ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03328221Updated Mar 9, 2021

Physical Activity on Heart Rate Variability in Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury

An observational study in Acquired Brain Injury and Consciousness, Level Altered, sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-03-09.

Sponsored by Rigshospitalet, Denmark · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 20 studies in Brain Injuries by Rigshospitalet, Denmark — 5 open to participants now, 7 under way, none of them phase 3. Brain Injuries · Rigshospitalet, Denmark.

Enrollment
10th of 13
6 · median 100
Started
2017
with 3 others
Observational
14 of 20
4 open now
Registered
5th of 20
by date

Among the 20 studies in Brain Injuries by Rigshospitalet, Denmark, this one is the 10th largest by enrollment of the 13 observational ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2017, is one of 14 observational ones, and was the 5th registered.

Brain Injuries

946 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 235 are open to participants now.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Open to participants now

5 of the 20 studies in Brain Injuries by Rigshospitalet, Denmark are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 5 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 152 Brain Injuries studies recruiting now, 75 (49%) set no upper age limit and 55 (36%) stop at 75 or younger; 39 take children under 18; 23 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 20 studies in Brain Injuries by Rigshospitalet, Denmark, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This study aims to explore autonomic cardiovascular regulation, through measures of heart rate variability (HRV), during different passive and active activities in patients with severe acquired brain injury and a low conscious state. Data from active rehabilitation will be compared with passive periods of rest as well as nightly variance during a continuous 5-day period.

Read the detailed description

Background Severe acquired brain injury is usually associated with permanent disabilities in motor skills and cognitive functions that inhibit patients level of functioning, communication, participation in social activities and ability to work [Faul et al 2015, McLafferty et al 2016]. Patients with severe brain injury often have reduced level of consciousness in the early stages after the incident. Studies have shown that the autonomic nervous system can be affected in these patients, shown by analysis of the heart rate variability in the low frequency domain [Riberholt et al 2016, Vistisen et al 2014]. Signals from motor- and sensory cortex can influence sympathetic and parasympathetic activity and thus be a part of the cardiovascular adaptation during function [Sequeira et al 2000]. Aerobic exercise has been demonstrated to be effective regarding to autonomic cardiovascular regulation among healthy workers [Hallman et al 2017].

One method to assess sympathetic- and parasympathetic activity of the autonomous nervous system, as well as baroreflex sensitivity, is through the analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) [van de Vooren et al 2007]. A study of traumatic brain injured patients admitted to a neurocritical intensive care unit reveals that reduced HRV and baroreflex sensitivity within the first week of admission is associated with a poor neurological outcome at 1 year post-injury [Henden et al 2014]. Patients with severe acquired brain injury and low state of consciousness has demonstrated vastly reduced HRV and baroreflex sensitivity 40 days post injury during rest and head-up tilt[Riberholt et al 2016, Vistisen et al 2014].

Rehabilitation of patients with severe acquired brain injury and low state of consciousness is multimodal. Physical stimulation of the cardiovascular system can be exercised through an array of interventions such as mobilization, standing using a tilt-table, bed-biking, robot-assisted walking or other methods. To the authors' knowledge, no studies have been published researching the association between physical stimulation and HRV in patients with severe acquired brain injury in the subacute phase.

Hypotheses

  • Patients with low state of consciousness have reduced HRV during rest.
  • HRV is affected by physical activity such as, tilt-table mobilization, bed-biking or robot assisted walking.
  • HRV is altered over time if patients are subjected to multiple bouts of physical exercise such as tilt-table mobilization, bed-biking or robot assisted walking.

Methods This is a prospective observational study. Patients are recruited from the Department of Neurorehabilitation/TBI Unit, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. This study will include patients above 18 years of age with severe acquired brain injury admitted for highly specialized neurorehabilitation. Patients must have a low level of consciousness defined as either vegetative or minimally conscious state. Five days of continuous heart rate monitorization at a sample rate of 256 Hz will start approximately 40 days after the initial injury using the ePatch® system. This study has been approved by the local ethics committee in the capital region of Denmark and oblige to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. All data will be depersonalized and the Danish data protection agency has approved this study.

Treatment Participants will receive usual care, as practiced at the study location, regarding both medical care and rehabilitation efforts. There is no experimental intervention nor added or reduced treatment associated with this study.

Measurements Five days of continuous electrocardiography (ECG) will be recorded with ePatch (BioTelemetry Technology ApS, Denmark). The apparatus has a build-in inclinometer, accelerometer and the opportunity to mark the initiation of an event; in this case physical exercise, and is able to monitor heart rate continuously for five days at a sample rate of 256 Hz. The Epatch is attached to the patient's skin, over their sternum, using an adhesive patch. It can withstand most daily activities and is splash resistant. If medical imaging is necessary the ePatch will be removed and replaced afterwards.

Statistical analysis For statistical analysis of data comparing mean HRV of (T-exercise) with (T-rest) and (T-night) with (T-day) the paired t-test or equivalent non-parametric method will be utilized. A mixed effects model repeated measure analysis or equivalent non-parametric method (restricted maximum likelihood) will be performed for comparative analysis of variation from the 5 days of data collection.

Foreseeing the need in some cases to remove the ePatch, for various reasons, within the span of the 5 days of data collection, data will be included if events from 3 days of measurements can be extracted.

Data extracted from the participants medical record will be used to comprise a table of demographic characteristics that will include data on: age, sex, diagnose, body mass index (BMI), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) at admittance, days removed from injury, level of functioning as measured with Early Functional Abilities scale (EFA) as well as level of consciousness as measured with Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R). Likewise, data of participants medicinal intake during the study period will be retrieved from their medical record.

Ethical considerations As participants receive usual care no direct benefits are associated with this study.

Potential scientific benefits Researching autonomic cardiovascular regulation through HRV in patients with severe acquired brain injury is a relatively novel area. This exploratory study can help provide provisional information and thus generate further hypotheses for studies generating evidence of higher quality.

Harms The ePatch is designed for home-monitoring with an emphasis on ensuring minimum discomfort during use and is CE certified for clinical usage. During use or at removal, some individuals may experience slight skin-irritation under the adhesive patch that holds the ePatch in place. We assess the potential risks of participating in this study to be minimal.

Reporting of harms All adverse events related to participation in this study will be continuously monitored during the study. Besides notifying the local ethics committee, a list of encountered adverse events will be presented at publication.

Stopping guideline If 2 patients present allergic skin-reactions to the ePatch or adhesive patch during data collection the study will pause and consult with the manufacturers. If further 2 patients, after consultation with the manufacturers, present allergic skin-reactions the study will shut down.

Financial conditions This study is part of a thesis initiated by Jon Damsager Lauesen, Christian Gunge Riberholt and Karen Søgaard. Patients included in this study will not be financially compensated.

03

Conditions studied

  • Acquired Brain Injury
  • Consciousness, Level Altered

Keywords

  • Heart rate variability
  • Observational study
  • Physical activity
  • Rehabilitation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients admitted at Department of Neurorehabilitation/TBI Unit, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, with a low conscious state (vegetative or minimally conscious state) 40 days removed from injury.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Admitted at Department of Neurorehabilitation/TBI Unit, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
  • Low conscious state (vegetative or minimally as determined by Glasgow Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R))

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known heart disease prior to brain injury
  • Not possible to obtain
  • Patients fiddling with or removing other monitoring equipment
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Low frequency (LF) spectral analysis

    LF (0.05-0.15 Hz) during activity (T-exercise), rest (T-rest) and sleep (T-night)

    Time frame: 5 days of continuous measurements

Secondary outcomes

  1. High frequency (HF) spectral analysis

    HF (0.15-0.35 Hz) during activity (T-exercise), rest (T-rest) and sleep (T-night)

    Time frame: 5 days of continuous measurements

  2. LF/HF ratio

    The ratio between the power of LF and HF frequency bands during activity (T-exercise), rest (T-rest) and sleep (T-night)

    Time frame: 5 days of continuous measurements

  3. SDRR

    Standard deviation of the RR-intervals during activity (T-exercise), rest (T-rest) and sleep (T-night)

    Time frame: 5 days of continuous measurements

07

Study locations

1 site
  • at Department of Neurorehabilitation/TBI Unit, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
    Copenhagen, 2650, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Faul M, Coronado V. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;127:3-13. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-52892-6.00001-5. PubMed 25702206 ↗
  • McLafferty FS, Barmparas G, Ortega A, Roberts P, Ko A, Harada M, Nuno M, Black KL, Ley EJ. Predictors of improved functional outcome following inpatient rehabilitation for patients with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016 Jul 15;39(3):423-30. doi: 10.3233/NRE-161373. PubMed 27589512 ↗
  • Riberholt CG, Olesen ND, Thing M, Juhl CB, Mehlsen J, Petersen TH. Impaired Cerebral Autoregulation during Head Up Tilt in Patients with Severe Brain Injury. PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0154831. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154831. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27168188 ↗
  • Vistisen ST, Hansen TK, Jensen J, Nielsen JF, Fleischer J. Heart rate variability in neurorehabilitation patients with severe acquired brain injury. Brain Inj. 2014;28(2):196-202. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.860477. Epub 2013 Dec 2. PubMed 24295072 ↗
  • Sequeira H, Viltart O, Ba-M'Hamed S, Poulain P. Cortical control of somato-cardiovascular integration: neuroanatomical studies. Brain Res Bull. 2000 Sep 1;53(1):87-93. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(00)00312-9. PubMed 11033212 ↗
  • Hallman DM, Holtermann A, Sogaard K, Krustrup P, Kristiansen J, Korshoj M. Effect of an aerobic exercise intervention on cardiac autonomic regulation: A worksite RCT among cleaners. Physiol Behav. 2017 Feb 1;169:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.11.031. Epub 2016 Nov 24. PubMed 27889332 ↗
  • van de Vooren H, Gademan MG, Swenne CA, TenVoorde BJ, Schalij MJ, Van der Wall EE. Baroreflex sensitivity, blood pressure buffering, and resonance: what are the links? Computer simulation of healthy subjects and heart failure patients. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Apr;102(4):1348-56. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00158.2006. Epub 2006 Dec 21. PubMed 17185500 ↗
  • Henden PL, Sondergaard S, Rydenhag B, Reinsfelt B, Ricksten SE, Aneman A. Can baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability predict late neurological outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014 Jan;26(1):50-9. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3182a47b62. PubMed 24064714 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2017 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 15 months.

Of 143 non-industry observational studies under Brain Injuries, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 73. This study's 15 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 148 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 73.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 28, 2017
First posted
Nov 1, 2017
StartActual
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completionActual
Dec 30, 2018
CompletionActual
Dec 30, 2018
Last update
Mar 9, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 9, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03328221
Responsible party
Ingrid Poulsen (Director of research department RUBRIC, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 1, 2017
Start date
Sep 1, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2018
Completion
Dec 30, 2018
Last update
Mar 9, 2021

Study contacts

Christian Riberholt
principal investigator · Department of Neurorehabilitation, TBI Unit
Ingrid Poulsen
study director · Department of Neurorehabilitation, TBI Unit

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion