CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03304587Updated Jun 10, 2025Results posted

Effects of Bright Light on Co-occurring Cancer-related Symptoms in Breast Cancer Survivors

An interventional study of Polysomnography (PSG) and Rectal thermistor 400 Series in Breast Cancer, sponsored by Michigan State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-10.

Sponsored by Michigan State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study will implement therapeutic bright light that is tailored to the individual's circadian typology and will estimate its effects on circadian rhythms, 4 common cancer-associated symptoms, and impact on quality of life in survivors living with cancer. Examining a selected phase marker (core body temperature) in relation to the associated clinical features (symptoms) is the starting point for future investigation of the biological mechanisms of symptoms.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a home-based, personalized bright light intervention, and to estimate the effects of bright light on 4 common long-term or late effects of cancer (sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, cognitive dysfunction) and on quality of life in post-treatment survivors of breast cancer. The three specific aims include:

Aim #1: To assess the feasibility of implementing a home-based, personalized bright light intervention and the proposed data collection plan in post-treatment survivors of breast cancer.

Aim #2: To estimate the effects of the personalized bright light intervention on sleep disturbance, fatigue, depression, cognitive dysfunction, and quality of life in survivors of breast cancer.

Aim #3: To estimate the effects of a personalized bright light intervention on circadian rhythms in survivors of breast cancer.

The participants of this randomized, controlled pilot study will be randomized to either 30-minute blue-green light therapy at 12,000 lux or dim red light control at 5 lux. Light will be self-administered using a light visor cap at home for 14 consecutive days. Tailored to the individual's circadian pattern, light will be delivered either within 30 minutes of waking in the morning or between 1900-2000 hours in the evening. The nocturnal sleep patterns will be monitored by all-night in-lab polysomnography; sleep quality, fatigue, depression, and quality of life will be self-reported; cognition will be objectively assessed before and after the intervention. Circadian rhythm will be indexed by nocturnal core body temperature before and after the intervention. Feasibility will be determined by the proportion of contacted, recruited, and retained subjects, and completeness of the data collected. Subjective feedback and burden will be assessed at study exit.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Females
  • 21 years of age or older 1-3 years post-completion of chemotherapy or/and radiation therapy for stage I-III breast cancer
  • Experience ≥ 2 concurrent symptoms (fatigue, sleep disruption, depressive symptoms, and/or cognitive dysfunction as measured by 4 screening instruments)
  • Be either phase advanced or delayed (morning or evening types by the Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) ≥59 or ≤41)
  • Sighted
  • Mentally competent to consent
  • Able to understand English.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing cancer treatment for another malignancy
  • Have metastatic cancer
  • Engaged in shift work or travel across more than three time zones within 2 weeks prior to study
  • Current diagnosis of seasonal affective disorder or substance abuse Current diagnosis of major Axis I psychiatric disorders (e.g. depressive disorders), neurological impairments, or muscular dystrophies
  • Report severe depressive mood (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) >24)
  • Take prescribed sedative hypnotics or steroids Have eye conditions (glaucoma or retinal disease), problems triggered by bright light (e.g., migraine), or take photosensitizing medications (e.g., some porphyrin drugs, antipsychotics, antiarrhythmic agents)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm 1: Bright blue-green light

    * Bright blue-green light (\~515nm; 12,000 lux) for 30 minutes once a day. * For those who have scores of ≤41 (evening types) on Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), light will be delivered within 30 minutes of waking for 14 consecutive mornings. For those who receive scores of ≥59 (morning types), light will be delivered between 1900-2000 hours for 14 consecutive evenings. * Light therapy will be self-administered using a light visor cap * Each participant will make (3) overnight visits to the sleep laboratory * On 2 randomly selected days, the participants will wear a light meter during wake time

    Diagnostic Test: Polysomnography (PSG) · Diagnostic Test: Rectal thermistor 400 Series · Other: Bright blue-green light · Diagnostic Test: Digital foot candle datalogging light meter · Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-Fatigue · Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep Disturbance · Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression · Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function · Other: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) · Other: Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression · Other: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) · Other: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) · Other: Daily Log

  • Active comparator
    Arm 2: Dim red light

    * Dim red light (5 lux) (control group) for 30 minutes once a day. --For those who have scores of ≤41 (evening types) on Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ), light will be delivered within 30 minutes of waking for 14 consecutive mornings. For those who receive scores of ≥59 (morning types), light will be delivered between 1900-2000 hours for 14 consecutive evenings. * Light therapy will be self-administered using a light visor cap * Each participant will make (3) overnight visits to the sleep laboratory --On 2 randomly selected days, the participants will wear a light meter during wake time

    Diagnostic Test: Polysomnography (PSG) · Diagnostic Test: Rectal thermistor 400 Series · Other: Dim red light · Diagnostic Test: Digital foot candle datalogging light meter · Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-Fatigue · Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep Disturbance · Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression · Other: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function · Other: Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) · Other: Center for Epidemiological Studies - Depression · Other: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) · Other: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) · Other: Daily Log

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPolysomnography (PSG)

    Sleep patterns will be measured by in-lab PSG following a standardized protocol. 10mm silver/silver chloride electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) electrodes and 11mm silver/silver chloride electroculography (EOG) electrodes will be connected to a Nihon Kohden system, 912 model (Nihon Kohden, Irvine, CA). A standard sleep montage following the 10/20 procedure for electrode placement, left and right electrooculography referenced to the opposite mastoid and mentalis electromyography will be followed. Data will be visually scored by a polysomnographer blind to study conditions following the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Manual.

    Also known as: PSG

  • Diagnostic testRectal thermistor 400 Series

    Nocturnal core body temperature will be measured using a rectal thermistor 400 series manufactured by YSI (Yellow Springs, OH, USA) inserted up to a depth of 7 cm. and taped in place. The thermistor will be connected to a Model 4600 thermometer (YSI, Yellow Springs, OH, USA) that will be interfaced with the PSG via cabling. Core temperature readings will be continuously monitored and recorded every 5 minutes during the all-night sleep studies.

  • OtherBright blue-green light

    -The cap visor-mounted device controls the distance of the light exposure, and positions the light source above eye level to target on the lower retina for better effect

  • OtherDim red light

    -The cap visor-mounted device controls the distance of the light exposure, and positions the light source above eye level to target on the lower retina for better effect

  • Diagnostic testDigital foot candle datalogging light meter

    On 2 random days during the 2-week bright light treatment, ambient light will be recorded continuously during waking hours using a digital foot candle datalogging light meter (Extech Instruments, Waltham, MA) Model SDL400. The 7.1" x 2.9" x 1.0" light meter (12.21 oz) has the capacity to measure up to 10,000 footcandles (accuracy: ± 4% reading). The light-weight light sensor is approximately 2 inches in diameter and comes with a clip and strap that makes it comfortable to wear just below the neck.

  • OtherPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-Fatigue

    8 items with a 5-point rating scale (1=not at all to 5 =very much) measuring fatigue experience and fatigue impact. Higher scores indicate worse fatigue. PROMIS-Fatigue was developed based on rigorous methodologies. The psychometric properties have been established across chronic illnesses including cancer. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores means more the attribute to be measures: e.g., for fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, higher scores mean worse fatigue, worse sleep disturbance, worse depression. But for physical function, higher scores mean better functioning.

    Also known as: PROMIS-Cancer-Fatigue

  • OtherPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep Disturbance

    8 items with 5-point rating scales measuring overall sleep and sleep-related impairments. Higher scores indicate worse sleep disturbances. Validity was supported by moderate to high correlations with the existing scales, e.g. PSQI, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The scores significantly differed participants with and without sleep disorders. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores means more the attribute to be measures: e.g., for fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, higher scores mean worse fatigue, worse sleep disturbance, worse depression. But for physical function, higher scores mean better functioning.

    Also known as: PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance

  • OtherPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression

    8 items with 5-point rating scales (1=never to 5=always) measuring affective and cognitive manifestations of depressive mood. Higher scores indicate worse depression. In a sample of depressed outpatients, PROMIS-Depression showed greater reliability when compared to the CES-D and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Convergent validity with the CES-D and PHQ-9 was supported by strong correlations, ranged 0.72 to 0.84 PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores means more the attribute to be measures: e.g., for fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, higher scores mean worse fatigue, worse sleep disturbance, worse depression. But for physical function, higher scores mean better functioning.

    Also known as: PROMIS-Depression

  • OtherPatient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function

    8 items with 5-point rating scales measuring the individual's ability to complete daily activities. Higher scores indicate worse functioning. Validity was tested in 1,415 adults with diverse clinical conditions. The PROMIS Physical Function scores corresponded to the expected positive or negative changes in the individual's physical function. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores means more the attribute to be measures: e.g., for fatigue, sleep disturbance, depression, higher scores mean worse fatigue, worse sleep disturbance, worse depression. But for physical function, higher scores mean better functioning.

    Also known as: PROMIS-Physical Function

  • OtherPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    19 self-report items measuring sleep quality, latency, duration, efficiency, disturbance, medication use, and daytime dysfunction. Each item is rated on a 0-3 rating scale. The global PSQI score ranges 0-21, with higher scores indicating more severe sleep disturbance. A global PSQI score greater than 5 was found to have a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.5% in differentiating good and poor sleepers.

    Also known as: PSQI

  • OtherCenter for Epidemiological Studies - Depression

    20-item self-report instrument commonly used to measure depressive symptoms in cancer patients. Each item is rated on a 4-point rating scale (0=rarely or none of the time to 3=all of the time) describing the frequency of occurrence during the past week. Score can range from 0-60, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms.

    Also known as: CES-D

  • OtherMontreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    The MoCA is highly sensitive for screening patient with mild cognitive impairment. The MoCA is a 30-point scale with 7 cognitive subtests: visuo-executive, naming, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. It scores from 0 to 30, where higher scores indicate better cognition and a score below 26 indicates cognitive impairment. The MoCA is highly sensitive for screening patient with mild cognitive impairment.

    Also known as: MoCA

  • OtherEuropean Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 items with a 4-point rating scale (1=not at all to 4=very much) measuring functioning, symptom intensity, and global health status/quality of life during the past week.

    Also known as: EORTC QLQ-C30

  • OtherDaily Log

    -A log where the participants will indicate date, wake time, sleep time answer 3 questions regarding the previous nights sleep (answers range from 1=not at all to 5=very much), have an area to indicate if naps occurred during the day, and 2 questions about fatigue \& sleepiness (answers ranging from 0=no fatigue/sleepiness to 10=worst fatigue/sleepiness

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Study Attrition and Adherence

    Study participants kept a daily log where they listed the dates and times they used the light visor - noting time they put it on, and the time they took it off. The light exposure were recorded to assess adherence to the treatment protocol. Adherence: percentage that the study participant used the light visor for 30 minutes per day during the 14-day light therapy intervention (based on the daily log that reported use or not use of the light visor for 30 minutes for the 14 days of the intervention and the time they put it on each day and took it off each day) Attrition: study participants withdrew from the study prior to completing the intervention

    Time frame: Up to 3 weeks from registration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effects of Bright Light on Sleep Disturbance as Measured by the PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep disturbance T-Score. A higher PROMIS-Sleep disturbance T-score represents greater\\worse sleep disturbance. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores mean worse sleep disturbance Note: For negatively-worded concepts like Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a Fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  2. Effects of Bright Light on Sleep Disturbance as Measured by the PSQI

    Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global score: The PSQI has 7 components, with each component self-rated from 0-3, with 3 being worse sleep quality. Global PSQI sleep score is the sum of all 7 components, with score range from 0-21, with higher score meaning worse sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  3. Effects of Bright Light on Fatigue as Measured by the PROMIS-Cancer-Fatigue

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-Fatigue T-Score. A higher PROMIS-Cancer-Fatigue T-score represents greater\\worse fatigue. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores mean worse fatigue Note: For negatively-worded concepts like Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a Fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  4. Effects of Bright Light on Fatigue as Measured by the Daily Log

    Fatigue self-report is rated numerically from 1-5, with greater score meaning more fatigue

    Time frame: Kept throughout the approx 3 weeks of the study

  5. Effects of Bright Light on Depression as Measured by the PROMIS-Depression

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression T-Score. A higher PROMIS-Depression T-score represents greater\\worse Depression. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores mean worse worse depression. Note: For negatively-worded concepts like Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a Fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  6. Effects of Bright Light on Depression as Measured by the CES-D

    Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score: Total CES-D range is 0-60, with higher score meaning more depressed.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  7. Effects of Bright Lights on Cognitive Dysfunction as Measured by the MoCA

    MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment): Test conducted by researcher, with total score range 0-30. Higher score means less cognitive dysfunction.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  8. Effect of Bright Light on Quality of Life as Measured by the PROMIS-Physical Function

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function T-Score. A higher PROMIS-Physical Function T-score represents greater\\better Physical Function. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores mean better functioning. Note: A T-score of 60 is one SD greater than average; A T-Score of 40 is one SD lower than average.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  9. Effect of Bright Light on Quality of Life as Measured by EORTC QLQ-30

    Quality of Life (QOL)-Global Health score: Range 0-100, higher score is better global health quality of life Quality of Life (QOL) Symptom score: Range 0-100, Higher score is worse symptoms quality of life Quality of Life (QOL)-Function: Range 0-100, Higher score is better functional quality of life

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  10. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Total Sleep Time

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes of total sleep time is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  11. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Sleep Efficiency

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG)is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Sleep efficiency is reported as percentage of total sleep time.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  12. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Sleep Onset Latency

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes of latency to sleep onset is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  13. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Awakenings

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG)is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes of awakenings during sleep is recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  14. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Arousals

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG)is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Arousal minutes during sleep are recorded

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  15. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Arousal Index

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Arousal index is total number of arousals per hour of sleep.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  16. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes till wake after sleep onset is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  17. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-sleep Stages (Min)

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) used to measure effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes spent in each sleep stage is reported. Stage 1 is when a person first falls asleep, normally lasts 1-7minutes. Body has not fully relaxed, though body and brain activities start to slow with periods of brief movements. Stage 2 the body enters a more subdued state including a drop in temperature, relaxed muscles and slowed breathing and heart rate. Stage 3 muscle tone, pulse and breathing rate decrease as body relaxes. REM brain activity picks up, body experiences atonia-a temporary paralysis of muscles except for eyes and muscles that control breathing. Usually takes 90 minutes to reach REM stage.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

  18. Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-sleep Stages (%)

    Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Percentage of time in each sleep stage is reported. Stage 1 is when a person first falls asleep, normally lasts 1-7minutes. Body has not fully relaxed, though body and brain activities start to slow with periods of brief movements. Stage 2 the body enters a more subdued state including a drop in temperature, relaxed muscles and slowed breathing and heart rate. Stage 3 muscle tone, pulse and breathing rate decrease as body relaxes. REM brain activity picks up, body experiences atonia-a temporary paralysis of muscles except for eyes and muscles that control breathing. Usually takes 90 minutes to reach REM stage.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)

06

Results

Posted Jun 10, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Started1515
Withdrawal11
Completed1414
Not completed11
Withdrew: Headache after intervention01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10

Outcome measures

PrimaryStudy Attrition and Adherence

Study participants kept a daily log where they listed the dates and times they used the light visor - noting time they put it on, and the time they took it off. The light exposure were recorded to assess adherence to the treatment protocol. Adherence: percentage that the study participant used the light visor for 30 minutes per day during the 14-day light therapy intervention (based on the daily log that reported use or not use of the light visor for 30 minutes for the 14 days of the intervention and the time they put it on each day and took it off each day) Attrition: study participants withdrew from the study prior to completing the intervention

Time frame:
Up to 3 weeks from registration
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Study Attrition and Adherence
ParticipantsArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Attrition11
Adherence to light therapy1414
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Sleep Disturbance as Measured by the PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Sleep disturbance T-Score. A higher PROMIS-Sleep disturbance T-score represents greater\\worse sleep disturbance. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores mean worse sleep disturbance Note: For negatively-worded concepts like Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a Fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Effects of Bright Light on Sleep Disturbance as Measured by the PROMIS-Sleep Disturbance
T-scoreArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline56 ± 657.3 ± 7.5
Post-Test49.6 ± 5.350.4 ± 6
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Sleep Disturbance as Measured by the PSQI

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Global score: The PSQI has 7 components, with each component self-rated from 0-3, with 3 being worse sleep quality. Global PSQI sleep score is the sum of all 7 components, with score range from 0-21, with higher score meaning worse sleep quality.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Effects of Bright Light on Sleep Disturbance as Measured by the PSQI
score on a scaleArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline9.3 ± 3.29.6 ± 3.2
Post-Test7.8 ± 2.46.0 ± 3.1
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Fatigue as Measured by the PROMIS-Cancer-Fatigue

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Cancer-Fatigue T-Score. A higher PROMIS-Cancer-Fatigue T-score represents greater\\worse fatigue. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores mean worse fatigue Note: For negatively-worded concepts like Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a Fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Effects of Bright Light on Fatigue as Measured by the PROMIS-Cancer-Fatigue
T-scoreArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline55.8 ± 6.856.3 ± 7.9
Post Test48.3 ± 4.450.5 ± 6.4
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Fatigue as Measured by the Daily Log

Fatigue self-report is rated numerically from 1-5, with greater score meaning more fatigue

Time frame:
Kept throughout the approx 3 weeks of the study
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Effects of Bright Light on Fatigue as Measured by the Daily Log
score on a scaleArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline self-reported fatigue3.54 ± 2.034.57 ± 2.41
Post-Test self-reported fatigue1.92 ± 1.442.86 ± 2.35
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Depression as Measured by the PROMIS-Depression

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Depression T-Score. A higher PROMIS-Depression T-score represents greater\\worse Depression. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores mean worse worse depression. Note: For negatively-worded concepts like Fatigue, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a Fatigue T-score of 40 is one SD better than average.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Effects of Bright Light on Depression as Measured by the PROMIS-Depression
T-scoreArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline50.4 ± 7.951.1 ± 6.4
Post-Test45.2 ± 5.946.5 ± 7.0
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Depression as Measured by the CES-D

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score: Total CES-D range is 0-60, with higher score meaning more depressed.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Effects of Bright Light on Depression as Measured by the CES-D
score on a scaleArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline14.7 ± 8.316.3 ± 4.1
Post-Test6.0 ± 3.88.9 ± 5.3
SecondaryEffects of Bright Lights on Cognitive Dysfunction as Measured by the MoCA

MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment): Test conducted by researcher, with total score range 0-30. Higher score means less cognitive dysfunction.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Effects of Bright Lights on Cognitive Dysfunction as Measured by the MoCA
score on a scaleArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline27.9 ± 1.726.6 ± 2.2
Post-Test28.0 ± 2.027.1 ± 1.7
SecondaryEffect of Bright Light on Quality of Life as Measured by the PROMIS-Physical Function

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Physical Function T-Score. A higher PROMIS-Physical Function T-score represents greater\\better Physical Function. PROMIS measures provide a common metric: the T-score (mean = 50, standard deviation = 10). A mean of 50 equals the mean in the U.S. general population. Higher scores mean better functioning. Note: A T-score of 60 is one SD greater than average; A T-Score of 40 is one SD lower than average.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · T-score
Effect of Bright Light on Quality of Life as Measured by the PROMIS-Physical Function
T-scoreArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline47.5 ± 10.248.6 ± 8.1
Post-Test48.7 ± 9.251.3 ± 8.3
SecondaryEffect of Bright Light on Quality of Life as Measured by EORTC QLQ-30

Quality of Life (QOL)-Global Health score: Range 0-100, higher score is better global health quality of life Quality of Life (QOL) Symptom score: Range 0-100, Higher score is worse symptoms quality of life Quality of Life (QOL)-Function: Range 0-100, Higher score is better functional quality of life

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Effect of Bright Light on Quality of Life as Measured by EORTC QLQ-30
score on a scaleArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline QOL-Global65.6 ± 16.676.1 ± 16.0
Post-Test QOL-Global76.2 ± 7.981.0 ± 11
Baseline QOL-Symptom20.7 ± 13.019.5 ± 9.0
Post-Test QOL-Symptom13.4 ± 7.112.1 ± 7.3
Baseline QOL-Function76.7 ± 15.780.4 ± 10.4
Post-Test QOL-Function87.0 ± 6.687.6 ± 9.2
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Total Sleep Time

Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes of total sleep time is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Total Sleep Time
minutesArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline394.2 ± 68.9393.53 ± 59.35
Post-Test386.1 ± 84.8415.9 ± 71.5
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Sleep Efficiency

Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG)is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Sleep efficiency is reported as percentage of total sleep time.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of sleep time
Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Sleep Efficiency
percentage of sleep timeArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline81.9 ± 7.982.7 ± 8.08
Post-Test81.0 ± 14.382.4 ± 12.2
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Sleep Onset Latency

Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes of latency to sleep onset is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Sleep Onset Latency
minutesArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline58.6 ± 64.843.9 ± 49.5
Post-Test35.7 ± 33.152.4 ± 55.4
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Awakenings

Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG)is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes of awakenings during sleep is recorded.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Awakenings
minutesArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline20.5 ± 8.616.4 ± 7.1
Post-Test15.6 ± 5.215.2 ± 6.0
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Arousals

Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG)is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Arousal minutes during sleep are recorded

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Arousals
minutesArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline53.4 ± 20.464.6 ± 40.7
Post-Test45.8 ± 17.958.0 ± 32.2
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Arousal Index

Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Arousal index is total number of arousals per hour of sleep.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · Total number of arousals per hr of sleep
Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Arousal Index
Total number of arousals per hr of sleepArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline8.4 ± 3.59.6 ± 5.3
Post-Test7.8 ± 2.88.1 ± 4.0
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)

Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes till wake after sleep onset is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)
minutesArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline51.6 ± 19.947.8 ± 22.7
Post-Test72.8 ± 41.548.2 ± 31.4
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-sleep Stages (Min)

Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) used to measure effects of bright light on level of stress. Minutes spent in each sleep stage is reported. Stage 1 is when a person first falls asleep, normally lasts 1-7minutes. Body has not fully relaxed, though body and brain activities start to slow with periods of brief movements. Stage 2 the body enters a more subdued state including a drop in temperature, relaxed muscles and slowed breathing and heart rate. Stage 3 muscle tone, pulse and breathing rate decrease as body relaxes. REM brain activity picks up, body experiences atonia-a temporary paralysis of muscles except for eyes and muscles that control breathing. Usually takes 90 minutes to reach REM stage.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-sleep Stages (Min)
minutesArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline Stage 126.0 ± 12.628.2 ± 13.9
Post-Test Stage 124.7 ± 7.926.1 ± 14.5
Baseline Stage 2236.7 ± 49.1241.2 ± 55.4
Post-Test Stage 2250.3 ± 61.3279.9 ± 74.3
Baseline Stage 337.7 ± 40.032.5 ± 23.4
Post-Test Stage 327.1 ± 30.223.4 ± 27.4
Baseline REM93.9 ± 30.791.7 ± 28.9
Post-Test REM84.0 ± 28.986.5 ± 33.9
SecondaryEffects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-sleep Stages (%)

Objective testing using in-lab polysomnography (PSG) is used to measure the effects of bright light on level of stress. Percentage of time in each sleep stage is reported. Stage 1 is when a person first falls asleep, normally lasts 1-7minutes. Body has not fully relaxed, though body and brain activities start to slow with periods of brief movements. Stage 2 the body enters a more subdued state including a drop in temperature, relaxed muscles and slowed breathing and heart rate. Stage 3 muscle tone, pulse and breathing rate decrease as body relaxes. REM brain activity picks up, body experiences atonia-a temporary paralysis of muscles except for eyes and muscles that control breathing. Usually takes 90 minutes to reach REM stage.

Time frame:
Baseline (day 2 of study) and Post-treatment (approx day 17 of study)
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of sleep time
Effects of Bright Light on Level of Stress as Measured by the PSG-sleep Stages (%)
percentage of sleep timeArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
Baseline Stage 16.9 ± 4.07.4 ± 4.4
Post-Test Stage 16.7 ± 2.96.3 ± 3.3
Baseline Stage 260.6 ± 10.761.0 ± 7.7
Post-Test Stage 264.8 ± 7.766.7 ± 11.0
Baseline Stage 39.2 ± 9.08.5 ± 6.6
Post-Test Stage 37.3 ± 7.56.4 ± 8.4
Baseline REM23.4 ± 5.423.2 ± 6.5
Post-Test REM21.2 ± 5.820.7 ± 6.9

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline assessment through post-assessment (up to 3 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm 1: Bright Blue-green Light0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)
Arm 2: Dim Red Light0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)1/15 (6.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventArm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red Light
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/151/15

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Arm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red LightTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years151429
>=65 years011
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red LightTotal
Mean50.8 ± 8.154.2 ± 8.752.4 ± 8.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red LightTotal
Female151530
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Arm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red LightTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American112
White141428
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Arm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red LightTotal
United States — Greater Lansing, Michigan111122
United States — St Louis Metro., Illinois/Missouri448
Education
Education(years)Arm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red LightTotal
Mean15.6 ± 2.716.5 ± 2.616.1 ± 2.7
Marital Status
Marital Status(Participants)Arm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red LightTotal
Single112
Married/Partnered11920
Divorced347
Widowed011
Employment
Employment(Participants)Arm 1: Bright Blue-green LightArm 2: Dim Red LightTotal
Full time91019
Part time112
Self employed415
Retired134

5 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Michigan State University
    East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 1, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · May 1, 2022
  • Informed consent form · May 23, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03304587
Lead sponsor
Michigan State University
Collaborators
National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
Responsible party
Horng-Shiuann Wu (Associate Professor, Michigan State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 9, 2017
Start date
Nov 6, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2022
Completion
Aug 31, 2022
Results posted
Jun 10, 2025
Last update
Jun 10, 2025

Study contacts

Horng-Shiuann Wu, PhD
study chair · Michigan State University College of Nursing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion