ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05863312REDOSUpdated Nov 9, 2026

REtinal Detachment Outcomes Study

An interventional study of Pars plana vitrectomy and Pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle in Retinal Detachment, sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
560
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Few large randomized controlled trials provide strong evidence to guide surgical repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair. The purpose of this factorial, single-blind, randomized controlled trial is to analyze and compare the surgical outcomes, functional visual outcomes, complications, and quality of life associated with RRD repair using (A) pars plana vitrectomy only (PPV) or PPV with scleral buckle (PPV-SB) and (B) sulfur hexafluoride gas (SF6) or perfluoropropane gas (C3F8) tamponade.

Methods: Eligible patients with moderately complex RRD will be randomized 1:1 to PPV or PPV-SB and 1:1 to SF6 or C3F8 gas tamponade. Approximately 560 patients will be recruited to be able to detect a difference of around 10% in SSAS rate between groups. Patients will be followed using multimodal imaging and quality of life questionnaires before and after the surgical repair until 1 year postoperative. The primary outcome will be single surgery anatomic success (SSAS), defined as absence of reoperation for recurrent RRD in the operating room. Secondary outcomes will be pinhole visual acuity (PHVA) at 8-10 weeks and 6 months, final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), final retina status (i.e., attached or detached), time to onset of RRD recurrence, severity and number of complications, and questionnaire results.

Discussion: This will be the first 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial examining repair techniques in primary RRD. It will also be the first randomized controlled trial to compare gas tamponade between the two most common agents. Notably, it will be adequately powered to detect a clinically significant effect size. The use of multimodal imaging will also be a novel aspect of this study, allowing us to compare head-to-head the impact of adding an SB to the retina's recovery after RRD repair and of differing gas tamponades. Until now, the treatment of RRD has been largely guided by pragmatic retrospective cohort studies. There is a lack of strong evidence guiding therapeutic decisions and this trial will address (1) whether supplemental SB is justified and (2) whether longer duration gas tamponade with C3F8 is necessary.

02

Conditions studied

  • Retinal Detachment

Keywords

  • Pars plana vitrectomy
  • Scleral buckle
  • Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
  • Proliferative vitreoretinopathy
  • Anatomic success
  • Visual acuity
  • Retinal displacement
  • Postoperative pain
  • Quality of life
  • Complications
03

In context

Retinal Detachment

199 studies on the registry are indexed under Retinal Detachment; 29 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 560 is above the median of 50 across 132 interventional studies indexed under Retinal Detachment.

Browse Retinal Detachment studies →

Lead sponsor

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval is the lead sponsor of 137 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria, retinal detachment with:

  • Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) grade ≥C2
  • Chronic RRD with duration >3 months
  • Proliferative diabetic retinopathy with tractional retinal detachment (RD)
  • Macular holes
  • Epiretinal membrane grade 3 or 4
  • Traumatic RD
  • Giant retinal tears
  • Retinal dialysis
  • Foveoschisis
  • Wet age-related macular degeneration
  • Endophthalmitis
  • Acute retinal necrosis
  • Coats disease
  • Retinopathy of prematurity
  • Retinoschisis
  • Retinal colobomas
  • Prior glaucoma surgery or strabismus surgery (favoring PPV only)
  • Superior RD extent less than 3 clock hours (favoring PPV only)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
560 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pars plana vitrectomy + sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade

    Procedure: Pars plana vitrectomy · Other: Sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade

  • Experimental
    Pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle + sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade

    Procedure: Pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle · Other: Sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade

  • Experimental
    Pars plana vitrectomy + perfluoropropane gas tamponade

    Procedure: Pars plana vitrectomy · Other: Perfluoropropane gas

  • Experimental
    Pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle + perfluoropropane gas tamponade

    Procedure: Pars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle · Other: Perfluoropropane gas

Interventions

  • ProcedurePars plana vitrectomy

    Pars plana vitrectomy will be performed in a standard fashion starting with central vitrectomy, then by localizing retinal breaks, and marking them with endodiathermy. Perfluorocarbon will be used to displace subretinal fluid which will be aspirated at its exit from the retinal break as much as possible and maximal vitreous base shaving will be performed in all cases. This will be followed by an air-fluid exchange. Use of cryotherapy to solidify the retina intraoperatively and use of internal limiting membrane peeling of the posterior pole will be at the discretion of the surgeon. In all cases, laser photocoagulation around retinal breaks, holes, areas of lattice degeneration, and posterior to sclerotomy sites will be done and then a 360° laser retinopexy will be performed at the surgeon's discretion and consisted of three rows of medium-white burns anterior to the level of the vortex vein, towards and beyond the equator.

    Also known as: PPV

  • ProcedurePars plana vitrectomy with scleral buckle

    In cases with SB, after 360° peritomy and dissection in 4 quadrants, a 41-circling band with 3082 sleeves (Labtician Ophthalmics, Oakville, ON Canada) will be used in all cases and fixed to the sclera at approximatively 11.5 mm from the limbus (or 5.5 from the insertion of rectus muscles) using partial thickness scleral tunnel or mattress sutures with 5.0 prolene or nylon performed in 4 quadrants depending on the surgeon preferences. Pars plana vitrectomy will then be performed as in the PPV only group.

    Also known as: PPV-SB

  • OtherSulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade

    At the end of the surgery, the eye is filled with sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade.

    Also known as: SF6

  • OtherPerfluoropropane gas

    At the end of the surgery, the eye is filled with perfluoropropane gas tamponade.

    Also known as: C3F8

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Single surgery anatomic success

    Freedom from reoperation for recurrent RRD

    Time frame: Until final 1 year follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pinhole visual acuity

    Time frame: 8-10 weeks, 6 months

  2. Best-corrected visual acuity

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Time to onset of RD recurrence

    Time frame: Until final 1 year follow-up

  4. Severity and number of complications

    Time frame: Until final 1 year follow-up

  5. Quality of life questionnaire

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 8-10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement, CHU de Québec - Université Laval
    Québec, Quebec G1S4L8, Canada
    Recruiting
    • Julie Mauger · Contact
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hebert M, Bourgault S, Caissie M, Tourville E, Dirani A. REtinal Detachment Outcomes Study (REDOS): study protocol for a factorial, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2023 Dec 20;24(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07815-x. PubMed 38124155 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The full protocol will be published in the journal Trials. The final trial dataset could be made available to other research teams upon reasonable request and after evaluation of the request by the trial team. The shared dataset will be coded and will not include any identifying patient data.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2023 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 46 months after the start.

Of 55 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Retinal Detachment, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 49. This study's planned 46 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 56 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 49.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 8, 2023
First posted
May 18, 2023
StartActual
Sep 26, 2023
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 2028
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Publications
1 publication citing this study linked from PubMed, e.g. PubMed 38124155 ↗
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Publications 1 publication citing this study linked from PubMed, e.g. PubMed 38124155 ↗
    + 2 other changes: verification date and oversight details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05863312
Collaborators
Fighting Blindness Canada
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 18, 2023
Start date
Sep 26, 2023
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Julie Mauger, BSc
Contact
cuo.recherche@fmed.ulaval.ca
418-682-7511 ext. 84821
Ali Dirani, MD MSc MPH
principal investigator · CHU de Québec - Université Laval
Mélanie Hébert, MD MSc
principal investigator · CHU de Québec - Université Laval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion