ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06828822CIRCLEUpdated Sep 24, 2026

CongenItal Naevus Cohort for Longitudinal Evaluation

An interventional study of Neurodevelopmental assessment and Meeting with the parents in Naevi, Neurodevelopmental Disorder and Congenital Nevus, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Recruiting at 16 sites in France. Open to participants aged 0 Years to 24 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
819
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
0 Years to 24 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Congenital Nevus (CN) is a pigmented skin lesion present at birth, which grows in size as the child grows. It can vary in appearance and is classified by its size, from small (less than 1.5 cm) to giant (greater than 40 cm). CN is associated with genetic mutations, mainly in the NRAS/BRAF genes.

A large CN can lead to several clinical issues, including:

Risk of neurological disorders: Large CN can be associated with neurological abnormalities such as neuro-meningeal melanosis, hydrocephalus, or brain malformations. These conditions may cause early neuro-developmental delays. The risk is not well understood and requires further studies.

Risk of melanoma: The risk of developing melanoma is higher for a large CN but remains low for smaller ones. Increased monitoring is necessary during the early years for large and giant CN.

Psycho-social impact: Parents often experience significant anxiety at birth due to the cancer risk and social stigma. As the child grows, a visible CN may impact their quality of life, particularly socially at school.

Management of CN remains controversial, especially for those of medium to giant size or with multiple satellites. There is an urgent need for further research to clarify best practices in monitoring and treatment, including the need for routine brain imaging and criteria for surgical intervention.

Ultimately, this study aims to deepen our understanding of CN, its associated neurological and melanoma risks, and the psycho-social challenges it poses, while striving to establish clear, evidence-based guidelines for monitoring and treatment to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Naevi
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorder
  • Congenital Nevus

Keywords

  • Congenital Nevus
  • Neurodevelopmental Disorder
03

In context

Nevus

47 studies on the registry are indexed under Nevus; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 819 is above the median of 100 across 19 interventional studies indexed under Nevus.

Browse Nevus studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 839 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years to 24 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient under 2 years old.
  • Patient with a medium, large, or giant congenital nevus (CN) according to the Krengel classification, either single or multiple.
  • Patient affiliated with social security.
  • Patient whose legal representatives consent to their child's participation in the project.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with light brown spots or pigmented lesions not classified as nevi.
  • Patient for whom It is impossible to establish annual follow-up.
  • Patient whose parents do not speak French.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
819 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Child with a congenital nevus

    Other: Neurodevelopmental assessment · Other: Patient quality of life assessment

  • Other
    Legal representatives

    Other: Meeting with the parents

Interventions

  • OtherNeurodevelopmental assessment

    This assessment will be conducted using the ASQ-3 test. (ASQ-3 stands for Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition, which is a common screening tool for evaluating developmental progress in young children.)

  • OtherMeeting with the parents

    This meeting will evaluate the parents' acceptance of the lesion and their quality of life using the MARKS test (Measure of Acceptance of Skin Marks). The results will provide insights into how the parents perceive the lesion and how it impacts their daily lives.

  • OtherPatient quality of life assessment

    Collection of patient quality of life data

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine the prevalence of neurodevelopmental abnormalities in infants and young children with medium to giant congenital nevus, and according to nevus characteristics (size, number), at the age of 3 years.

    This assessment will be conducted using the ASQ-3 (Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition).

    Time frame: 3 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The occurrence of other neurological abnormalities (early epilepsy, etc.), screening for psychomotor developmental delays.

    Time frame: 3 years

  2. The prevalence of neurological abnormalities on MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), both absolutely and according to the characteristics of the congenital nevus.

    Time frame: 3 years.

  3. The occurrence of early melanoma or another tumor.

    Time frame: 3 years.

  4. The evolution of the clinical characteristics of the congenital nevus (size, color, texture, number of satellites), and associated functional signs (pruritus).

    According to the Krengel classification 1 (size, projected adult size, number of satellites) and assessment of color, roughness, hair growth, pruritus/eczematization, and proliferative nodules.

    Time frame: 3 years.

  5. Description of the histopathological characteristics of the congenital nevus (if available) following excision or biopsy.

    If an excision or biopsy is performed, it will be possible to provide the histopathological characteristics of the congenital nevus (CN).

    Time frame: 3 years.

  6. Description of the molecular characteristics of the congenital nevus (if available) following excision or biopsy.

    If an excision or biopsy is performed, it will be possible to provide the molecular characteristics of the congenital nevus (CN).

    Time frame: 3 years.

  7. Parental satisfaction of cares management and surgery.

    Parental satisfaction with the management and surgery, if performed, and evaluation of the patient's satisfaction with the intervention using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

    Time frame: 3 years.

  8. Lesion acceptance and quality of life.

    The parents' acceptance of the lesion and their quality of life will be evaluated using the MARKS test (Measure of Acceptance of Skin Marks). The results will provide insights into how the parents perceive the lesion and how it impacts their daily lives.

    Time frame: 3 years.

  9. Identification of factors influencing the clinical care pathway and their correlation on health outcomes.

    Time frame: 3 years.

  10. Identification of the patient's well-being using the Cartoon CDLQI test.

    The Cartoon Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (Cartoon CDLQI) is a version of the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) designed to make assessing the quality of life in children with skin diseases more engaging and accessible for younger children. (Scale from 1 to 4 ; with 4 being the worst outcome ( "a lot" ) and 1 being the best ("not at all").

    Time frame: 3 years.

07

Study locations

16 of 16 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2031, 72 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 29, 2025
First posted
Feb 14, 2025
StartActual
Jul 23, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jul 23, 2031
CompletionEst.
Jul 23, 2031
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06828822
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2025
Start date
Jul 23, 2025
Primary completion
Jul 23, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 23, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Research and Innovation Department of Nantes UH
Contact
bp-prom-regl@chu-nantes.fr
+33253482810
Hélène AUBERT, M.D.
Contact
Helene.AUBERT@chu-nantes.fr

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion