ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07205133Updated Apr 15, 2026

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Whole Body Vibration Therapy With Usual Care and Usual Care to Improve Muscle Health in Older Adults

An interventional study of Whole Body Vibration Training and Otago Exercise in Aging, Frailty and Sarcopenia, sponsored by Changi General Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-15.

Sponsored by Changi General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a randomized controlled trial where participants would be randomly assigned to one of 2 groups. One group would receive Whole body vibration therapy and usual care and the other group only usual care. Measurements of muscle mass, strength and function would be taken before the interventions, and at 2 other points after interventions. Differences in the outcomes between the two groups would be analysed.

Read the detailed description

Background: The prevalence of Frailty and Sarcopenia is increasing with increasing proportion of older adults in the population. While screening for frailty and sarcopenia has become more common, frailty interventions are still developing. Effective interventions include resistance exercise programs that are progressive and sustained. However, take up rate and adherence to these programs are low due to many barriers like time, cost and convenience to the older adult. Many older adults who are frail may be unable to adhere to exercise programs due to cognitive impairment and tolerability. An alternative modality, Whole Body Vibration Training (WBVT), has emerged with evidence in improving muscle strength and function which may be easier to complete and a safe alternative.

Aim: Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel progressive 4-week, thrice-weekly WBVT intervention and usual care compared to usual care in improving muscle mass, strength and function in the pre-frail and mildly frail older adult.

Methods: 20 participants would be randomly allocated to each arm. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in change in maximal isometric knee-extension strength from baseline to 2 weeks post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include Appendicular Skeletal Mass Index (ASMI), hand grip strength (HGS), gait speed (GS), 5 timed chair stands, Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) and physical activity level using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Other secondary outcomes include falls rate during the study, 1-year unplanned emergency department visits, hospitalizations as well as all-cause mortality. The measurements would be done at 3 points, namely pre-intervention (baseline), 2 weeks post-intervention and at 3 months. Qualitative data would include participant surveys and semi-structured interviews to assess feasibility, accessibility and future implementation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aging
  • Frailty
  • Sarcopenia
  • Muscle Strength
  • Muscle Function
  • Muscle Mass

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Frailty
  • Sarcopenia
  • Whole Body Vibration Therapy
  • Muscle Strength
  • Muscle Function
  • Muscle Mass
03

In context

Frailty

1,284 studies on the registry are indexed under Frailty; 452 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 81 across 767 interventional studies indexed under Frailty.

Browse Frailty studies →

Lead sponsor

Changi General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 101 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy Volunteer or Patients aged 65 and above,
  • Clinical frailty Scale (CFS) score of 3-4,
  • Independently ambulating without any aid
  • willingness and consent to participate in the study and ability to travel to the study-site for the measurements and interventions, and
  • participants with no regular exercise habits (defined as less than 150mins/week of moderate intensity aerobic exercise and less than twice a week of strengthening exercises)for past 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current active enrolment into any Day Rehab or community exercise program,
  • to WBVT machine usage (see below),
  • diagnosis of dementia,
  • history of Diabetes Mellitus
  • ≤20kg/m2,
  • recent hospital admissions within the last 3 months,
  • end stage organ failure,
  • chronic diseases which are not well managed, for example, poorly controlled hypertension,
  • (NYHA) score II and above for patients with history of heart failure and
  • MUST Score ≥1.

Contraindications to WBVT:

PRIMARY CONTRAINDICATIONS TO WBVT

  • Pregnancy
  • Acute thrombosis (acute vascular occlusion)
  • Artificial joints in stimulated body regions
  • Fresh fractures in stimulated body regions
  • Within 3 months post surgery/procedure and/or any fresh wounds and scars in the stimulated body regions
  • or if the wound healing is not yet completely finished.

SECONDARY CONTRAINDICATIONS TO WBVT

  • Acute inflammation of the musculoskeletal system, activated arthrosis or
  • arthropathy (e.g. acute inflammation and swelling in joints).
  • Acute tendinopathies in stimulated body regions (acute tendonitis)
  • Acute hernias (tissue ruptures)
  • Acute discopathy (acute disc-related back problem)
  • Stone disease of the bile ducts and urinary tract
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Epilepsy due to secondary risk of injury
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Whole Body Vibration Training

    The WBVT would be conducted using the Galileo Vibration machine (Galileo® S 35), for 3 sessions per week for 4 weeks. The participants would be progressed in terms of (i)vibration frequency from 15 Hz to at least 25 Hz (maximum 30 Hz for those who can tolerate) (ii)for the angles of their squats (from an approximate starting point of 20 degrees ("mini squats" to 45 degrees "quarter squats"; maximum to 90 degrees-thighs parallel to ground or "half-squats" for those who can tolerate); as well as (iii) increasing number of each 1-minute set (from 6 to 8 sets), while standing on the WBVT machine barefoot with both feet flat on the platform set at an amplitude of 2-3mm (according to the participant's height and body physique) with variable rest breaks (up to 1 minute) between each set for a total of 15 minutes each training session. Any missed session would be recorded. To ensure compliance, the subjects would receive a standard phone-call/text reminder prior to the scheduled session.

    Other: Whole Body Vibration Training · Other: Otago Exercise

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Participants from both arms would also be provided the exercise sheet on "Otago exercises" (30)and demonstrated in one session how to perform the exercises. In-person demonstration of the "Otago exercises" would be done upon recruitment by trained study team members, at the visit for baseline measurements and a return-demonstration would be done after. They would be instructed to perform the Otago exercises daily according to the standardized instructions stated and progressed from 10 to 15 repetitions on their own for at least 3 times a week and advised to also continue other aerobic exercises, for example, brisk walking. Participants would be given an exercise and falls diary to record their exercise participation as well as any falls that occurred during the study duration for up to 3 months.

    Other: Otago Exercise

Interventions

  • OtherWhole Body Vibration Training

    Information already included in arm/group descriptions.

  • OtherOtago Exercise

    Usual Care

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Isometric Knee Extension Strength

    Measured using a JTech Medical, Northstar Echo Muscle Tester with subject seated with knee flexed at 90 degrees and hanging, muscle tester is placed at the ventral surface of the ankle between malleoli and subject instructed to push against tester with maximal effort to extend the knee. Best of three trials would be taken.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 weeks after intervention and 3 months after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hand Grip Strength

    Measured using Jtech Medical, Northstar Echo Grip hand dynamometer with participant sitting upright with elbows flexed at 90 degrees and arms unsupported, best of 3 tries from each hand.

    Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention

  2. Appendicular Skeletal Mass Index

    Height adjusted Appendicular Skeletal Mass index as measured by the InBody S10 Body Composition Analysis machine

    Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention

  3. Gait Speed

    6 metres normal gait speed (metres/second)

    Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention

  4. 5-timed chair stands

    Time taken to perform 5 chair stands with both arms crossed over chest (seconds)

    Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention

  5. Calf Circumference

    Widest calf circumference with participant in standing position

    Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention

  6. Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)

    Assessment for physical activity level according to the PASE questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention

  7. Quality of life scale

    QOL measured with the EQ-5D-5L

    Time frame: Baseline and at 2 weeks post intervention and 3 months post intervention

  8. Number of falls

    Number of falls per participant during study period

    Time frame: 1 year post interventions

  9. 1 year unplanned emergency department visits and hospitalisation events

    as described above

    Time frame: 1 year post interventions

  10. All-cause mortality

    Mortality all-cause

    Time frame: up to 1 year post interventions

Other outcomes

  1. Participant Surveys

    Survey on user experience and satisfaction as well as feasibility, accessibility

    Time frame: 2 weeks post intervention up to 3 months post intervention

  2. Exercise adherence

    Participants would be instructed to record their exercise participation in an exercise diary with remarks on any symptoms experienced.

    Time frame: During 4 weeks intervention period

  3. Semi-structured interviews

    Semi-structured interviews would be conducted for the 20 participants in the WBVT (intervention) arm to enhance the qualitative data collected.

    Time frame: 2 weeks post intervention up to 3 months post intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dyer SM, Crotty M, Fairhall N, Magaziner J, Beaupre LA, Cameron ID, Sherrington C; Fragility Fracture Network (FFN) Rehabilitation Research Special Interest Group. A critical review of the long-term disability outcomes following hip fracture. BMC Geriatr. 2016 Sep 2;16(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0332-0. PubMed 27590604 ↗
  • Akehurst H, Grice JE, Angioi M, Morrissey D, Migliorini F, Maffulli N. Whole-body vibration decreases delayed onset muscle soreness following eccentric exercise in elite hockey players: a randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Oct 12;16(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02760-4. PubMed 34641941 ↗
  • Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81. PubMed 7154893 ↗
  • Lee SY, Goh A, Tan K, Choo PL, Ong PH, Wong WP, Wee SL. Effectiveness of a community-delivered pneumatic machine resistance training programme (Gym Tonic) for older adults at neighbourhood senior centres - a randomized controlled trial. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2021 Oct 7;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s11556-021-00273-x. PubMed 34620081 ↗
  • Claflin DR, Larkin LM, Cederna PS, Horowitz JF, Alexander NB, Cole NM, Galecki AT, Chen S, Nyquist LV, Carlson BM, Faulkner JA, Ashton-Miller JA. Effects of high- and low-velocity resistance training on the contractile properties of skeletal muscle fibers from young and older humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Oct;111(4):1021-30. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01119.2010. Epub 2011 Jul 28. PubMed 21799130 ↗
  • Burd NA, West DW, Staples AW, Atherton PJ, Baker JM, Moore DR, Holwerda AM, Parise G, Rennie MJ, Baker SK, Phillips SM. Low-load high volume resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis more than high-load low volume resistance exercise in young men. PLoS One. 2010 Aug 9;5(8):e12033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012033. PubMed 20711498 ↗
  • Yoshiko A, Watanabe K. Author Correction: Impact of home-based squat training with two-depths on lower limb muscle parameters and physical functional tests in older adults. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15802. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95096-2. No abstract available. PubMed 34326445 ↗
  • Chew STH, Kayambu G, Lew CCH, Ng TP, Ong F, Tan J, Tan NC, Tham SL. Singapore multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on muscle health in older adults: assessment and multimodal targeted intervention across the continuum of care. BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 17;21(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02240-8. PubMed 34001023 ↗
  • Currier BS, Mcleod JC, Banfield L, Beyene J, Welton NJ, D'Souza AC, Keogh JAJ, Lin L, Coletta G, Yang A, Colenso-Semple L, Lau KJ, Verboom A, Phillips SM. Resistance training prescription for muscle strength and hypertrophy in healthy adults: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2023 Sep;57(18):1211-1220. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106807. Epub 2023 Jul 6. PubMed 37414459 ↗
  • Hurst C, Robinson SM, Witham MD, Dodds RM, Granic A, Buckland C, De Biase S, Finnegan S, Rochester L, Skelton DA, Sayer AA. Resistance exercise as a treatment for sarcopenia: prescription and delivery. Age Ageing. 2022 Feb 2;51(2):afac003. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac003. PubMed 35150587 ↗
  • Wu S, Ning HT, Xiao SM, Hu MY, Wu XY, Deng HW, Feng H. Effects of vibration therapy on muscle mass, muscle strength and physical function in older adults with sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2020 Sep 17;17:14. doi: 10.1186/s11556-020-00247-5. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32963629 ↗
  • Yi M, Zhang W, Zhang X, Zhou J, Wang Z. The effectiveness of Otago exercise program in older adults with frailty or pre-frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023 Nov;114:105083. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105083. Epub 2023 Jun 22. PubMed 37390692 ↗
  • Lam FM, Lau RW, Chung RC, Pang MY. The effect of whole body vibration on balance, mobility and falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas. 2012 Jul;72(3):206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.04.009. Epub 2012 May 18. PubMed 22609157 ↗
  • Remer F, Keilani M, Kull P, Crevenna R. Effects of whole-body vibration therapy on pain, functionality, postural stability, and proprioception in patients with subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2025 Feb;175(1-2):20-40. doi: 10.1007/s10354-023-01026-4. Epub 2023 Nov 24. PubMed 37999785 ↗
  • Gloeckl R, Heinzelmann I, Kenn K. Whole body vibration training in patients with COPD: A systematic review. Chron Respir Dis. 2015 Aug;12(3):212-21. doi: 10.1177/1479972315583049. Epub 2015 Apr 22. PubMed 25904085 ↗
  • Nowak-Lis A, Nowak Z, Gabrys T, Szmatlan-Gabrys U, Batalik L, Knappova V. The Use of Vibration Training in Men after Myocardial Infarction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 11;19(6):3326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063326. PubMed 35329010 ↗
  • Qiu CG, Chui CS, Chow SKH, Cheung WH, Wong RMY. Effects of Whole-Body Vibration Therapy on Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Rehabil Med. 2022 Mar 29;54:jrm00266. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v54.2032. PubMed 35174868 ↗
  • Yang X, Xue X, Tu H, Li N. Effect of whole-body vibration training on the recovery of lower limb function in people with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Nov;45(23):3823-3832. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2138993. Epub 2022 Nov 11. PubMed 36367314 ↗
  • Costantino C, Bertuletti S, Romiti D. Efficacy of Whole-Body Vibration Board Training on Strength in Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Study. Clin J Sport Med. 2018 Jul;28(4):339-349. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000466. PubMed 28657911 ↗
  • Lai CC, Tu YK, Wang TG, Huang YT, Chien KL. Effects of resistance training, endurance training and whole-body vibration on lean body mass, muscle strength and physical performance in older people: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2018 May 1;47(3):367-373. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy009. PubMed 29471456 ↗
  • Billot M, Calvani R, Urtamo A, Sanchez-Sanchez JL, Ciccolari-Micaldi C, Chang M, Roller-Wirnsberger R, Wirnsberger G, Sinclair A, Vaquero-Pinto N, Jyvakorpi S, Ohman H, Strandberg T, Schols JMGA, Schols AMWJ, Smeets N, Topinkova E, Michalkova H, Bonfigli AR, Lattanzio F, Rodriguez-Manas L, Coelho-Junior H, Broccatelli M, D'Elia ME, Biscotti D, Marzetti E, Freiberger E. Preserving Mobility in Older Adults with Physical Frailty and Sarcopenia: Opportunities, Challenges, and Recommendations for Physical Activity Interventions. Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Sep 16;15:1675-1690. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S253535. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32982201 ↗
  • Ng TP, Feng L, Nyunt MS, Feng L, Niti M, Tan BY, Chan G, Khoo SA, Chan SM, Yap P, Yap KB. Nutritional, Physical, Cognitive, and Combination Interventions and Frailty Reversal Among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Med. 2015 Nov;128(11):1225-1236.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Jul 6. PubMed 26159634 ↗
  • Lim WS, Cheong CY, Lim JP, Tan MMY, Chia JQ, Malik NA, Tay L. Singapore Clinical Practice Guidelines For Sarcopenia: Screening, Diagnosis, Management and Prevention. J Frailty Aging. 2022;11(4):348-369. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2022.59. PubMed 36346721 ↗
  • Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Chou MY, Iijima K, Jang HC, Kang L, Kim M, Kim S, Kojima T, Kuzuya M, Lee JSW, Lee SY, Lee WJ, Lee Y, Liang CK, Lim JY, Lim WS, Peng LN, Sugimoto K, Tanaka T, Won CW, Yamada M, Zhang T, Akishita M, Arai H. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 Consensus Update on Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):300-307.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Feb 4. PubMed 32033882 ↗
  • Dent E, Lien C, Lim WS, Wong WC, Wong CH, Ng TP, Woo J, Dong B, de la Vega S, Hua Poi PJ, Kamaruzzaman SBB, Won C, Chen LK, Rockwood K, Arai H, Rodriguez-Manas L, Cao L, Cesari M, Chan P, Leung E, Landi F, Fried LP, Morley JE, Vellas B, Flicker L. The Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):564-575. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.018. PubMed 28648901 ↗
  • Dent E, Martin FC, Bergman H, Woo J, Romero-Ortuno R, Walston JD. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1376-1386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31785-4. PubMed 31609229 ↗
  • Dent E, Chapman I, Howell S, Piantadosi C, Visvanathan R. Frailty and functional decline indices predict poor outcomes in hospitalised older people. Age Ageing. 2014 Jul;43(4):477-84. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft181. Epub 2013 Nov 19. PubMed 24257468 ↗
  • Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, Kowal P, Onder G, Fried LP. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1365-1375. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31786-6. PubMed 31609228 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared at this time because participants were not explicitly consented for data sharing.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07205133
Collaborators
BMEC Pte Ltd
Responsible party
Christine Chen Yuanxin (Doctor, Changi General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 3, 2025
Start date
Jan 10, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2026

Study contacts

Christine Yuanxin Chen, MBBS
Contact
christine.chen.y.x@singhealth.com.sg
+65-9030 4976

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion