ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03394768Updated May 11, 2021Results posted

Comparison Between NICOM-Cheetah and Flotrac-Vigileo for Cardiac Output Monitoring.

An observational study in Cardiac Output, Low, sponsored by Changi General Hospital. Terminated at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-11.

Sponsored by Changi General Hospital · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Interim analysis shown futility to continue due to lack of benefit.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
26
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cardiac output (CO) monitoring is an important tool in critically ill patients with haemodynamic instability. Traditionally, this has been accomplished using the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). However, its use has been associated with various complications such as pneumothorax, arrhythmia, infection, pulmonary valve injury and embolism. This has led to the development of various minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring devices such as the oesophageal Doppler, PiCCO®, NiCCO® and FloTrac®. These devices however have their inherent limitations and though minimally invasive, are still not without risks to the patient. More recently a completely non-invasive CO monitoring device, NICOM Cheetah® has been introduced. Its use is based on thoracic bioreactance and it involves placement of 4 electrodes on either side of the thorax and it analyses changes in the phase of electrical voltage signal to the current applied across the thorax. Initial validation studies on the NICOM Cheetah® device revealed promising results. This study intends to compare cardiac output monitoring capabilities of the NICOM Cheetah® device using the FloTrac® CO monitor as a reference.

Read the detailed description

This will be a single centre prospective observational study. 50 consecutive patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) who are deemed to require cardiac output monitoring by the treating intensivist will be studied. Data collection is planned to be carried out over 2 consecutive years. Inclusion criteria are: 1) Patients who are deemed to require cardiac output monitoring. 2) Patients 21 years old and above. 3) American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status 1 to 4. Exclusion criteria are: 1) Patients who are not on mechanical ventilation. 2) Patients who are not in sinus rhythm. 3) Patients with allergy to adhesive tapes. Patients will be treated as per department protocols and no additional intervention will be performed. Each patient will have an arterial catheter inserted as per our usual practice. All patients will have the FloTrac® connected to the arterial catheter (standard of care in CGH SICU) and the NICOM Cheetah® electrodes placed on the skin across the anterior thoracic wall. The FloTrac CO monitor is the current standard of care for cardiac output monitoring in the SICU of CGH. All patients deemed to require cardiac output monitoring will receive the FloTrac (as per departmental practice). The NICOM CO monitor involves the application of non-invasive sensor strips. In this study, it will be applied to patients receiving the FloTrac (standard of care), on top of the standard care of monitoring with Flotrac. For each patient, standard demographic and SICU data (age, gender, comorbidities, ASA score, admission diagnosis, type of surgery, cause of haemodynamic instability, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP) at the time of instituting cardiac output (CO) monitoring, use of inotropic support, presence of renal replacement therapy, presence of mechanical ventilation and APACHE II score) will be collected. Cardiac Index (CI) values simultaneously recorded by the NICOM Cheetah® and FloTrac® on a 15-minutely basis for the first 10-hour period will also be collected. These data will be automatically recorded by the FloTrac® Vigilance monitor and the Cheetah NICOM monitor and transcribed to a data entering/analysis software by the principal and co-principal investigators for data analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiac Output, Low

Browse trials for

03

In context

Cardiac Output, Low

99 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiac Output, Low; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 66 across 48 observational studies indexed under Cardiac Output, Low.

Browse Cardiac Output, Low studies →

Lead sponsor

Changi General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) who are deemed to require cardiac output monitoring by the treating intensivist

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who are deemed to require cardiac output monitoring.
  • Patients 21 years old and above
  • (ASA) physical status 1 to 4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are not on mechanical ventilation.
  • Patients who are not in sinus rhythm.
  • Patients with allergy to adhesive tapes
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
2 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • NICOM Cheetah®

    Patients will be treated as per department protocols and no additional intervention will be performed. Each patient will have an arterial catheter inserted as per our usual practice. All patients will have the FloTrac® connected to the arterial catheter (standard of care in CGH SICU) and the NICOM Cheetah® electrodes placed on the skin across the anterior thoracic wall. The NICOM CO monitor involves the application of non-invasive sensor strips. In this study, it will be applied to patients receiving the FloTrac (standard of care), on top of the standard care of monitoring with Flotrac.

    Other: No additional intervention

  • FloTrac®

    Same patient population as the NICOM Cheetah® group as described above as all patients will have the FloTrac® connected to the arterial catheter (standard of care in CGH SICU) and the NICOM Cheetah® electrodes placed on the skin across the anterior thoracic wall. The FloTrac CO monitor is the current standard of care for cardiac output monitoring in the SICU of CGH. All patients deemed to require cardiac output monitoring will receive the FloTrac (as per departmental practice).

    Other: No additional intervention

Interventions

  • OtherNo additional intervention

    Patients will be treated as per department protocols and no additional intervention will be performed

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Degree of Disagreement, %

    Comparison of cardiac output monitoring capabilities of the NICOM Cheetah® versus the FloTrac®. Cardiac output defined as the amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute. Bland-Altman analysis used to compare the level of disagreement between the 2 devices, %.

    Time frame: 10 hours of data collected for each participant

07

Results

Posted Mar 3, 2021

Participant flow

Participants recruited from the surgical intensive care unit of Changi General Hospital, Singapore, from 2018 until 2021

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAll Participants
Started26
Completed26
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryDegree of Disagreement, %

Comparison of cardiac output monitoring capabilities of the NICOM Cheetah® versus the FloTrac®. Cardiac output defined as the amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute. Bland-Altman analysis used to compare the level of disagreement between the 2 devices, %.

Time frame:
10 hours of data collected for each participant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of disagreement
Degree of Disagreement, %
percentage of disagreementAll Participants
Degree of Disagreement, %69.2

Adverse events

Collected over 2 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
All Participants0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)0/26 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)All Participants
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years13
>=65 years13
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Participants
Mean68.58 ± 12.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Participants
Female11
Male15
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)All Participants
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino0
Unknown or Not Reported26
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)All Participants
Singapore26
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Changi General Hospital
    Singapore, 529889, Singapore
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Squara P, Denjean D, Estagnasie P, Brusset A, Dib JC, Dubois C. Noninvasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM): a clinical validation. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Jul;33(7):1191-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0640-0. Epub 2007 Apr 26. PubMed 17458538 ↗
  • Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, Yalamanchili K, Winklmaier M, Burkhoff D. Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008 Apr;22(2):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s10877-008-9112-5. Epub 2008 Mar 14. PubMed 18340540 ↗
  • Marque S, Cariou A, Chiche JD, Squara P. Comparison between Flotrac-Vigileo and Bioreactance, a totally noninvasive method for cardiac output monitoring. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R73. doi: 10.1186/cc7884. Epub 2009 May 19. PubMed 19454009 ↗
  • Mehta Y, Arora D. Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring. World J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 26;6(9):1022-9. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i9.1022. PubMed 25276302 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be available to anyone else other than the investigators of this study

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2018 to primary completion in Jan 2021, 28 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2021, 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 3, 2018
First posted
Jan 9, 2018
StartActual
Aug 10, 2018
Primary completionActual
Jan 5, 2021
CompletionActual
Jan 5, 2021
Results first posted
Mar 3, 2021
Last update
May 11, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03394768
Responsible party
Chang See Seong (Consultant, Changi General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 9, 2018
Start date
Aug 10, 2018
Primary completion
Jan 5, 2021
Completion
Jan 5, 2021
Results posted
Mar 3, 2021
Last update
May 11, 2021

Study contacts

See Seong Chang, MBBS, MMed
principal investigator · Changi General Hospital
Louis Ng, MBBS, ANZCA
principal investigator · Changi General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in May 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion