ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05353569OCTIIUpdated Jan 21, 2026

Coherent Optical Detection of Middle Ear Disease

An interventional study of OCT Device(s) in Otitis Media, Otitis Media With Effusion and Otitis Media Acute, sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Months to 6 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-21.

Primary conditionOtitis Media with EffusionRegistry: Otitis MediaReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Otitis Media — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Otitis Media with Effusion
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Otitis Media with Effusion, a narrower term within Otitis Media.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Medical College of Wisconsin · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2022; still recruiting 4 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
235
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
12 Months to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this project is to see if optical coherence tomography (OCT), a new technology acting as an ultrasound for the ear, facilitates accurately diagnosing acute otitis media (AOM) and otitis media with effusion (OME) in children. Clinical diagnoses made using solely otoscopy will be compared to those made with the addition of OCT.

Read the detailed description

Otitis media (OM) is the most common diagnosis in pediatric patients seen for illness in the United States, affects 90% of all children, and is the most common indication for antimicrobial therapy and surgery in young children. Despite many attempts to improve diagnosis, treatment, and prevention, OM continues its highly prevalent impact on children and substantial ongoing morbidity. OM continues as the most common cause of hearing loss in children and leads to speech, educational and other developmental delays. OM causes life-threatening complications and is expensive, resulting in over $5 billion annually in U.S. health care expenditures. Despite the prevalence and difficulties with OM, diagnostic accuracy to allow appropriate treatment is lacking, leading to misplaced resources in treating OM. This proposal builds on our central hypothesis that enhanced diagnostic tools, specifically, optical coherence tomography (OCT), will yield improved diagnosis and lead to reduced need for antibiotics to treat acute OM, reduced surgical interventions for chronic otitis media, and overall fewer complications and cost associated with this disease. In this proposal, the investigators will explore three specific aims. The first aim, part A, the investigators will perform a comparative assessment of middle ear pathology using otoscopy and OCT in pediatric patients that present to a primary care clinic with complaints of otalgia or OM, with the hypothesis that OCT added to standard otoscopy will improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce overall antibiotic prescriptions. In part B of this aim, a comparative assessment of middle ear pathology using otoscopy along with audiometry/tympanometry and OCT will be performed in pediatric patients that present to the pediatric otolaryngology clinic with a referral for chronic otitis media with effusion (OME), with the hypothesis that OCT added to standard otoscopy and audiometry/tympanometry will improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce overall need for surgery in patients with OME. In the second aim, using the OCT images captured in the previous aim, the investigators will develop image processing and machine learning algorithms for automated identification of effusions and biofilms in OCT image data to augment OM diagnosis for medical decision making. Finally, using the OCT images captured previously, along with our machine learning algorithms, the investigators will establish OCT B-mode and M-mode image-based features that predict the resolution or persistence of middle ear effusions over time. Collectively, this project will demonstrate how these advances in diagnostic tools and algorithms will improve diagnosis and provide added information for clinical decision making in the management of OM.

02

Conditions studied

  • Otitis Media
  • Otitis Media With Effusion
  • Otitis Media Acute

Browse trials for

03

In context

Otitis Media with Effusion Reclassified

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Otitis Media with Effusion; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 235 is above the median of 80 across 61 interventional studies indexed under Otitis Media with Effusion.

Browse Otitis Media with Effusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Medical College of Wisconsin is the lead sponsor of 548 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Of its 75 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 57 (76%) have results posted.

Compared within Otitis Media with Effusion, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Otitis Media. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Months to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Parental complaint of ear infection or ear pain (Children's Wisconsin Urgent Care Clinics) OR referred for evaluation of otitis media with effusion (Children's Wisconsin ENT Clinic)
  • Speak English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with craniofacial abnormalities
  • Children with diagnosed immunologic abnormalities
  • Children with congenital syndromic conditions
  • Current open and functioning ear tubes
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
235 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Children's Wisconsin Urgent Care Clinics

    Subjects will receive a standard-of-care otoscopy examination, followed by a research-only examination using an OCT device (PCT).

    Diagnostic Test: OCT Device(s)

  • No intervention
    Children's Wisconsin (Effusion in 0 or 1 ear)

    Subjects will only receive a standard-of-care otoscopy examination.

  • Experimental
    Children's Wisconsin (Effusion in 2 ears)

    Subjects will receive standard-of-care ear and hearing examinations (otoscopy and audiometry/tympanometry), followed by research-only examinations using two OCT devices (UIUC OCT and PCT).

    Diagnostic Test: OCT Device(s)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testOCT Device(s)

    Results from standard-of-care examinations will be compared to research-only examination(s) (OCT device(s)).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Children's Wisconsin Urgent Care Clinic Analysis (Standard-of-Care Diagnosis)

    The investigators will look at the percentage of patients that receive the decision for antibiotic prescriptions using only a standard-of-care examination (otoscopy) (prior to addition of a research-only OCT device).

    Time frame: 5 years

  2. Children's Wisconsin Urgent Care Analysis (Research Device Diagnosis)

    The investigators will look at the percentage of patients that receive the decision for antibiotic prescriptions after the addition of a research-only OCT device.

    Time frame: 5 years

  3. Children's Wisconsin ENT Clinic Analysis (Standard-of-Care Diagnosis)

    The investigators will look at the percentage of patients that receive the decision for surgical intervention using only standard-of-care examinations (otoscopy, audiometry/tympanometry) (prior to addition of research-only OCT devices).

    Time frame: 5 years

  4. Children's Wisconsin ENT Clinic Analysis (Research Devices Diagnosis)

    The investigators will look at the percentage of patients that receive the decision for surgical intervention after the addition of research-only OCT devices.

    Time frame: 5 years

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Children's Wisconsin ENT Clinic
    Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226, United States
    Recruiting
  • Children's Wisconsin Urgent Care Clinics
    Wauwatosa, Wisconsin 53226, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kerschner JE, Daley RA Jr, Link R, Jones RM, Peterson KJ, Chun RH, Flanary VA, Gorelik M, Keppel KL, Maksimoski M, Malloy M, Martin TJ, McCormick ME, Robey TC, Ansari S, Matoska GM, Rupcich CA, Saunderson ML, Shay SG, Sulman C, Erbe C, Thompson JK, Khampang P, Yan K, Simpson PM, Ho A, Monroy GL, Spillman DR, Aksamitiene E, Boppart SA. Clinical trial assessing the use of optical coherence tomography in decision making for children presenting with acute otitis media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2026 Mar;202:112728. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2026.112728. Epub 2026 Jan 14. PubMed 41547297 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 59 months after the start.

Of 16 interventional studies with no phase under Otitis Media with Effusion, half reached primary completion within 48 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 59 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 24, 2022
First posted
Apr 29, 2022
StartActual
May 24, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 2028
Last update
Jan 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05353569
Responsible party
Matthew Maksimoski (Assistant Professor, Medical College of Wisconsin) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 29, 2022
Start date
May 24, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 21, 2026

Study contacts

Roxanne Link, APNP
Contact
rlink@mcw.edu
414-266-3760
Christy Erbe
Contact
cerbe@mcw.edu
414-955-2670
Joseph Kerschner, MD
principal investigator · Medical College of Wisconsin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion