ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03373292Updated Dec 14, 2017

Endovascular Stenting Treatment for Patients With Internal Jugular Vein Stenosis

A Phase 1 interventional study of Venous stenting for internal jugular vein stenosis and One-month routine medical treatment followed by venous stenting for internal jugular vein stenosis in Stent Stenosis, Intracranial Hypertension and Headache, sponsored by Capital Medical University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-14.

Sponsored by Capital Medical University · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2017), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, randomized, single-center clinical study aiming to explore the safety and efficacy of venous stenting for patients with internal jugular vein stenosis (IJVS).

Read the detailed description

The role of isolated non-thrombotic IJVS in idiopathic intracranial hypertension has recently gained a vested interest. Compared with venous sinus stenosis, isolated IJVS at extracranial segments is more concealed and likely to be neglected, leading to misdiagnosis or treatment delay and subsequent exacerbation of clinical outcomes. Stenting seems to hold a potential of addressing the intracranial pressure elevation-associated clinical issues from etiological level, especially after medical therapy failure. The complications of stenting such as ipsilateral headache, restenosis, intra-stent thrombosis and hemorrhage have beem demonstrated in the settings of intracranial sinus obstruction and osseous impingement-associated IJVS, particularly bony structures between the styloid process and lateral mass of C1 that constrain the IJV. Nevertheless, so far, to the best of our knowledge, few or no stenting related adverse events have been found in isolated IJVS patients with venous stent implantation.

In this study, 60 patients satisfied with the inclusion criteria will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. The safety and efficacy of stenting in patients with non-osseous impingement-mediated IJVS will be analyzed. Other medical interventions will be guaranteed according to the best medical judgment from clinical practitioners.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stent Stenosis
  • Intracranial Hypertension
  • Headache
  • Tinnitus
  • Papilledema
  • Visual Impairment

Keywords

  • Stenting
  • Jugular vein stenosis
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Headache
  • Tinnitus
  • Papilledema
  • Visual impairment
03

In context

Intracranial Hypertension

165 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Hypertension; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is above the median of 50 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Intracranial Hypertension.

Browse Intracranial Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Capital Medical University is the lead sponsor of 295 studies on the registry; 91 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ranging from 18 to 80 years of age, both genders.
  2. Patients diagnosed with IJVS surrounded by abnormally and tortuous collateral veins verified by MRV, CTV and/or DSA.
  3. Pressure gradient across the stenotic segments is equal to or greater than 4 mmHg.
  4. Intracranial hypertension associated manifestations cannot be satisfactorily controlled by conservative or non-surgical therapies.
  5. obtained from the patient or his/her health care proxy, able to cooperate follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. External osseous impingement associated IJVS.
  2. to iodinated contrasts.
  3. Contraindication to general anesthesia.
  4. Contraindication to standard medical therapy such as Aspirin, Clopidogrel or anticoagulants.
  5. Intracranial abnormalities such as tumor, abscess, vascular malformation, cerebral venous sinus stenosis or thrombosis.
  6. Previous history of major surgeries within 30 days prior to inclusion, or scheduled for any of the procedures within 12 months after inclusion.
  7. Severe hematological, hepatic or renal dysfunctions.
  8. Current or having a history of chronic physical diseases or mental disorders.
  9. Pregnant or lactating women.
  10. \< 1 year due to concomitant life-threatening illness.
  11. Patients unlikely to be compliant with intervention or return for follow-up visits.
  12. No signed consent from the patient or available legally authorized representatives.
  13. Patients recruited to other clinical trials with medications or devices, which may affect the outcome of this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Venous stenting (Group-1)

    Patients in this group will undergo venous stenting treatment at once after enrollment.

    Procedure: Venous stenting for internal jugular vein stenosis

  • Experimental
    Stenting one-month after routine medical treatment (Group-2)

    Patients in this group will undergo routine medical treatment for one month, followed by venous stenting intervention.

    Procedure: One-month routine medical treatment followed by venous stenting for internal jugular vein stenosis

Interventions

  • ProcedureVenous stenting for internal jugular vein stenosis

    After confirming the diagnosis of IJVS by Jugular Vein Doppler Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Venography (MRV) and/or Computed Tomography Venography (CTV), and excluding external compression-induced stenosis as well as other causes of intracranial pressure elevation, patients will be divided into two groups randomly (30 for each group: group-1 and group-2). Patients in Group-1 will receive Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) immediately after enrollment, and trans-stenotic pressures (∆MPGs) will be measured, balloon angioplasty bridging venous stenting will be performed when their ∆MPGs of jugular veins are equal to or greater than 5.44 cmH₂O (4 mmHg).

  • ProcedureOne-month routine medical treatment followed by venous stenting for internal jugular vein stenosis

    Patients in Group-2 will receive routine medical treatment for one month. Afterwards, they will undergo DSA (the procedure is the same as that in Group-1). Notably, patients in Group-2 with medical uncontrolled intracranial hypertension will be provided stenting of their jugular veins at any time during the one-month routine medical treatment, in attempt to reduce their intracranial pressure and ameliorate visual damages in time.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correction of internal jugular vein stenosis (IJVS) and abnormal collateral veins

    The status of internal jugular vein blood flow and collateral veins will be evaluated by imaging modalities, mainly including: Jugular Vein Doppler Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Venography (MRV), Computed Tomography Venography (CTV) and Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA).

    Time frame: baseline, 1, 6 and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The evaluation of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) pressure

    CSF pressure will be assessed by lumbar puncture.

    Time frame: baseline, immediately post-stenting, within 1 month

  2. The evaluation of headache

    The intensity of headache will be assessed with the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6).

    Time frame: baseline, within 1, 6 and 12 months

  3. The evaluation of tinnitus

    The severity of tinnitus will be assessed by the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Questionnaire (THIQ).

    Time frame: baseline, within 1, 6 and 12 months

  4. The evaluation of the severity of papilledema and other ophthalmological conditions

    The severity of papilledema will be assessed based on Frisén papilledema grade (FPG) criteria; the assessment of other ophthalmological conditions including visual acuity, visual field, and fundus etc. will be based on visual acuity chart, visual fields picture, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) etc.

    Time frame: baseline, within 1, 6 and 12 months

  5. Changes in cerebral white matter (WM)

    The characteristics of WM will be evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

    Time frame: baseline, within 12 months

  6. The evaluation of cognitive function

    Cognitive function will be assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and/or the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-M).

    Time frame: baseline, within 12 months

  7. The evaluation of mental status

    Mental status will be assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS score ranges between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. A cut-off point of 8/21 is indicated for anxiety or depression.

    Time frame: baseline, within 12 months

  8. The evaluation of sleeping status

    Sleeping status will be assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and/or the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS). The PSQI score provides an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where a cut-off score of ≤5 denotes a healthier sleep quality. The AIS score provides an overall score ranging from 0 to 24, where a cut-off score of \<6 denotes a healthier sleep quality.

    Time frame: baseline, within 12 months

  9. The extent of disability or dependence in the daily activities

    The extent of disability will be assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). (Score 0-no symptoms; score 1-no significant disability; score 2-slight disability; score 3-moderate disability; score 4-moderately severe disability; score 5-severe disability; score 6-dead.)

    Time frame: baseline, within 12 months

  10. Percentage of participants with abnormal lab values

    Lab examinations such as hepatic and renal function, blood and urine routine will be recorded.

    Time frame: baseline, within 12 months

  11. Percentage of participants with procedure-related and/or stenting-related complications

    Time frame: within 12 months

  12. The incidence of all cause mortality

    Death secondary to any reasons

    Time frame: within 12 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhou D, Meng R, Zhang X, Guo L, Li S, Wu W, Duan J, Song H, Ding Y, Ji X. Intracranial hypertension induced by internal jugular vein stenosis can be resolved by stenting. Eur J Neurol. 2018 Feb;25(2):365-e13. doi: 10.1111/ene.13512. Epub 2017 Dec 7. PubMed 29114973 ↗
  • Higgins JN, Garnett MR, Pickard JD, Axon PR. An Evaluation of Styloidectomy as an Adjunct or Alternative to Jugular Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Disturbances of Cranial Venous Outflow. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017 Apr;78(2):158-163. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1594238. Epub 2016 Nov 23. PubMed 28321380 ↗
  • Spitze A, Malik A, Lee AG. Surgical and endovascular interventions in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Curr Opin Neurol. 2014 Feb;27(1):69-74. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000049. PubMed 24296639 ↗
  • Ding J, Liu Y, Li X, Chen Z, Guan J, Jin K, Wang Z, Ding Y, Ji X, Meng R. Normobaric Oxygen May Ameliorate Cerebral Venous Outflow Disturbance-Related Neurological Symptoms. Front Neurol. 2020 Nov 13;11:599985. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.599985. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33281736 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 14, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03373292
Responsible party
Ji Xunming (Vice President, Professor, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 14, 2017
Start date
Jan 2018 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2020 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2020 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 14, 2017

Study contacts

Ran Meng, MD, PhD
Contact
Ranmeng2011@pku.org.cn
+86-10-83198952
Da Zhou, MD, PhD Candidate
Contact
popdoctor@foxmail.com
+86-10-83198952
Xuming Ji, MD, PhD
study director · Xuanwu Hosptial, Capital Medical University
Ran Meng, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Xuanwu Hosptial, Capital Medical University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion