ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07830693E-PROTECTUpdated Sep 25, 2026

Efanesoctocog Prophylaxis Or The Optimization Of Treatment: Real-World Experience Of Taylorizing Clotting Therapy In Hemophilia A

An observational study in Hemophilia A Patient, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 8 sites in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-25.

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Observational

Updated Sep 25, 2026Primary outcomes revisedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
553
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 157 studies in Hemophilia A with a site in France — 20 open to participants now, 33 under way, 15 of them phase 3. Hemophilia A · France.

Planned enrollment
9th of 62
553 · median 125
Started
2027
with 1 other
Observational
62 of 157
11 open now
Primary completion
2028-12
later than 25 of 32 live
Registered
156th of 157
by date
Lead sponsor
6 of 157
Nantes University Hospital

Among the 157 studies in Hemophilia A with a site in France, this one is the 9th largest by planned enrollment of the 62 observational ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2027, is one of 62 observational ones, reaches primary completion later than 25 of the 32 other live ones, and was the 156th registered.

Hemophilia A

844 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 136 are open to participants now.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Open to participants now

20 of the 157 studies in Hemophilia A with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

14 more — sign in →

All 20 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 86 Hemophilia A studies recruiting now, 51 (59%) set no upper age limit and 30 (35%) stop at 75 or younger; 54 take children under 18; 10 take healthy volunteers.

This study: all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 157 studies in Hemophilia A with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Prophylactic management of severe Hemophilia A (HA) without inhibitors has historically relied on frequent intravenous infusions of standard or EHL FVIII concentrates or on subcutaneous emicizumab administered weekly to monthly intervals , yet both approaches maintain a notable treatment burden and variable factor utilization.

Efanesoctocog alfa (ALTUVOCT®, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum SOBI) was engineered as a fusion of FVIII, von Willebrand factor (VWF) binding domains, and XTEN polypeptides to decouple FVIII from endogenous VWF and extend its circulatory half-life beyond that of existing EHL concentrates.

In the pivotal XTEND-1 trial (NCT04161495) of 159 patients aged ≥ 12 years, once-weekly prophylaxis (50 IU/kg) yielded a mean ABR of 0.70 episodes per patient-year versus approximately 3.0 episodes on prior regimens. The study ended with superior bleeding protection, with FVIII activity above 40 IU/dL for the majority of each week and of 15 IU/dL at day 7. In children under 12, XTEND-Kids phase 3 data (n = 74) demonstrated comparable bleeding control; the average ABR for patients per year was 0.70. The XTEND-ed long-term extension (3-year data) assessed maintaining low ABRs, stable FVIII levels, and consistent tolerability. Efanesoctocog alfa was also well-tolerated in all trials, with adverse events similar to those of other FVIII products and no inhibitor development reported as a result of treatment. The analysis of pharmacokinetics indicated an extended half-life that supports once-weekly dosing and maintains FVIII activity in the normal to near-normal range (> 40 IU/dL) for the majority of each dosing interval.

While regulatory and health-technology assessments recognize its favorable pharmacokinetics and hemostatic efficacy, they underscore the non-randomized, intra-patient design of these studies, the paucity of robust head-to-head comparisons with standard FVIII or emicizumab, and the absence of real-world QoL and consumption data. Despite the promising results, critical questions remain unanswered in routine clinical practice: efanesoctocog alfa is designed for once-weekly dosing but how does switching to efanesoctocog alfa alter real-world FVIII consumption, what clinical or psychosocial factors drive clinicians and patients to transition, and how do patients perceive efficacy, convenience, and treatment burden post-switch?

This study is designed to bridge this knowledge gap by quantifying pre- and post-switch FVIII utilization, systematically capturing switch-motivations through patient interviews, and applying validated patient-reported outcome measures to assess satisfaction and QoL impacts. Addressing these dimensions will not only inform personalized prophylaxis regimens and clarify resource utilization but also enrich pharmaco-economic models and guide future therapeutic innovations in HA management.

Individual profit - The switched patient must benefit from a lower injection frequency for the same clinical outcome (change of prescription); this could also favorably impact his quality of life. The possibility of changing the replacement therapy with FVIII or emicizumab to efanesoctocog alfa will be proposed to the patient during a routine consultation.

The Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) will make it possible to properly appraise the patient's view. QoL questionnaires (PERQOLATEUR), Hemophilia Functional Ability Scoring Tool questionnaires (Hemo-FAST©) and treatment evaluation questionnaires will be presented (See Appendice 8), particularly during the shared decision-making consultation on the switch and the following routine consultation.

Group profit - This study will allow a better understanding of the use of health resources (quantification of FVIII consumption before and after switching to efanesoctocog alfa), to better understand the motivations of a person with HA to change treatment, and to evaluate in a real situation the impact on the patient's QoL of a new substitutive treatment.

The research has no risks and constraints because only questionnaires (part of routine care or without health data) are distributed to patients.

03

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia A Patient

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hemophilia A
  • factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency
  • efanesoctocog alfa
  • ALTUVOCT®
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population targets people with severe hemophilia A or moderate hemophilia A (FVIII:C \< 3 IU/dL), without inhibitors / with history of inhibitors, of any sex, any age. These subjects must be followed in one centre of the BERHLINGO network. The patients will be included in the flow, with routine consultations.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Conduct of research: patients followed up at one of the eight investigator centers of the BERHLINGO network
  • Pathology: severe HA (FVIII:C \<1 IU/dL) or moderate HA (1 IU/dL \< FVIII:C \< 3 IU/dL), without inhibitor / with history of inhibitor (inhibitor rate \< 0.6 Bethesda unit per milliliter (BU/mL))
  • Prophylactic Treatment with FVIII or emicizumab since at least March 1, 2025 -
  • Sex: male or female
  • Age: patients of all age
  • Consent: patient who did not object to their participation in the E-PROTECT study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under guardianship
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
553 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Population A

    Patients who won't switch to efanesoctocog alfa.

    Other: Study questionnaires · Other: Clinical/pharmacological data collection

  • Population B1

    Patients treated with FVIII who will be switched to efanesoctocog alfa

    Other: Study questionnaires · Other: Clinical/pharmacological data collection

  • Population B2

    Patients treated with FVIII mimetic agents who will be switched to efanesoctocog alfa

    Other: Study questionnaires · Other: Clinical/pharmacological data collection

Interventions

  • OtherStudy questionnaires

    The PERQOLATEUR project aims to develop a standardized yet personalized questionnaire to assess patients' perceived quality of life in relation to their condition and the treatments received. Patients are first asked to select the themes that matter most to them, and then to evaluate their well-being in relation to these themes, as well as the impact of their health problems and treatments on them. The questionnaire is particularly relevant for patients with chronic conditions, but well-being can be assessed in any individual (Co-development of the questionnaire with patients and healthcare professionals + Psychometric validation based on COSMIN recommendations + Item analysis using the Rasch model). The Hemo-FAST© questionnaire is a validated tool offering a quick and easy assessment of joint health and functionality by capturing both the adult patient and clinician perspectives, through the use of patient-reported-outcome and of physician-reported-outcome, with a score of 0 indic

  • OtherClinical/pharmacological data collection

    Collection of data from the patient's medical file on clinical evaluation and the patient's treatment history.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Description and comparison of the Hemophilia Functional Ability Scoring Tool questionnaires (Hemo-FAST©) before/after marketing authorization of ALTUVOCT® (efanesoctocog alfa) in adult people with severe or moderate hemophilia A (with FVIII:C < 3 IU/dL)

    The Hemo-FAST© questionnaire is a validated tool offering a quick and easy assessment of joint health and functionality by capturing both the adult patient and clinician perspectives, through the use of patient-reported-outcome and of physician-reported-outcome, with a score of 0 indicating the best possible joint health status and a score of 100 as the worst.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

8 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Dec 2028, 23 months later.

Of 78 non-industry observational studies under Hemophilia A, half reached primary completion within 36 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 96. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 131 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 79.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 15, 2026
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Sep 25, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedDescription and comparison of the Hemophilia Functional Ability Scoring Tool questionnaires (Hemo-FAST® scores©) before/after marketing authorization of ALTUVOCT® (efanesoctocog alfa) in adult people with severe or moderate hemophilia A (with FVIII:C < 3 IU/dL)Time frame: 2 years
Sep 25, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 25, 2026
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedDescription and comparison of the Hemophilia Functional Ability Scoring Tool questionnaires (Hemo-FAST® scores©) before/after marketing authorization of ALTUVOCT® (efanesoctocog alfa) in adult people with severe or moderate hemophilia A (with FVIII:C < 3 IU/dL)Time frame: 2 years
    + 1 other change: description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07830693
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 25, 2026

Study contacts

Sponsor Departement Nantes university hospital
Contact
bp-prom-regl@chu-nantes.fr
+33 253482835 ext. +33
Valérie HORVAIS
Contact
valerie.horvais@chu-nantes.fr
Marc TROSSAËRT
principal investigator · Nantes UH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion