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2018 to primary completion in Apr 2023, 61 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2025, 1 year 10 months after primary completion.

Of 44 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Affective Symptoms, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 40. This study's 61 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 44 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 14, 2017
First posted
Jan 30, 2018
StartActual
Mar 5, 2018
Primary completionActual
Apr 20, 2023
CompletionActual
Apr 20, 2023
Results first posted
Mar 18, 2025
Last update
Mar 18, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03416010
Responsible party
Bernadette Melnyk (Dean and Professor, College of Nursing Vice President of Health Promotion, Professor of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Ohio State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 30, 2018
Start date
Mar 5, 2018
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2023
Completion
Apr 20, 2023
Results posted
Mar 18, 2025
Last update
Mar 18, 2025

Study contacts

Bernadette Melnyk, PhD
principal investigator · Ohio State University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion