ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03323736OTTERUpdated May 26, 2022Results posted

In-Office Tympanostomy Tube Placement in Children (OTTER)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Iontophoresis & tube placement and Tube placement in OME - Otitis Media With Effusion and AOM - Acute Otitis Media, sponsored by Tusker Medical. Completed at 19 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 12 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-05-26.

Sponsored by Tusker Medical (part of Smith & Nephew, Inc.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
370
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
6 Months to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 27 studies in Otitis Media with Effusion with a site in United States — 7 open to participants now, 8 under way, none of them phase 3. Otitis Media with Effusion · United States.

Enrollment
2nd of 20
370 · median 82
Started
2017
with 1 other
Phase 3
6 of 27
none open now
Registered
17th of 27
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 27
Tusker Medical

Among the 27 studies in Otitis Media with Effusion with a site in United States, this one is the 2nd largest by enrollment of the 20 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2017, is one of 6 in phase 3, and was the 17th registered.

Otitis Media with Effusion

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Otitis Media with Effusion; 17 are open to participants now.

Browse Otitis Media with Effusion studies →

Open to participants now

7 of the 27 studies in Otitis Media with Effusion with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

All 7 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 8 Otitis Media with Effusion studies recruiting now, 1 (13%) set no upper age limit and 7 (88%) stop at 75 or younger; 8 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 6 Months to 12 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 27 studies in Otitis Media with Effusion with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

A prospective, single-arm, multicenter study to evaluate effectiveness and safety of Tymbion iontophoresis and tympanostomy tube placement using the Tula Iontophoresis and Tube Delivery Systems for children in an office setting.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to evaluate effectiveness and safety of tympanostomy tube (TT) placement in children following local anesthesia in a physician's clinic setting (henceforth referred to as 'in-office'). Local anesthesia using Tymbion, a lidocaine-based anesthetic, is delivered by the Tula Iontophoresis System (IPS) and TT placement is implemented by the Tula Tube Delivery System (TDS).

The IPS will be used to facilitate anesthetic delivery to the tympanic membrane (TM). The Iontophoresis System consists of an Iontophoresis Control Unit, Iontophoresis Earsets and a return electrode patch. The Control Unit monitors and delivers a fixed amount of charge (ie, dose) to the patient through the Earsets(s) and alerts the operator when charge delivery is complete. The lidocaine-based solution used for local anesthesia of the TM is Tymbion (2% lidocaine HCl/ 1:100,000 epinephrine).

The TDS is a mechanical device that integrates a myringotomy blade, tympanostomy tube and tube inserter for TT placement with a user-controlled activation. The study will use the TDS with a grommet-type tube.

This pivotal study will include up to 422 children ages 6 months through 12 years indicated for tympanostomy tube placement enrolled at approximately 15 to 25 investigational centers in the US and Canada. The pivotal cohort consists of 222 subjects. In addition, up to 100 subjects will be enrolled as lead-in procedures in the OR using the TDS and up to 100 subjects will be enrolled as lead-in procedure in-office (using IPS and TDS) as the surgeons' initial experience with the technology prior to enrolling into the pivotal cohort.

All pivotal and lead-in subjects will follow the same study protocol assessments and visit schedule consisting of a screening visit, procedure visit and 3-week, 6 month, 12 month, 18 month, and 24 month post-procedure follow-up visits. Lead-in procedures will be analyzed separately from the pivotal pediatric cohort.

03

Conditions studied

  • OME - Otitis Media With Effusion
  • AOM - Acute Otitis Media
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Males or females at least 6 months old through 12 years old at time of consent
  2. Indication for tympanostomy tube insertion per Clinical Practice Guideline
  3. Behavioral capacity and cooperative temperament to undergo an awake procedure, based on physician judgment (not applicable to OR Lead-In subjects)
  4. Subject's parent/guardian and subject are able and willing to comply with the protocol and attend all study visits
  5. Subject's parent/guardian and subject are able and willing to provide or assent as age appropriate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Significantly atrophic, retracted, bimeric, monomeric or atelectatic tympanic membrane
  2. Perforated tympanic membrane
  3. Otitis externa
  4. Active or recent conditions of the tympanic membrane (eg, prior myringotomy with incomplete wound healing or re-epithelization)
  5. Hemotympanum
  6. Damaged/denuded skin in the auditory canal
  7. Cerumen impaction resulting in a significant amount of cleaning required to visualize the tympanic membrane potentially causing abrasion or irritation to the external ear canal
  8. Anatomy that precludes sufficient visualization of and access to the tympanic membrane
  9. Anatomy that necessitates tympanostomy tube placement in the posterior half of the tympanic membrane
  10. History of sensitivity or allergic reaction to lidocaine HCl, tetracaine, epinephrine, or any to local anesthetics of the amide type, or any component of the anesthetic drug formulation (not applicable to OR Lead-In subjects)
  11. Familial history of insensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthetics of the amide type (eg, history of inadequate anesthesia with dental numbing agents). (not applicable to OR Lead-In subjects)
  12. Electrically sensitive medical support systems (eg, pacemakers, defibrillators, cochlear implants)
  13. Other conditions that would preclude performing the study procedure including iontophoresis system ear plug incompatibility.
  14. Health conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would present undue risk to the subject, based on device/anesthetic drug product label warnings and precautions.
  15. Subject is 4 years or older and not able to complete all baseline assessments. Subject is younger than 4 years and not able to complete all baseline assessments, not including audiometry.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
370 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Pivotal Cohort

    Active Tymbion iontophoresis and tube insertion using the Tube Delivery System in-office.

    Combination Product: Iontophoresis & tube placement

  • Other
    Office Lead-In Cohort

    Active Tymbion iontophoresis and tube insertion using the Tube Delivery System in-office. Physician initial in-office iontophoresis and tube insertion procedures (minimum of 2 subjects per investigator).

    Combination Product: Iontophoresis & tube placement

  • Other
    OR Lead-In Cohort

    Tubes insertion using the Tube Delivery System in the operating room (OR). Physician initial tube insertion procedures in the OR (minimum of 2 subjects per investigator).

    Device: Tube placement

Interventions

  • Combination productIontophoresis & tube placement

    Subjects will receive active Tymbion iontophoresis and will have tubes placed in-office using the Tube Delivery System in all ears indicated for tube placement.

  • DeviceTube placement

    Subjects will have tubes placed in the OR using the Tube Delivery System in all ears indicated for tube placement.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Procedural Success:

    Count (and percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort with successful placement of Tusker Medical tympanostomy tubes in all indicated ears in an office procedure. Note: the primary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts.

    Time frame: Day of Procedure (Day 0) Immediately following tube placement

  2. Tube Placement Tolerability

    Mean subject-reported pain score following TDS tube placement using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) (pivotal cohort children ages 5 and older only). The FPS-R has 6 faces which permits scaling to a 0-to-10 scoring system in intervals of 2 (ie 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10), where 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'very much pain'. Note- the primary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts.

    Time frame: Day of Procedure (Day 0) Immediately following tube placement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tube Patency

    Count (and percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort, in which a Tusker Medical tube was successfully placed, with functionally patent tube(s) at the 3-week post-procedure follow-up visit. Note- thus secondary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts. Note - This endpoint includes subjects for which at least 1 ear had successful tube placement. For bilateral subjects, they may be considered a non-successful procedure if only 1 ear had successful tube placement, however would be evaluated for the Tube Patency endpoint for the ear that was successful.

    Time frame: 3 Weeks Post Procedure

  2. Tube Retention

    Count (percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort, in which a Tusker Medical tube(s) was successfully placed, with presence of a Tusker Medical tube across the TM in all successfully treated ears at the 3-week post-procedure follow-up visit. Note- the secondary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts. Note - This endpoint includes subjects for which at least 1 ear had successful tube placement. For bilateral subjects, they may be considered a non-successful procedure if only 1 ear had successful tube placement, however would be evaluated for the Tube Retention endpoint for the ear that was successful.

    Time frame: 3 Weeks Post Procedure

  3. Anesthesia Effectiveness

    Count (percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort, who completed iontophoresis for all indicated ears, with adequate anesthesia for TT placement in all treated ears as determined by physician's evaluation of TM anesthesia prior to tube placement. Note- the secondary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts.

    Time frame: Day of Procedure (Day 0)

07

Results

Posted Jan 31, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePivotal CohortOffice Lead-In CohortOR Lead-In Cohort
Started2415970
Treated2224768
Completed2224768
Not completed19122
Withdrew: Screen failure1491
Withdrew: Withdrawal before treatment311
Withdrew: Iontophoresis fill/no iontophoresis220

Outcome measures

PrimaryProcedural Success:

Count (and percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort with successful placement of Tusker Medical tympanostomy tubes in all indicated ears in an office procedure. Note: the primary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts.

Time frame:
Day of Procedure (Day 0) Immediately following tube placement
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Procedural Success:
ParticipantsPivotal Cohort (6 Month to <5 Year Old Children)Pivotal Cohort (5 Through 12 Year Old Children)
Procedural Success:10391
Statistical analysis
  • Pivotal Cohort (6 Month to <5 Year Old Children) · Credible interval: 0.86 · 95% CI 0.80 to 0.91
  • Pivotal Cohort (5 Through 12 Year Old Children) · Credible interval: 0.89 · 95% CI 0.82 to 0.93
PrimaryTube Placement Tolerability

Mean subject-reported pain score following TDS tube placement using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) (pivotal cohort children ages 5 and older only). The FPS-R has 6 faces which permits scaling to a 0-to-10 scoring system in intervals of 2 (ie 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10), where 0 represents 'no pain' and 10 represents 'very much pain'. Note- the primary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts.

Time frame:
Day of Procedure (Day 0) Immediately following tube placement
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Tube Placement Tolerability
score on a scalePivotal Cohort (5 Through 12 Year Olds)
Tube Placement Tolerability3.30 ± 3.39
Statistical analysis
  • Pivotal Cohort (5 Through 12 Year Olds) · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.0072 (Mean FPS-R score hypothesized to be less than (superior to) a performance goal of 4.2, at a significance level of 0.025 (p\<0.025).)
SecondaryTube Patency

Count (and percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort, in which a Tusker Medical tube was successfully placed, with functionally patent tube(s) at the 3-week post-procedure follow-up visit. Note- thus secondary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts. Note - This endpoint includes subjects for which at least 1 ear had successful tube placement. For bilateral subjects, they may be considered a non-successful procedure if only 1 ear had successful tube placement, however would be evaluated for the Tube Patency endpoint for the ear that was successful.

Time frame:
3 Weeks Post Procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Tube Patency
ParticipantsPivotal Cohort
Tube Patency191
Statistical analysis
  • Pivotal Cohort · mid-P method for single proportion · p = <0.0001 (Pre-specified threshold for superiority was \>80%, at alpha = 0.025.)
SecondaryTube Retention

Count (percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort, in which a Tusker Medical tube(s) was successfully placed, with presence of a Tusker Medical tube across the TM in all successfully treated ears at the 3-week post-procedure follow-up visit. Note- the secondary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts. Note - This endpoint includes subjects for which at least 1 ear had successful tube placement. For bilateral subjects, they may be considered a non-successful procedure if only 1 ear had successful tube placement, however would be evaluated for the Tube Retention endpoint for the ear that was successful.

Time frame:
3 Weeks Post Procedure
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Tube Retention
ParticipantsPivotal Cohort
Tube Retention206
Statistical analysis
  • Pivotal Cohort · mid-P method for single proportion · p = <0.0001 (Pre-specified threshold for superiority was \>88%, at alpha = 0.025.)
SecondaryAnesthesia Effectiveness

Count (percentage) of subjects in the pivotal cohort, who completed iontophoresis for all indicated ears, with adequate anesthesia for TT placement in all treated ears as determined by physician's evaluation of TM anesthesia prior to tube placement. Note- the secondary endpoint applies only to the Pivotal Cohort, and not to the OR Lead-In or Office Lead-In cohorts.

Time frame:
Day of Procedure (Day 0)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Anesthesia Effectiveness
ParticipantsPivotal Cohort
Anesthesia Effectiveness206
Statistical analysis
  • Pivotal Cohort · mid-P method for single proportion · p = <0.0001 (Pre-specified threshold for superiority was \>85%, at alpha = 0.025.)

Adverse events

Collected over Procedure through most recent follow-up visit with mean follow-up of 14.3 months (all cohorts combined). Individual cohort mean follow-up time is 11.3 months for OR Lead-In Cohort, 14.1 months for Office Lead-In Cohort, and 15.3 months for Pivotal Cohort.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OR Lead-In Cohort (Subjects Treated in OR)0/68 (0%)4/68 (5.9%)28/68 (41.2%)
Office Lead-In Cohort (Subjects Treated in Office)0/47 (0%)0/47 (0%)22/47 (46.8%)
Pivotal Cohort (Subjects Treated in Office)0/222 (0%)3/222 (1.4%)79/222 (35.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOR Lead-In Cohort (Subjects Treated in OR)Office Lead-In Cohort (Subjects Treated in Office)Pivotal Cohort (Subjects Treated in Office)
Respiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/680/471/222
Wrist FractureMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/680/470/222
Velopharyngeal InsufficiencyRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/680/470/222
PneumoniaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/680/472/222
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders0/680/471/222
InfluenzaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/680/471/222
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 16
Most frequent other events
EventOR Lead-In Cohort (Subjects Treated in OR)Office Lead-In Cohort (Subjects Treated in Office)Pivotal Cohort (Subjects Treated in Office)
OtorrheaEar and labyrinth disorders19/687/4760/222
Otitis MediaEar and labyrinth disorders13/6811/4761/222
Occluded TubeEar and labyrinth disorders13/685/4751/222
Ear PainEar and labyrinth disorders6/689/4729/222
Upper Respiratory InfectionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/683/4718/222
Ear infectionEar and labyrinth disorders6/684/4712/222
NasopharyngitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/684/4710/222
Inadequate AnesthesiaEar and labyrinth disorders0/684/478/222
Pharyngitis StreptococcalRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders3/684/4717/222
Middle ear effusionEar and labyrinth disorders2/684/4715/222

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pivotal CohortOffice Lead-In CohortOR Lead-In CohortTotal
Mean4.7 ± 3.184.8 ± 3.103.4 ± 2.554.5 ± 3.09
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pivotal CohortOffice Lead-In CohortOR Lead-In CohortTotal
Female932028141
Male1292740196
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pivotal CohortOffice Lead-In CohortOR Lead-In CohortTotal
Hispanic or Latino3161451
Not Hispanic or Latino1914054285
Unknown or Not Reported0101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pivotal CohortOffice Lead-In CohortOR Lead-In CohortTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0000
Asian4037
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American246636
White1833553271
More than one race4105
Unknown or Not Reported75618
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Pivotal CohortOffice Lead-In CohortOR Lead-In CohortTotal
Canada34411
United States2194364326
08

Study locations

19 sites
  • California Head and Neck Specialists
    Carlsbad, California 92008, United States
  • Sacramento ENT
    Roseville, California 95661, United States
  • Camino Ear Nose & Throat Clinic
    San Jose, California 95138, United States
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center
    Hartford, Connecticut 06106, United States
  • Yale School of Medicine, Section of Otolaryngology
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
  • South Florida Pediatric Otolaryngology
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316, United States
  • Nemour's Children's Specialty Care
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207, United States
  • Advanced ENT & Allergy
    Louisville, Kentucky 40207, United States
  • Albany ENT & Allergy Services
    Albany, New York 12206, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
  • Charlotte Ear Eye Nose & Throat Associates, PA
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28105, United States
  • Specialty Physician Associates
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18017, United States
  • South Carolina Ear Nose and Throat
    Lugoff, South Carolina 29078, United States
  • Carolina Ear Nose and Throat Clinic
    Orangeburg, South Carolina 29118, United States
  • Ear Nose and Throat Specialists of Abilene
    Abilene, Texas 79601, United States
  • Frisco ENT for Children
    Frisco, Texas 75033, United States
  • Collin County ENT
    Frisco, Texas 75034, United States
  • Ear Medical Group
    San Antonio, Texas 78240, United States
  • British Columbia Children's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3N1, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Oct 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2019, 15 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2020, 11 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2017
First posted
Oct 27, 2017
StartActual
Oct 31, 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 28, 2019
CompletionActual
Mar 25, 2021
Results first posted
Jan 31, 2020
Last update
May 26, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03323736
Lead sponsor
Tusker Medical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2017
Start date
Oct 31, 2017
Primary completion
Feb 28, 2019
Completion
Mar 25, 2021
Results posted
Jan 31, 2020
Last update
May 26, 2022

Study contacts

Lawrence Lustig
principal investigator · Columbia University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion