ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07877298REPEAT-PPGUpdated Oct 16, 2026

Within-Session Repeatability of EUS-Guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement

An observational study in Portal Hypertension, Chronic Liver Disease and Liver Cirrhosis, sponsored by University Hospital Muenster. Not yet recruiting at 5 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-16.

Sponsored by University Hospital Muenster · Observational

Updated Oct 16, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective multicentre observational reliability study will determine how much a repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided portal pressure gradient (EUS-PPG) measurement differs from the first measurement in the same patient during the same procedural session. Each participant will undergo two complete EUS-PPG measurement sets using an identical 22-gauge measurement setup. The study will quantify within-session repeatability when the same expert performs both sets and inter-operator reproducibility when different operators perform the sets.

Read the detailed description

Consecutive adults with an independently established clinical indication for EUS-PPG will be enrolled at five centres. The clinically indicated first measurement will be followed by a research-only second complete measurement set during the same sedation episode, without an intervention between sets. After the first set, the system will be flushed, the needle fully withdrawn from the liver, the system recalibrated, and the portal and hepatic veins punctured again for fresh triplicate readings. The interval between sets is targeted at 10 minutes or less. Procedure lists will be cluster-randomised according to examination lists to one of three operator configurations: the same expert performs both sets, two different experts perform the sets, or an expert and a trainee under supervision perform the sets. The order within each pair will be randomised. Clinical decisions will be based exclusively on the first measurement set. Participants will undergo safety follow-up through day 30.

02

Conditions studied

  • Portal Hypertension
  • Chronic Liver Disease
  • Liver Cirrhosis

Keywords

  • EUS-PPG
  • Endoscopic ultrasound
  • Portal pressure gradient
  • Portal hypertension
  • Repeatability
  • Reproducibility
  • Bland-Altman analysis
  • Intraclass correlation coefficient
03

In context

Hypertension, Portal

345 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension, Portal; 110 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is close to the median of 151 across 128 observational studies indexed under Hypertension, Portal.

Browse Hypertension, Portal studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Muenster is the lead sponsor of 192 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive adult patients with an independently established clinical indication for EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement, including patients with and without clinically significant portal hypertension.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Clinical indication for EUS-guided portal pressure gradient measurement established independently of the study
  • Written informed consent, including consent for the additional measurement set

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to endoscopy, sedation, or endosonography-guided vascular puncture
  • Non-correctable coagulation disorder
  • Hemodynamic instability at the time of the procedure
  • Any intervention between the two measurement sets that may alter portal pressure, including fluid administration beyond maintenance requirements, vasoactive substances, paracentesis, or variceal band ligation
  • Technically non-evaluable first measurement set
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Inability to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
None retained

Groups and cohorts

  • Same expert operator

    Both complete measurement sets are performed by the same expert operator.

    Diagnostic Test: Repeated EUS-Guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement

  • Two expert operators

    The two complete measurement sets are performed by two different expert operators, with order randomised.

    Diagnostic Test: Repeated EUS-Guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement

  • Expert and trainee operators

    One complete measurement set is performed by an expert and the other by a trainee under direct supervision, with order randomised.

    Diagnostic Test: Repeated EUS-Guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testRepeated EUS-Guided Portal Pressure Gradient Measurement

    During a clinically indicated EUS-PPG procedure, each participant undergoes a second complete EUS-PPG measurement set in the same session. For each set, pressures in a hepatic vein and an intrahepatic portal vein branch are measured in triplicate using the same 22-gauge measurement chain. Before the repeat set, the system is flushed, the needle is fully withdrawn from the liver, the transducer is recalibrated, and the target vessels are independently re-identified and punctured. No treatment or portal-pressure-altering intervention occurs between the two sets.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Within-session repeatability coefficient of EUS-PPG measured by the same expert operator

    The repeatability coefficient will be calculated as 2.77 multiplied by the within-subject standard deviation of paired EUS-PPG measurements in the same-expert group. It will be reported in mmHg and as a percentage of the cohort mean, with a 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: During the index EUS-PPG procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Inter-operator reproducibility coefficient of EUS-PPG

    The reproducibility coefficient will be estimated from paired EUS-PPG differences when different operators perform the two measurement sets and will be reported in mmHg and as a percentage, with a 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: During the index EUS-PPG procedure

  2. Variance components of repeated EUS-PPG measurements

    A mixed-effects model using all individual readings will estimate patient-, procedure-list-, operator-, measurement-set-, and reading-level variance components.

    Time frame: During the index EUS-PPG procedure

  3. Intraclass correlation coefficient for paired EUS-PPG measurements

    Two-way absolute-agreement intraclass correlation coefficients will be reported overall and by operator configuration with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: During the index EUS-PPG procedure

  4. Bland-Altman agreement of paired EUS-PPG measurements

    Bias and 95% limits of agreement will be calculated overall and separately by operator pairing.

    Time frame: During the index EUS-PPG procedure

  5. Discordant classification at portal pressure gradient thresholds of 10 mmHg and 12 mmHg

    The proportion of participants whose classification crosses the 10-mmHg or 12-mmHg threshold between the two measurement sets will be reported.

    Time frame: During the index EUS-PPG procedure

  6. Procedure-associated adverse events

    Adverse events will include bleeding, pain, hemoglobin decrease, sedation-related events, unplanned admission or prolongation of stay, transfusion, and unplanned intervention.

    Time frame: From the index procedure through 30 days

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, Belgium
    • Wim Laleman, MD PhD · Contact
  • Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Philippe Willems, MD · Contact
  • McGill University Health Centre
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    • Amine Benmassaoud, MD · Contact
  • University Hospital Muenster
    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia 48149, Germany
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
    Rome, Lazio 00168, Italy
    • Francesco Santoapolo, MD · Contact
08

References and documents

Publications

  • International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5725-1:1994. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Part 1: General principles and definitions. Geneva: ISO; 1994.
  • Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1331-5. doi: 10.1002/sim.1108. PubMed 12111881 ↗
  • Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):101-10. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:13.0.co;2-e. PubMed 9463853 ↗
  • Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hrobjartsson A, Roberts C, Shoukri M, Streiner DL. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Jan;64(1):96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Jun 17. PubMed 21130355 ↗
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10. PubMed 2868172 ↗
  • de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C; Baveno VII Faculty. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022 Apr;76(4):959-974. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.022. Epub 2021 Dec 30. PubMed 35120736 ↗
  • Keiding S, Vilstrup H. Intrahepatic heterogeneity of hepatic venous pressure gradient in human cirrhosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002 Aug;37(8):960-4. doi: 10.1080/003655202760230946. PubMed 12229973 ↗
  • Reverter E, Blasi A, Abraldes JG, Martinez-Palli G, Seijo S, Turon F, Berzigotti A, Balust J, Bosch J, Garcia-Pagan JC. Impact of deep sedation on the accuracy of hepatic and portal venous pressure measurements in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2014 Jan;34(1):16-25. doi: 10.1111/liv.12229. Epub 2013 Jun 13. PubMed 23763484 ↗
  • Groszmann RJ, Wongcharatrawee S. The hepatic venous pressure gradient: anything worth doing should be done right. Hepatology. 2004 Feb;39(2):280-2. doi: 10.1002/hep.20062. No abstract available. PubMed 14767976 ↗
  • Tandon P, Ripoll C, Assis D, Wongcharatrawee S, Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G. The interpretation of hepatic venous pressure gradient tracings - excellent interobserver agreement unrelated to experience. Liver Int. 2016 Aug;36(8):1160-6. doi: 10.1111/liv.13065. Epub 2016 Feb 8. PubMed 26763558 ↗
  • Bai W, Al-Karaghouli M, Stach J, Sung S, Matheson GJ, Abraldes JG. Test-Retest Reliability and Consistency of HVPG and Impact on Trial Design: A Study in 289 Patients from 20 Randomized Controlled Trials. Hepatology. 2021 Dec;74(6):3301-3315. doi: 10.1002/hep.32033. Epub 2021 Aug 15. PubMed 34181770 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Jul 2028, 18 months later.

Of 61 non-industry observational studies under Hypertension, Portal, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 256. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 64 studies reached it within 43 months; a quarter within 30 and three quarters within 256.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 8, 2026
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2028
Last update
Oct 16, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 16, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 16, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07877298
Responsible party
Prof. Dr. Michael Praktiknjo (Professor of Hepatology, University Hospital Muenster) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 16, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 16, 2026

Study contacts

Michael Praktiknjo, MD PhD
Contact
michael.praktiknjo@ukmuenster.de
+49 251 83 44826
Dominik van de Loo, MD
Contact
dominikjulian.vandeloo@ukmuenster.de
+49 251 83 44476

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion