ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03370380Updated Aug 6, 2018

Aflibercept in Patients With Pigment Epithelial Detachments (PED)

An observational study in Pigment Epithelial Detachment, sponsored by University Hospital Muenster. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-08-06.

Sponsored by University Hospital Muenster · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
18
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Uncontrolled single site non randomized non interventional study to determine the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injections of Aflibercept in patients with recent vision loss due to retinal pigment epithelial detachment secondary to AMD

02

Conditions studied

  • Pigment Epithelial Detachment

Browse trials for

03

In context

Retinal Detachment

199 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinal Detachment; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 60 across 58 observational studies indexed under Retinal Detachment.

Browse Retinal Detachment studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Muenster is the lead sponsor of 192 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

In total 20 eyes/patients are treated and observed after inclusion diagnosis and informed consent over a period about 1 year.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with vascular PED due to AMD
  • Male or female patients with the age > 50 years
  • Angiographic and via OCT ensured PED ≥ 200 µm in the eye for treatment
  • Written
  • Best corrected visual acuity (ETDRS-Visus): 24 - 73 letters within

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that do not fulfill the a. m. inclusion criteria
  • Patients which have been treated with or with verteporfin via photodynamic therapy or focal lasercoagulation treatment until 3 months before,
  • Anti VEGF therapy until 1 month before screening
  • Patients with other retinal vascular diseases including diabetic rethinopathia or retinal vein occlusion
  • Other ocular operative procedurs 3 months before Screening
  • Anamnesis of non controlled glaucoma
  • Active or intraocular Inflammation or Inflammation of ocular adnexa
  • Subfoveal fibrosis within study eye
  • Larger surgical interventions 1 month before Screening
  • Anamnesis of serious cardiovascular diseases or stroke 6 months before srceening
  • Allergy of components of the study medication
  • Patients which might be not compliant
  • Patients participating at another clinical trial at the same time
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, women in child-bearing years without using a safe method
  • Chronical alcohol- or drug abuse within the last year
  • lack of capacity and/or knowledge of German language
  • Neurologic disease i. e. multiple sclerosis
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Patients are treated according to authorization of Aflibercept

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Retention and improvement of visual acuity

    Visual acuity after treatment completion compared to baseline

    Time frame: Screening until 1 month after last injection within study eye (Month 12)

  2. Height of Pigment Epithel Detachment

    The height of PED after treatment completion compared to baseline

    Time frame: Screening until 1 month after last injection within study eye (Month 12)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital Muenster
    Muenster, 48149, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Clemens CR, Alten F, Termuhlen J, Mihailovic N, Rosenberger F, Heiduschka P, Eter N. Prospective PED-study of intravitreal aflibercept for refractory vascularized pigment epithelium detachment due to age-related macular degeneration: morphologic characteristics of non-responders in optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;258(7):1411-1417. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04675-y. Epub 2020 Apr 18. PubMed 32306096 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2015 to primary completion in Apr 2018, 36 months.

Of 22 observational studies under Retinal Detachment, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 42. This study's 36 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 29, 2017
First posted
Dec 12, 2017
StartActual
Apr 17, 2015
Primary completionActual
Apr 23, 2018
CompletionActual
Apr 23, 2018
Last update
Aug 6, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 6, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03370380
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 12, 2017
Start date
Apr 17, 2015
Primary completion
Apr 23, 2018
Completion
Apr 23, 2018
Last update
Aug 6, 2018

Study contacts

Christoph Clemens, Dr. med.
principal investigator · University Hospital Muenster

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion