CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03334682FASCEUpdated Sep 14, 2026

Randomized Double-blind Study on the Benefit of Spironolactone for Treating Acne of Adult Woman.

A Phase 3 interventional study of spironolactone and Doxycycline in Acne Vulgaris, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Completed at 9 sites in France. Open to female participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
158
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Acne vulgaris of adult woman has increased over the past 10 years; it affects currently 20% to 30% of adult women.

The physiopathology of adult woman acne is distinguished from the teenager one by essentially 2 factors:

  • hormonal factor with a peripheral hyperandrogenism coupled with an hypersensibility of cutaneous androgens receptors of these women. But this point is still at the stage of hypothesis.
  • inflammatory factor linked with Propionibacterium Aces ; indeed these women received most of the time many cures of local and systematic antibiotics at the origin of resistant Propionibacterium Aces strains which lead to a chronical activation of cutaneous innate immunity.

On a therapeutic plan, four types of systemic treatment, approved in this indication are:

  • Tetracyclines which are problematic for the bacterial resistance and consequently constant relapse when they are stopped.
  • Zinc salts which target only the inflammatory lesions and were shown less effective than cycline
  • Antiandrogens, with acetate of cyproterone associated with risks of phlebitis and pulmonary embolism, and increase risk of triglycerides, cholesterol and hepatic balance.
  • The last alternative is represented by isotretinoin but the use in women of childbearing potential is binding because of the teratogen risks and the hyperandrogenism represents an identified risk of relapse.

In this context, the spironolactone could represent an interesting alternative. It blocks the 5-alpha-reductase receptors at sebaceous gland and inhibits Luteinizing hormone (LH) production at the pituitary level. It is not submitted to isotretinoin constraints, does not lead to bacterial resistance and targets the peripheral hyperandrogenism.

Currently, very few studies have been performed and on a weak number of patients but they showed that at low doses (lower than 200mg/day), spironolactone can be effective against acne.

In that context, it seemed clearly interesting to perform the first double-blind randomized study spironolactone vs cyclines which remains the moderate acne reference treatment and to demonstrate the superiority of spironolactone's efficacy in order to establish it as alternative way to cycline.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acne Vulgaris

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with acne, with at least 10 inflammatory lesions and no more than 3 nodules
  • Patient who already had one cycline course for her acne treatment with a 3 months* wash out or who never had any cycline
  • Patient having signed an informed consent
  • Absence of use of oral antibiotics and Zinc salts in the last 30 days
  • Absence of use of systemic isotretinoin and antiandrogens in the last 6 months
  • Absence of microphysiotherapy in the last 15 da
  • Women of child-bearing age under contraception since 3 months (oral contraception, implant or IUD).
  • Patients with social security

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient affected by active /progressive diseases, as infections including Hidradenitis suppurativa, cancers, or endocrine syndrome (eg polycystic ovary syndrome), Addison's disease)
  • Patient affected by Rosacea
  • Patient with contra-indication to the use of one of the investigational products or auxiliary :

    • Patient with intolerance or hypersensitivity to cyclin's, spironolactone or to any ingredient present in associated benzoyl peroxide gel
    • Patient with significant impairment of renal excretory function, acute or chronic renal failure, anuria.
    • Patient with life-threatening or very severe hepatic impairment.(grade III or IV)
  • Patient with hyperkalaemia or strongly requiring potassium-sparing diuretics (eg amiloride, canrenoate, eplerenone, triamterene), or treated continuously with Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II antagonist, NSAIDs, heparin and molecular weight heparin, ciclosporin and tacrolimus.
  • Patient requiring topical isotretinoin or who stopped this drug since less than 2 weeks
  • Patient previously treated with spironolactone
  • Pregnant woman or likely to become pregnant or nursing and refusing to use an effective contraceptive method
  • Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial
  • Patient under guardianship or trusteeship
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
158 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    spironolactone

    Spironolactone ARROW ® 75 mg, 150mg, orally, once a day during all the trial (12 months: 6 months on double-blinded spironolactone then 6 months on open-label spironolactone), + topical therapy during all the trial (benzoyl peroxide 5%)

    Drug: spironolactone

  • Active comparator
    doxycycline

    (Doxycycline Sandoz 100 mg), 100mg/day during 3 months followed by placebo during 3 months, on double-blinded + topical therapy during all the trial (benzoyl peroxide 5%

    Drug: Doxycycline

Interventions

  • Drugspironolactone

    Dispensation of spironolactone at each visit according to the arm description described above.

  • DrugDoxycycline

    Dispensation of doxycycline then placebo, at each visit according to the arm description described above.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment efficacy

    The treatment's efficacy will be determined by the rate of success in each arm. The best rate of success between Month 4 and Month 6 will be chosen for the final result. Rate of success, defined by a decrease of both Adult Female Acne Scoring Tool (AFAST) scores 1 and 2: 1. AFAST score 1: decrease of at least 2 grades compared to baseline or to grade 0 if the baseline was at 1 and 2. AFAST score 2: decrease to grade 1 if baseline was \> 1 or to grade 0 if the baseline was at 1 AFAST 1 (also called GEA) assesses the comedones (open and closed), the non-inflammatory lesions, the papules and pustules and the nodules. The stage is defined according to a global evaluation of severity of acne and ranges from Grade 0 (no acne) to Grade 5 (the worse situation). AFAST 2 assesses acne on an area from the left and right mandibular zone to the upper edge of the trunk and ranges from Grade 0 (no acne) to Grade 3 (the worse situation).

    Time frame: Month 4 and Month 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical adverse events

    Number and type of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) occurring from the beginning of the treatment until end of the follow-up

    Time frame: Within 12 months after randomization

  2. Sodium abnormal values (biological adverse events)

    Sodium measurement (mmol/L)

    Time frame: From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9

  3. Potassium abnormal values (biological adverse events)

    potassium measurement (mmol/L)

    Time frame: From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9

  4. Chlore abnormal values (biological adverse events)

    Chlore measurement (mmol/L)

    Time frame: From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9

  5. Calcium abnormal values (biological adverse events)

    Calcium measurement (mmol/L)

    Time frame: From 30 days to 7 days before randomization visit, Month 2, Month 4, Month 9

  6. AFAST score 1 (GEA) at 0 or 1

    Number of patients with AFAST score 1 (GEA) at 0 or 1.

    Time frame: Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

  7. AFAST score 2 (Mandibular) at 0 or 1

    Number of patients with AFAST score 2 (Mandibular) at 0 or 1.

    Time frame: Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

  8. AFAST score 1 associated with AFAST score 2 at 0 or 1

    Number of patients with both AFAST score 1 and AFAST score 2 at 0 or 1.

    Time frame: M2, M4, M6, M9 and M12

  9. Quality of life (cost-utility assessment and general quality of life assessment)

    EQ-5D (EuroQol 5 dimensions) questionnaire: The questionnaire focuses on five dimensions: mobility, personal autonomy, current activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. For each of these dimensions, three answers are possible.

    Time frame: Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

  10. Quality of life (specific to acne)

    Cardiff Acne disability Index (CADI) is a disease-specific questionnaire measuring disability induced by acne.

    Time frame: Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

  11. Bacterial and parasital evaluations

    Presence of P acnes, M Furfur and S epidermidis, aureus

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline) and Month 4

  12. Inflammatory lesions of the face

    Number of inflammatory lesions of the face

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

  13. retentional lesions of the face

    Number of retentional lesions of the face

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

  14. Face lesions

    Total number of face lesions

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

  15. Trunk lesions

    Factor F2 of ECLA scale ECLA ("Echelle de Cotation des Lésions d'Acné") is a scale for acne proposed by the dermatology research team of Nantes University Hospital. It is composed of 3 factors: Factor 1 (F1) counts the acne lesions on the face; Factor 2 (F2) counts the lesions acne on the trunk and Factor 3 (F3) counts the scars. In this study, the factor F2 will be used. The factor F2 assesses the extensive character of acne lesions on 5 defined areas: cervical areas (F2N); chest areas (F2C); back area (F2B) and arm area (F2A) according to a qualitative scale 0=absent, 1=poor 2=medium 3=significant. It is completed by the count of the present nodules in each area.

    Time frame: Day 0 (baseline), Month 2, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

  16. Relapse

    number of patients with relapse, defined as follows : 1. AFAST score 1 (GEA score): increase of 2 points versus score of previous visit, in case of success Or 2. AFAST score 2 (mandibular score): increase of 1 point versus score of previous visit, in case of success

    Time frame: Month 4 and Month 6

  17. Reappearance of 10% and more of inflammatory lesions.

    Number of patients with a reappearance of 10% and more of inflammatory lesions.

    Time frame: Month 6

  18. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost per Quality-Adjusted Life-Year, QALY) of the comparison between the spironolactone and cycline.

    costs: resources consumed, QALY: EQ-5D

    Time frame: Month 6

06

Study locations

9 sites
  • Chru Brest
    Brest, France
  • CHU Caen
    Caen, France
  • CHU Grenoble
    Grenoble, France
  • CH La Rochelle
    La Rochelle, France
  • CH Le Mans
    Le Mans, France
  • CHU de Nantes - Dermatologie
    Nantes, France
  • CHU Poitiers
    Poitiers, France
  • Cabinet du Dr Jean-Paul Claudel
    Tours, France
  • CHRU Tours
    Tours, France
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Dreno B, Nguyen JM, Hainaut E, Machet L, Leccia MT, Beneton N, Claudel JP, Celerier P, Le Moigne M, Le Naour S, Vrignaud F, Poinas A, Dert C, Boisrobert A, Flet L, Korner S, Khammari A. Efficacy of Spironolactone Compared with Doxycycline in Moderate Acne in Adult Females: Results of the Multicentre, Controlled, Randomized, Double-blind Prospective and Parallel Female Acne Spironolactone vs doxyCycline Efficacy (FASCE) Study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2024 Feb 21;104:adv26002. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v104.26002. PubMed 38380975 ↗
  • Poinas A, Lemoigne M, Le Naour S, Nguyen JM, Schirr-Bonnans S, Riche VP, Vrignaud F, Machet L, Claudel JP, Leccia MT, Hainaut E, Beneton N, Dert C, Boisrobert A, Flet L, Chiffoleau A, Corvec S, Khammari A, Dreno B. FASCE, the benefit of spironolactone for treating acne in women: study protocol for a randomized double-blind trial. Trials. 2020 Jun 25;21(1):571. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04432-w. PubMed 32586344 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03334682
Lead sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 7, 2017
Start date
Jan 31, 2018
Primary completion
Feb 3, 2023
Completion
Jul 4, 2023
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion